Who is Making Money in the AI Era? The Must-See Investment List for HALO Asset Trading

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-06Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-06

Abstrak

The article examines who profits in the AI era, revisiting Daniel Gross's 2024 questions on AI's impact. It finds value is concentrated in infrastructure: Nvidia, with a $3.2 trillion market cap increase, captured most profits, while cloud providers like Microsoft saw modest gains. Energy emerged as a critical bottleneck, with nuclear and utility stocks surging. Copper demand soared due to data centers, while coal saw mixed results. Geopolitically, the US leads in AI investment and model development. API costs plummeted 50x, driving deflation in knowledge production, but overall SaaS revenues grew. Key bottlenecks include chip packaging and power transformers. The piece also discusses AI's uneven impact on employment, regional real estate, and the fragile balance in semiconductor supply chains, particularly on Taiwan.

Editor's Note: In early 2024, AI was still in a phase of both fervor and uncertainty. At that time, Daniel Gross raised 18 questions on a single page: Where will value flow? Will energy become a bottleneck? Will software engineers be replaced? How will the competitive landscape between nations change?

Looking back two years later, these questions themselves are more enlightening than any specific predictions. AI profits have indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—Nvidia emerged as the biggest winner; energy and power quickly became new strategic bottlenecks; API costs plummeted, while computing power, capital, and geopolitical risks continued to amplify.

This article revisits the key questions Gross raised at the time and examines them against the reality of the past two years. It is not only a review of AI investment logic but also a roadmap for observing how the technological revolution is reshaping market structures, industry chains, and the global power landscape.

Below is the original text:

In January 2024, Daniel Gross, then CEO of Safe Superintelligence and now Head of AI at Meta, published an article titled "AGI Trades."


The article was just one page long, listing a series of questions about the potential impacts of AI progress. Looking back over two years later, these questions appear remarkably prescient, even though no definitive conclusions were drawn for each question at the time. Below, we review each of the 18 questions he raised.

Markets

In a post-AGI world, where will value flow?


Currently, value is indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—chips, packaging, power, and other areas. Nvidia has captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many companies are still operating at a loss. This is also clearly reflected in market capitalization changes: Nvidia's market cap increased by $3.2 trillion, rising from $1.2 trillion to $4.4 trillion; in comparison, the gains for cloud platforms have been much more modest (Microsoft up 4%, Amazon up 30%).

In the private market, the valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI has also been astonishing, but their combined total value increase of $1.4 trillion is still lower than the market cap added by Nvidia during the same period.


This was a critical question at the very beginning of 2024.

What will happen to Nvidia and Microsoft?


Nvidia has performed exceptionally strongly. Its revenue grew from $60.9 billion in fiscal year 2024 to $215.9 billion in fiscal year 2026, nearly tripling.

Microsoft, however, has been less dominant. Azure's growth did accelerate to a 40% year-over-year rate, but from January 2024 to March 2026, Microsoft's stock price rose by only 4%. The market has questioned its annual AI capital expenditure of over $80 billion—when will these investments translate into returns remains unclear.

In this AI "gold rush" of "selling shovels and picks," Nvidia is clearly the biggest winner, while Microsoft's bets on infrastructure have yet to deliver obvious returns to shareholders.

Is copper mispriced?


It was severely undervalued. In January 2024, the price of copper was $3.75 per pound; two years later, it reached a record high of $6.61 per pound.

AI's demand for copper is enormous. For example:

Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 server rack uses over 5,000 copper wires

If fully straightened, the total length exceeds 2 miles

A 100MW data center requires approximately 3,000 tons of copper

Overall, data centers may consume 500,000 tons of copper annually. Some have thus called "copper the new oil." Of course, many other things have also been called "the new oil," as AI infrastructure construction is extremely complex, with bottlenecks at almost every stage. So this analogy should be viewed with caution.

Real Estate

If AI can write all software, will San Francisco become the new Detroit?

It depends on what is meant by "the new Detroit."

AI actually saved San Francisco from becoming a declining city like Detroit. San Francisco is still thriving:

· Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%

· OpenAI occupies 1 million square feet of office space

· Anthropic owns a 25-story office building

· Sierra signed a lease for 300,000 square feet of office space

In the first half of 2025, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding flowed to the Bay Area

Of course, there is another side: overall employment in San Francisco remains below pre-pandemic levels, but housing prices remain strong. Thus, it is far from a "shell city." The urban environment has also become cleaner.

