Barrons:The FTX Scandal Ripped Crypto Apart. What Comes Next?

BarronsPublicado a 2022-11-21Actualizado a 2022-11-21

Resumen

Some advisors say there’s no rush to get into crypto. “There’s nothing wrong with putting this in the ‘too hard’ pile,” says Meb Faber, CEO of Cambria Investment Management.

The biggest scandal in crypto involves celebrities, sports stars, Caribbean intrigue, and a corporate mystery: How, exactly, did a company valued at $32 billion go bankrupt almost overnight? In hindsight, Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX empire displayed legions of red flags. But its fall has been striking, even to veterans of the largest blowups in corporate history.

“Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls,” said John J. Ray, the new CEO of FTX, in a bankruptcy court filing. That’s quite a comment coming from the lawyer who cleaned up Enron’s bankruptcy two decades ago.

FTX has spilled blood in the streets. But far more is likely to come, and this is no time to play bargain hunter. Yes, Bitcoin and other tokens have lost more than 20%. And stocks like Coinbase Global (ticker: COIN), Silvergate Capital (SI), and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) have been slammed. More than $200 billion has been wiped off token market value since FTX started cracking in early November.

Why Bitcoin Has Weathered FTX’s Collapse

But nothing about this crisis indicates that it will end soon. Damage to the crypto ecosystem’s credibility is unquantifiable. And more fallout is likely as other trading platforms reveal exposures to FTX and related entities, potentially pushing down token prices, crypto-related stocks, and companies even more.

Government investigations of FTX are just starting, and lawsuits are piling up. One is already targeting celebrities like Tom Brady, Larry David, and Stephen Curry for promoting FTX on its website and in a Super Bowl ad.

“We knew crypto had a highly unstable value, and now we know the platforms for trading and storing them are unreliable,” says Cornell University economist Eswar Prasad, a leading digital-asset expert. “Even the basic requirement that assets can be kept securely is not met by crypto.”

In Washington, calls for comprehensive crypto rules are intensifying, including a plea this past week from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen; she said it’s “vital” to address the industry’s risks, protect consumers, and promote financial stability. “The dominoes aren’t done falling,” says Matt Hougan, chief investment officer of Bitwise Asset Management, a crypto index fund provider. “Contagion risk will keep people out of the market, and I don’t know what other shoe will drop.”

One might draw two conclusions. The first is that crypto has sealed its own coffin as an asset class—proving beyond a reasonable doubt that it’s the “mother of all scams,” in the words of New York University economist Nouriel Roubini.

The other possible conclusion is that crypto is simply proving itself irrelevant. A decade into its development, the technology has yet to make serious inroads into mainstream financial markets or commerce. The latest fiasco hasn’t dented broader financial markets. The S&P 500SPX +0.48% index is up 3.7% since FTX fell apart. Spreads in yields between corporate bonds and Treasuries—another sign of stress—haven’t blown out like they did during the 2008-09 financial crisis.

Hougan, for one, calls both conclusions silly. “One exchange engaging in bad activity doesn’t mean the end of crypto, blockchain technologies, or programmable money,” he says. Bitwise hasn’t seen meaningful outflows from its institutional clients, he adds, partly because they still believe in the technology and are willing to wait for this crisis to blow over.

Others in the industry say there will be a silver lining: Regulation will finally kick in, preventing other blowups. “One of the bad outcomes that could come here is conflating clear examples of human misconduct with the technology,” says Dante Disparte, chief strategy officer of Circle, the company backing the $44 billion USDC stablecoinUSDCUSD –0.01% . “It’s precisely because of something like this that we need to regulate the industry.”

In short, crypto probably won’t die, but it won’t be the same in a post-FTX world. More than ever, it needs government supervision, audited financial statements, consumer protections, and transparency to survive and advance. Turning crypto into a regulated medium of exchange goes against the original libertarian ethos of BitcoinBTCUSD –0.35% —designed to avoid the strictures of government and corporate control. The industry may have little choice, however, if it wants to survive.

The Collapse of a $32 Billion Empire and Its Aftermath

This past week brought a flurry of revelations about potential malfeasance at Bahamas-based FTX. Corporate funds were used to buy homes in the Bahamas and other personal items for employees, Ray’s filing said, with no documentation of the transactions as loans. Expenses were filed in online chats, approved with personalized emojis.

FTX didn’t keep appropriate books and records, Ray noted, and its unacceptable practices included the use of software “to conceal the misuse of customer funds.”

How much money has been lost isn’t known. Ray noted an unauthorized transfer of $372 million of crypto and said someone had minted $300 million in unapproved tokens, diluting their value. The balance sheet has a hole of $8 billion to $10 billion, including $1 billion to $2 billion in customer assets that have gone missing, according to Reuters and other media reports. Bankman-Fried received a $1 billion loan from Alameda Research, his trading company, Ray said.

