Who Was GameFi’s Biggest Winner in March | March Monthly Report

cryptoslateDipublikasikan tanggal 2022-04-14Terakhir diperbarui pada 2022-04-14

Abstrak

GameFi projects showed strong resistance to the negative macro environment in February and March, with many areas of development not only growing steadily but breaking out against market trends. 

GameFi projects showed strong resistance to the negative macro environment in February and March, with many areas of development not only growing steadily but breaking out against market trends. 

Footprint Analytics data shows that the number of GameFi game projects went up to 1,406, up 5% MoM. Trading volume at the end of the month was $129 million, up 154% MoM. Active users increased 56% from February. It is worth noting that the two game projects, Par War Online and DeFi Kingdoms, have increased by more than 25,000% in active users in the past 30 days.

The following will analyze the overall situation for GameFi in March using data.

GameFi Market Overview

GameFi Project Count Up 5% MoM, BSC Project Count Up 1303% YoY

Looking at the overall development of GameFi, many blockchains and gaming projects have emerged in the past year. According to Footprint Analytics, as of March 31, there were 35 blockchains participating in the GameFi sector, with 1,406 game projects in total, up 5% MoM.

Footprint Analytics - Number of GameFi Protocols by Chains

Footprint Analytics – Number of GameFi Protocols by Chains

Although most of the early projects were concentrated on Ethereum, due to the impact of network congestion and high gas fees, the poor user experience slowed down the pace of development. Instead, on-chain gaming projects such as BSC, Polygon, WAX and EOS are gradually increasing.

Notably, BSC has the fastest growing project count, up 1303% YoY. It has low gas fees and a throughput 5 times higher than Ethereum, with 449 gaming projects deployed on BSC by the end of March.

At the same time, some chain’s have faced the problem of having one project driving the entire ecosystem. 

For example, Splinterlands has single-handedly driven the development of Hive, which has been a Top 5 GameFi project by number of users for the past three months. There is also DeFi Kingdoms on Harmony, which surpassed Axie Infinity multiple times in March in daily trading volume the become the largest project according to this metric.

Footprint Analytics - Top 10 Games Ranking by Volume

Footprint Analytics – Top 10 Games Ranking by Volume

GameFi’s Trading Volume Picks Up, Active Users Up 56% MoM

The number of users is the key to the healthy operation of the entire GameFi ecosystem. If there are no users, the game project will become worthless. As of March 31, the total number of active users was 10.96 million, including 1.27 million new users. Compared to February, the number of active users increased by 56%.

Footprint Analytics - Monthly Gamers Trend

Footprint Analytics – Monthly Gamers Trend

Footprint Analytics - GameFi New Users by Chain 

Footprint Analytics – GameFi New Users by Chain

Par War Online and DeFi Kingdoms are the games that are driving GameFi’s rapid growth in active users. In the last 30 days, active user growth has been 28,931% and 25,319%, respectively. These two games are attracting users primarily because of their high revenue generation opportunities, such as the 300% to 400% APY LP for DeFi Kingdoms.

According to Footprint Analytics data, GameFi’s trading volume has been on a downward trend due to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. It was only after March 21 that volume picked up quickly, ending the month at $129 million, up 154 percent from February. It gradually recovered from a per capita volume of about $30 to $105 per capita.

Footprint Analytics - GameFi of Volume Trend

Footprint Analytics – GameFi of Volume Trend

Footprint Analytics - GameFi Volume and Transactions per User
Footprint Analytics - GameFi Volume and Transactions per User

Footprint Analytics – GameFi Volume and Transactions per User

As can be seen, although the GameFi market showed a downward trend in transaction volume due to the macroeconomic impact, it quickly rebounded after late March with more new users engaging in the GameFi sector. This means that sensible tokenomics and products can create games that engage users.

GameFi Monthly Investment Volume Increased 307% MoM

The data shows that GameFi investments in March were $458 million, an increase of 307% compared to February. In terms of investment sector, NFT and Web3 in the GameFi category saw the largest increases. 

As the number of GameFi protocols increases, the influx of blockchains such as BSC has broken the slow pace of Ethereum in the GameFi sector, contributing to the continued inflow of funding.

Footprint Analytics - Gaming Financing distribution

Footprint Analytics – Gaming Financing distribution

The financing received by GameFi projects mainly comes from seed rounds, the main reason behind this phenomenon is that the GameFi industry is in the early stage, and the development cycle of quality game projects is long, which is also the trend cycle for investors to observe the industry.

Footprint Analytics - Monthly Number of GameFi Projects Funded

Footprint Analytics – Monthly Number of GameFi Projects Funded

Game Projects That Accelerate GameFi’s out of the Circle in March

Footprint Analytics believes that GameFi is one of the most effective means of attracting new users into crypto. Opportunities with stronger gameplay and higher yields will become the main focus in GameFi in the future. 