How will AI affect wealth inequality?

It is still too early to draw conclusions, as data changes are not yet significant, but some studies are worth noting.

A 2025 IMF study suggested: AI may reduce wage inequality (by automating high-income jobs) but could exacerbate wealth inequality (as gains concentrate among tech company owners).

An OECD study found: Low-skilled jobs saw the fastest wage growth (assemblers +11.6%), while high-skilled jobs saw the slowest (CEOs +2.7%). However, this may reflect minimum wage policies more than AI itself.

In capital markets, concentration is also increasing: The "Magnificent Seven" (Mag7) account for about 32% of the S&P 500's market cap and contributed about 42% of total returns in 2025; meanwhile, massive funding rounds for AI startups (OpenAI $110 billion, Anthropic $30 billion) have also created enormous private wealth for a small number of founders and investors.

Energy & Data Centers

If AI becomes an energy competition, how should one invest?

This assessment is completely correct. AI has indeed become an energy game.

Those who caught this trade made significant profits. For example:

Vistra: +321%, the second-largest gain in the S&P in 2024 (after Palantir)

Constellation Energy: Stock price tripled since ChatGPT's release

NRG Energy: Rose about 95% in 2025 alone

Oklo: Up over 700% in 12 months

Nuclear energy saw a boom:

· Microsoft signed a $16 billion, 20-year PPA to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear plant

· Google signed a 500MW small modular reactor (SMR) agreement with Kairos Power

· Meta signed 6.6GW power contracts with multiple nuclear energy companies

Energy has become one of the most successful investment themes of the AI era.

In the entire data center supply chain, which parts are the hardest to scale 10x?

The bottleneck in the chip industry is CoWoS packaging technology (TSMC's Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate).

In the data center field, the biggest bottleneck may be power transformers.

· Delivery lead times approach 3 years

· A 30% supply gap emerged in 2025

· Costs have risen 150% since 2020

This 100-year-old technology has become a key constraint on the speed at which data centers can connect to the grid.

Is coal undervalued?

To some extent, yes, but far less so than copper. Coal prices actually fell about 22% in 2025, with some recovery by early 2026.

Coal companies performed decently:

· Peabody Energy: +34%

· CONSOL Energy: +37%

Meanwhile, U.S. coal-fired power generation increased by 13% by September 2025.

This was particularly evident in states with rapid data center growth:

· Ohio: +23%

· Oklahoma: +58%

Nations

Who are the winners and losers?

The clear winner is the United States.

2024 U.S. private AI investment: $109 billion (China only $9.3 billion)

Cumulative investment since 2013: $470 billion, more than the rest of the world combined

40 significant AI models released by the U.S. in 2024, compared to 15 from China

The game is not over, but for now, the U.S. is the center of AI competition.

What will happen to India's $250 billion GDP export dependency on GPT-4 tokens?

Signs are beginning to show, but it's still early. Hiring in India's IT outsourcing industry has noticeably declined. Between 2024–2025, large IT companies cut about 58,000 jobs, whereas the industry had added 360,000 employees between 2021–2023.

Will software engineers be replaced like typists in history?

Software engineers haven't moved to blue-collar jobs yet, but the career structure is already diverging:

Demand for AI engineers grew 143%

Entry-level hiring at large tech companies fell 25%

Internship positions decreased by 30%

The future choice might be: either move up to become "managers of AI agents" or shift to fields like manufacturing—after all, many factories need people who understand software to automate production lines.

Will there be a large-scale employment program similar to the "New Deal"?

Not yet.

In July 2025, the Trump administration launched the "American AI Action Plan," including:

An AI education executive order

Skills training programs

A $84 million Labor Department apprenticeship grant

But U.S. workforce training spending is only 0.1% of GDP, among the lowest in OECD countries. No plan has yet reached the scale of the original WPA (which employed 8.5 million people).

Is lifelong learning worth investing in?

This is a very abstract and personal question. But my answer is: Yes.

Inflation

If AI is truly deflationary, how would we see the signals first?

The best indicator might be AI API prices.

