Is Operation Chokepoint 3.0 here? Here’s everything you need to know…

ambcryptoDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-08-03Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-08-04

Key Takeaways

Major banks like JPMorgan have been accused of trying to choke crypto innovation by charging exorbitant data and transfer fees. However, thanks to the SEC’s support and global growth, platforms like Coinbase remain undeterred.


In a recent development that could intensify the already-strained relationship between traditional finance and the crypto industry, concerns have emerged over U.S banks allegedly working behind the scenes to undermine major crypto platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood.

Are big banks curbing crypto?

On 31 July, Alex Rampell, General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, brought some concerns into the spotlight through a sharply worded newsletter. He raised questions about whether incumbent financial institutions are using unfair tactics to slow down crypto adoption.

He said, 

“Banks are aiming to implement their own Chokepoint 3.0 — charging insanely high fees to access data or move money to crypto and fintech apps — and, more concerningly, blocking crypto and fintech apps they don’t like.”

Following the Biden-era crackdown on crypto, which was often dubbed Operation Chokepoint 2.0, a new wave of financial pressure seems to be emerging from within the banking sector itself.

Operation Chokepoint 3.0

According to Rampell, U.S banks are quietly rolling out “Chokepoint 3.0.” He argued that banks like JPMorgan are now using high fees and restricted access to stifle fintech and crypto rivals.

As evidence of this alleged under-the-wraps operation, he pointed to JPMorgan now charging fintech apps for accessing customer data.

He warned that moves like these could cost platforms that utilize this data to provide services to their customers, many of which are new-age crypto companies, hundreds of millions of dollars.

“This isn’t about revenue—it’s about killing competition.”

He added, 

“If it suddenly costs $10 to move $100 into a Coinbase or Robinhood account, maybe fewer people will do it. Or if it costs $10 to get a cheaper loan from a fintech, maybe you’ll be forced to take a crappier one from JPM.”

Rampell further warned that banks could soon take more aggressive steps, such as blocking users from linking their accounts to crypto or fintech platforms altogether. Steps like these could effectively force consumers to stick with traditional financial services.

Drawing parallels to the Biden-era Operation Chokepoint, which sought to limit banking access for crypto firms, Rampell claimed that this new wave of obstruction isn’t coming from regulators, but from the banks themselves.

“JPMorganChase is an $800 billion company. Make no mistake: this isn’t about a new revenue stream. It’s about strangling competition. And if they get away with this, every bank will follow.”

Crypto exchanges stand strong

Despite mounting resistance from traditional banking giants, the crypto industry continues to push forward, with platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood expanding aggressively.

In fact, Coinbase is reportedly considering the launch of tokenized stocks and derivatives in the U.S. All while Robinhood is rolling out over 200 tokenized stocks and ETFs across 31 European countries.

Simultaneously, regulatory tailwinds under the new, relatively more crypto-friendly administration are helping reshape the landscape.

In fact, despite Rampell’s concerns over JPMorgan stifling the crypto sector, the bank’s 30 July announcement of a direct bank-to-wallet link with Coinbase signals a notable shift.

So, while banks may attempt to slow down crypto’s momentum, the industry’s evolution seems far from over. 

Share

Bacaan Terkait

Pengamatan Kepatuhan Laporan BIS: Risiko Sebenarnya Stablecoin, Bukan Hanya "Pelepasan Jangkar"

Laporan BIS mengingatkan bahwa risiko utama stablecoin tidak hanya terletak pada kemungkinan "depegging" (kehilangan patokan nilai), tetapi pada tantangan untuk memasukkannya ke dalam sistem keuangan yang dapat diidentifikasi, dipantau, dipertanggungjawabkan, dan diregulasi. Laporan berjudul "Anchoring Trust in Money" menekankan bahwa uang bukan sekadar produk teknologi. Kepercayaan datang dari kerangka hukum, likuiditas, unit akun bersama, dan integritas keuangan. Dalam sistem tradisional, bank bertanggung jawab atas KYC, pemantauan transaksi, dan pelaporan. Sebaliknya, stablecoin yang beredar di blockchain tanpa izin menghadapi risiko kombinasi: anonimitas semu, dompet non-kustodial, jembatan lintas rantai, dan kurangnya kejelasan subjek hukum. Transparansi pada rantai (on-chain) tidak sama dengan transparansi kepatuhan. Alamat yang terlihat tidak berarti identitas terungkap. Risiko stablecoin dapat merembes kembali ke keuangan tradisional melalui pintu masuk/keluar dana (on/off-ramp), platform perdagangan, dan akun pelanggan. Masa depan regulasi bukan melarang inovasi, tetapi "menanamkan aturan" ke dalam infrastruktur. Sistem keuangan token masa depan harus menyematkan identifikasi pelanggan, penyaringan risiko pra-transaksi, jejak data yang dapat diaudit, dan mekanisme kolaborasi lintas yurisdiksi sejak awal. Kepatuhan bukanlah penghalang, melainkan infrastruktur dasar yang memungkinkan inovasi keuangan berkelanjutan dan aman.

marsbit2j yang lalu

Pengamatan Kepatuhan Laporan BIS: Risiko Sebenarnya Stablecoin, Bukan Hanya "Pelepasan Jangkar"

marsbit2j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片