From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-06-09Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-06-09

Abstrak

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: i...

Original |Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author |Golem(@web3_golem)

How much market credibility does Arthur Hayes have left? Recently, Arthur Hayes, the "Father of Crypto Perpetual Contracts" and co-founder of BitMEX, has faced public criticism, with on-chain detective ZachXBT also publicly questioning how much exit liquidity he has created using his followers.

Liquidated HYPE, NEAR, WLD

Starting last week, Arthur Hayes performed several unannounced selling operations to exit the top.

Arthur Hayes had repeatedly publicly stated that HYPE would rise to 150 dollars in this cycle. On June 1, Arthur Hayes was passionately criticizing and making a 100, 000 dollars bet with Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, for disparaging Hyperliquid. However, just 3 days later, Arthur Hayes announced he had completely liquidated his HYPE and NEAR holdings, with HYPE falling over 13.6% that day. His sell-off successfully exited at the top; HYPE hit a new high of 75.5 dollars on June 4 before falling continuously, currently trading around 62-64 dollars.

In addition to selling HYPE and NEAR, Arthur Hayes also liquidated ZEC and WLD. His liquidation of ZEC might be somewhat justified due to the Orchard Pool attack, but his selling of WLD resembled a classic "KOL cutting retail" operation: secretly accumulating, publicly shilling, and finally selling at a pumped price.

Because from publicly shilling WLD to liquidating WLD, Arthur Hayes only "acted" for 3 days. On June 3, the day before selling HYPE, Arthur Hayes publicly called for WLD to reach 10 dollars, suggesting WLD would become an alternative for investors who find it difficult to directly participate in SpaceX equity trading. After the news spread, WLD rose over 35% that day. But by June 6, Arthur Hayes changed his tune, stating he had sold all his WLD because SpaceX's pre-market price movement was "anomalous." This single, light explanation caused WLD to drop over 20% that day.

The difference between Arthur Hayes and "third-rate KOLs" is that he writes essays, often justifying his actions from the perspectives of macroeconomics and top-level design.

On June 9, Arthur Hayes published a lengthy essay, Reality Test (taking about 20 minutes to read fully), explaining his recent moves. He argued that three factors—rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the IPOs of the three major AI stocks (SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI), and Trump turning against AI for mid-term elections—would burst the AI bubble.

Based on this, his family office Maelstrom holds significant positions in US-listed energy producers and has sold AI-related stocks and non-core crypto assets, holding only BTC and ETH.

Arthur Hayes' Words Shouldn't Be Heeded, But His Actions Must Be Watched

Arthur Hayes' articles are not only adept at using a large amount of economic data and charts to argue points but sometimes also overlay political and historical perspectives, leaving people dazzled. But when you take his words seriously and invest real money following his moves, he might announce the next day that he has liquidated and started talking down, seemingly forgetting what he said the day before, and your portfolio takes a simultaneous hit.

Such operations are common. As early as 2025, Arthur Hayes repeatedly played the "bullish one moment, liquidating the next" script. The most classic example remains HYPE. In August 2025, during a speech at WebX Japan, Arthur Hayes touted HYPE, claiming the token still had up to 126x upside potential (Odaily Note: price was 45.9 dollars that day), but just one month later, he announced he had sold all HYPE for millions in profit, citing the need to avoid token unlock risks.

This sale by Arthur Hayes was precisely at the peak of HYPE's last bull run, after which HYPE fell continuously. It wasn't until mid-January 2026 that Arthur Hayes started buying HYPE again on a large scale. Judging from the price action, his entry point was again the low point of this cycle's rally.

Similar examples include ETHFI and ENA, all involving public bullish statements, followed by unannounced sales, achieving precise exits at the top.(Related reading:You Ran Again First! A Review of Arthur Hayes' Exit Records)

Long-term followers of Arthur Hayes have summarized a methodology: Arthur Hayes' words shouldn't be listened to, but his actions must be closely watched. Follow his accumulation cautiously, but sell decisively when he does.

