Understanding the Key Issues of Tokenization in One Article

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-04-16Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-04-16

Abstrak

The core of tokenization lies in eliminating friction in financial infrastructure, not speculative digital assets. The true value is in near-instant settlement (T+0 vs. traditional T+2), 24/7 liquidity, fractional ownership, and the disintermediation of financial processes. Tokenization represents real-world assets (real estate, bonds, private equity) as digital tokens on a blockchain, functioning as programmable digital deeds that enable self-custody and automated ownership tracking. It addresses four key problems: 1) Settlement Speed: Atomic, near-instant settlement replaces multi-day processes. 2) Liquidity: Enables secondary markets for historically illiquid assets. 3) Fractional Ownership: Drastically lowers investment minimums by automating administrative overhead. 4) Disintermediation: Replaces trust-based functions of custodians and clearinghouses with self-executing smart contracts. This is not about cryptocurrency speculation. Major institutions like J.P. Morgan (Onyx), BlackRock (BUIDL), and Goldman Sachs are building the infrastructure, focusing on reliable asset management. Significant hurdles remain, including uncertain legal frameworks, lack of different blockchain platforms, and resistance from intermediaries protecting their revenue streams. Tokenization doesn't create a frictionless utopia but fundamentally reshapes the cost structure and efficiency of global financial infrastructure, representing its largest reorganization since the advent of electronic...

Author: Theo

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

The core of tokenization lies in eliminating all friction.

Here is a statement that sounds mundane at first but is profound upon reflection: when you sell a stock today, you actually have to wait two business days to get the money. Not two seconds, not two minutes, but two full days.

This is called T+2 settlement. It is so commonplace, so thoroughly embedded in the architecture of modern finance, that most investors never stop to ask why.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,WenQu极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

This is the real significance of asset tokenization: not coins, not speculation, not NFT avatars, but a bet—a bet that the entire settlement and custody infrastructure of global finance can be rebuilt on programmable ledgers.

When that day comes, those two days of waiting, intermediary fees, qualified investor thresholds, and trading hour restrictions will seem as ancient and obsolete as fax machines.

So, what exactly is asset tokenization?

Layman's Definition: Think of a token as a digital deed. When you buy a tokenized share of a commercial property, your digital wallet receives a token representing your ownership share.

This token automatically records who owns it, when it changes hands, and under what conditions it can be transferred, all without a registrar updating a spreadsheet.

Unlike a paper deed or brokerage account record maintained by a third-party custodian, a blockchain-based token is by design self-custodied: the ownership record is maintained by the network itself, not by any single institution that could freeze, lose, or misrepresent it.

The underlying mechanisms vary; some tokenization projects use public blockchains like Ethereum, others use permissioned enterprise chains operated by consortia of banks.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <h3 style="font-family: '极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Problem 1: Settlement Speed

The T+2 settlement window exists because it takes time to reconcile trades across multiple intermediaries (exchanges, clearing brokers, central securities depositories). Each institution maintains its own records; synchronizing these records requires a sequential handoff process.

On a blockchain, settlement is atomic. When a trade executes, the token moves from one wallet to another in the same transaction. There is no handoff, no reconciliation, and no window of counterparty risk.

Settlement happens in seconds, or in current implementations, under a minute for more complex trades. The US stock market moved from T+3 to T+2 in 2017 and to T+1 in 2024; the tokenized market skips all that and goes straight to near-instant settlement.

For institutional traders, the difference between T+1 and T+0 is not just speed, it's capital efficiency. Every day between trade execution and settlement is a day that capital is locked in a limbo state, unable to be redeployed.

"The two-day settlement window is accumulated institutional friction that has calcified into standard practice, and tokenization is the first credible solution to dismantle it."

<strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: Ping极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Selling it requires finding a willing bidder, negotiating a price, hiring lawyers on both sides, conducting due diligence, and then waiting months for the closing. There is no exchange, no bid-ask spread, and if you desperately need $200,000 in cash on a Thursday, you can't just sell a small piece of the building.

This is not unique to real estate. Private equity, infrastructure assets, fine art, venture capital fund shares, litigation financing rights: vast pools of wealth are stuck in assets that trade extremely infrequently, are incredibly opaque, and are limited to large institutions with patience and resources.

Tokenization does not automatically make illiquid assets liquid. But it creates the infrastructure for secondary markets to exist.

