Who Are the Real Winners in the 'Tokenization' Narrative?

marsbitPublié le 2026-03-20Dernière mise à jour le 2026-03-20

Résumé

The article explores the real beneficiaries of the tokenization narrative and concludes that nearly everyone stands to gain, though the timing, reasons, and mechanisms differ significantly. Retail investors benefit through democratized access, as tokenization removes systemic barriers that previously excluded them from high-yield assets like private credit. They can now invest with small amounts, trade 24/7, access global assets, and use programmable capital in DeFi strategies. Issuers gain from faster, cheaper, and broader fundraising. Tokenization reduces settlement times from weeks to minutes, lowers operational costs through smart contracts, and enables innovative product designs like tranched risk products and dynamic yield mechanisms. Institutions are drawn to tokenization for its operational efficiencies: near-instant settlement (T+0) reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital, and cuts costs. Major players like BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs are already implementing tokenized solutions for these advantages. Infrastructure builders—such as custodians, compliance providers, and data oracles—are positioned to become the foundational layer of a multi-trillion-dollar market, akin to "picks and shovels" in a gold rush. Emerging markets experience a transformative impact, as tokenization and stablecoins offer financial inclusion to billions. They provide access to dollar-denominated assets, inflation-resistant savings, low-cost remittances, and real-time payrol...

I discussed this topic last week, and Andy from Rollup also raised related questions. Everyone keeps asking: Who are the real beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization?

The real answer is: Almost everyone benefits, but the reasons, timing, and underlying logic are completely different.

Retail Investor Perspective: From Spectators to Participants

For decades, retail investors have been systematically excluded from high-yield assets. Not because the assets are too complex, but because the traditional financial system is designed for large amounts of capital, accredited investors, and inefficient clearing—small investments simply aren't cost-effective.

Tokenization doesn't just lower the barrier; it dismantles the entire system that creates barriers.

Consider what it's like for retail investors to invest in private credit now:

· Minimum investment typically $250K–$1M

· Must be an accredited investor

· Lock-up period of 3–7 years

· Almost no secondary market

· Completely at the mercy of fund managers

Once such a fund is tokenized:

· Fractional ownership: Invest with $100, not $1M. Smart contracts solve the high cost of managing small amounts.

· 7×24 trading: No market open/close times, no clearing windows, no waiting for bank transfers.

· Globally accessible: Retail investors in Lagos, Jakarta, and São Paulo can buy the same tokenized treasury fund as those in Manhattan.

· Composability: Tokenized assets are programmable capital. They can be used as loan collateral, in vault strategies, or transferred across platforms—no broker needed.

Deeper insight: Retail investors gain not just "cheaper access to the same things," but a whole new set of financial behaviors.

Within an afternoon, one can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, use them as collateral to borrow stablecoins, and then deploy them into yield strategies—all self-custodied, without calling a wealth manager.

Before tokenization, retail investors were spectators in the global capital markets. After tokenization, they become participants. The difference is immense.

Issuer Perspective: Faster Funding, Broader Channels, Lower Costs

For issuers, the logic is simple: Tokenization enables faster funding, lower costs, and an exponentially larger investor base. Every issuer cares about these three points, and tokenization delivers on all of them.

The shift from traditional issuance to tokenized issuance:

· Traditional settlement takes weeks to months; tokenization completes in minutes to hours.

· Traditional methods require custodians, transfer agents, brokers, and clearinghouses; tokenization uses smart contracts for distribution, compliance, and clearing.

· Traditional methods are limited by geography, regulation, and minimums; tokenization is global, 7×24, and accessible with small amounts.

· Traditional manual reconciliation, quarterly reports, and shareholder registry upkeep are extremely costly; tokenization enables automated reporting, on-chain transparency, and real-time data.

· Traditional product structures are rigid; tokenization supports tiered design, flexible redemptions, and dynamic yield mechanisms.

