Middle East Conflict Rekindles Rate Hike Expectations, Gold Suffers Worst Sell-off in 43 Years

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Gold suffered its worst weekly decline in 43 years, with spot prices falling for eight consecutive sessions—the longest losing streak since October 2023. Silver also plunged over 15%, while platinum and palladium followed lower. The sell-off was triggered by escalating Middle East conflicts, which drove up oil prices and reinforced expectations of Federal Reserve rate hikes rather than cuts. Market bets on a Fed hike by October rose to 50%, reducing the appeal of non-yielding gold amid higher real rate prospects. Technical indicators worsened, with RSI falling below 30, triggering stop-losses and self-reinforcing selling. Gold ETFs saw outflows for three straight weeks, losing over 60 tons. The situation echoes the 1983 crash when OPEC nations sold gold reserves to raise cash amid an oil price collapse. Despite a 4% year-to-date gain, macro conditions have deteriorated. Rising energy prices may reduce global GDP by 0.3% and lift inflation by 0.5-0.6%, increasing stagflation risks. Gold’s future trajectory hinges on real rates and geopolitical developments—further rate hike expectations could sustain pressure, while any de-escalation may revive safe-haven demand.

Gold recorded its worst weekly decline in 43 years this week, with historical echoes sending chills through the market.

This week, gold posted its largest weekly drop since March 1983, with the spot price falling for eight consecutive days, marking the longest losing streak since October 2023. Meanwhile, silver fell more than 15% this week, with palladium and platinum also moving lower.

The trigger for this sharp decline was the escalating Middle East conflict, which pushed up energy prices and, in turn, suppressed expectations for interest rate cuts. Market bets on a Federal Reserve rate hike have risen to 50%, fueling this wave of selling in precious metals.

More alarmingly for the market, the current situation bears a striking resemblance to the historic crash in March 1983, which was triggered by massive gold sales by Middle Eastern oil producers—back then, OPEC members, facing plummeting oil revenues, were forced to sell their gold reserves for cash, causing the gold price to plunge over a hundred dollars in a matter of days.

It is worth noting that, according to historical data, this week's decline in gold is the most severe since that "sell-gold-for-cash" storm 43 years ago.

Rate Cut Expectations Unravel, Gold's Safe-Haven Logic Fails

Since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran last month, gold has been declining for several weeks, a stark contrast to its traditional role as a "safe-haven asset."

The reason is that the war brings not expectations of easing but inflationary pressures. Currently, the market's prediction of the Fed's policy path has undergone a fundamental reversal.

Traders are now pricing in a 50% probability of a Fed rate hike by October. Soaring energy prices are boosting inflation expectations, and gold, as a non-yielding asset, becomes significantly less attractive in an environment of rising real interest rates.

At the same time, there are signs of tightening US dollar liquidity. Cross-currency basis swaps began to widen noticeably this week, indicating a degree of dollar funding pressure.

This phenomenon may explain the deeper logic behind the gold sell-off—when dollar liquidity tightens, gold is often one of the first assets investors liquidate.

It is noteworthy that the most severe declines in the metals market this week were concentrated during Asian and European trading hours, consistent with the pattern of dollar shortage pressures first appearing in offshore markets.

Technical Stop-Losses Triggered, Selling Becomes Self-Reinforcing

Amid the sustained decline, gold's technical indicators have deteriorated significantly, with the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) falling below 30, entering a zone some traders consider oversold.

Rhona O'Connell, an analyst at StoneX Financial, pointed out that this gold correction is the result of profit-taking and liquidity liquidation. She stated that the price above $5,200 had attracted substantial buying, making the market积累相当的回调脆弱性 (accumulated considerable vulnerability to a correction).

Once prices started to fall, a large number of investors' stop-loss orders were automatically triggered, rapidly forming a self-reinforcing spiral of selling. Technical signals like moving averages further exacerbated the downward pressure.

Meanwhile, passive selling triggered by falling stock markets also spilled over into gold.

O'Connell noted that forced liquidations related to equity assets may have dragged down gold prices, while slowing central bank gold purchases and continued outflows from gold ETFs further dampened market sentiment. According to Bloomberg data, gold ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive weeks, with combined holdings dropping by more than 60 tonnes over those three weeks.

The Ghost of the 1983 Middle East "Sell-Gold-for-Cash"

The current situation reminds market participants of the oil crisis-induced gold crash 43 years ago.