If ownership of a building can be divided into tokens traded on a digital exchange, then a limited partner needing liquidity doesn't have to wait for a fund's redemption window or find a buyer for their entire stake. They can sell tokens. Not the whole asset, just slices of it. This changes the investment logic for every asset class historically burdened by an illiquidity premium.

The more experienced builders in this space have learned a deeper lesson: issuing the token is only half the job.

A tokenized asset without a secondary market, without a recognized collateral framework, and without integration into trading venues is functionally inert. It's a better proof of ownership, but not yet a better financial instrument.

A few platforms are now starting to treat liquidity as a day-one design requirement, not something to be left to develop organically post-launch. Theo, founded by former market makers from IMC Trading and Optiver, launched thBILL (an on-chain exposure investing in an institutional-grade US Treasury strategy managed by Wellington Management, in partnership with Standard Chartered's Libeara).

This product integrated market making, lending protocol support, and cross-chain deployment (covering Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and HyperEVM) from the very inception. This token can be traded, used as collateral, or put to work directly in DeFi protocols without conversion.

This is a live demonstration of what it truly takes to solve the liquidity problem: not just issuance infrastructure, but a complete market structure that makes holding the tokenized asset worthwhile.

Problem 3: Fractional Ownership and Access Barriers

Most private credit funds have a minimum investment of $500,000. Many commercial real estate syndications have a minimum of $100,000.

Traditional Ownership vs. Tokenized Ownership

Smart contracts eliminate most of the administrative overhead. Dividend distributions can be programmed to execute automatically when conditions are met, without manual processing or custody fees. Ownership records update in real-time. Investor communication can happen on-chain.

The regulatory environment here is indeed very complex: securities laws in most jurisdictions still require accredited investor status for certain investments, and tokenization does not change these rules.

What it changes is: the economic feasibility of serving a broader investor base once regulations permit, or in the growing asset classes where regulations already do.

<strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

Every intermediary present in a financial transaction exists to solve a trust problem. Escrow agents ensure no one runs off with the money during a property closing. Clearing houses guarantee you still receive your securities if your counterparty defaults. Custodians hold assets for clients who cannot be trusted to self-custody safely.

Smart contract replaces trust with code. A tokenized bond can be programmed to automatically pay coupons to token holders on specific dates, release collateral upon loan repayment, and execute early redemptions if certain conditions are triggered.

<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height极速结算、7×极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong style="font-size: inherit; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,Wen极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

  • Terms are Programmed into the Contract Payment schedules, transfer restrictions, redemption conditions, and governance rights are embedded in the code, self-executing without human intermediaries.

  • Tokens Trade on Secondary Market Token holders can sell their positions on exchanges built for tokenized assets, with settlement in seconds and no clearing intermediary.

  • Cash Flows are Automatically Distributed Rental income, coupon payments, and other distributions go directly into token holders' wallets upon triggering, without paying agents, float, or processing delays.

  • Why This Has Nothing to Do with Cryptocurrency

    It is understandable to conflate tokenization with cryptocurrency speculation, but it is almost entirely unhelpful. Yes, tokenization uses blockchain technology. Yes, the same ledger infrastructure underpins Bitcoin. But the similarity ends there.

    Bitcoin and its speculative derivatives derive their value from scarcity and narrative. Tokenized real estate, bonds, and private equity are representations of assets whose value derives from income, cash flow, and physical operations. Tokenization is a new layer of ownership and settlement for existing asset classes.

    The institutions building tokenization infrastructure include J.P. Morgan, BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and HSBC—institutions whose entire business models rely on managing real assets for real clients.

    "The institutions building tokenization infrastructure are companies like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and J.P. Morgan, whose survival depends on managing core assets with extreme reliability."</极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    It would be dishonest to portray tokenization as an absolute inevitability. There are structural hurdles that will slow its adoption, and these hurdles have nothing to do with the technology itself.

    The legal framework in most jurisdictions still defines asset ownership in terms of paper records, registered agents, and custodial accounts. A token on a blockchain has no automatic legal standing; it requires explicit regulatory recognition, which varies wildly between countries and asset classes.

    Some governments are acting. The EU's DLT Pilot Regime and the UK's proposed Property (Digital Assets etc.) Bill are early examples. But legal certainty for tokenized assets remains patchwork.

    Interoperability between different blockchain platforms is another unresolved issue. A tokenized bond issued on J.P. Morgan's Onyx chain cannot automatically settle with a tokenized fund share issued on Ethereum without a cross-chain bridge, which reintroduces another form of counterparty risk.

    Ironically, the proliferation of numerous competing settlement networks is recreating the very problem of "siloed institutional databases" that tokenization was meant to solve.