GPT-4 level inference cost:

Late 2022: $20 per million tokens

December 2025: $0.40 per million tokens

A 50x decrease in three years. This pace even exceeds the decline in PC computing costs or internet bandwidth costs. This is likely to be a leading indicator of service price deflation.

If demand for knowledge products keeps growing while production costs fall, how should we understand deflation?

Although AI API prices have plummeted, AI company incomes are soaring. Price decrease → usage explosion → total spending increases. Meanwhile, SaaS companies are adding 20%–37% "AI taxes" at renewal. Thus, even as the cost of producing software approaches zero, SaaS revenues are still growing.

This is similar to the computing industry in the Moore's Law era: individual products become cheaper, but the overall market size expands.

Geopolitics

Is interconnect really important?

Extremely important.

In large GPU clusters:

30%–50% of training time is spent on communication between GPUs

not on computation

For example:

Google TPUv7 Ironwood uses a 3D torus topology to connect 9,216 chips

Nvidia NVL72 connects 72 GPUs

Thus, interconnect networks are crucial for AI scaling.

If a country has more energy, can it achieve AGI with落后制程 (落后制程 - older process technology)?

Currently, it seems unlikely.

All leading AI chips use 4nm or 3nm processes:

Nvidia Blackwell

Google TPUv7

AWS Trainium3

China's Huawei Ascend 910C (SMIC 7nm) is competitive in inference but requires more chips and more energy for training. Simply increasing energy consumption to bridge the technology gap will eventually run into economic cost limitations.

What is the most likely "Taiwan event"?

The most likely is a blockade of the Taiwan Strait.

Tensions are escalating:

2024: China conducted "Joint Sword-2024B" exercises

2025: "Righteous Mission 2025" deployed over 100 aircraft and 13 warships

27 rockets launched from Fujian, with 10 falling into Taiwan's contiguous zone

Meanwhile, China's 2026–2030 five-year plan began separating the表述 of "peaceful unification" and "unification."

TSMC is also planning ahead: Eight fabs are under construction in Arizona, potentially handling 30% of advanced chip capacity in the future.

But the entire system remains in an extremely fragile balance.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QAccording to the article, which company has been the biggest winner in the AI boom and why?

ANvidia has been the biggest winner. The article states that Nvidia captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many other companies were still losing money. Its market capitalization increased by $3.2 trillion, from $1.2T to $4.4T, a gain that was larger than the combined valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI.

QWhat is identified as the new strategic bottleneck for the AI era, and which investments performed well as a result?

AEnergy and power are identified as the new strategic bottleneck. Investments in energy companies performed exceptionally well. Examples given include Vistra (+321%), Constellation Energy (tripled since ChatGPT's release), NRG Energy (+~95% in 2025), and Oklo (+700% in 12 months). The article also highlights a major resurgence in nuclear power to meet AI's energy demands.

QHow has the cost of AI API inference changed, and what is its significance?

AThe cost of GPT-4 level inference has plummeted, falling from $20 per million tokens in late 2022 to $0.40 per million tokens by December 2025, a 50x decrease in three years. This rapid deflation in the cost of a key knowledge product is described as a leading indicator for deflation in service prices more broadly.

QWhat was the impact of AI on the city of San Francisco, according to the article?

AContrary to fears that AI might cause its decline, the article states that AI 'saved San Francisco' from becoming a declining city like Detroit. Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%, and AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Sierra signed leases for massive amounts of office space. Furthermore, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding in the first half of 2025 went to the Bay Area.

QWhich nation is identified as the clear winner in the AI competition so far, and what evidence is provided?

AThe United States is identified as the clear winner. The evidence provided is that the U.S. had $109 billion in private AI investment in 2024 (compared to China's $93 billion), has invested a cumulative $470 billion since 2013 (more than all other countries combined), and produced 40 significant AI models in 2024 (compared to China's 15).