Historical data shows that around February 21, 1983, British and Norwegian oil producers led price cuts, putting pressure on OPEC to follow suit, abruptly intensifying the global oil market's oversupply. Facing a sharp contraction in oil revenues, Middle Eastern oil producers (mainly OPEC members) were forced to sell their gold reserves on a large scale to raise cash, triggering a gold price crash.

Reporting from The New York Times at the time corroborates this. According to a March 1, 1983, New York Times report, traders explicitly stated that sales by Middle Eastern oil producers were the direct trigger for the gold price plunge and warned that if oil revenues fell further, these Arab countries might sell more gold. At that time, the gold price plunged more than $105 from its high in less than a week, with the largest single-day drop reaching $42.50, the worst in nearly three years.

According to the New York Times report at the time, the proceeds from the Middle Eastern sales immediately flowed into Eurodollars and other short-term investment vehicles, causing short-term interest rates to soften, which in turn sent a warning signal to the global gold market. Since February 21 coincided with the US Presidents' Day holiday, with New York markets closed, the full impact wasn't felt until the following week, subsequently triggering chain-reaction forced liquidations that also affected commodity markets like copper, grains, soybeans, and sugar.

ZeroHedge pointed out that the 1983 gold crash marked the entry of the oil market into a bear market cycle that lasted for years—OPEC discipline frayed, market share was continuously lost, and oil prices remained under pressure throughout the 1980s.

Stagflation Clouds Loom, Can Gold Prices Stabilize?

Despite this week's heavy losses, gold is still up about 4% year-to-date. The price hit a record high of nearly $5,600 per ounce in late January, supported then by investor enthusiasm, central bank buying sprees, and market concerns about Trump interfering with Fed independence.

However, the current macroeconomic environment has significantly deteriorated. According to a Bloomberg report, Goldman Sachs economist Joseph Briggs expects that rising energy prices will drag global GDP down by 0.3 percentage points over the next year and push overall inflation up by 0.5 to 0.6 percentage points. Rising stagflation risks are severely compressing central banks' policy space.

Goldman Sachs analyst Chris Hussey noted that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has entered its fourth week, and hopes for a quick resolution of the conflict are fading. If the conflict continues, the longer oil prices remain high, the harder it becomes for the "look-through the short-term pain" narrative in stock and bond markets to hold, and the vulnerability of global assets will be further exposed.

For gold, the path of real interest rates will be a key variable. If the conflict drags on, inflation expectations continue to heat up, and the Fed's rate hike path becomes clearer, pressure on gold may persist; whereas, once signals of a easing in geopolitical tensions emerge, whether suppressed safe-haven demand can be released again remains the market's biggest悬念 (suspense).

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the sharpest weekly decline in gold prices since 1983 triggered by?

AThe sharpest weekly decline in gold prices since 1983 was triggered by escalating Middle East conflicts, which raised energy prices and suppressed expectations for interest rate cuts, leading to increased bets on Federal Reserve rate hikes.

QHow does the current gold market situation parallel the historical event of 1983?

AThe current situation parallels the 1983 event where OPEC members, facing a sharp drop in oil revenue, were forced to sell off their gold reserves to raise cash, causing a historic crash in gold prices.

QWhy did the traditional 'safe-haven' logic for gold fail during the recent Middle East tensions?

AThe traditional safe-haven logic failed because the war brought inflationary pressure instead of expectations for monetary easing. Rising energy prices increased inflation expectations, making gold, a non-yielding asset, less attractive as real rates rose.

QWhat technical indicator signaled that gold had entered oversold territory during the sell-off?

AThe 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) fell below 30, which is a level some traders consider to indicate an oversold market.

QAccording to Goldman Sachs analysis, what is the expected economic impact of rising energy prices?

AGoldman Sachs economists estimated that rising energy prices would reduce global GDP by 0.3 percentage points over the next year and raise overall inflation by 0.5 to 0.6 percentage points, increasing stagflation risks.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Por qué el Bitcoin se mantiene en $64,000 tras la dura pausa de la Fed