    Finally, there is the issue of vested interests. The intermediaries being displaced are not passive bystanders. Custodians, clearing houses, and transfer agents provide significant fee income to the very institutions also trying to build tokenization platforms. These incumbent groups have every incentive to adopt the technology slowly and in ways that protect their existing revenue streams.

    What is Changing, What is Not

    <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    Fractional ownership does not automatically create deep liquidity: a thousand small散户 of a tokenized building still cannot force an asset sale, and the market for the tokens will remain thin unless market makers are actively involved.

    <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line-height: 2; font-family: PingFang SC,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Hiragino Sans GB,Heiti SC,Microsoft YaHei,WenQuan极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。</p> <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 16px; font-weight: inherit; word-break: break-all; line极速结算、7×24 小时全天候流动性、碎片化所有权以及金融中介的缓慢消亡:这些看似枯燥的基础设施变革,才是真正重塑市场的力量。

    The T+2 window compresses relentlessly towards zero. The minimum viable investment for illiquid asset classes is falling. The per-transaction cost of processing a payment or recording an ownership transfer becomes closer to the cost of a database write, not the cost of a human-operated administrative task.

    None of these changes are dramatic in isolation. But when stacked on top of all the assets currently locked in slow, expensive, heavily intermediated structures, it constitutes the largest reorganization of financial infrastructure since electronic trading replaced open outcry.

    This is a story about infrastructure. Your investment thesis, your regulatory questions, your timeline predictions depend entirely on whether you truly understand this. And right now, most people watching tokenization still don't see it.

    Kripto yang Sedang Tren

    Pertanyaan Terkait

    QWhat is the core purpose of tokenization according to the article?

    AThe core purpose of tokenization is to eliminate friction in the financial system, specifically by enabling near-instant settlement, providing 24/7 liquidity, enabling fractional ownership, and removing the need for slow financial intermediaries.

    QWhat problem does the T+2 settlement cycle in traditional finance highlight, and how does tokenization solve it?

    AThe T+2 settlement cycle highlights the institutional friction and inefficiency caused by a chain of custodians, clearinghouses, and counterparty reconciliation systems. Tokenization solves this with atomic settlement on a blockchain, where asset transfers and payment occur simultaneously in a single transaction within seconds, eliminating the waiting period and counterparty risk.

    QHow does tokenization address the issue of illiquidity in assets like commercial real estate?

    ATokenization creates the infrastructure for secondary markets by representing ownership of an illiquid asset as digital tokens. These tokens can be fractionally owned and traded on digital exchanges, allowing investors to sell slices of the asset instead of the whole thing, which was previously impractical. However, the article notes that liquidity is not just issuance but requires a full market structure with market makers and integration into trading venues.

    QWhy is tokenization not primarily about cryptocurrency speculation, and which institutions are leading its development?

    ATokenization is not about cryptocurrency speculation because its value is derived from the income, cash flow, and physical operations of real-world assets (like real estate, bonds, private equity), not from scarcity or narrative. It is a new ownership and settlement layer for existing asset classes. Leading institutions building this infrastructure include J.P. Morgan (Onyx), BlackRock (BUIDL), Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, and HSBC.

    QWhat are some of the major real-world obstacles to the widespread adoption of tokenization mentioned in the article?

    AMajor obstacles include: 1) Legal and regulatory frameworks in most jurisdictions that are based on paper records and custodial accounts, requiring explicit regulatory recognition for blockchain tokens. 2) A lack of interoperability between different blockchain platforms, which recreates the problem of siloed databases. 3) Resistance from existing financial intermediaries (custodians, clearinghouses) whose fee-based revenue models are threatened by this disintermediating technology.

    Bacaan Terkait

    Setelah Tiga Kuartal Berturut-Turut Turun, Bisakah Pasar Kripto Menyambut Jendela Stabilitas di Kuartal Ketiga?