A traditional private credit fund typically serves 50–200 institutions, with a fundraising round taking months. A tokenized fund can serve thousands of investors: compliance is programmable, account opening is digital, and the barrier is extremely low—retail investors, small family offices, and crypto-native institutions can all participate.

Tokenization also enables entirely new product design capabilities:

· Creating tiered products with different risk/return profiles within a single smart contract

· Flexible daily/weekly/monthly redemptions, executed automatically by code

· Dynamic yield mechanisms based on on-chain data

· Hybrid products combining fixed income with DeFi yields

These are too costly to implement in traditional finance but are simple in a tokenized system.

Institutional Perspective: Clearing, Transparency, Structural Risk Reduction

Institutions don't care about crypto concepts or decentralization ideals. What they are truly obsessed with is: counterparty risk, operational costs, reporting accuracy, and regulatory compliance.

And tokenization offers quantifiable improvements in every one of these areas. This is why top global financial institutions are all entering the space.

The current financial system operates on at least T+2 settlement. This means that for two days after a trade:

· Counterparty default risk persists

· Capital is tied up and cannot be reused

· Reconciliation, margin, and collateral management are extremely complex

Tokenization makes settlement nearly instantaneous (T+0). This alone can:

· Release vast amounts of capital tied up in settlement cycles

· Eliminate counterparty risk during the settlement period

· Greatly reduce reliance on back-end systems like clearinghouses and central counterparties

This transformation could bring about potential annual efficiency gains of approximately $2.4 trillion globally. By 2030, conservative short-term annual gains are estimated between $31 billion and $130 billion.

Major players already in action:

· BlackRock launched the tokenized money market fund BUIDL, with over $1 billion in assets

· Franklin Templeton put fund shares on-chain via BENJI

· J.P. Morgan built the Onyx platform for tokenized repo and collateral management

· Goldman Sachs, HSBC, UBS, Citi are all piloting or building tokenization infrastructure

They're not in it because blockchain is trendy, but because it's cheaper, faster, and lower risk.

Infrastructure Builder Perspective: The "Pickaxe Sellers" in a Trillion-Dollar Market

In every major transformation, the winners are those who build the infrastructure. The picks in the gold rush, the servers for the internet, AWS for cloud computing.

Real-world asset tokenization is building a new financial infrastructure. The companies that get it right will become the underlying pipes for a market exceeding $11 trillion.

Essential modules for this ecosystem:

· Custodians: Ensure the legal correspondence between on-chain tokens and real-world assets—one of the most critical roles.

· Compliance layer: KYC/AML, investor accreditation, geographic restrictions, cross-border compliance—all programmable.

· Issuance platforms: Enable anyone to tokenize assets legally and simply.

· Clearing and settlement infrastructure: Enable instant settlement, connecting on-chain and traditional banking systems.

· Oracles and data: Bring net asset value, interest rates, defaults, real estate prices, commodity prices on-chain—the foundation for token pricing.

· Legal and structuring services: SPVs, trusts, fund structures—without a legal underlying, a token is just a string of digits.

Emerging Markets Perspective: The Overlooked True Revolution

Rarely discussed in Western finance circles, but potentially the most important part: For billions in emerging markets, tokenization isn't "better finance"—it's the first financial system truly built for them.

Financial challenges in many emerging markets:

· High inflation, rapid local currency depreciation;

· Large unbanked or underbanked populations;

· Capital controls, preventing allocation to foreign currency and overseas assets;

· Cross-border remittance fees of 5%–10%, taking days;

· Extremely low local asset returns, failing to beat inflation.

Tokenization + stablecoins change all of this:

· Earn dollar yields without a U.S. bank account. Someone in Argentina can hold tokenized U.S. Treasuries, earning dollar yields via stablecoins. All that's needed is a wallet and internet—no accredited investor status, no wire transfers. In a country with 40% annual currency depreciation, this isn't an improvement; it's a lifeline.

