[Featured Research]Blur: An NFT Flipper’s Paradise

MirrorDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-02-13Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-02-19

Abstrak

Blur is a community-driven NFT marketplace and aggregator designed with pro traders in mind. It introduces many new features and quality-of-life updates over other leading marketplaces, making the NFT trading experience more streamlined and intuitive.

Key Takeaways

  • Blur is a new NFT marketplace that caters to expert and high-volume traders.
  • The platform introduces several highly-requested features such as sorting NFTs by trait floor price and real-time price feeds.
  • However, Blur's many features and detailed dashboard may make it daunting to use for more casual NFT buyers.

Blur takes NFT trading to the next level with a host of new, innovative features.

What Is Blur?

A new NFT marketplace is making waves on Ethereum.

Blur is a community-driven NFT marketplace and aggregator designed with pro traders in mind. It introduces many new features and quality-of-life updates over other leading marketplaces, making the NFT trading experience more streamlined and intuitive.

The platform aggregates NFT listings from leading marketplaces like OpenSea, LooksRare, and X2Y2, while also allowing users to list their assets natively on Blur. Unlike many other NFT marketplaces that charge a commission on trades, Blur maintains 0% fees for selling NFTs.

The marketplace was first announced in March 2022 and attracted a strong social following by encouraging those who found out about the in-development platform to refer friends to a waitlist. Those with the most referrals and a few select community members were given access to test Blur in closed beta before it launched to the public on October 19.

Crypto Briefing took a look at Blur to see if the latest development in the world of NFT trading has been worth the wait. We’ve judged it in five key areas: ease of use, features, team and backers, tokenomics, and how much traction it has generated so far. Here’s what we thought.

Ease of Use (3/5)

Getting started with Blur is simple. After navigating to the platform’s landing page, users are prompted to connect their Web3 wallet (it currently supports MetaMask and WalletConnect wallets) and start exploring the various NFT collections on the site.

Collections are listed in order of their one-day trading volume by default and are presented in a way that shows key data points such as floor price, number of owners, and various price and volume metrics at a glance. Users can also see all the Ethereum-based NFTs in their wallet via Blur’s portfolio tab. Here, it’s easy to track listed NFTs, their rarities, estimated collection value, and even a rough lifetime profit and loss statement.

Blur’s interface is very customizable. Users can switch between several views, such as lists and tiles, when looking through collections, depending on their preference. Unlike OpenSea, where users need to switch tabs to see sales history or other analytics, on Blur displays everything on a single page, making it easier to access and compare all relevant collection data. Other small accessibility features, such as dark/light mode, gas fee trackers, and an ETH price feed, also come as standard.

However, while Blur’s interface isn’t lacking in detail, the amount of data shown on screen can be daunting for less experienced users. The platform feels like it’s targeting advanced users and is more reminiscent of a Bloomberg Terminal than the user-friendly interfaces of eBay or Amazon. With so much information on the screen at one time, navigating the interface can take a bit of getting used to. But for those willing to take the time to get used to what Blur has to offer, the benefits over other NFT marketplaces are clear.

Overall, while Blur isn’t difficult to use, it could definitely be made more welcoming. Additionally, though the platform’s retro wave aesthetic gives it plenty of character, the harsh orange tones and clashing monochrome palette may make the user experience abrasive for some.

Features (5/5)

What Blur may lack in accessibility, it more than makes up for with its abundance of innovative features.

The platform claims that it runs up to ten times faster than other NFT aggregators, showing pending transactions on NFTs in less than a second, and updating listings every four seconds. The lightning-fast pending transactions display, combined with near-instant metadata updates on collection art reveals, gives Blur users a huge advantage in sniping NFTs. Additionally, Blur’s gas priority presets help users outcompete those buying NFTs through other exchanges or aggregators by getting their purchase transactions processed first. The cherry on top is that Blur’s contracts are more optimized than other marketplaces, saving users up to 17% on gas fees.