    Pasar kripto mengalami kuartal terburuk sejak 2022, dengan kapitalisasi pasar turun 12.6% menjadi $2.1 triliun, didorong oleh keluarnya modal dan penurunan volume perdagangan. Bitcoin dan Ethereum masing-masing jatuh 14.2% dan 25.4% di kuartal kedua. Aliran keluar bersih dari ETF Bitcoin AS mencapai $4.67 miliar, menandakan tekanan jual yang berkelanjutan. Faktor utama meliputi terputusnya hubungan dengan saham AS, kebijakan moneter Federal Reserve yang ketat, dan pelepasan aset oleh perusahaan seperti Strategy. Proses legislasi UU CLARITY yang akan memberikan kejelasan regulasi terhambat, meningkatkan premi risiko di sektor ini. Namun, ada tanda-tanda potensi stabilisasi. Aliran keluar ETF yang besar secara historis sering terjadi di akhir fase penurunan, dan para pemegang Bitcoin jangka panjang mulai menambah kepemilikan lagi. Sementara sebagian besar sektor menyusut, pasar prediksi dan aset koleksi yang ditokenisasi mencatat pertumbuhan signifikan. Pandangan untuk kuartal ketiga sangat bergantung pada pertemuan Fed akhir Juli. Sinyal kebijakan yang lunak dapat mendukung pemulihan Bitcoin, sementara sikap yang hawkish dapat memicu konsolidasi lebih lanjut. Meskipun tantangan regulasi tetap ada, indikator teknis seperti harga Bitcoin yang mendekati rata-rata bergerak 200-mingguannya menunjukkan dasar jangka panjang belum rusak. Logika pasar telah bergeser dari mengandalkan narasi ke faktor fundamental seperti kebijakan dan ekspektasi suku bunga.

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Setelah Tiga Kuartal Berturut-Turut Turun, Bisakah Pasar Kripto Menyambut Jendela Stabilitas di Kuartal Ketiga?

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    The SpaceX Trade, Terbuka: SPCXON Mulai Diperdagangkan di WEEX

    SpaceX meluncurkan IPO terbesar dalam sejarah pada Juni 2026, namun akses bagi banyak pedagang terhambat oleh batasan regional dan prosedur broker. WEEX kini menghadirkan SPCXON/USDT di pasar spotnya, sebuah instrumen tokenisasi yang memungkinkan paparan terhadap pergerakan harga SpaceX melalui akun kripto yang diselesaikan dengan USDT, tanpa memerlukan broker AS atau pembiayaan bank. SPCXON adalah produk tokenisasi yang mencerminkan ekonomi kepemilikan SpaceX bagi pedagang yang memenuhi syarat di luar AS, dengan dividen diinvestasikan kembali. Aset ini diperdagangkan di WEEX sebagai pasangan spot dengan USDT, tersedia selama jam pasar, memberikan akses mudah bagi trader kripto. Kasus investasi untuk SpaceX didasarkan pada pertumbuhan pendapatan Starlink dan pencapaian Starship, meskipun valuasinya yang tinggi (sekitar 90-110 kali pendapatan) telah memperhitungkan eksekusi sempurna selama bertahun-tahun. Faktor seperti jumlah saham publik yang terbatas dan masa buka kunci (unlock) insider pertama menjadi pertimbangan penting. Penting untuk diingat bahwa SPCXON memberikan paparan, bukan kepemilikan langsung atas saham atau hak suara. Harganya dapat diperdagangkan pada premium atau diskon terhadap nilai aset bersih. WEEX menawarkan akses ke berbagai aset TradFi yang ditokenisasi seperti ini dalam satu akun terpadu, bersama dengan pasar futures dan kampanye perdagangan dengan pool hadiah.

    TheNewsCrypto4j yang lalu

    The SpaceX Trade, Terbuka: SPCXON Mulai Diperdagangkan di WEEX

    TheNewsCrypto4j yang lalu

    Momen Perdagangan BIT: BTC Masih Tertekan oleh EMA 200 Mingguan, Setelah Ditolak Mungkin Kembali Turun, Saham Penyimpanan dan Semikonduktor yang Melonjak Malam Kemudian Mulai Anjlok di Pasar Malam