More than a million customers, creditors, and investors in FTX and related entities are now trying to recoup funds. But even the jurisdiction of FTX’s remaining assets is in dispute. The Bahamas Securities Commission said on Thursday that it had directed the transfer of all FTX Digital Markets’ assets to a wallet it controls “for safekeeping,” a sign that jurisdictional battles over the bankruptcy could delay customer recoveries even further.

Neither an FTX representative nor Bankman-Fried responded to requests for comment. Bankman-Fried has continued posting on Twitter, apologizing, explaining, and making sometimes bizarre comments. He “continues to make erratic and misleading public statements,” Ray said, citing a Twitter chat with a reporter where Bankman-Fried said, “F____ regulators they make everything worse.”

Other crypto players are struggling to contain the fallout. High-yield lender BlockFi, itself the recipient of a bailout by Bankman-Fried, has frozen customer deposits. Genesis 6221 0.00% Global Capital, a large lender, stopped withdrawals, leading Gemini Trust, an exchange founded by the Winklevoss twins, with ties to Genesis, to do the same with its yield-paying accounts.

“Genesis has been exploring all possible options and has been having positive conversations with potential investors,” a spokesperson said in a statement to Barron’s.

Another casualty has been Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, the largest publicly traded Bitcoin fund with $10.5 billion worth of the token. The trust’s publicly traded security, GBTC, fell to a 40% discount to its underlying Bitcoin assets this past week. ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood saw that as a bargain, buying more than 300,000 shares of GBTC for her ARK Next Generation InternetARKW –1.92% exchange-traded fund (ARKW). But GBTC’s discount reflects skepticism that Bitcoin isn’t done falling, and the discount could widen further due to forced-selling as more crypto entities come under pressure.

Other exchanges are racing to reassure customers. Coinbase says it doesn’t take actions with customer assets without their permission. Crypto.com says it fully backs customer assets with reserves. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao has tried to reassure customers of his exchange, the world’s largest by volume, while calling for other exchanges to publish “proof of reserves.”

For now, the token market appears to be taking all of this in stride. Bitcoin’s price has dropped about 20%, and Ether’s price has fallen 24%. That’s not remarkable in the volatile token market, says The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania’s professor Kevin Werbach, who called for more crypto regulations in a Senate hearing last February, alongside Bankman-Fried. “If I told you to look at the trading chart of most cryptocurrencies and asked you to identify the period right after the most spectacular failure in the history of the space, you’d probably not pick this out,” Werbach says.

Crypto Comes Crawling to D.C.

As bulls see it, FTX’s failure will prompt Washington to pass comprehensive rules. Indeed, the best outcome may be crypto versions of Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank—the sweeping rule changes for Wall Street that came after Enron’s collapse in 2002 and the 2008-09 financial crisis. Those rules included criminal liability for executives intentionally misstating accounting, new capital buffer requirements for banks, and far more consumer protections.

U.S. policy makers are now redoubling efforts in crypto. In December, a House panel plans to hold a hearing on FTX. Next year, Congress is likely to consider bills that would require exchanges and brokerages to register with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and/or the Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulators will also be under pressure to ensure that the FTX model of co-mingling customer assets with proprietary trading entities never happens again. That separation of assets is now a bedrock of equity broker/dealers and exchanges, but it’s often absent in crypto.

Without guardrails, deep-pocketed investors like family offices and sovereign-wealth funds will stay away, says Monsur Hussain, global head of research for financial institutions at Fitch Ratings. “Some funds and family offices have liquidated at least part of their holdings until they see the dust settle,” he says.

The White House also wants rules for stablecoins, which are used extensively for crypto banking and trading. Circle and other stablecoin companies have lobbied hard for rules. But the market itself has been shrinking, falling by $25 billion since peaking last May at $186 billion. “It would be difficult here to imagine a sustained recovery in crypto prices without the shrinkage of the stablecoin universe stopping,” wrote analysts at J.P. Morgan in a note.

If there are winners in the fiasco, it may be companies that are already extensively regulated. Andrei Kazantsev, global head of crypto trading for Goldman Sachs, said at a conference that he’d seen a “flight to quality” from institutions seeking safe counterparties, instead of using unregulated exchanges and trading platforms.

Yet Coinbase, a beneficiary of that flight to safety, faces new headwinds. Bank of America downgraded the stock to Neutral on Friday, citing “diminished confidence in the crypto ecosystem,” especially among the exchange’s core retail customer base. BofA also sees revenue risk to Coinbase if there’s “sustained further deterioration” in crypto asset prices, such as Bitcoin going to $10,000 from its recent $16,600.

