The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts is Given by Yuanbao

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

The article "The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts is Given by Yuanbao" discusses the recent trend of crypto investors turning to Yuanbao, a Web2 platform by Tencent, for cash red packet rewards amid a severe market downturn. Starting February 1st, Yuanbao’s cash reward campaign attracted widespread participation, with crypto community members shifting from trading to actively engaging in Yuanbao’s referral-based tasks to earn small but guaranteed cash payouts. This comes as global financial markets, including crypto, experienced significant losses, with Bitcoin dropping below $75,000 and Ethereum and Solana also declining sharply. On January 31st, the crypto market saw over $2.56 billion in liquidations. The author contrasts Yuanbao’s straightforward, no-cost cash rewards with the high-risk, often disappointing airdrops in the crypto space. While crypto airdrops typically offer tokens that require selling to realize gains—and often come with hidden costs like time, research, and potential losses—Yuanbao provides immediate, tangible cash benefits. A case study highlights an Infinex user who lost over $11,900 after a 406-day participation, receiving tokens worth far less than invested. The piece argues that crypto airdrops have evolved from rewarding early users to serving as exit strategies for projects, with declining returns and increased risks. Unlike Web2 companies like Tencent, which use reliable cash incentives backed by strong cash flow and legal frameworks, ...

Author|Golem(@web 3_golem)

"xxx has sent you a cash red envelope!"

After the Yuanbao cash red envelope activity began on February 1st, many long-dead project/research exchange groups completely transformed into "grab Yuanbao wool" mutual aid groups.

For crypto enthusiasts, transitioning from esteemed crypto traders to wool-pulling participants in Yuanbao red envelopes is also a helpless move.

Starting from January 31st, global financial markets plummeted. Precious metals, which had previously surged, quickly crashed. Spot silver nearly erased its yearly gains, and spot gold once fell below $4500. The crypto market didn't fare much better. On February 2nd, Bitcoin broke below the $75,000 support level, hitting a low of $74,604. ETH fell to a low of $2157.14, and SOL even lost the $100 level, touching a low of $95.95.

According to Coinglass data, the crypto market saw a total of $2.5615 billion in liquidations on January 31st, setting a record for the highest single-day liquidation volume since the "10/11 crash." Therefore, "too亏损到不想说话 (losing so much that I don't want to talk)" became the true psychological state of many crypto enthusiasts (like the silent Yi Lihua).

For crypto enthusiasts who just experienced a bloodbath, grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes, though a drop in the bucket for recouping losses, provides some psychological comfort, offering a temporary escape from the harsh market reality.

A joke in group chats

Crypto Airdrops: From Swallowing Losses to Passionate Rights Defense

Calling Yuanbao's cash red envelopes the biggest airdrop for crypto enthusiasts today is not a gimmick.

The amount of cash red envelopes Yuanbao can distribute to each user is not large, mostly ranging from a dozen to a few dozen RMB, but the valuable part is that the interaction is simple and truly cost-free. Users only need to spend a little time recruiting people and step-by-step experiencing product features to get cash red envelopes. The task cycle is short, allowing for quick returns.

In contrast, airdrops from crypto projects are first distributed in the form of tokens. Profit is realized only after the tokens are sold. Although the amount received seems much larger than Yuanbao's in most cases, after deducting the costs of time, research, opportunity, friction, and potential risk of being stuck with worthless tokens, how much is really left?

A user who accompanied Infinex for 406 days deeply feels this. On January 31st, the decentralized perpetual contract trading platform Infinex announced its TGE and airdrop claims. The project team successfully上岸 (made it ashore), but the community was collectively反撸 (screwed over).

一千万是只猫 (X: @RXu107) is a typical example of being反撸. On February 1st, he posted that he spent over $11,900 (approximately 82,000 RMB) participating in this project (4400 U for NFT, 7500 U for public sale) and deeply accompanied it for 406 days as a community member. But on TGE day, not only did he not recover his costs, but his paper loss also exceeded 100,000 RMB (2900 U + 11,284 locked INX tokens).

Facing the反撸, the blogger had no choice but to repeatedly tell his friends how upset he was.