However, if Arthur Hayes continues such performances, especially cases like this WLD price manipulation, no matter how reasonable the excuses are disguised, his market credibility will be threatened. It's like a crypto version of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." In the end, Arthur Hayes will inevitably face backlash.

One sentence in his latest published article is correct—"I am still an unabashed gambler," and gamblers generally don't end well.

Kripto yang Sedang Tren

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat recent actions have led to Arthur Hayes' market credibility being questioned?

AArthur Hayes has faced criticism for abruptly selling off assets like HYPE, NEAR, and WLD after publicly endorsing them. For example, he sold HYPE days after predicting it would reach $150 and dumped WLD just three days after recommending it, actions that have drawn accusations of creating exit liquidity for his followers.

QHow did Arthur Hayes explain his sudden sale of AI-related crypto assets like WLD?

AIn his article 'Reality Test,' Hayes cited three main reasons: rising energy costs due to restricted traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, the potential IPO of major AI companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI), and the possibility of Trump turning against AI for midterm elections. He claimed these factors could burst the AI bubble, prompting his family office to sell non-core crypto assets and hold only BTC and ETH.

QWhat is the 'methodology' some investors have developed regarding Arthur Hayes' market behavior?

ASome investors have concluded that 'Arthur Hayes' words cannot be trusted, but his actions must be closely watched.' They advise being cautious about following his buying moves but promptly selling when he does, as he has a history of publicly advocating for assets and then selling them at what often turns out to be a peak.

QWhat was a previous instance where Arthur Hayes exhibited similar 'pump and dump' behavior?

AA classic example is with HYPE in August 2025. Hayes publicly promoted HYPE at the Japan WebX conference, claiming it had 126x upside potential. Just one month later, he announced he had sold all his HYPE holdings, profiting millions, citing token unlock risks. This sale occurred near the peak of HYPE's price at that time.

QAccording to the article, what does Arthur Hayes call himself, and what warning is implied about such a label?

AIn his latest article, Arthur Hayes states, 'I am still an unapologetic gambler.' The article implies that such behavior is risky and warns that consistently acting like a gambler manipulating the market could lead to a loss of credibility and eventual backlash, similar to the 'boy who cried wolf' fable.

Bacaan Terkait

Saham 'Teknologi Momentum' AS Catat Kenaikan Terbesar Sejarah dalam Sehari, tapi Apakah Jatuhnya Sudah Berakhir?

Saham momentum teknologi AS mengalami rebound dramatis pada Selasa (21/7). Indeks momentum TMT Morgan Stanley melonjak lebih dari 12%, rekor kenaikan harian terbesar dalam sejarah. Indeks momentum beta tinggi Goldman Sachs (GSCBHMOM) naik sekitar 8.5%, kinerja harian terkuat sejak April 2025. Sektor semikonduktor, dengan Indeks Semikonduktor Philadelphia naik 4.6%, menjadi pendorong utama. Rebound ini terjadi setelah penurunan selama tiga hari berturut-turut dan kejatuhan kumulatif 33% untuk saham momentum. Analis menyebut rebound ini didorong oleh "short squeeze" atau pemaksaan likuidasi posisi jual, terutama dari pedagang di Korea Selatan dan Jepang yang terkena margin call. Namun, kualitas rebound dipertanyakan karena volume perdagangan rendah dan lebih banyak saham yang turun daripada naik di S&P 500 meski indeks naik, menunjukkan kelemahan dalam keluasan pasar. Pandangan institusi keuangan terpecah. BTIG memperingatkan rebound telah mencapai level resistensi kunci dan merekomendasikan untuk mengurangi posisi. Sebaliknya, Goldman Sachs dan UBS percaya penjualan momentum mendekati akhir dan melihatnya sebagai peluang untuk membeli secara bertahap, meski dengan struktur terbatas risikonya. Laporan keuangan musim ini, terutama dari Alphabet yang dijadwalkan minggu ini, akan menjadi katalis kunci berikutnya. Pasar akan sangat memperhatikan panduan pengeluaran modal Alphabet untuk petunjuk arah pengeluaran AI. Sementara itu, pasar obligasi memberi sinyal peringatan dengan kenaikan imbal hasil obligasi AS, didorong oleh kenaikan harga minyak di atas $90 per barel akibat ketegangan geopolitik di Timur Tengah. Beberapa analis memperingatkan bahwa kenaikan lebih lanjut dalam imbal hasil obligasi jangka panjang dapat membebani pasar saham.

