Plummeting Around 12%, Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing CoreWeave Turns into a Fierce Battlefield Between Bulls and Bears

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-09Actualizado a 2026-05-09

Resumen

On May 8th, AI cloud computing provider CoreWeave (CRWV) plunged 11.4% following its Q1 2026 earnings report, intensifying the polarized market view on the stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and its Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss also widened to $740M. The key trigger was a weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue forecast, coupled with rising costs that compressed adjusted operating margin to just 1%. The bull thesis centers on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA as a key customer and investor, and client diversification with major names like Anthropic and Meta. Supporters point to its 'hyperscale' status and over $20B in recent financing. Bears highlight the "growth at all costs" model: despite soaring revenue, losses are expanding, capital expenditures are massive (~$6.8B in Q1), and total debt has ballooned to around $25B. Significant insider selling by executives adds to skepticism. This contrast is embodied by investor Duan Yongping (known as "China's Buffett"), who initiated a small, exploratory position (~0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows, viewing it as a speculative bet on the AI infrastructure chain. The upcoming Q2 report is seen as a critical test for management's promise of a profit margin rebound. CoreWeave remains a battleground stock where long-term narrative clashes with near-term financial reality.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

On May 8, AI cloud computing provider CoreWeave (CRWV) plummeted 11.4% in a single day, closing at $114.15. This marks another instance of "earnings day decline" for the company since its IPO in March of last year. However, unlike previous times, this sell-off is compounded by a more dramatic contrast: Duan Yongping, widely known in Chinese circles as a disciple of Warren Buffett, just established a new position in CoreWeave in Q4 2025, amounting to approximately $20 million. Based on the position size and the Q4 average price, his entry point was close to CoreWeave's lowest range for the year in December 2025.

CoreWeave is currently one of the most divisive AI assets in the US stock market. On one side is the narrative of being a "pick-and-shovel seller" deeply tied to Nvidia, backed by nearly $100 billion in order backlog; on the other side is the financial reality of expanding losses with scale, alongside continuous insider selling. The Q1 earnings report acted like a prism, refracting this divide with stark clarity.

Q1 Earnings: Revenue Doubles but Losses Widen, Q2 Guidance Punctures Valuation

CoreWeave's Q1 revenue reached $2.08 billion, a 112% year-over-year increase and a 32% sequential increase, surpassing the LSEG market consensus of $1.97 billion. However, adjusted earnings per share loss was $1.12, worse than the expected loss of $0.90; the net loss widened to $740 million, more than doubling from $315 million a year ago.

The forward guidance is what truly ignited the sell-off. The company provided a Q2 revenue range of $2.45 billion to $2.6 billion, with a midpoint of $2.53 billion, significantly lower than the market expectation of $2.69 billion. Concurrently, the lower limit for the full-year 2026 capital expenditure was raised from $30 billion to $31 billion, with CFO Nitin Agrawal attributing the increase to rising component costs.

The fragility of the profit structure was laid bare. While Q1 adjusted EBITDA reached $1.16 billion (a 56% margin), which appeared impressive; adjusted operating profit was merely $21 million, compressing the operating margin to just 1%. The reason lies in the 127% year-over-year surge in technology and infrastructure costs to $1.27 billion, and sales and marketing expenses skyrocketing over sixfold to $69 million. Revenue is growing, but costs are growing faster.

CEO Michael Intrator emphasized on the earnings call: "We have reached hyperscale." He disclosed that the company now has 10 clients committed to spending over $1 billion each, a significant improvement in concentration risk compared to 2024 when 62% of revenue relied on a single customer, Microsoft. Intrator also projected that CoreWeave's annualized revenue should exceed $30 billion by the end of 2027.

The Bull Narrative: $100 Billion Order Backlog, Deep Ties with Nvidia

The core supporting the bull case is the order backlog. As of the end of Q1, CoreWeave's remaining performance obligations (RPO) stood at $99.4 billion, a net increase of approximately $33 billion sequentially and nearly quadrupling year-over-year. Intrator stated that new contracts signed in Q1 alone exceeded $40 billion.

The client roster is also reshaping market perception. In Q1, CoreWeave added Anthropic as a client, providing computing power for its Claude series models; signed a $2.1 billion AI cloud agreement with Meta; trading firm Jane Street committed to roughly $6 billion in orders and separately completed a $1 billion equity investment. Nvidia purchased an additional $2 billion worth of CoreWeave Class A common stock this quarter. This global largest GPU supplier is simultaneously an investor and a significant customer of CoreWeave, a tripartite relationship dubbed Nvidia's "favored son."