The blogger反撸 by Infinex tells his friend how upset he is

Infinex's fully diluted valuation at TGE was only $150 million. The total investment in Yuanbao's New Year red envelope activity is approximately $140 million USD. What does this mean? It's equivalent to Tencent directly buying Infinex at its maximum valuation and giving it away for free to the entire nation.

Facing the pain of being反撸 and deceived, most people in the community choose the same approach as "一千万是只猫" – swallowing their losses. But some choose to stand up and confront the project team.

Crypto blogger Ice Frog (X: @Ice_Frog666666) is a typical representative. He started by airdrop hunting, but ironically, in 2025, Ice Frog was either defending airdrop rights or on his way to defend airdrop rights. He is still negotiating with the prediction market project Space (Odaily Note: Space raised $20 million publicly, the team privately took $13 million) and has even taken legal measures.

Web2 Can Afford Airdrops, Web3 Can't Fulfill Promises

The most ironic point is that today's imbalance between "input and return" in crypto airdrops is not the "moral decay" of a single project, but the result of a整套 (whole set of) changes in the industry structure.

In 2020, Uniswap opened the era of crypto project airdrops. Since then, there have been constant major airdrop opportunities (大毛) in the crypto space. Stories of getting a car, a house, or reaching A8 (wealth level) from airdrops attracted batch after batch of people into the airdrop hunting track, presenting an aesthetic of "the industry is on the rise."

But by 2025, this changed. Market narratives dried up, primary financing weakened, secondary buying power was insufficient. Airdrops were no longer about sharing the future with early users, but more like mortgaging the future for present data, creating an exit path for the project team itself or换取 (exchanging for) the next round of financing window. Thus, major airdrops disappeared, small airdrops shrank, and "being反撸" became the industry norm.

The so-called airdrop is essentially rewriting the advertising budget into a reward pool, bypassing third parties to directly establish growth relationships with users. Whether it's the 1 billion RMB given by Web2's Yuanbao or the fixed airdrop allocation in Web3 project tokenomics, the essence is this same logic.

But the difference is that Web2 giants use cash to buy user certainty, while Web3 offers token rewards as a promise that may be fulfilled. This results in the same strategy leading to two different destinies.

The certainty of Yuanbao's cash red envelopes comes from cash flow and约束机制 (binding mechanisms). Tencent's strong cash flow determines that Yuanbao "can pay out." The binding mechanisms under mature laws determine that Yuanbao "cannot renege." Coupled with the "simple and brainless" no-threshold interaction, users naturally understand it as a "welfare benefit."

In contrast, crypto enthusiasts not only付出 (invest) costs several times higher than Web2羊毛党 (wool-pullers) (e.g., capital, time, energy), but also worry about being sybil attacked, token unlock periods, and ever-changing airdrop rules. The most ironic thing is that the收益 (returns) obtained in the end are not even as good as Yuanbao's.

Therefore, airdrops in the crypto space today have long degenerated from direct growth rewards into promises where the fulfillment of responsibility is constantly postponed, or even not fulfilled at all. If this situation does not change in 2026, the user retention rate will be sacrificed along with it.

From User Growth to Retention, the Utility of Airdrops Can Only Last the First Half

Using airdrops for user growth has always been the most common and direct means in the business world to deal with powerful competitors.

Tencent invested 1 billion RMB cash to support Yuanbao because its competitor Doubao is strong enough. By the end of 2025, Doubao was the first AI product in China to reach 100 million daily active users. The same goes for Web3. In the prediction market track, Polymarket dominates. To compete for users, Opinion, predict.fun, and Limitless also use points airdrops for user growth, directly pulling users into the product.

In the short term, airdrops can indeed create a huge user influx entry point. But in the long run, what determines user retention is still product-market fit, user experience, and ecological linkage, among other factors. In Web3's business history, there are no shortage of project cases that were bustling before the airdrop but became deserted afterwards. Therefore, both Web2 and Web3 face the same "post-airdrop problem": how to retain users.

Ten years ago, Tencent, a company adept at imitating and then surpassing, used "WeChat red envelopes" to push WeChat Pay into a national-level入口 (entry point), proving its extreme familiarity with the "user growth → retention → habit" chain. Whether they can create another miracle for Yuanbao in the same way is still debated, but they at least have ample experience in "how to convert airdrops into retention."