Another widely-praised feature is how Blur’s interface clearly displays the rarity of different NFT traits and even allows users to see the floor price for specific attributes. Instead of trawling through listings and past sales to accurately value your above-floor-price NFTs, Blur does all the hard work for you by finding the lowest listings for each individual trait and presenting the data in an easily digestible format. This feature helps users accurately value their own assets and can also aid those looking to snipe NFTs with undervalued attributes.

Blur also excels ahead of its competitors by offering tools to help users “sweep the floor”—slang for buying multiple of the lowest-priced NFTs from a given collection. All collections feature a floor depth chart showing how many NFTs are listed at various intervals above the floor, helping prospective sweepers visualize how their purchases will impact the market. Sweeping on Blur also includes a couple of important quality-of-life updates, such as skipping NFTs that already have pending transactions (again, helping save gas) and skipping over NFTs marked as suspicious or stolen. And when it comes to reselling those swept NFTs, Blur has users covered with its gas-optimized bulk listing and delisting functions.

The only real criticism of Blur’s features is that they are currently only available for Ethereum-based NFTs. However, the Blur team has hinted that it plans to integrate NFTs on other chains such as Polygon in the future.

Team and Backers (4/5)

In March 2022, Blur raised $11 million in its seed round led by leading crypto venture capital firm Paradigm. As one of crypto’s most successful VC firms, Paradigm’s investment in Blur should not be underestimated. The firm has previously backed many winners in the NFT space, with marketplaces OpenSea and Magic Eden also holding spots in its portfolio.

The raise also saw participation from several major players in the NFT and crypto scene, such as the pseudonymous collectors 6529, Cozomo de’ Medici, Zeneca, and MoonOverlord. Support from NFT thought leaders like these are also a good sign and shows that Blur’s incentives are likely more closely aligned with the broader NFT community.

However, while the quality of Blur’s backers and investors is high, there is still one important factor that users should understand. The entire Blur team is currently anonymous, choosing not to reveal their real-life identities and instead communicate through pseudonymous online personas. Anonymous teams like Blur are not uncommon in crypto—some of the space’s best and most trusted developers have also chosen to remain anonymous. However, when a team is anonymous, it limits its accountability. It is entirely possible a team member could turn rogue and damage the project in the future. Another concern is that a core team member’s identity could be revealed as someone with a less than the reputable background, as was the case when Wonderland’s 0xSifu was revealed to be the former convict and QuadrigaCX co-founder Michael Patryn.

Although we don’t know the identities of the Blur team, at least some of those who have invested likely know who is behind it. Investors like Paradigm have a good track record of investing in reputable projects, reducing the risk of nasty surprises. Additionally, Blur has revealed that its team members hold experience across MIT, Citadel, Five Rings Capital, Twitch, Brex, Square, and Y Combinator, further adding to the project’s reputability.

Tokenomics (3/5)

There’s not much to be said about Blur’s token structure at the moment. Although the project has announced a BLUR governance token will launch through an airdrop in January 2023, essential details such as the maximum supply and seed investor allocation have yet to be revealed. Still, the fact that Blur has confirmed a token puts it ahead of the leading NFT marketplace OpenSea in terms of decentralization and rewarding its community.

Blur has been very clear about what users can do in the token launch run-up to receive a BLUR airdrop. Firstly, anyone who traded NFTs on Ethereum within the past six months automatically qualifies for at least one care package of BLUR tokens. From here, there are several things users who both did and did not receive the first airdrop can do to earn tokens in a second, larger drop scheduled for January.

According to a Blur blog post, users can increase the amount of BLUR tokens they receive in January by listing NFTs from active collections, using the platform’s various listing tools, such as listing by floor price or trait floor price, and placing at least three sweeps on collections through Blur. Additionally, users who respect collection royalties instead of setting them to 0 will also receive more tokens. Finally, Blur loyalty will also affect the rarity of care packages received, with higher rarities yielding more tokens. To ensure a user’s loyalty stays high, they must list NFTs on Blur at the same or a lower price than on other marketplaces.