· Stablecoins become savings tools. In high-inflation countries, USDC and USDT have become de facto savings vehicles for preserving value. Tokenized assets add yield on top of this.

· Ordinary people can invest in top global assets. People in Southeast Asia and Africa previously had almost no access to: U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade bonds, private credit, global real estate. Tokenization makes these assets fractional and 7×24 accessible.

· Instant, low-cost cross-border transfers. Remittances are vital for many economies, but traditional methods have high fees and slow processing. Stablecoins and tokenized assets complete transfers in minutes at minimal cost.

· Real-time payroll settlement. Wages can be paid on-chain in real-time; employees don't have to wait for payday and can withdraw anytime.

Globally, about 1.4 billion adults are unbanked, and billions more are underbanked. Tokenization + stablecoins offer the first path to truly large-scale financial inclusion that doesn't rely on traditional banks.

For these people, tokenization isn't just "making finance a bit better"—it's making finance accessible for the first time.

Complete Beneficiary Map

· Retail investors: Gain access and composability—low barrier, global, programmable capital.

· Issuers: Faster funding, lower costs, broader investor base, more flexible products.

· Institutions: Real-time settlement, risk reduction, lower operational costs, increased transparency.

· Regulators: On-chain traceability, embedded compliance—shifting from passive to real-time, precise oversight.

· Infrastructure providers: Become the underlying pipes of a trillion-dollar market, with massive long-term gains.

· Emerging markets: Truly achieve financial inclusion, solving structural issues like inflation, controls, and lack of services.

Essential Risk Disclaimer

Tokenization is not a panacea:

· It cannot fix bad assets

· It does not guarantee liquidity

· It does not make risks disappear

Tokenized bonds can still default; tokenized real estate can still drop in value. If the legal structure is weak, custody is unreliable, oracles are fraudulent, or the issuer doesn't manage the asset, the token is worthless.

All the benefits are real, supported by logic and reality, but they only materialize if the legal, custody, compliance, and operational aspects are all done correctly.

The token is just the final piece; everything underlying it is what truly matters.

Tokenization is not magic; it's infrastructure. And infrastructure only works if built correctly.

So, Who Benefits the Most?

Frankly: It depends on the timeframe.

· Short-term: Institutions and issuers win first

They save real money immediately on clearing, compliance, and operations—no need for retail investors or secondary markets, just better infrastructure.

· Medium-term: Infrastructure and technology providers win

By 2030, the market size could reach $11 trillion. Companies in custody, compliance, issuance, and clearing will become industry standards.

· Long-term: Retail investors and emerging market populations ultimately benefit the most

When infrastructure matures, compliance stabilizes, and secondary markets deepen, anyone globally can invest in any asset, 7×24, using their phone.

So, the answer to "who benefits the most" isn't a single group. Rather: Everyone benefits, just at different times, for different reasons, in different ways.

Questions liées

QWho are the main beneficiaries of real-world asset tokenization according to the article?

AAlmost everyone benefits, but in different ways, at different times, and for different underlying reasons. The key beneficiaries include retail investors, issuers, institutions, infrastructure builders, and emerging markets.

QHow does tokenization specifically benefit retail investors?

ATokenization transforms retail investors from spectators into participants by lowering investment thresholds (e.g., $100 instead of $1 million), enabling 24/7 global access, providing composability (e.g., using tokens as collateral for loans), and allowing self-custody without intermediaries.

QWhat advantages do institutions gain from asset tokenization?

AInstitutions benefit from near-instant settlement (T+0), which reduces counterparty risk, frees up capital tied in清算 cycles, lowers operational costs, improves transparency, and enhances regulatory compliance.

QWhy is tokenization particularly transformative for emerging markets?

AFor emerging markets, tokenization provides the first accessible financial system by enabling dollar-denominated收益 (e.g., via tokenized U.S. treasuries), offering stablecoin savings tools, allowing global asset investment, facilitating low-cost cross-border transfers, and enabling real-time payroll结算—addressing issues like high inflation and limited banking access.

