Trump nominates Kevin Warsh as Fed chair, crypto markets react to potential policy shift

ambcryptoDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-01-30Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-01-30

Abstrak

President Trump has nominated former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Fed Chair, effective upon Powell's term expiration in May 2026, pending Senate confirmation. Warsh, who served from 2006 to 2011, is known for his views on monetary policy and financial stability. Markets reacted immediately, with Bitcoin falling around 2% to near $81,000–$82,000, gold dropping roughly 5%, and equities declining amid expectations of a more hawkish stance. Analysts suggest a Warsh-led Fed may resist rapid rate cuts or balance sheet expansion, potentially leading to tighter liquidity and higher risk premiums for crypto and other risk assets. The confirmation process and ongoing policy uncertainty are likely to continue influencing market sentiment.

President Donald Trump has officially nominated former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Chair of the Federal Reserve. This move is already reverberating across financial and crypto markets.

Trump’s announcement on Friday positions Warsh to take the helm when Powell’s term expires in May 2026, subject to Senate confirmation.

Warsh served on the Fed’s Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011 and has been a prominent voice on monetary policy, inflation, and central bank structure.

Nomination comes with market uncertainty and policy questions

The nomination marks the end of a prolonged selection process. It places Warsh, a veteran policymaker, at the centre of expectations about the future direction of U.S. monetary policy.

Analysts and investors are parsing how his leadership could differ from Powell’s, particularly on issues such as the size of the central bank’s balance sheet, the interest rate trajectory, and financial stability frameworks.

Warsh’s nomination comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Federal Reserve’s independence and a separate Justice Department investigation into Powell’s leadership, both of which have complicated the confirmation process.

Early market reaction shows risk asset downward pressure

Financial markets reacted sharply in the immediate aftermath of the announcement and related rumours.

Bitcoin fell around 2%, dipping toward $81,000–$82,000, its lowest levels in two months, as speculation over Warsh’s policy stance grew.

Traditional markets showed similar caution, with gold sliding by roughly 5% alongside other assets that typically benefit from looser monetary policy.

Broader U.S. equity futures opened lower, and the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields strengthened on expectations that a Warsh-led Fed may resist rapid interest rate cuts or balance sheet expansion.

The crypto reaction reflects risk asset repricing amid uncertainty over future monetary settings and the potential for a more hawkish stance from the central bank under new leadership.

What this could mean for crypto markets

For crypto markets, the nomination carries several implications:

  • Monetary policy expectations: If markets view Warsh as inclined toward tighter monetary policy or slower rate cuts, liquidity conditions could remain less supportive for risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
  • Regulatory environment and sentiment: Warsh has previously described Bitcoin and crypto assets in measured terms — including saying that Bitcoin “does not make me nervous” when asked about digital assets — but his broader views reflect a focus on macro stability.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: A Fed more resistant to expanding its balance sheet could mean less accommodative conditions than traders had priced in, potentially keeping risk premiums elevated across digital asset markets.

Importantly, the nomination and Senate confirmation process are ongoing. Markets can continue to adjust as lawmakers vet the nominee and as commentary around the Fed’s policy path becomes clearer.


Final Thoughts

  • Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Reserve introduces policy uncertainty that has already pressured crypto and risk assets lower.
  • Markets are pricing potential shifts in monetary policy, with liquidity expectations and rate path projections likely to influence crypto sentiment through the confirmation process.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWho has President Donald Trump nominated to be the next Chair of the Federal Reserve?

APresident Donald Trump has nominated former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh to be the next Chair of the Federal Reserve.

QWhat was the immediate reaction of Bitcoin's price to the nomination announcement?

ABitcoin fell around 2%, dipping toward $81,000–$82,000, reaching its lowest levels in two months.

QWhat are two key areas of monetary policy that analysts are comparing between Warsh and the current chair, Jerome Powell?

AAnalysts are comparing their potential approaches to the size of the central bank’s balance sheet and the interest rate trajectory.

QAccording to the article, how did the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields react to the news, and why?

AThe U.S. dollar and Treasury yields strengthened on expectations that a Warsh-led Fed may resist rapid interest rate cuts or balance sheet expansion.

QWhat did Kevin Warsh say about Bitcoin that the article highlights?

AThe article highlights that Warsh has said Bitcoin "does not make me nervous" when asked about digital assets.