Traction (4/5)

In the two weeks since Blur’s public launch, it has generated a good amount of use among NFT enthusiasts. According to the official Blur Twitter account, the platform outpaced Gem as the highest-volume NFT aggregator just three days after its release.

However, it wasn’t until the highly-anticipated Art Gobblers NFT mint on October 31 that Blur’s true potential was revealed. Thanks to Blur’s real-time data feed of NFT sales and listings, those looking to trade the Art Gobblers drop flocked to the platform in droves. Blur recorded a daily trading volume of 8,453.7 ETH, not far behind leading marketplace OpenSea’s 12,275 ETH.

A Dune dashboard created by user takamori shows that the Art Gobbler’s boost pushed Blur ahead of rival marketplaces X2Y2 and LooksRare, placing it firmly in the number two spot behind OpenSea for 30-day trading volume. Additionally, comparing Dune data from users’ sealaunch and rchen8 reveals that since Blur launched on October 19, OpenSea’s Ethereum trading volumes have registered a visible decline while Blur’s increased, indicating that a significant amount of trading volume has left the top marketplace for Blur.

On social media, Blur is also off to a strong start, racking up over 127,000 Twitter followers and 108,000 Discord members. Even if only a fraction of these followers start using the platform, Blur should be able to capture a significant chunk of the NFT market share away from other platforms. However, it’s also worth noting that Blur’s airdrop campaign is likely helping to increase its trading volumes. Many NFT traders will be making a point to use Blur to increase their allocation of BLUR tokens. Whether these users will remain after the January airdrop remains to be seen.

While it’s still early days for Blur, the platform has done very well to capture as much use as it has in such a short amount of time. Blur is clearly on its way to becoming a valuable and lasting piece of Web3 infrastructure. However, as the platform’s target audience is mostly expert traders, Blur may have difficulty growing with newer entrants to the crypto and NFT space. This could limit the platform’s medium to long-term growth if it doesn’t find a way to address this issue.

Final Thoughts

Blur shows that despite the current crypto winter, there are still active and dedicated teams of developers who believe in the long-term vision of crypto technology. From a technical perspective, Blur blows other NFT marketplaces and aggregators out of the water, and its use during the Art Gobblers mint is a testament to this fact.

Still, although the quality of what Blur offers is not in question, whether it can find mass adoption might be. While there is a dedicated community of hardcore NFT flippers who will likely exclusively use Blur going forward, newer or more casual NFT buyers may not see the features Blur offers a worthwhile tradeoff over the ease of use provided by marketplaces like OpenSea. As crypto and NFT adoption increases, Blur also has the potential to grow its user base. However, if Blur wants a shot at overtaking OpenSea, it will need to find a way to stay true to expert traders while making its platform more accessible and friendly for a broader audience. Overall, Crypto Briefing gives Blur a 4/5 rating.

Bacaan Terkait

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

Sebuah koalisi yang terdiri dari pemimpin Katolik, kelompok yang sejalan dengan penegak hukum, dan advokat anti-penjualan manusia memperingatkan bahwa RUU CLARITY Act berpotensi melemahkan pengamanan yang digunakan untuk memerangi kejahatan yang dimungkinkan oleh crypto. Kritik ini berfokus pada ketentuan yang akan melindungi pengembang perangkat lunak non-kustodial agar tidak diperlakukan seperti penyedia pengiriman uang. Perdebatan ini menyentuh salah satu pertanyaan tersulit dalam regulasi crypto: bagaimana membedakan perangkat lunak netral dari perantara keuangan. Para pendukung crypto berargumen bahwa pengembang yang menerbitkan kode non-kustodial tidak boleh diregulasi seperti bursa atau prosesor pembayaran. Sementara para pengkritik khawatir pengecualian yang terlalu luas dapat menyulitkan pelacakan keuangan ilegal. Perangkat lunak non-kustodial adalah inti dari DeFi. Arsitektur ini menciptakan tantangan penegakan hukum ketika aktor jahat menggunakan alat yang sama. Meski RUU CLARITY Act bertujuan menciptakan aturan struktur pasar yang lebih jelas, penentangan ini menunjukkan bahwa perdebatan kebijakan juga menyangkut isu seperti perdagangan manusia, pengelakan sanksi, dan visibilitas bagi penegak hukum. Tekanan ini tidak berarti RUU tersebut mati, tetapi mungkin membutuhkan amandemen, perlindungan yang lebih sempit, atau persyaratan pelaporan tambahan untuk mengatasi kekhawatiran tentang celah bagi keuangan ilegal. Bagi perusahaan crypto, aturan yang lebih jelas dapat membuka investasi, namun jika RUU ini dianggap melemahkan pencegahan kejahatan, jalur politisnya bisa menjadi lebih sulit.