QWhat are the critical risks associated with tokenization mentioned in the article?

ATokenization cannot fix bad assets, guarantee liquidity, or eliminate risks. It relies on proper legal structures, reliable custody, accurate oracles, and competent asset management. Without these, tokenized assets may become worthless.

Lectures associées

STRC a décroché : La première communication financière post-décrochage, comment Strategy répare sa dynamique capitalistique ?

Le fournisseur de trésorerie Bitcoin Strategy a publié ses résultats pour le deuxième trimestre 2026, enregistrant une perte nette de 8,22 milliards de dollars en raison de la volatilité du BTC, malgré une légère hausse de son chiffre d'affaires. La principale préoccupation des investisseurs reste la capacité de l'entreprise à rétablir la durabilité de son modèle de financement après le décrochage de son instrument de prédilection, le STRC, qui échange toujours en dessous de sa valeur nominale cible. Strategy continue d'accumuler des BTC, détenant désormais 843 775 unités, mais sa stratégie de capital a évolué. Elle adopte désormais une gestion active et bilatérale, utilisant non seulement ses réserves de liquidités et ses rachats d'actions pour gérer les pressions, mais aussi un nouveau « programme de monétisation » ayant déjà vendu pour 218 millions de dollars de BTC. La priorité absolue reste de ramener le STRC à sa valeur nominale. La direction s'engage à ne pas émettre de nouvelles actions STRC à escompte et mise sur l'augmentation de ses réserves de trésorerie (3,75 milliards de dollars) et sur un programme de rachat de titres de 1 milliard de dollars pour restaurer la confiance. Un objectif de réalignement d'ici le 8 septembre a été fixé. L'avenir du modèle de Strategy dépend à court terme du succès de la ré-ancre du STRC, et à long terme d'une reprise du prix du Bitcoin, fondement ultime de sa logique de croissance.

marsbitIl y a 33 mins

STRC a décroché : La première communication financière post-décrochage, comment Strategy répare sa dynamique capitalistique ?

marsbitIl y a 33 mins

Le premier rapport financier après le décrochage majeur du STRC, comment Strategy répare-t-elle la roue du capital ?

STRA, la société trésorerie Bitcoin, a publié ses résultats financiers du deuxième trimestre 2026. Malgré des revenus de 122 millions de dollars (en hausse de 6.9%), elle a enregistré une perte nette de 8.22 milliards de dollars, principalement due à des pertes non réalisées sur ses réserves de Bitcoin, évaluées à 550 milliards de dollars pour 843 775 BTC. Le rapport se concentre sur la réponse de STRA à la crise de son instrument de financement privilégié, le STRC, qui s'est décroché de sa valeur nominale cible de 100 dollars, tombant jusqu'à 74.57 dollars. La priorité absolue de l'entreprise est de ramener le STRC à son ancrage. Pour cela, elle ne procédera à aucune nouvelle émission à prix réduit, maintient son taux de dividende à 12% et utilise un programme de rachat de 10 milliards de dollars pour acquérir des STRC décotés sur le marché. STRA vise une stabilisation d'ici début septembre. Parallèlement, STRA opère un changement stratégique majeur dans la gestion de son capital. Elle passe d'un modèle linéaire "lever des fonds -> acheter du BTC" à une gestion active et multidirectionnelle de ses quatre piliers : Bitcoin, liquidités en dollars, actions ordinaires (MSTR) et titres de crédit numérique (STRC). Le Bitcoin n'est plus seulement une réserve à accumuler mais peut être monétisé si nécessaire. L'entreprise optimise activement sa structure de dette et joue sur les opportunités d'arbitrage entre ses différents actifs. En résumé, la capacité de STRA à relancer sa "roue du capital" dépend à court terme de la réussite du réancrage du STRC, et à long terme de la reprise d'une tendance haussière du prix du Bitcoin, fondement ultime de son modèle économique.