Bitcóin cierra julio cerca de los 64.000 dólares tras una volátil reacción a la decisión de la Fed de mantener las tasas sin cambios, aunque sin indicar un pronto aflojamiento monetario. Esto ha provocado una rotación de capital hacia los ETF de Bitcoin, que registraron una entrada neta de 32,1 millones de dólares, mientras que los fondos de Ethereum experimentaron salidas. El mercado de criptomonedas, con una capitalización de unos 2,29 billones de dólares, se mantiene en un rango lateral, con Bitcoin encontrando soporte en 63.000-63.500 dólares y resistencia en 66.000 dólares. La Fed mantuvo su tasa clave, pero tres miembros votaron a favor de un aumento, señalando una postura más dura de lo esperada. En este entorno macroeconómico incierto, los inversores institucionales parecen favorecer a Bitcoin como activo principal, aunque persiste el interés selectivo en activos como Solana. Mientras, la aprobación de la ley CLARITY en EE.UU. se retrasa hasta después del receso de agosto. Para el último día de julio, el enfoque estará en los datos macro de EE.UU. El escenario base para Bitcoin es la consolidación entre 63.000 y 66.000 dólares, con su ruptura superior dependiendo de nuevos flujos institucionales. La estabilidad por encima de 63.000 dólares para BTC, el mantenimiento de Ethereum sobre 1.860 dólares y las entradas continuas en ETF son claves para una posible base de recuperación en la segunda mitad del año.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Por qué el Bitcoin se mantiene en $64,000 tras la dura pausa de la Fed

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Parker Lewis responde por qué bitcoin sigue siendo el mejor dinero

El influyente analista de Bitcoin, Parker Lewis, critica las estrategias de marketing de corporaciones que actúan como tesorerías cripto. Advierte que la venta de "crédito digital" mediante acciones preferentes perpetuas distorsiona la esencia de la criptomoneda. Lewis enfatiza que Bitcoin no genera rendimiento fiduciario por diseño y que las promesas de dividendos son riesgosas, dependiendo de nuevos inversores. Destaca el riesgo de estos derivados, señalando que el mercado de acciones preferentes perpetuas es minúsculo comparado con el crédito global, lo que demuestra que los grandes actores evitan estos riesgos, trasladándolos a minoristas. Rechaza la idea de que Bitcoin es "demasiado volátil", argumentando que la volatilidad es una consecuencia natural de la adopción masiva de un activo con oferta fija e inelástica. En lugar de comprar derivados corporativos como acciones de MicroStrategy, recomienda adquirir Bitcoin directamente, considerándolo más seguro. Lewis alerta que este enfoque distrae de la verdadera amenaza: la rápida devaluación del dinero fiduciario. Ilustra la inflación real con su "Índice Ribeye", mostrando un aumento del 90% en el precio de un filete desde 2020, muy superior a las cifras oficiales. Concluye que la estrategia más prudente es la posesión directa de Bitcoin y el control total de las claves privadas, protegiendo así los ahorros de la inflación y los riesgos sistémicos de los derivados corporativos.

cryptonews.ruHace 10 min(s)

Parker Lewis responde por qué bitcoin sigue siendo el mejor dinero

cryptonews.ruHace 10 min(s)

Arrestados participantes en esquema fraudulento con XRP, que robaron 9 millones de dólares a 71 inversores

El periódico surcoreano "Chosun" informa que la Policía Metropolitana de Seúl detuvo a tres personas acusadas de operar una plataforma de inversión fraudulenta utilizando XRP. Según las autoridades, entre el 16 y el 23 de octubre, el grupo recaudó aproximadamente 3,4 millones de XRP (equivalentes a unos 9 millones de dólares) de 71 inversores, tras lo cual cerró el sitio web y desapareció. Los sospechosos promovían el sitio Fxrpntwork.com a través de blogs, artículos en línea y vídeos de YouTube, prometiendo la garantía del capital y un rendimiento mensual del 1,5% al 1,8%. Instruyeron a los inversores a transferir XRP desde intercambios surcoreanos a través de plataformas extranjeras y luego a carteras controladas por el grupo. La policía advirtió a los inversores que verifiquen fuentes oficiales antes de transferir activos a carteras o plataformas no verificadas, destacando el peligro de dejarse engañar por información no contrastada en YouTube u otras plataformas. Los estafadores copiaron el branding de "Flare Network" y "FXRP" para que su plataforma pareciera legítima. Ripple advierte que tales esquemas suelen imitar nombres, logotipos y sitios web de organizaciones confiables para crear una falsa apariencia de seguridad. Este caso ilustra cómo las promesas de rendimiento garantizado siguen siendo una señal común de fraude en criptomonedas. Las autoridades surcoreanas congelaron activos virtuales por valor de 17.300 millones de wons tras detectar el esquema, y el análisis de carteras reveló transferencias adicionales por 27.300 millones de wons, lo que sugiere que podría haber más víctimas y cómplices sin identificar.

cryptonews.ruHace 13 min(s)

Arrestados participantes en esquema fraudulento con XRP, que robaron 9 millones de dólares a 71 inversores

cryptonews.ruHace 13 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片