To this end, Odaily Planet Daily contacted an internal staff member of Yuanbao and asked from a product perspective how Web3 project airdrops should be improved. The answer was very practical:

"As one of the internet companies with the largest market capitalization, Web3 projects may not have direct lessons to learn from Tencent. But the core of user growth methods like airdrops is still improving retention. This requires a series of联动 (linkages) after the airdrop. For example, PR and marketing need to think about how to further spread the玩法 (gameplay/mechanism). The product side also needs to make more moves to achieve this."

From the perspective of Web3 practitioners, merely discussing traffic tactics feels shallow. What product features, beyond the token, can actually retain users is worth more scrutiny.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason cryptocurrency enthusiasts are turning to Yuanbao' cash red envelope activity according to the article?

AAfter a significant market crash that caused heavy losses, cryptocurrency enthusiasts are seeking psychological comfort and a temporary escape from the harsh market reality. The activity offers a simple, no-cost way to earn small cash rewards, which provides some solace despite being insufficient to recoup their trading losses.

QHow does the article contrast the 'Yuanbao' cash red envelope with typical cryptocurrency project airdrops?

AThe article contrasts them by highlighting that Yuanbao's red envelopes are simple, require no capital investment, and offer immediate cash payouts. In contrast, crypto airdrops are paid in tokens that must be sold to realize profits, involve significant costs (time, research, opportunity cost, potential losses), and often result in users being 'counter-farmed' or receiving less value than expected.

QWhat specific example does the article use to illustrate the problem of being 'counter-farmed' in a crypto airdrop?

AThe article uses the example of a user named '一千万是只猫' who participated in the Infinex project for 406 days. He invested over $11,900 (approx. 82,000 RMB) by buying an NFT and participating in the public sale, but at the Token Generation Event (TGE), he not only failed to recover his costs but also faced an on-paper loss of over 100,000 RMB (2,900 USDT plus 11,284 locked INX tokens).

QWhat fundamental difference does the article point out between Web2 companies like Tencent (Yuanbao) and Web3 projects when conducting airdrop campaigns?

AThe fundamental difference is certainty. Web2 companies like Tencent use cash from their strong cash flow to buy user growth, and mature legal constraints ensure they 'can pay and cannot renege.' Web3 projects, however, offer token rewards as a promise that may be fulfilled later, introducing uncertainty due to factors like vesting periods, changing rules, and the risk of the token's value plummeting.

QAccording to the Yuanbao insider quoted in the article, what is the core challenge for both Web2 and Web3 projects after an airdrop campaign?

AThe core challenge is user retention. The insider stated that the key is improving retention after the airdrop through a series of follow-up actions. This requires efforts from PR and marketing to further spread awareness of the product's features and, crucially, requires the product side to implement more features and improvements to genuinely keep users engaged beyond the initial incentive.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GensynAI : Que la IA no repita los errores de Internet

En los últimos meses, el auge de la IA ha atraído talento del sector cripto. Muchos proyectos exploran cómo la blockchain puede integrarse en la infraestructura de IA, pero pocos logran un modelo de negocio cerrado. Gensyn se distingue al enfocarse en el núcleo más costoso: el entrenamiento de modelos. Su propuesta es organizar recursos de GPU dispersos globalmente en una red abierta para entrenamiento de IA. Los desarrolladores pueden enviar tareas, los nodos aportan capacidad de cálculo, y la red verifica los resultados y distribuye incentivos. Esto aborda un problema crítico: la creciente centralización del poder de cálculo en grandes tecnológicas, donde el acceso a GPUs como la H100 se ha convertido en una barrera clave para la innovación. Gensyn destaca por cuatro razones: 1. Ataca la capa de infraestructura central de la IA (entrenamiento), no solo aplicaciones. 2. Ofrece un modelo de colaboración abierto que puede optimizar costes y eficiencia para equipos más pequeños. 3. Su principal barrera tecnológica y ventaja es la capacidad de verificar resultados y garantizar fiabilidad en un entorno distribuido. 4. Responde a una demanda real y creciente en un mercado ya validado, más allá de la narrativa cripto. En conclusión, la frontera entre cripto e IA se desdibuja. La IA necesita coordinación de recursos e incentivos para la colaboración global, áreas donde la tecnología blockchain puede aportar soluciones. Gensyn representa un paso hacia una infraestructura de IA más abierta y accesible, no solo controlada por unos pocos gigantes.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