    **PASAR KRIPTO & SAHAM: BTC Hadapi Resistensi, Saham Semikonduktor Turun di Perdagangan Malam** Pasar kripto melanjutkan pemulihan, dengan harga Bitcoin bertahan di sekitar $66,000 setelah rebound lebih dari 15% dari titik terendah Juli. Namun, BTC menghadapi **tembok resistensi kuat di dekat $68,000**, yang bertepatan dengan biaya rata-rata investor selama lima bulan terakhir dan titik gagalnya rebound pertengahan Juni. Secara teknis, perhatian tertuju pada **200 EMA mingguan (~$68,328) sebagai level kunci**. Jika BTC ditolak di level ini, potensi penurunan menuju support $63,000 terbuka. Analis menyoroti volume rendah dan penurunan open interest futures di CME, menandakan rebound ini lebih dipicu likuiditas rendah musim panas daripada awal bull run penuh. Di pasar saham AS, **indeks futures utama turang** setelah sesi kemarin yang kuat. Sektor semikonduktor dan penyimpanan (storage), yang melonjak pada hari Selasa (contoh: Micron +12%), **mengalami koreksi di perdagangan malam (night trading)**. ETF semikonduktor turun 2,22% dan saham Micron turun 2,29%. Meski begitu, ada sorotan positif seperti **Super Micro Computer (SMCI)** yang naik lebih dari 15% setelah melaporkan pandangan pendapatan yang kuat dan pesanan baru yang sangat besar, mengonfirmasi permintaan server AI tetap solid. Kekhawatiran makro muncul dari **kenaikan harga minyak mentah (di atas $91)** akibat ketegangan geopolitik dan **lonjakan imbal hasil (yield) obligasi pemerintah AS**, dengan imbal hasil 10-tahun mencapai sekitar 4,64%. Faktor-faktor ini dapat menambah tekanan inflasi dan membatasi ruang gerak pasar saham. Saham terkait kripto seperti Coinbase dan Robinhood naik kuat didorong oleh perkembangan regulasi yang lebih jelas di AS. Di Asia, **Korea Selatan** dan **Jepang** menunjukkan kinerja beragam. Indeks KOSPI Korea naik didukung pemulihan saham semikonduktor, sementara pasar Jepang melemah dengan **Yen terus melemah ke level terendah sejak 1986**, meningkatkan kekhawatiran akan intervensi bank sentral. **Yang Perlu Diperhatikan Selanjutnya:** * **22 Juli:** Acara AI AMD, rilis laporan keuangan dari Google (Alphabet), Tesla, IBM. * **23 Juli:** Keputusan suku bunga Bank Sentral Eropa (ECB), data klaim pengangguran AS, laporan keuangan Intel. * Perkembangan lebih lanjut dari **harga minyak, imbal hasil obligasi, dan dinamika Yen Jepang** akan menjadi penentu sentimen pasar risiko secara keseluruhan.

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Momen Perdagangan BIT: BTC Masih Tertekan oleh EMA 200 Mingguan, Setelah Ditolak Mungkin Kembali Turun, Saham Penyimpanan dan Semikonduktor yang Melonjak Malam Kemudian Mulai Anjlok di Pasar Malam

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Mantan Ketua CFTC dan Presiden Circle, Tarbert: Satu Pihak Menasihati Anda untuk Berpikir Jangka Panjang, di Sisi Lain Menguangkan $30 Juta Sendiri

    Penulis: Zen, PANews Heath Tarbert, mantan Ketua CFTC dan Presiden Circle, baru-baru ini menyerukan kepada investor untuk mengadopsi pandangan jangka panjang terhadap saham Circle, meskipun harganya telah turun 70% dari puncaknya. Namun, ia sendiri secara konsisten menjual saham CRCL sejak perusahaan go public, menguangkan sekitar $30 juta tanpa pernah membeli saham tambahan di pasar terbuka. Tarbert, yang bergabung dengan Circle pada Juli 2023 dan menjadi Presiden pada awal 2025, dikenal sebagai pendukung kuat narasi "jangka panjang" perusahaan. Namun, sehari sebelum IPO Circle, ia menetapkan rencana perdagangan 10b5-1 untuk menjual hingga 353.290 saham dalam setahun. Dalam 13 bulan setelah IPO, ia menjual lebih dari 360.000 saham, termasuk penjualan tunggal senilai $11,5 juta pada Maret 2026. Ia bahkan menetapkan rencana 10b5-1 kedua untuk menjual hingga 160.000 saham lagi pada akhir tahun 2026. Langkah Tarbert ini menuai kecaman karena dianggap tidak konsisten dengan pesan "jangka panjang" yang ia sampaikan kepada publik. Perjalanan kariernya sering dikaitkan dengan "revolving door" antara regulator dan dunia keuangan. Setelah mengundurkan diri sebagai Ketua CFTC pada Maret 2021, ia bergabung dengan Citadel Securities hanya 27 hari kemudian sebagai Kepala Penasihat Hukum, tepat saat perusahaan itu menghadapi pengawasan ketat terkait peristiwa GameStop. Di Citadel, ia juga mendukung undang-undang yang memperluas wewenang CFTC atas pasar crypto, sementara Citadel diketahui berencana berekspansi ke aset kripto. Tarbert kemudian pindah ke Circle pada 2023, membantu perusahaan mengatasi tantangan regulasi dan akhirnya go public melalui IPO langsung. Meskipun sangat berharga bagi perusahaan, tindakannya menjual saham dalam jumlah besar sambil mendorong investor untuk bertahan menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang komitmennya yang sebenarnya terhadap masa depan jangka panjang Circle.