Footprint Analytics -  Ranking of Daily Gamers (March 31)

Footprint Analytics –  Ranking of Daily Gamers (March 31)

Hot Game Projects

Having a multi-game ecosystem and interoperability between games is more attractive for user participation. 

From the number of users and the number of transactions, it can be seen that in March, there were many GameFi projects in which users participated in transactions. But the more popular ones were DeFi Kingdoms, StarSharks and Thetan Arena. The number of users and transactions of the three game projects are on the rise.

Footprint Analytics -  DeFi Kingdoms Users & Transactions

Footprint Analytics –  DeFi Kingdoms Users & Transactions

Thetan Arena has rapidly gained new users with its strong gameplay, mobile support, short game time (3 to 5 minutes per round), and low entry cost.

Footprint Analytics -  Thetan Arena Users & Transactions

Footprint Analytics –  Thetan Arena Users & Transactions

Starsharks is the BSC project with the largest user growth. It leverages the innovative Rent to Play model, where players can buy or rent NFTs through the platform’s native leasing feature to facilitate full utilization and liquidity of NFT assets.

Footprint Analytics -  StarSharks Users & Transactions

Footprint Analytics –  StarSharks Users & Transactions

Starsharks’ retention rate in March was 13%, and the overall user retention rate is declining. By comparison. Cryptokitties (a popular Ethereum chain game) had a retention rate of 1.2% in March. 

This shows that innovation and project liquidity are important to retain users.

Footprint Analytics -  Starsharks Monthly Retention Analysis

Footprint Analytics –  Starsharks Monthly Retention Analysis

Footprint Analytics -  Cryptokitties Monthly Retention Analysis

Footprint Analytics –  Cryptokitties Monthly Retention Analysis

Game Items with a Crash in the Number of Users

According to Footprint Analytics data, MetaverseMiner’s user numbers and transactions are crashing. Once players earn less revenue (in terms of a stable token or fiat), highly experimental games like this often face the loss of traffic.

Footprint Analytics -  MetaverseMiner Users & Transactions

Footprint Analytics –  MetaverseMiner Users & Transactions

March also saw one of the largest security breaches in GameFi history. On March 23, cybercriminals stole $622 million from Axie Infinity users in cryptocurrency. As a result, the number of users decreased.

Footprint Analytics -  Axie Infinity Users & Transactions

Footprint Analytics –  Axie Infinity Users & Transactions

Bacaan Terkait

Nilai Alokasi Emas sebagai "Asuransi Finansial" dalam Krisis Utang AS dan Latar Belakang Yield Tinggi

Dalam konteks krisis utang AS dan lingkungan suku bunga tinggi, emas berperan sebagai "asuransi finansial" untuk menjaga nilai portofolio. Harga emas telah naik signifikan, mencapai rekor tertinggi US$5.589 per ons pada Januari 2026, didorong oleh lima kekuatan utama: kekhawatiran fiskal AS yang tidak berkelanjutan, tren de-dolarisasi yang dipicu pembekuan aset bank sentral Rusia, ketegangan geopolitik di Timur Tengah (seperti penutupan Selat Hormuz), lonjakan permintaan investasi, dan ketidakpastian kebijakan Federal Reserve di bawah ketua baru, Kevin Warsh. Emas memiliki hubungan terbalik dengan suku bunga riil dan dolar AS. Bank sentral global, termasuk China (yang menambah cadangan selama 18 bulan berturut-turut), terus membeli emas dalam jumlah besar, menciptakan permintaan struktural baru. Investor dapat mendapatkan eksposur melalui kepemilikan fisik, ETF emas seperti GLD dan IAU (biaya rendah), atau ETF pertambangan emas seperti GDX yang menawarkan leverage namun berisiko lebih tinggi. Namun, emas juga menghadapi risiko jika suku bunga riil naik tajam, dolar menguat, ketegangan geopolitik mereda, atau terjadi tekanan jual di pasar. Dalam portofolio, alokasi 5-10% dianggap wajar sebagai lindung nilai. Perkembangan kunci yang perlu dipantau meliputi pergerakan suku bunga riil AS, perundingan AS-Iran mengenai Selat Hormuz, data pembelian bank sentral, dan sinyal kebijakan Fed. Logika mendasar untuk memegang emas sebagai diversifikasi tetap kuat di tengah ketidakpastian fiskal dan geopolitik saat ini.