链捕手4m yang lalu

Saham 'Teknologi Momentum' AS Catat Kenaikan Terbesar Sejarah dalam Sehari, tapi Apakah Jatuhnya Sudah Berakhir?

链捕手4m yang lalu

Bersatu Terus Berpisah, Berpisah Terus Bersatu: Ketika L1 Menjadi Rollup Dirinya Sendiri, Apa Akhir dari Ethereum?

"Setelah sekian lama, akhirnya terpecah; setelah terpecah, akhirnya kembali bersatu." Judul artikel ini secara tepat menggambarkan tantangan dan evolusi dalam hubungan antara Lapisan 1 (L1) dan Lapisan 2 (L2) Ethereum. Artikel ini membahas bagaimana visi awal L2 sebagai solusi penskalaan utama Ethereum, yang bertujuan menyediakan ruang blok yang murah dan efisien, kini sedang ditinjau ulang seiring dengan peningkatan kapasitas penskalaan L1 itu sendiri. Dengan penggabungan rute pekerjaan protokol "Scale", Ethereum kini melihat penskalaan L1 dan L2 sebagai kerangka kerja yang terpadu. Hal ini menggeser peran L2 dari sekadar penyedia ruang transaksi yang lebih murah menjadi penyedia fungsi yang terdiferensiasi, seperti optimasi aplikasi tertentu, fitur privasi, dan model tata kelola yang lebih fleksibel. L2 kini dilihat sebagai spektrum lingkungan eksekusi yang membangun berbagai tingkat hubungan keamanan, penyelesaian, dan likuiditas dengan Ethereum L1. Masalah fragmentasi yang ditimbulkan oleh banyaknya L2 juga menjadi fokus penting. Pengalaman pengguna yang terfragmentasi, dengan aset dan aplikasi yang tersebar di berbagai rantai, mendorong pengembangan solusi interoperabilitas seperti kerangka Open Intents dan Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL). Tujuannya adalah untuk membuat interaksi antar-L2 terasa seperti bertransaksi pada satu rantai tunggal. Memperpendek waktu finalitas L1 menjadi detik juga merupakan target jangka panjang yang penting untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan dan efisiensi dalam berbagi status antar lingkungan eksekusi. Gagasan yang lebih mendalam adalah bahwa dengan masuknya sistem bukti (seperti zkEVM) ke dalam protokol inti, L1 Ethereum sendiri pada akhirnya dapat mengadopsi pola verifikasi yang mirip dengan Rollup, di mana sebagian node melakukan eksekusi berkinerja tinggi dan node lainnya memverifikasi bukti kriptografisnya. Ini mengaburkan batas tradisional antara L1 dan L2, mengubah Rollup dari sekadar hierarki di atas L1 menjadi arsitektur eksekusi dan verifikasi yang lebih universal. Kesimpulannya, masa depan Ethereum bukanlah tentang L1 yang menghilangkan kebutuhan akan L2, atau sebaliknya. Masa depan terletak pada pembentukan ekosistem di mana berbagai lingkungan eksekusi (L2) dengan fungsi dan kinerja yang berbeda-beda dapat hidup berdampingan, sambil berbagi fondasi keamanan, likuiditas, dan hubungan status yang kuat dengan hub global L1. Tantangan berikutnya adalah menyatukan kembali kapasitas yang telah dipecah ini menjadi pengalaman yang kohesif dan andal, sambil tetap mempertahankan keuntungan penskalaan yang telah diraih.