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Mantan Ketua CFTC dan Presiden Circle, Tarbert: Satu Pihak Menasihati Anda untuk Berpikir Jangka Panjang, di Sisi Lain Menguangkan $30 Juta Sendiri

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Gate Research Institute: Produk Keuangan Kripto Menggulirkan Gelombang "Wall Street-ization", Kompetisi atau Integrasi?

    **Ringkasan: Gelombang "Wall Street-ization" Produk Keuangan Kripto: Kompetisi atau Integrasi?** Artikel ini membahas fenomena konvergensi antara keuangan tradisional (TradFi) dan keuangan kripto (Crypto). Meskipun Bitcoin awalnya dirancang sebagai sistem peer-to-peer yang terdesentralisasi dan bebas dari perantara seperti bank, pasar kripto kini semakin diintegrasikan ke dalam infrastruktur keuangan tradisional. **Tren "Wall Street-ization":** Dimulai dengan disetujuinya ETF spot Bitcoin pada 2024, aset kripto kini dikemas menjadi produk seperti ETF (oleh BlackRock, Fidelity, dll.), futures, dan sekuritisasi aset riil (RWA) seperti obligasi pemerintah yang ditokenisasi. Ini memberikan akses yang mudah dan teregulasi bagi investor institusional, tetapi juga berarti kekuasaan atas penerbitan, penentuan harga, kustodian, dan distribusi aset kripto semakin bergeser ke lembaga keuangan besar. **Dua Jalur Konvergensi (1+1>2):** Artikel ini menyoroti dua arah integrasi: 1. **Dari CEX ke TradFi:** Dilambangkan oleh **Gate.io**, yang berkembang dari bursa kripto menjadi platform multi-aset. Gate kini menawarkan perdagangan saham nyata (AS, Hong Kong, Korea) menggunakan USDT, menyediakan akses tanpa batas waktu ke pasar tradisional. 2. **Dari TradFi ke Crypto:** Dilambangkan oleh **Robinhood**, platform broker tradisional yang memperluas layanannya ke aset kripto (termasuk melalui akuisisi Bitstamp) dan mengembangkan produk seperti token saham di blockchain. **Tujuan Bersama: Akun Keuangan "Super" Terpadu:** Kedua jalur ini bertujuan menciptakan **akun keuangan generasi berikutnya yang terpadu**. Pengguna di masa depan mungkin dapat memperdagangkan Bitcoin, saham Apple, ETF, emas, dan obligasi pemerintah yang ditokenisasi dalam satu antarmuka yang sama, menggunakan stablecoin sebagai lapisan dana. **RWA dan Obligasi Pemerintah di On-Chain sebagai Lapisan Tengah:** Tokenisasi aset dunia nyata, terutama obligasi pemerintah AS, menyediakan aset berpenghasilan rendah risiko di ekosistem on-chain. Pasar ini tumbuh pesat (naik 40% pada paruh pertama 2026) meskipun pasar kripto turun, menunjukkan permintaan nyata. **Kesimpulan:** "Wall Street-ization" bukanlah pengambilalihan sepihak, melainkan **transformasi timbal balik**. TradFi dan Crypto saling melengkapi: Crypto mendapatkan akses ke likuiditas, kepatuhan, dan jaringan distribusi yang luas, sementara TradFi mengadopsi efisiensi, kecepatan, dan pasar 24/7 dari Crypto. Hasil akhirnya adalah pembentukan **pasar modal terpadu yang lebih efisien dan global**, di mana batas antara aset tradisional dan kripto semakin kabur.

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Gate Research Institute: Produk Keuangan Kripto Menggulirkan Gelombang "Wall Street-ization", Kompetisi atau Integrasi?

    marsbit4j yang lalu

    Trading

    Spot

    Artikel Populer

    Cara Membeli ONE

    Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian Harmony (ONE) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli Harmony (ONE) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan Harmony (ONE) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan Harmony (ONE) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading Harmony (ONE)Lakukan trading Harmony (ONE) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

    590 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2024.12.12Diperbarui pada 2026.06.02

    Cara Membeli ONE

    Diskusi

    Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga ONE (ONE) disajikan di bawah ini.

    活动图片