In the Internet Shutdown Winter, Iranians Rely on Decentralized Technology to Connect with the World

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-02-02Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-02-02

Abstrak

Since early January, Iran has experienced severe nationwide internet blackouts amid violent protests triggered by the collapse of the national currency, the rial. Citizens like Darius, using pseudonyms for safety, have turned to decentralized tools such as dVPNs, OpenVPN, Shadowsocks, and V2Ray to bypass government censorship during brief connectivity windows. These tools disguise internet traffic to evade detection, allowing limited communication via platforms like Telegram. The Iranian government imposed the blackout to suppress protests and control information flow, following economic turmoil and public unrest. Experts note that decentralized networks and satellite systems like Starlink provide critical, resilient access, though complete shutdowns remain challenging to circumvent. The blackout has inflicted significant economic damage and hindered accurate reporting of casualties, with estimates of protest-related fatalities ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands. Despite these efforts, sustained resistance faces major obstacles without external support, as Iran’s heavily funded security apparatus maintains tight control. Decentralized technology remains a vital, though imperfect, lifeline for Iranians seeking to share information and connect with the outside world.

Written by: Liam Kelly

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Since early January, Iran has been experiencing a large-scale internet shutdown, but some resourceful individuals have begun using decentralized technology to connect with the outside world.

During a brief window of internet connectivity amid the severe internet blockade in Iran this month, Darius managed to send a short message via Telegram.

"They are afraid of the videos protesters upload online, so they turned off all the street lights," he shared on January 14 with the Persian-language community Sentinel, of which he is a long-term member.

"People have to walk using their phone flashlights; everything is terrible. They have even broken North Korea's record in censorship."

This was about a week after the collapse of the Iranian rial (Iran's currency) sparked violent protests.

Since then, Darius has been switching between various network routing tools, including Sentinel's decentralized virtual private network (dVPN), to continue bypassing the government's strict communication blockade.

The tools he relies on include:

OpenVPN: A widely used tool that hides users' IP addresses;

Shadowsocks: Based on the SOCKS5 protocol, it disguises network traffic as random data;

V2Ray: Uses the security certificates of legitimate websites to conceal users' real identities.

In information exclusively provided to DL News, he described life under a violent regime with near-total internet disconnection.

"We are living in hell, with no internet, no money, no media, no support whatsoever," wrote Darius on January 14, using a pseudonym to protect his identity. "We need help; people cannot resist with bare hands—they shoot us with shotguns and AK-47s."

Digital Iron Curtain

In response to the ongoing protests that began last December and have spread to multiple areas beyond the capital Tehran, the Iranian government implemented the most severe communication shutdown in the regime's nearly 50-year history on January 8.

Adam Burns, co-founder of the Australian Internet Association, stated that the Iranian government's move has a dual purpose.

"This is a standard communication control measure, aimed at organizationally stifling protest activities and preventing international exposure," he told DL News. "Essentially, it's a form of risk management."

During this period, decentralized networks and traffic obfuscation tools became critical lifelines for the people.

Reports indicate that since last August, up to 90% of Iranians have used some form of circumvention tool to connect to the outside world.

Such networks are typically more resilient than centralized networks, which have a single database or point of failure. To destroy a decentralized network, the government must shut down every self-hosted node one by one or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

Other tools, such as Starlink, the distributed satellite network operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX, have also become vital communication channels for the people. Since systems like Starlink lack a single local node, their distributed infrastructure can provide critical network connectivity even under intense censorship.

However, reports note that such large-scale internet restrictions cost the country billions of dollars in economic losses.

"By providing decentralized, highly resilient network access to resist even the most aggressive censorship, we help keep information flowing, allowing the brave people inside Iran to document and share the violence concealed by the internet shutdown," Sentinel CEO Aleksandr Litreev told DL News.

Of course, in a complete internet blackout, almost no network can function.

However, during the shutdown, people like Darius can seize brief windows of connectivity, as the regime needs to balance silencing criticism with maintaining economic operations.

"It's a cyclical cat-and-mouse game," Burns said.

Using his combination of tools, Darius disguises his network requests as ordinary traffic, directing them to large Iranian e-commerce websites that the government keeps online for economic purposes. This encrypted data is then tunneled to overseas servers that can access the external internet.

This is not foolproof, nor is it sustainable, but it allows Darius to send a few Telegram messages during brief connectivity windows.

"Once the traffic pattern is exposed as an unauthenticated connection, it is immediately cut off," Darius wrote on January 23.

Chaos in Iran

Over the past four weeks, Iran has descended into total chaos.

On December 28, people gathered in Tehran's Grand Bazaar to protest the government's handling of the currency collapse. By the end of 2025, the Iranian rial had hit a historic low, with 1 US dollar exchanging for 1.4 million rials, partly due to severe international sanctions and financial mismanagement by Iran's leadership. The US imposed sanctions on Iran to prevent its nuclear weapons program and stop its support for terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis.

"It's like holding a shitcoin listed only on isolated exchanges, its price falling every day, until you have to use this worthless currency to buy basic necessities like milk and meat," Darius wrote. "Worse, the next day, the same items cost even more."