链捕手16m yang lalu

Bersatu Terus Berpisah, Berpisah Terus Bersatu: Ketika L1 Menjadi Rollup Dirinya Sendiri, Apa Akhir dari Ethereum?

链捕手16m yang lalu

Balapan Agen Berakhir, Super Workspace Naik Tahta

Selama sebulan terakhir, raksasa teknologi China — Tencent, Alibaba, dan ByteDance — tiba-tiba melakukan hal yang sama: mengurangi produk *Agent* AI yang tersebar dan mengonsolidasikannya ke dalam platform tunggal yang lebih besar. Tencent menggabungkan operasi QClaw ke dalam WorkBuddy, yang dianggap sebagai produk strategis. Alibaba mengintegrasikan tiga alat AI (QoderWork, Wukong, MuleRun) ke dalam "Qianwen Office" di bawah DingTalk. ByteDance mengubah fokus TRAE SOLO dari AI pemrograman menjadi TRAE Work untuk kolaborasi alur kerja. Perubahan ini menandai pergeseran industri dari fase eksplorasi di mana banyak *Agent* dibuat untuk setiap skenario, menuju konsolidasi. Insentifnya jelas: biaya komputasi tinggi dan tumpang tindih fungsional membuat model yang terfragmentasi tidak berkelanjutan. Kompetisi kini bergeser dari inovasi produk ke kemampuan menyederhanakan dan menciptakan *entry point* utama. Konsensus baru yang muncul adalah "super workstation" atau platform kerja terpadu. Alih-alih menargetkan hanya pengembang (pasar yang lebih kecil), fokus beralih ke miliaran pekerja kantoran. Pasar ini jauh lebih besar dalam hal pengguna dan potensi konsumsi token. Platform seperti WorkBuddy (Tencent), Qianwen Office (Alibaba), dan TRAE Work (ByteDance) bertujuan menjadi pintu masuk AI utama untuk pekerja, dengan memanfaatkan ekosistem yang ada (WeChat/Dokumen Tencent, DingTalk, Lark) untuk mengakses data perusahaan dan API. Peran *Agent* berevolusi dari produk yang terlihat menjadi kemampuan tak kasat mata yang tertanam dalam alur kerja. Implikasinya mendalam untuk perangkat lunak perusahaan. *User interface* (UI) tradisional mungkin menjadi kurang relevan karena pekerja berinteraksi melalui platform AI tunggal. Perangkat lunak backend (ERP, CRM, dll.) akan perlu mengekspos fungsinya sebagai "Skills" atau API yang terstandarisasi untuk diakses oleh *super workstation* ini, berpotensi mengubah model bisnis dari lisensi per pengguna menjadi pembayaran berdasarkan penggunaan. Singkatnya, era *Agent* sebagai produk mandiri yang jumlahnya meledak telah berakhir. Masa depan adalah platform kerja AI terpadu yang kuat, di mana *Agent* menjadi infrastruktur tak terlihat yang mengotomatiskan dan menghubungkan seluruh alur kerja digital. Teknologi matang pada akhirnya menghilang ke dalam latar belakang, seperti listrik atau protokol internet, menjadi fondasi yang penting tetapi tidak lagi dibicarakan.

marsbit48m yang lalu

Balapan Agen Berakhir, Super Workspace Naik Tahta

marsbit48m yang lalu

Trading

Spot

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli HYPE

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian Hyperliquid (HYPE) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli Hyperliquid (HYPE) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan Hyperliquid (HYPE) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan Hyperliquid (HYPE) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading Hyperliquid (HYPE)Lakukan trading Hyperliquid (HYPE) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

419 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2024.12.11Diperbarui pada 2026.06.02

Cara Membeli HYPE

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga HYPE (HYPE) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片