Bacaan Terkait

ETF Hanya Tiket Masuk: Institusionalisasi Sejati Bitcoin Terjadi di Tempat yang Tak Terlihat

**Ringkasan: Bitcoin Melampaui ETF, Menjadi "Bahan Baku" Keuangan Institusional** Sementara ETF Bitcoin menarik semua perhatian, perubahan institusional yang lebih dalam justru terjadi di balik layar. Bitcoin kini tidak hanya sekadar aset yang dimiliki, tetapi mulai berfungsi seperti obligasi pemerintah AS atau emas—sebagai **"bahan baku keuangan" (financial primitive)** yang mendukung berbagai produk dan layanan kompleks. **Contoh Implementasi:** * **Cadangan Asuransi:** Perusahaan asuransi di Barbados menggunakan Bitcoin senilai $40 juta sebagai cadangan untuk polis asuransi properti. * **Pinjaman dan Obligasi Bertingkat:** Platform seperti Ledn menawarkan pinjaman dengan jaminan Bitcoin. Bahkan, kumpulan pinjaman tersebut telah disekuritisasi menjadi obligasi senilai $188 juta yang **mendapat peringkat investasi (BBB-) dari S&P**, pertama kalinya untuk sekuritas berbasis aset digital. * **Jaringan Kolateral & Penyelesaian:** Lembaga seperti Anchorage Digital dan Copper.co mengembangkan jaringan yang memungkinkan institusi menggunakan Bitcoin sebagai margin dan menyelesaikan transaksi dengan aman, mirip dengan pasar tradisional. * **Strategi Tanpa Pandangan (Agnostic):** Dana lindung nilai menjalankan **strategi basis (basis trade)** dengan memanfaatkan selisih harga futures dan spot Bitcoin, di mana aliran dana mereka dapat memengaruhi pasar secara mekanis, terlepas dari sentimen harga. * **Bendahara Perusahaan:** Perusahaan seperti Strategy (contoh hipotetis) membeli Bitcoin dalam skala besar dengan mendanainya melalui penerbitan obligasi konversi dan saham preferen, menciptakan produk pendapatan tetap yang didukung oleh Bitcoin. **Uji Tekanan dan Risiko:** Penurunan harga Bitcoin sekitar 27% pada Februari 2026 menguji ketahanan sistem ini. Mekanisme pencairan (liquidation) otomatis berfungsi seperti dirancang, namun juga mengungkap **risiko efek domino (contagion)** jika banyak lender mencairkan jaminan secara bersamaan saat harga turun tajam. **Kesimpulan:** ETF memecahkan masalah **cara memiliki** Bitcoin. Evolusi yang lebih signifikan adalah menjawab **untuk apa** Bitcoin dimiliki. Dengan mulai berintegrasi ke dalam mekanisme inti keuangan—sebagai kolateral, cadangan, dan dasar untuk instrumen berperingkat—peran institusional terpenting Bitcoin mungkin tidak akan pernah terlihat jelas dalam grafik aliran dana ETF, karena ia perlahan-lahan **menjadi bagian dari mesin keuangan itu sendiri**.

marsbit5m yang lalu

ETF Hanya Tiket Masuk: Institusionalisasi Sejati Bitcoin Terjadi di Tempat yang Tak Terlihat

marsbit5m yang lalu

Pendiri ZEC Tanggapi Bug Orchard: Tidak Ada Tanda Pencurian, Akan Membekukan Kolam Orchard

Pendiri Zcash (ZEC) merespons kerentanan keamanan yang ditemukan di modul Orchard, dengan fokus pada empat pertanyaan utama: apakah kerentanan telah dieksploitasi, apakah aset pengguna yang sah dapat ditarik, apakah pengguna dapat memverifikasi total pasokan ZEC tidak mengalami penambahan buatan, dan apakah ada kerentanan pemalsuan serupa lainnya. Berdasarkan investigasi, kemungkinan kerentanan ini telah dieksploitasi dianggap rendah. Alasannya termasuk kerumitan teknis yang tinggi untuk menemukan dan memanfaatkannya, respons cepat tim dengan membekukan sementara pool Orchard, dan tidak adanya bukti transaksi mencurigakan yang menunjukkan eksploitasi. Aset pengguna yang sah di Orchard diperkirakan dapat ditarik normal jika kerentanan belum dieksploitasi. Namun, jika sudah dieksploitasi, ada risiko beberapa aset sah tidak dapat ditarik penuh karena batas saluran penarikan. Pengguna yang khawatir dapat memindahkan asetnya ke alamat transparan (t-address) atau pool privasi Sapling, dengan mempertimbangkan trade-off privasi dan risiko lainnya. Saat ini, pengguna biasa belum dapat secara independen memverifikasi bahwa total pasokan ZEC tidak bertambah secara tidak sah karena adanya kerentanan ini. Namun, rencana peningkatan jaringan Ironwood akan menutup permanen pool Orchard. Setelah itu, siapa pun yang menjalankan node dapat memverifikasi bahwa tidak ada token yang dapat keluar melebihi jumlah yang awalnya disetor dengan sah, sehingga memulihkan kemampuan verifikasi mandiri pengguna. Pemeriksaan menyeluruh oleh Shielded Labs dan mitra, dibantu oleh alat AI canggih, belum menemukan kerentanan pemalsuan token lainnya. Tim semakin yakin bahwa tidak ada kerentanan berbahaya serupa yang masih tersembunyi. Kesimpulannya, berdasarkan analisis saat ini, aset pengguna dianggap aman dan tidak ada indikasi penambahan pasokan ZEC yang tidak sah. Peningkatan Ironwood yang akan datang diharapkan dapat secara permanen mengatasi masalah verifikasi pasokan ini.