bitcoinist3j yang lalu

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

bitcoinist3j yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

**Rangkuman: Tuduhan Penipuan dan Pertanyaan Seputar Blockstream** Tahun ini, Blockstream, perusahaan kripto yang didirikan oleh perintis Bitcoin Adam Back, menjadi sorotan. Awalnya, karena investasi Jeffrey Epstein pada 2014 dan spekulasi bahwa Back bisa jadi Satoshi Nakamoto. Namun, kontroversi utama muncul dari laporan investigasi oleh akun NatInfoSec yang menuduh skema obligasi penambangan Bitcoin Blockstream (BMN) berpotensi penipuan mirip Ponzi. **Titik Tuduhan Utama:** 1. **Kapasitas dan Pembayaran yang Dipertanyakan:** NatInfoSec menyatakan untuk memenuhi kewajiban BMN, Blockstream membutuhkan daya komputasi (hashrate) 20-45 EH/s, tetapi dashboard perusahaan hanya menunjukkan 15 EH/s. Tidak ada bukti publik yang memadai (data listrik, impor perangkat keras, atribusi pool penambangan) untuk mendukung skala yang diklaim. Klausul dalam kontrak BMN juga memungkinkan Blockstream membayar dengan Bitcoin dari sumber mana pun, mempertanyakan asal hasil yang dibayarkan kepada investor. 2. **Imbal Hasil Tinggi yang Mencurigakan:** Obligasi BMN menawarkan imbal hasil tetap hingga sekitar 20% per tahun, angka yang sulit dipertahankan di industri penambangan Bitcoin yang sangat fluktuatif. Beberapa penawaran juga diklaim melibatkan perpanjangan pokok ke obligasi baru dengan imbal lebih tinggi. 3. **Masalah Pengungkapan dan Masa Lalu Eksekutif:** Christopher William Cook, figur kunci di divisi penambangan Blockstream dan CEO Exacore (entitas operasional terkait), memiliki catatan kriminal. Ia dihukum pada 2008 karena penipuan surat (mail fraud) dan menjalani hukuman penjara. Informasi ini tidak diungkapkan dalam dokumen penawaran BMN. Materi pemasaran juga diduga membesar-besarkan keterkaitan Cook dengan NASA. 4. **Keterkaitan dengan BSTR dan SPAC:** NatInfoSec mempertanyakan apakah potensi liabilitas BMN dan latar belakang Cook telah diungkapkan dengan benar dalam proses persiapan IPO perusahaan terkait Bitcoin, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), yang melibatkan Adam Back. **Tanggapan dan Debat Komunitas:** BitMEX Research menganalisis tuduhan tersebut, mengakui kemungkinan catatan kriminal Cook dan kekhawatiran atas imbal hasil tinggi. Namun, mereka berpendapat bahwa beberapa tuduhan kurang bukti atau menyesatkan, menekankan pemisahan struktur hukum antara BMN, Blockstream, dan BSTR. Perdebatan di komunitas berfokus pada **kemampuan untuk memverifikasi** hashrate dan hasil penambangan yang sebenarnya yang mendasari BMN. Para pendukung seperti Samson Mow membela operasi penambangan Blockstream, sementara para pengkritik meminta bukti verifikasi independen yang jelas. **Pertanyaan yang Belum Terjawab untuk BMN:** Kontroversi ini menyisakan beberapa pertanyaan kunci tentang BMN: skala sebenarnya dan batas tanggung jawab, kecukupan hashrate penambangan untuk mendukung pembayaran, sumber imbal hasil tetap yang tinggi, kemampuan memverifikasi aset Bitcoin yang digunakan untuk pembayaran, serta peran dan kepentingan Cook. Sampai saat ini, Blockstream belum memberikan tanggapan resmi yang menyeluruh terhadap berbagai tuduhan ini.