Regarding financing structure, CoreWeave completed an $8.5 billion investment-grade HPC (High-Performance Computing) secured delayed draw term loan (DDTL) in Q1, priced below 6%, hailed by management as "groundbreaking." Year-to-date, the company has raised over $20 billion in debt and equity financing, with the weighted average cost of debt decreasing by approximately 80 basis points. S&P Global Ratings concurrently upgraded CoreWeave's credit rating outlook from "stable" to "positive."

The Bear Logic: Bigger Scale, Less Profit, Debt Snowball Grows Larger

However, another set of numbers in the earnings report is causing anxiety. Q1 capital expenditure reached $6.8 billion, and the company expects Q2 capital expenditure to further climb to between $7 billion and $9 billion. The Q2 interest expense guidance range is $650 million to $730 million, reflecting the rapid expansion of the debt pile.

The total debt burden is already staggering. As of the end of Q1, CoreWeave's total debt was approximately $25 billion. Relative to the company's current annualized revenue scale, this leverage level is significantly higher than that of traditional cloud service providers. Morgan Stanley data shows that CoreWeave's debt financing for the full year 2025 reached about $11.8 billion, far exceeding the approximately $1.5 billion in equity financing during the same period. The company's core expansion tool is the DDTL, a "book-then-fund" model where it secures bank financing to purchase GPUs, using order contracts as collateral.

The sharpest criticism stems from profit quality. Although management repeatedly highlights the 56% EBITDA margin, the adjusted operating margin is only 1%, and the "real" gross margin after deducting technology and infrastructure costs is about 4%, showing compression both sequentially and against market expectations. On the call, Intrator attributed this to the phased effects of scaling, where the dilution effect on margins from adding new capacity is immense when expanding rapidly from a 1-gigawatt operational scale. He promised this was the "low point for margins," which would gradually rebound in future quarters.

However, the market is currently unwilling to pay for that promise. While analysts from Morgan Stanley and Jefferies issued positive evaluations, CoreWeave has experienced short-term pullbacks after every previous earnings report, with this decline being one of the steeper ones.

Ongoing Insider Selling, Mirroring Duan Yongping's Bottom Fishing

Around the earnings release, CoreWeave insiders continued their selling. CEO Mike Intrator sold 307,693 shares in late April; co-founders Brian Venturo and Chen Goldberg also recorded sales; institutional shareholder Magnetar Financial had previously offloaded over $300 million worth. The latest disclosures show another major shareholder recently sold approximately 1.2 million shares.

This forms a stark contrast with Duan Yongping's Q4 position building. According to a 13F filing by H&H International Investment in February 2026, Duan Yongping initiated a position in CoreWeave of 299,900 shares in Q4 2025, when the company's stock price had retreated over 65% from its highs, and market concern over its debt structure peaked.

It is noteworthy that CoreWeave constitutes only 0.12% of Duan Yongping's total H&H portfolio, a "light test" position. During the same period, Duan aggressively increased his Nvidia stake by over 1110% and initiated new positions in Credo Technology (high-speed connectivity) and Tempus AI (AI healthcare), with these three new AI positions combined accounting for less than 0.3%. This suggests Duan's real heavy bet is on Nvidia itself, with CoreWeave resembling a small, extended bet on the downstream AI computing supply chain.

The Key Question Now: Inflection Point or Trap?

During the Q&A session of the earnings call, Intrator posed an emotionally charged rhetorical question: "I've always felt like everyone is staring at the stock price tree and missing the whole forest."

This statement aptly summarizes the current bull-bear standoff. The bulls see the forest: the nearly $100 billion contract backlog, diversified customer base, tripartite Nvidia ties, and the credit rating upgrade. The bears see the tree: the 1% operating margin, widening net loss, aggressive capital expenditure, and continuously selling insiders.

CoreWeave's stock price is still up nearly 80% year-to-date and over 200% since its IPO. However, when a stock's bull case relies on long-term narratives while the bear case rests on current numbers, every earnings report becomes a battleground for these two narratives. In a previous interview with Fang Sanwen, Duan Yongping stated: "AI is a massive revolution brought about by qualitative changes in computing power, potentially exceeding the impact of the internet and industrial revolutions. There is a clear AI bubble currently; 90% of companies may be eliminated, but the survivors will become the next generation of giants." His 0.12% light position itself acknowledges the uncertainty of this gamble.