Foresight News11m yang lalu

Pendiri ZEC Tanggapi Bug Orchard: Tidak Ada Tanda Pencurian, Akan Membekukan Kolam Orchard

Foresight News11m yang lalu

Bank of Japan Siap Naikkan Suku Bunga, Apakah Saham-saham AI Tetap Bertahan?

**Ringkasan:** Pasar keuangan global saat ini sedang memantau ketat Bank of Japan (BoJ) menjelang keputusan suku bunganya pada 16 Juni. Banyak ekonom memperkirakan kenaikan suku bunga dari 0.75% menjadi 1.0%. Keputusan ini penting karena **Yen Jepang telah lama menjadi "mata uang pembiayaan global" yang murah**. Melalui transaksi *carry trade*, investor meminjam Yen berbunga rendah untuk membeli aset berisiko tinggi dan berpotensi imbal hasil lebih besar seperti saham teknologi AI dan cryptocurrency. Kenaikan suku bunga BoJ, meski tampak kecil, menandakan awal **"uang murah" global mulai menghilang**. Ini meningkatkan biaya leverage dan dapat mengurangi selera risiko investor. Aset dengan *beta tinggi* seperti saham AI (Nvidia, Microsoft) dan crypto (Bitcoin, Ethereum) sangat sensitif terhadap perubahan likuiditas dan biaya pendanaan global ini. Risiko utamanya bukan pada tingkat bunga 1%, tetapi pada **kecepatan normalisasi kebijakan** BoJ. Jika pasar mulai memperkirakan kenaikan suku bunga yang lebih cepat (misalnya, menjadi 1.25% pada akhir tahun), dapat memicu gelombang *unwind* (penutupan posisi) transaksi *carry trade* Yen. Investor akan menjual aset berisiko untuk membeli kembali Yen, berpotensi menyebabkan penurunan harga aset-aset tersebut secara bersamaan dan memperbesar volatilitas pasar. Intinya: BoJ tidak akan mengakhiri narasi dasar AI atau crypto, tetapi dapat **meninggikan "ambang batas pembiayaan"** untuk aset berisiko global. Di fase valuasi tinggi, likuiditas yang menyusut dapat menurunkan kelonggaran pasar terhadap valuasi dan mengurangi multipla yang bersedia dibayar untuk pertumbuhan masa depan. Pasca-keputusan, pantau hubungan antara: * Penguatan Yen * Peningkatan yield obligasi Jepang * Tekanan simultan pada aset *beta tinggi* (saham tech momentum, crypto). Sinyal ini akan menunjukkan apakah pasar mulai memperhitungkan kontraksi lebih dalam dari rantai leverage Yen.

marsbit19m yang lalu

Bank of Japan Siap Naikkan Suku Bunga, Apakah Saham-saham AI Tetap Bertahan?

marsbit19m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli ERA

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian Caldera (ERA) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli Caldera (ERA) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan Caldera (ERA) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan Caldera (ERA) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading Caldera (ERA)Lakukan trading Caldera (ERA) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

795 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2025.07.17Diperbarui pada 2026.06.02

Cara Membeli ERA

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga ERA (ERA) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片