marsbit16m yang lalu

Nilai Alokasi Emas sebagai "Asuransi Finansial" dalam Krisis Utang AS dan Latar Belakang Yield Tinggi

marsbit16m yang lalu

Celah 'Cetak Uang Tak Terbatas' Tersembunyi Empat Tahun, Privasi Coin ZEC Anjlok 50% dalam Sehari

Zcash (ZEC), mata uang kripto berfokus privasi, mengalami penurunan harga drastis hingga lebih dari 50% dalam sehari. Penyebabnya adalah pengungkapan sebuah kerentanan kritis dalam "kolam privasi" Orchard-nya, yang diaktifkan pada 2022. Peneliti keamanan Taylor Hornby menemukan bahwa celah ini memungkinkan penyerang secara teoritis membuat ZEC palsu dalam jumlah tak terbatas dan tidak terdeteksi dalam sistem privasi, dengan memanfaatkan kendala yang tidak lengkap dalam rangkaian bukti tanpa pengetahuan (zero-knowledge proof). Meskipun tim Zcash menegaskan kerentanan telah diperbaiki dan kemungkinan eksploitasi rendah, pasar dilanda kepanikan. Ketidakpastian utama adalah apakah ZEC palsu pernah dibuat dalam empat tahun terakhir dan bagaimana membuktikan bahwa hal itu tidak terjadi, mengingat sifat transaksi Orchard yang tersembunyi. Kepercayaan semakin terkikis ketika Arthur Hayes, pendiri BitMEX dan pendukung narasi ZEC, mengumumkan telah menjual seluruh portofolio ZEC-nya. Dia menyatakan kekhawatiran tentang ketidakmungkinan membuktikan secara kriptografis bahwa penambahan koin palsu tidak terjadi. Komunitas bereaksi dengan krisis kepercayaan, mempertanyakan keandalan audit dan perkembangan Zcash. Penemuan kerentanan dengan bantuan AI dalam waktu singkat, setelah bertahun-tahun tidak terdeteksi, semakin memperburuk sentimen. Penurunan harga mencerminkan kekhawatiran mendalam tentang integritas pasokan ZEC dan janji keamanan privasinya, mengubah koreksi harga menjadi krisis keyakinan yang lebih dalam.

Odaily星球日报32m yang lalu

Celah 'Cetak Uang Tak Terbatas' Tersembunyi Empat Tahun, Privasi Coin ZEC Anjlok 50% dalam Sehari

Odaily星球日报32m yang lalu

Seberapa Besar Risiko "Spiral Kematian" MSTR dan STRC?

Artikel ini membahas risiko "death spiral" pada struktur MSTR-STRC, yang dianalogikan dengan keruntuhan LUNA-UST namun memiliki perbedaan mendasar. MicroStrategy (MSTR) menjual 32 Bitcoin (senilai $2.5 juta), memicu penurunan pasar yang signifikan dan menekan harga MSTR serta saham preferennya, STRC. Kesamaan permukaan antara UST dan STRC terletak pada patokan harga, imbal hasil tinggi, dan risiko spiral. Namun, mekanisme stabilitas harga berbeda: UST mengandalkan algoritme penyesuaian pasokan LUNA, sedangkan STRC menyesuaikan tingkat dividen. STRC juga memiliki hak klaim prioritas dalam likuidasi. Dividen STRC terutama dibiayai dari penerbitan saham atau penjualan Bitcoin, berbeda dengan UST yang bergantung pada protokol Anchor. Inti keberlanjutan Strategy adalah kemampuan terus menerus mendapatkan pendanaan. Dengan cadangan dolar $9 miliar dan beban tahunan $17.12 miliar, mereka dapat bertahan sekitar 6 bulan. Syarat pendanaan (seperti mNAV > 1.22 untuk penerbitan saham) sangat bergantung pada kepercayaan pasar. Meski ada risiko umpan balik negatif antara MSTR dan STRC, struktur ini memiliki "rem": tidak ada keterkaitan otomatis langsung seperti di LUNA-UST, dan ada hak hukum bagi pemegang STRC. Leverage bersih Strategy hanya 11%. Analisis menunjukkan pemegang saham preferen masih mungkin mendapatkan kembali pokoknya selama harga Bitcoin tidak jatuh di bawah sekitar $26.300. Risiko kebangkrutan akibat utang sangat rendah. Enam bulan ke depan menjadi periode kritis, bertepatan dengan siklus Bitcoin dan ketahanan cadangan dolar. Masa depan Strategy bergantung pada kemampuannya melewati masa sulit ini dan melakukan deleveraging yang sehat untuk menghidupkan kembali mesin modalnya.

Foresight News1j yang lalu

Seberapa Besar Risiko "Spiral Kematian" MSTR dan STRC?

Foresight News1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片