Iran is a theocracy, with the vast majority of power held by the Supreme Leader, cleric Ali Khamenei. Although Iran has an elected president and parliament, their power is limited. The people have long criticized the regime, and the rial's collapse has completely changed the situation.

"Generally, people don't revolt for lofty ideals like democracy or universal suffrage; they rebel over things that affect their daily lives," Tallha Abdulrazaq, a researcher at the University of Exeter's Institute for Strategy and Security, told DL News. "As long as basic needs are met and there is hope for the future, people are more willing to live under authoritarian rule."

After the internet shutdown on January 8, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Basij militia began clearing protestors with live ammunition.

Due to the internet blackout, it has been difficult for people on the ground and multiple human rights organizations to verify the death toll. The Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths; London-based Persian-language news channel Iran International, citing internal documents from the Supreme National Security Council and the Presidential Office, reported at least 12,000 deaths. Two senior officials from Iran's Health Ministry told Time magazine that as many as 30,000 may have been killed between January 8 and 9.

As for overthrowing the regime, Abdulrazaq believes it is almost impossible without international intervention. "The Iranian government may not have invested in public services, but it has invested heavily in security agencies. Therefore, without external support, I don't see how these protests can overthrow the Iranian regime," he said.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat decentralized technologies are Iranians using to connect to the outside world during the internet blackout?

AIranians are using decentralized technologies such as Sentinel's dVPN, OpenVPN to hide IP addresses, Shadowsocks to disguise network traffic as random data, and V2Ray to mask user identities using legitimate website security certificates.

QWhy did the Iranian government impose such a severe internet blackout in January?

AThe Iranian government imposed the internet blackout to prevent the organization of protests and to stop international exposure of the violent crackdowns on demonstrators, following protests triggered by the collapse of the Iranian rial and economic mismanagement.

QHow do decentralized networks provide resilience against government censorship compared to centralized networks?

ADecentralized networks are more resilient because they lack a single point of failure or central database. To shut them down, the government would need to disable each self-hosted node individually or implement a complete nationwide internet blackout.

QWhat economic and social conditions led to the protests in Iran?

AThe protests were sparked by the collapse of the Iranian rial, which hit a record low of 1.4 million rials to the US dollar due to international sanctions and financial mismanagement. This led to severe inflation, making basic goods unaffordable and exacerbating public dissatisfaction with the regime.

QWhat are the reported casualty figures during the internet blackout and crackdown, and why is there difficulty in verifying them?

AReports vary widely: the Iran Human Rights Organization reported at least 3,428 deaths, Iran International cited internal documents suggesting at least 12,000 deaths, and Iranian Health Ministry officials told Time that up to 30,000 may have been killed. Verification is difficult due to the internet blackout, which prevents information from being shared and documented effectively.

Bacaan Terkait

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

Menurut artikel ini, pendiri Pinduoduo, Huang Zheng, memandang bisnis inti platformnya sebagai "asuransi terbalik" yang berhubungan dengan ketidakpastian. Argumen utamanya adalah bahwa dalam kapitalisme tradisional, orang kaya mengumpulkan kekayaan dengan menanggung ketidakpastian (seperti risiko finansial) yang tak tertanggungkan bagi orang biasa, yang kemudian membayar premi (seperti melalui tabungan rendah bunga atau membeli produk mahal demi kepastian) untuk mengalihkan risiko tersebut. Uang mengalir dari bawah ke atas. Pinduoduo berusaha "membalikkan" aliran ini. Melalui fitur seperti "pembelian kelompok" dan penawaran waktu terbatas, platform ini mengumpulkan banyak niat pembelian yang tersebar menjadi permintaan agregat yang pasti dan besar dalam waktu singkat. Kepastian permintaan massal ini memungkinkan pabrik mengurangi risiko kelebihan produksi dan menurunkan harga, sehingga mengembalikan sebagian nilai (dalam bentuk diskon) ke konsumen. Namun, tantangan utama adalah janji atau niat beli individu tidak berharga karena mudah dibatalkan tanpa konsekuensi. Di sinilah kaitannya dengan blockchain muncul. Huang Zheng bertanya-tanya apakah teknologi blockchain, dengan kontrak pintar dan sifat terdesentralisasi, bisa menjadi solusi untuk membuat komitmen individu menjadi terikat, dapat dipercaya, dan dapat diberi harga. Kontrak pintar dapat mengunci janji beli dengan jaminan keuangan, sehingga pembatalan akan dikenakan penalti. Ini mengubah "keinginan membeli" menjadi janji yang dapat ditegakkan, memberikan kepastian yang dapat dipercaya pabrik tanpa perantara. Artikel tersebut juga menarik paralel dengan Bitcoin, menyebutkan dua jalan menciptakan kepastian: 1) **Jalan Pinduoduo**: mengumpulkan keinginan tersebar menjadi skala besar untuk menghilangkan ketidakpastian. 2) **Jalan Bitcoin**: mengunci aturan dalam kode yang tidak dapat diubah (seperti pasokan tetap), menggantikan kepercayaan pada manusia dengan kepercayaan pada aturan algoritmik. Kedua pendekatan memiliki trade-off: yang pertama membatasi kebebasan individu untuk koordinasi massa, yang kedua mengorbankan fleksibilitas aturan untuk kepastian absolut.