marsbit7j yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

marsbit7j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

**Ringkasan Artikel: Komunitas Reddit r/wallstreetbets Menargetkan Wendy's (WEN), Apakah Ini GME Berikutnya?** Pada 24 Juni, saham Wendy's (WEN) melonjak setelah sebuah postingan berjudul "We need to save Wendy's" viral di subreddit r/wallstreetbets (WSB), memicu spekulasi bahwa ini bisa menjadi "meme stock" atau sasaran "short squeeze" berikutnya, mirip dengan fenomena GameStop (GME) pada 2021. Postingan tersebut, yang menggunakan guyonan lama di komunitas WSB tentang bekerja di Wendy's setelah investasi gagal, berhasil menarik perhatian dan mendorong diskusi untuk membeli saham atau opsi beli (call options). Saham WEN naik lebih dari 20% dalam perdagangan pra-pasar, dengan volume perdagangan yang sangat tinggi. Artikel ini menganalisis apakah WEN memiliki potensi untuk menjadi "squeeze" sistematis seperti GME. Beberapa faktor pendukung yang teridentifikasi adalah: * **Rasio Short Interest yang Cukup Tinggi:** Sekitar 31.83% saham beredar dipinjam untuk dijual (short), yang dapat menjadi bahan bakar jika harga naik dan para pedagang short terpaksa membeli kembali saham. * **Perhatian Komunitas yang Kuat:** Wendy's memiliki identitas merek yang mudah dikenali dan cocok dengan budaya meme di WSB. Namun, analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi WEN **tidak sama ekstremnya dengan GME tahun 2021**: * **Struktur Short yang Tidak Seekstrem GME:** Rasio short interest WEN (31.83%) jauh di bawah level GME yang pernah melebihi 100%, sehingga tekanan untuk menutup posisi short tidak separah saat itu. * **Bukti untuk "Gamma Squeeze" Masih Lemah:** Meski ada diskusi tentang opsi beli, belum ada bukti kuat bahwa pembelian opsi tersebut sudah cukup masif untuk memaksa market maker (penjual opsi) membeli saham dalam jumlah besar sebagai lindung nilai, yang dapat memicu akselerasi harga berkelanjutan. * **Sejarah sebagai Meme Stock:** WEN pernah mengalami lonjakan serupa pada 2021 yang akhirnya mereda, menunjukkan bahwa antusiasme komunitas tidak selalu diterjemahkan menjadi kenaikan harga yang berkelanjutan. * **Narasi Dasar yang Terbatas:** Kampanye "selamatkan Wendy's" lebih merupakan lelucon komunitas daripada didasarkan pada kesulitan finansial perusahaan yang nyata. **Kesimpulan:** Pergerakan harga WEN menunjukkan bahwa perhatian dari komunitas retail seperti WSB masih dapat dengan cepat menggerakkan harga saham. Namun, bukti saat ini lebih mengarah pada **"meme pop" jangka pendek atau "squeeze" ringan**, bukan tekanan short sistematis skala penuh seperti GME. Keberlanjutan rally akan bergantung pada apakah diskusi berkembang di luar satu postingan panas, volume perdagangan tinggi bertahan selama beberapa hari, dan aktivitas opsi beli meningkat secara signifikan untuk menciptakan putaran umpan balik yang memperkuat kenaikan harga.

marsbit7j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

marsbit7j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片