Bacaan Terkait

The Impossible Triad Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

**Judul: Segitiga Mustahil Sebenarnya Masalah Palsu** Industri crypto telah membangun sistem kriptografi paling kuat, tetapi ironisnya gagal melindungi privasi keuangan pengguna. Setiap transaksi dan kepemilikan terpapar secara publik. Blokchain pada dasarnya adalah komputer bersama yang lambat dan mahal, yang nilainya terletak pada akses tanpa izin dan konsensus terdesentralisasi. Selama satu dekade, industri terobsesi dengan "trilema" skalabilitas, keamanan, dan desentralisasi. Namun, kendala sebenarnya yang menghalangi masuknya modal triliunan dolar justru adalah **legalitas** dan **privasi**. 1. **Legalitas:** Sifat tanpa izin menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum. Namun, perkembangan regulasi seperti Undang-Undang GENIUS di AS mulai memberikan kejelasan kerangka hukum. 2. **Privasi:** Transparansi rantai publik bukanlah fitur, melainkan **pajak**. Setiap posisi dan transaksi yang terbuka mengundang eksploitasi seperti MEV (Miner Extractable Value), yang telah menyedot miliaran dolar dari pengguna biasa. Modal institusional besar tidak akan pernah menempatkan neracanya di tempat yang bisa dibaca pesaing secara real-time. Solusinya bukan transparansi penuh atau penyembunyian total. Kriptografi modern memungkinkan **privasi yang patuh (compliant privacy)**. Kita dapat membuktikan suatu pernyataan (misalnya, kecukupan cadangan, kepatuhan KYC, transaksi bersih) tanpa membongkar data dasarnya. Audit dan kepatuhan tetap terjaga, tetapi kebocoran informasi dan "pajak transparansi" dihilangkan. Dengan menutup dua cacat ini—melalui kemajuan regulasi dan adopsi privasi yang dapat dibuktikan—blokchain akan mengalami peningkatan murni. Ia akan berubah dari "spreadsheet Google yang mahal dan terbuka" menjadi mesin bersama yang dapat dipercaya yang akhirnya dapat menjaga rahasia. Inilah jembatan yang akan membawa sistem keuangan bernilai triliunan dolar ke dalam dunia yang sebenarnya dirancang untuknya sejak awal.

marsbit1j yang lalu

The Impossible Triad Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit1j yang lalu

Chip Optik, Perluasan Kapasitas Produksi Secara Kolektif

Kebutuhan chip optik sedang melonjak, memicu gelombang ekspansi kapasitas global di seluruh rantai pasokan. Di AS, Coherent memperluas pabrik 6 inci InP di Texas dengan pendanaan pemerintah, didukung investasi strategis dari Nvidia. Nokia menambah kapasitas pengujian dan pengemasan chip fotonik. Di Jepang, JX Advanced Metals berinvestasi besar untuk meningkatkan produksi substrat InP hingga 7-10 kali lipat. Di Eropa, IQE dan Tower Semiconductor menyepakati kesepakatan pasokan wafer epitaksial InP jangka panjang, menandakan konvergensi antara platform silicon photonics dan material III-V. Di Cina, perusahaan seperti Suzhou Ray Technology (Soluxe) dan San'an Optoelectronics secara agresif memperluas produksi chip optik dan bahan baku seperti InP. Ekspansi ini didorong oleh permintaan bandwidth yang meledak dari pusat data AI, terlepas dari jalur arsitektur masa depan seperti CPO (Co-Packaged Optics). Laporan Morgan Stanley menekankan bahwa kebutuhan konten optik akan terus tumbuh, baik dengan modul pluggable tradisional, NPO, CPO, atau arsitektur hybrid. Berbagai rute sumber cahaya seperti SiPh + Laser CW, VCSEL, dan MicroLED diperkirakan akan hidup berdampingan untuk aplikasi jarak berbeda dalam pusat data. Pada dasarnya, ini adalah perlombaan kapasitas global di mana AS membangun kembali manufaktur domestik, Jepang menguasai bahan baku, Eropa mendorong integrasi heterogen, dan Cina dengan cepat mengembangkan rantai pasokan terintegrasi secara vertikal. Perlombaan senjata di era fotonik telah memasuki tahap intensif.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Chip Optik, Perluasan Kapasitas Produksi Secara Kolektif

marsbit3j yang lalu

1996 atau 1999? Ujian Pertama Wash adalah 'Bagaimana Melihat AI'

Artikel ini membahas dilema utama yang dihadapi ketua Federal Reserve terbaru, Christopher Warsh, dalam menanggapi ledakan AI. Inti persoalannya adalah apakah kemajuan AI saat ini mirip dengan situasi 1996 — di mana Alan Greenspan membiarkan ekonomi tumbuh tanpa menaikkan suku bunga karena percaya pada pertumbuhan produktivitas — atau lebih mirip 1999, ketika Greenspan akhirnya menaikkan suku bunga secara agresif untuk mencegah overheating ekonomi. Warsh cenderung pada pendekatan 1996, berargumen bahwa manfaat produktivitas AI membutuhkan waktu untuk terlihat dalam data resmi, dan menaikkan suku bunga terlalu dini justru dapat meredam pertumbuhan yang sebenarnya membantu menekan inflasi. Namun, konteks makroekonominya berbeda: tekanan tarif, defisit fiskal yang membesar, dan memudarnya manfaat globalisasi membuat risiko inflasi lebih tinggi daripada era 1990-an. Di sisi lain, kritikus seperti Austan Goolsbee dari Bank Sentral Chicago berpendapat bahwa ledakan AI yang sudah diantisipasi banyak orang justru dapat memicu kenaikan pengeluaran di muka, mendorong overheating ekonomi dan mengharuskan kenaikan suku bunga yang lebih tajam nantinya. Perdebatan ini mencerminkan perpecahan internal di Fed. Paradoks terakhir bagi Warsh adalah keinginannya untuk menghapus "forward guidance" (panduan kebijakan ke depan), suatu praktik yang justru dibuat pada 1999. Jika ekonomi memburuk, ia harus memilih antara menggunakan alat yang ingin dihapusnya atau menghadapi gejolak pasar akibat ketidakpastian. Jawaban atas semua ini bergantung pada penilaiannya: apakah kita berada di tahun 1996 atau 1999?

marsbit6j yang lalu

1996 atau 1999? Ujian Pertama Wash adalah 'Bagaimana Melihat AI'

marsbit6j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片