The next test point is already clear: the Q2 earnings report. If the operating margin fails to rebound as promised by management by then, the credibility of the "forest" narrative will face a real stress test.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did CoreWeave's stock price drop sharply on May 8th?

ACoreWeave's stock price dropped 11.4% on May 8th primarily due to disappointing Q2 revenue guidance. The company forecast Q2 revenue between $2.45 and $2.6 billion, with a midpoint of $2.53 billion, which was significantly below market expectations of $2.69 billion. Additionally, the company's Q1 net loss widened to $740 million, more than double the loss from a year ago, and its adjusted operating margin was compressed to just 1%, fueling investor concerns about profitability despite rapid revenue growth.

QWhat are the main arguments of CoreWeave's bullish investors?

ABullish investors focus on CoreWeave's massive backlog of nearly $100 billion in Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO), which grew significantly in Q1. They highlight its deep ties with Nvidia, which is an investor, customer, and key GPU supplier. The company has diversified its client base, securing major agreements with companies like Meta and Anthropic, and improving its reliance on a single customer (previously Microsoft). Strong financing, including low-cost debt, and an 'investment-grade' credit rating upgrade from S&P also support the positive long-term narrative.

QWhat are the main concerns of CoreWeave's bearish investors?

ABearish investors point to CoreWeave's deteriorating profitability as scale increases. Key concerns include a net loss that more than doubled year-over-year, a razor-thin 1% adjusted operating margin, and capital expenditures that are soaring ($6.8B in Q1). The company's massive and growing debt load (approximately $25B) and high interest expense are seen as significant risks. Furthermore, the ongoing insider selling by executives and major shareholders contrasts with the bullish public narrative, raising questions about internal confidence.

QWhat was Duan Yongping's investment action regarding CoreWeave, and what does it signify?

ADuan Yongping, through his investment firm H&H International, initiated a position in CoreWeave in Q4 2025, purchasing approximately 299,900 shares worth around $20 million when the stock was near its yearly low. However, this position represents a very small 0.12% of his total portfolio. His much larger bet is on Nvidia itself. The CoreWeave investment is viewed as a minor, exploratory allocation to the downstream AI infrastructure sector, acknowledging both the sector's potential and its high uncertainty, rather than a strong conviction bet on the company.

QWhat is the key upcoming test for CoreWeave's investment thesis according to the article?

AThe next crucial test for CoreWeave will be its Q2 2026 earnings report. CEO Michael Intrator has promised that Q1 represented a 'low point' for margins and that profitability would improve in subsequent quarters. If the Q2 report fails to show a meaningful rebound in the operating margin from the current 1% level, the credibility of the company's long-term growth and profitability narrative ('the forest') will face severe pressure, potentially leading to further investor skepticism and stock price volatility.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Por primera vez, los ingresos de IREN por IA superaron los del minado de criptomonedas

Los ingresos de IREN por servicios de IA en la nube superaron por primera vez a los de minería de Bitcoin en el cuarto trimestre del año fiscal 2026, cerrado el 30 de junio: 70,5 millones de dólares frente a 66,7 millones. Sin embargo, la empresa registró una pérdida neta de 684 millones de dólares, impulsada en gran parte por una depreciación no monetaria de 450,4 millones de dólares por desmantelar equipos de minería para reconvertir instalaciones hacia AI Cloud. Los ingresos totales del trimestre cayeron un 5% a 137,2 millones de dólares. Mientras los ingresos por IA se duplicaron, los de minería se redujeron un 40%. La EBITDA ajustada cayó un 68% a 19,2 millones de dólares. Otras empresas mineras también mostraron una transición hacia servicios de computación de alto rendimiento (HPC) e IA. TeraWulf generó el 71% de sus ingresos del trimestre (31,9 millones de dólares) del alquiler de capacidad HPC, aunque reportó una EBITDA ajustada negativa y una gran pérdida neta. Cipher Digital aún no obtuvo ingresos de su nueva infraestructura, reportando pérdidas, mientras que Riot Platforms comenzó a reflejar ingresos por centros de datos, que aún son menores que los de minería. Este giro de los mineros públicos hacia la infraestructura de IA se intensificó en junio, impulsado por la creciente demanda y los altos gastos de capital en el sector.