Odaily星球日报Il y a 38 mins

Le premier rapport financier après le décrochage majeur du STRC, comment Strategy répare-t-elle la roue du capital ?

Odaily星球日报Il y a 38 mins

Coinbase affiche des pertes pour le deuxième trimestre consécutif et doit compter sur des sources de revenus autres que le trading

La plateforme d'échange de cryptomonnaies américaine Coinbase a publié ses résultats pour le deuxième trimestre, affichant une baisse de son chiffre d'affaires à 1,22 milliard de dollars et une perte nette GAAP de 359 millions de dollars, marquant ainsi son deuxième trimestre consécutif dans le rouge. Malgré un marché global des cryptos en recul (volumes de transactions au comptant en baisse de 25%), Coinbase a augmenté sa part de marché estimée à 10,3%. Ceci démontre que sa position d'acteur conforme aux régulations américaines lui permet de capturer une part plus importante de l'activité, même en période de volatilité réduite. La structure des revenus évolue significativement. Les revenus de transaction (599M$) et les revenus d'abonnement/services (555M$) sont désormais presque à égalité. Une part importante des revenus de services provient des stablecoins, générant 292M$ grâce aux intérêts sur les soldes USDC détenus sur ses produits. Ceci crée un flux de revenus plus récurrent, moins dépendant du seul volume transactionnel. La plateforme développe également ses offres sur les produits dérivés, dont les volumes (1,03 trillion de dollars) sont restés stables tandis que les volumes au comptant diminuaient. L'objectif est d'intégrer comptant, stablecoins et dérivés sur une même plateforme de liquidités pour fidéliser les utilisateurs. Bien que le résultat net GAAP soit négatif, l'EBITDA ajusté reste positif à 208M$, soulignant la capacité opérationnelle à couvrir les coûts courants. La société contrôle ses dépenses mais le défi reste de valider la croissance de ces nouvelles sources de revenus (stablecoins, dérivés, services) pour mieux résister aux cycles futurs du marché.

marsbitIl y a 54 mins

Coinbase affiche des pertes pour le deuxième trimestre consécutif et doit compter sur des sources de revenus autres que le trading

marsbitIl y a 54 mins

Le trimestre de juin de l'entreprise technologique la plus précieuse au monde : le chiffre d'affaires d'Apple franchit pour la première fois la barre des 1000 milliards de dollars

Apple a franchi pour la première fois la barre des 100 milliards de dollars de chiffre d'affaires (109,4 milliards) au cours de son trimestre de juin (exercice 2026, T3), le plus fort jamais enregistré pour cette période habituellement plus calme. La croissance annuelle du revenu a atteint 16,4%, portée principalement par l'iPhone, mais aussi par le Mac et les services. Ces trois secteurs ont établi des records pour un trimestre de juin. Les ventes d'iPhone ont généré près des deux tiers de la croissance totale du chiffre d'affaires, démontrant un rebond significatif du matériel. Les régions d'Europe et de Grande Chine ont été des moteurs clés de cette expansion. Malgré une contribution moindre au chiffre d'affaires total (28,1%), les services ont fourni 42,4% de la marge brute, grâce à un taux de marge très élevé de 75,6%. Ils jouent un rôle crucial en rendant chaque dollar de revenu plus profitable. Le bénéfice par action (EPS) a augmenté de 28,7%, soit un rythme plus rapide que le chiffre d'affaires. Cependant, Apple précise qu'un remboursement de droits de douane a ajouté environ 0,11$ à l'EPS et a amélioré la marge brute d'environ 2 points de pourcentage. En excluant cet effet ponctuel, la croissance de l'EPS serait d'environ 21,7%.

marsbitIl y a 55 mins

Le trimestre de juin de l'entreprise technologique la plus précieuse au monde : le chiffre d'affaires d'Apple franchit pour la première fois la barre des 1000 milliards de dollars

marsbitIl y a 55 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片