链捕手13m yang lalu

Apa Hubungannya Huang Zheng, Pendiri Pinduoduo, dengan Blockchain?

链捕手13m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

**Ringkasan: "Raja Penyimpanan yang Membangun Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Menjadi Orang Terkaya"** Artikel ini membahas kisah Zhu Yiming, pendiri dua raksasa chip memori Tiongkok: Gigadevice (GigaDevice) dan ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). Gigadevice (terdaftar di Shanghai dan Hong Kong), yang didirikan Zhu pada 2005, memulai bisnisnya dengan memanfaatkan celah pasar. Perusahaan ini mengembangkan bisnis utamanya di NOR Flash—jenis chip memori yang meski dianggap "kelas bawah" oleh raksasa seperti Samsung, tetap penting untuk aplikasi seperti mobil dan elektronik konsumen—hingga menguasai 20% pangsa pasar global (2025). Gigadevice kemudian mendiversifikasi ke Mikrokontroler (MCU), sensor, dan chip analog melalui akuisisi. Meski terdampak siklus industri, perusahaan ini tetap profitable dengan margin kotor stabil di atas 40% dan efisiensi biaya yang baik. Model bisnisnya adalah Fabless (tanpa pabrik fabrikasi). Namun, dalam industri chip memori yang sangat siklis dan kapital-intensif, model Fabless dianggap kurang tangguh. "Pemenang" sejarah seperti Samsung dan SK Hynix adalah perusahaan IDM (integrasi vertikal) yang mampu melakukan ekspansi "anti-siklus" dengan investasi besar saat industri lesu. Menyadari batasan Gigadevice, Zhu Yiming pada 2016 bekerja sama dengan pemerintah Hefei mendirikan CXMT dengan model IDM untuk memproduksi DRAM canggih. Keputusan Zhu untuk memimpin CXMT, menolak gaji hingga perusahaan untung, serta mendedikasikan sebagian besar insentif sahamnya untuk karyawan, membangun kepercayaan dan memungkinkan pendanaan besar dari negara dan bank. Hingga akhir 2025, nilai buku peralatan CXMT mencapai 169 miliar RMB, bahkan melebihi BYD. Meski kedua perusahaan yang dibangunnya—Gigadevice bernilai ~340 miliar RMB dan CXMT diproyeksikan bernilai triliunan RMB—Zhu Yiming hanya memiliki kurang dari 3% saham (tidak langsung) di CXMT dan sekitar 1% setelah IPO. Dengan perkiraan kekayaan kurang dari 50 miliar RMB, ia tidak akan masuk jajaran orang terkaya Tiongkok, menunjukkan pilihan strategisnya untuk membangun kerajaan industri daripada kekayaan pribadi.

marsbit20m yang lalu

Bos Penyimpanan yang Menaklukkan Kerajaan Triliunan, Akhirnya Tak Bisa Jadi Orang Terkaya

marsbit20m yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

XRP Ledger kembali menjadi sorotan setelah data biaya menunjukkan biaya jaringan harian turun di bawah $400, menurut metrik yang dilacak oleh DefiLlama dan penjelajah ledger. Biaya rendah memang merupakan desain inti XRPL untuk transaksi murah, namun jumlah biaya yang dihasilkan juga dapat berfungsi sebagai salah satu indikator aktivitas jaringan dan permintaan. Data mingguan menunjukkan pembakaran biaya sekitar $3.100, menggarisbawahi kontras dengan jaringan seperti Ethereum dan Bitcoin. Bagi pendukung, biaya rendah berarti efisiensi dan aksesibilitas tetap terjaga. Bagi pengkritik, angka ini dapat memicu pertanyaan tentang apakah jaringan melihat permintaan bernilai tinggi yang memadai, terutama dalam narasi pembayaran dan adopsi perusahaan yang telah lama dikembangkan. Data on-chain ini memberi para pelaku pasar satu cara untuk menguji aktivitas transaksional yang bermakna. Penting untuk tidak menyimpulkan secara berlebihan. Satu hari dengan biaya rendah tidak berarti jaringan gagal atau penyelesaian transaksi terhenti. Ini adalah satu titik data dalam debat penggunaan XRPL dan menciptakan kontras dengan dorongan Ripple yang lebih luas ke RLUSD, pembayaran agen AI, dan infrastruktur penyelesaian perusahaan. Langkah selanjutnya adalah mengamati apakah angka biaya pulih, apakah jumlah transaksi menunjukkan cerita yang berbeda, dan apakah penjelajah asli XRPL seperti Bithomp mengonfirmasi tren yang sama. Cerita ini mencerminkan pergeseran dalam crypto di mana infrastruktur, utilitas token, dan data on-chain semakin penting, melampaui aksi harga jangka pendek.

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Biaya Harian XRP Ledger Turun di Bawah $400 Seiring Pertanyaan Aktivitas Jaringan Kembali Muncul

bitcoinist4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片