GensynAI : Que la IA no repita los errores de Internet

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

¿Por qué el desarrollo de la IA en China es tan rápido? La respuesta está dentro de sus laboratorios

El artículo explora las razones del rápido desarrollo de la IA en China, centrándose en la cultura organizativa de sus laboratorios. A diferencia del ecosistema estadounidense, que prioriza la innovación disruptiva, el capital y las "estrellas" científicas individuales, el enfoque chino se caracteriza por un pragmatismo basado en la ejecución en equipo, la ingeniería eficiente, la rápida iteración y un fuerte deseo de controlar la pila tecnológica clave. Los laboratorios chinos sobresalen como "seguidores rápidos", optimizando direcciones ya establecidas. Una cultura que valora menos el ego individual y más el trabajo en equipo, combinada con una gran afluencia de jóvenes investigadores y estudiantes integrados en proyectos centrales, facilita una adaptación ágil y un enfoque en tareas prácticas de mejora de modelos. Existe un respeto general dentro del ecosistema, que se percibe más como una comunidad que como tribus en competencia. En el ámbito industrial, se observa una mentalidad de "construir, no comprar", con muchas grandes empresas tecnológicas desarrollando sus propios modelos LLM fundamentales para mantener la soberanía tecnológica. El apoyo gubernamental existe pero es descentralizado. La demanda interna de IA está creciendo, potencialmente similar al mercado de la nube, y los desarrolladores muestran una fuerte admiración por herramientas como Claude. Aunque hay una gran necesidad de chips de Nvidia, también se utilizan alternativas locales como Huawei para inferencia. El ecosistema de datos es menos maduro que en Occidente, lo que fomenta soluciones internas. En conclusión, se están formando dos trayectorias distintas: una carrera impulsada por el capital y el prestigio en EE.UU. frente a una competencia industrial impulsada por la capacidad de ejecución, el ecosistema de código abierto y la autonomía tecnológica en China. El autor destaca la calidez y el enfoque pragmático de los investigadores chinos, subrayando que la competencia futura dependerá no solo de los modelos, sino también de las capacidades organizativas y la fuerza del ecosistema.

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

¿Por qué el desarrollo de la IA en China es tan rápido? La respuesta está dentro de sus laboratorios

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

3 años, 5 veces: el renacimiento de una fábrica de vidrio centenaria

Según CRU, la demanda de fibra óptica en centros de datos de IA creció un 75,9% anual, ampliando el déficit de oferta del 6% al 15%. Los precios de la fibra se triplicaron en meses. NVIDIA invirtió en Corning, Lumentum y Coherent (total 45 mil millones USD) para asegurar la cadena de suministro óptica. Corning, fundada en 1851, ve su valor subir un 316,81% en el último año, alcanzando 160 mil millones USD. Su crecimiento se debe a dos factores clave: la rigidez de la oferta (el proceso de fabricación de preformas es complejo y lento) y la transición forzada de cobre a fibra en infraestructuras de IA para mayor eficiencia y menor consumo energético. La fibra es crucial para la IA: su uso en bastidores de IA es 5-10 veces mayor que en centros tradicionales. Se espera que la demanda de fibra para IA represente el 35% del mercado total para 2027. Corning lidera en fibra especializada de baja pérdida, alta densidad y resistencia a la curvatura, esencial para transmisiones de 800G a 1,6T. Sus ingresos en comunicación óptica para empresas se duplicaron en dos años, superando los 30 mil millones USD en 2025, respaldados por acuerdos a largo plazo con Meta, NVIDIA y otros grandes clientes. Aunque no es el mayor fabricante global, Corning destaca en I+D (más de 10 mil millones USD anuales) y en su enfoque en el segmento premium de centros de datos de IA. El aumento de precios beneficia a toda la industria, como muestran los resultados de empresas chinas. El despliegue de Óptica de Co-Embalaje (CPO) y la posible adopción de fibra hueca son variables futuras clave. Sin embargo, la rápida apreciación de las acciones de Corning (multiplicando por 3 su relación P/E) ya refleja grandes expectativas, lo que podría aumentar la volatilidad si los pedidos no cumplen con el ritmo esperado.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

3 años, 5 veces: el renacimiento de una fábrica de vidrio centenaria

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片