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

Por primera vez, los ingresos de IREN por IA superaron los del minado de criptomonedas

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

Analistas identifican el riesgo de los depósitos tokenizados para la accesibilidad del crédito

Los bancos estadounidenses están explorando los depósitos tokenizados como alternativa a las stablecoins, pero su adopción generalizada podría alterar la estructura de financiación bancaria y reducir la capacidad de las entidades crediticias para transformar obligaciones a corto plazo en préstamos a largo plazo, según un análisis del Banco de la Reserva Federal de Dallas. Los autores señalan que la tokenización podría aumentar la sensibilidad de los depósitos a los tipos de interés, elevar las salidas de fondos y obligar a los bancos a mantener más activos líquidos. A diferencia de las stablecoins, estos depósitos tokenizados operan dentro del sistema bancario existente y pueden generar intereses, aunque actualmente son menos convenientes para transferencias entre bancos. Para su expansión, se están considerando modelos basados en consorcios. La tokenización podría cambiar significativamente la concesión de créditos. Los depósitos tradicionales, relativamente estables, financian préstamos a largo plazo, pero la transferencia instantánea de depósitos tokenizados facilitaría que los clientes cambien de banco en busca de mayor rentabilidad. El desarrollo de IA agentales y contratos inteligentes podría automatizar estos movimientos. El análisis estima que un acortamiento del 10% en la vida media de los depósitos podría reducir el potencial de transformación de plazos en unos 580.000 millones de dólares, y un aumento del 10% en la sensibilidad a los tipos podría disminuir la disposición de los bancos a asumir riesgo de interés en unos 700.000 millones. Para mantener el volumen crediticio, los bancos podrían depender más de la deuda a plazo, lo que encarecería los préstamos. Además, los depósitos tokenizados podrían forzar a los bancos a aumentar sus reservas de activos líquidos de alta calidad, como bonos gubernamentales, debido a la mayor volatilidad y dificultad para predecir salidas de fondos. La experiencia de Brasil con su sistema de pagos instantáneos Pix, lanzado en 2020, muestra que un uso intensivo aumentó la demanda de activos líquidos y redujo la intermediación crediticia, llevando a los bancos a otorgar más préstamos de alto riesgo para mejorar la rentabilidad. Los autores subrayan que los depósitos tokenizados en EE.UU. aún están en fase incipiente, pero su evolución, junto con las stablecoins y los valores tokenizados, podría transformar profundamente el sistema de pagos y la operativa bancaria, requiriendo que los reguladores evalúen su impacto en la política monetaria y la estabilidad financiera.

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

Analistas identifican el riesgo de los depósitos tokenizados para la accesibilidad del crédito

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

Bitcoin suma 14.264 dólares en una semana; según Galaxy, la señal de que el próximo mínimo se acerca está a la vuelta de la esquina

Bitcoin registró un aumento semanal (hasta el 23 de agosto) de 14.264 dólares, un 22,7%, cerrando en 77.387 dólares. Este fue su mejor desempeño semanal en términos absolutos, aunque históricamente ha tenido ganancias porcentuales mayores cuando su precio era más bajo. Tras el cierre semanal, el precio alcanzó un máximo de tres meses en 81.000 dólares antes de retroceder a 79.000. Analistas señalan como catalizador el anuncio del Tesoro de EE.UU. de duplicar sus operaciones de recompra de bonos para apoyar la liquidez. Además, Alex Thorn de Galaxy Digital destacó que el fondo IBIT de BlackRock mostró su mayor impulso de compra minorista en dos años, indicando un renovado interés de inversionistas retail. Galaxy Research monitorea la media móvil de 50 semanas del Bitcoin (actualmente en ~82.470 dólares) como señal clave. Históricamente, un cierre semanal por encima de este nivel ha confirmado el fin de 11 de los 13 mercados bajistas desde 2011. Por tanto, superar los ~82.500 dólares sería una fuerte señal de que se ha tocado fondo y no solo un rebote temporal. Matt Cole de Strive ofreció una visión optimista, sugiriendo que el próximo ciclo de Bitcoin podría ser el más fuerte hasta ahora. Sin embargo, se advierte que los récords en dólares son más fáciles de batir a medida que la base de precios sube, por lo que la solidez del rally aún necesita confirmación.

cryptonews.ruHace 20 min(s)

Bitcoin suma 14.264 dólares en una semana; según Galaxy, la señal de que el próximo mínimo se acerca está a la vuelta de la esquina

cryptonews.ruHace 20 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片