“How far does this go? As much I keep hoping things will get better, things keep getting worse,” says D.A. Davidson analyst Chris Brendler, who maintained a Buy on Coinbase.

Some advisors say there’s no rush to get into crypto. “There’s nothing wrong with putting this in the ‘too hard’ pile,” says Meb Faber, CEO of Cambria Investment Management.

FTX now appears likely to join Enron, Lehman, and Madoff in the pantheon of corporate failures. But the chaos it’s creating in crypto is no reason to buy the dip. “I don’t think this is a value opportunity,” says Deutsche Bank strategist Marion Laboure.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Informe de Investigación: Morgan Stanley analiza a SanDisk SNDK, la verdad sobre el poder de fijación de precios en centros de datos en la nube y el dividendo del razonamiento de IA

**Resumen: Análisis de Morgan Stanley sobre SNDK - Poder de fijación de precios en centros de datos en la nube y oportunidades en inferencia de IA** Morgan Stanley actualizó su informe sobre SanDisk (SNDK) el 22 de junio, elevando el precio objetivo de 1100 a 1750 dólares y manteniendo la recomendación de "sobreponderar". La lógica central se basa en que la demanda de **inferencia de IA** está reescribiendo las reglas del mercado NAND. Los clientes de centros de datos en la nube, que buscan almacenamiento de alto rendimiento para cargas de trabajo como KV Cache, muestran poca sensibilidad al precio, otorgando a SNDK un sólido poder de fijación. Un pilar clave es el nuevo modelo de negocio (NBM) de SNDK, que ya ha asegurado más de un tercio de sus envíos en bits para el año fiscal 2027. Estos contratos a largo plazo (3-5 años) con precios fijos o con límites garantizan márgenes brutos de alrededor del **80% incluso en escenarios de precios bajos**, proporcionando una resiliencia significativa frente a los ciclos del sector. Se prevé que la escasez de oferta de NAND persista, impulsada por la expansión acelerada de centros de datos para IA. Morgan Stanley espera que los precios promedio (ASP) continúen subiendo hasta mediados de 2027. Los ingresos de SNDK se proyectan que crezcan de 7.355 mil millones de dólares en FY25 a 48.826 mil millones en FY27, impulsados por el negocio en la nube de alto margen, con un EPS que pasaría de 2.74 a 14.73 dólares. Los riesgos incluyen un crecimiento del sector menor al esperado, una mayor competencia y posibles pérdidas de cuota de mercado. Sin embargo, el marco de inversión se sostiene en el cambio estructural de demanda por la IA, la protección de márgenes vía contratos NBM y un entorno de oferta ajustada.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Informe de Investigación: Morgan Stanley analiza a SanDisk SNDK, la verdad sobre el poder de fijación de precios en centros de datos en la nube y el dividendo del razonamiento de IA

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

¡Triplicando el rendimiento! NEAR alcanza el límite físico de 200ms en generación de bloques con SPICE

NEAR One, el equipo central de desarrollo de NEAR, ha anunciado dos importantes actualizaciones del protocolo NEAR: fragmentación dinámica (para escalabilidad) y la implementación de un esquema de firma cuántica (para seguridad post-cuántica). Este artículo detalla el próximo plan central de la hoja de ruta tecnológica: SPICE (Separación de Consenso y Ejecución), un componente clave antes de Nightshade 3.0. SPICE, al desacoplar el proceso de consenso de la ejecución de transacciones, permitirá a NEAR reducir el tiempo de creación de bloques de 600 ms a 200 ms, triplicando el rendimiento y alcanzando un límite físico teórico. Esto se traduce en una confirmación de transacción más rápida (~0.4s), menor latencia y soporte para transacciones complejas de larga duración. La arquitectura separada permite que el consenso (ordenación de transacciones) funcione a máxima velocidad sin esperar a que se complete la ejecución del estado. Además de la velocidad, SPICE sienta las bases para Nightshade 3.0, permitiendo una mayor paralelización, una mejor distribución de la carga entre fragmentos y allanando el camino para transacciones atómicas entre fragmentos en el futuro. Esta mejora es crucial para casos de uso como pagos instantáneos y la economía de agentes de IA, donde la velocidad y la ejecución confiable son esenciales. El equipo de Near One está avanzando en el desarrollo de SPICE para su lanzamiento en los próximos meses.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

¡Triplicando el rendimiento! NEAR alcanza el límite físico de 200ms en generación de bloques con SPICE

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Agencia de Inteligencia: AMD restaura función de cifrado de memoria en CPU para consumidores, acciones de chips coreanas se desploman un 10% causando conmoción en el mercado

Resumen de TechFlow Intelligence: **IA y Software:** OpenAI lanza DayBreak, modelo enfocado en seguridad. Usuarios critican a Cursor por caída en calidad y velocidad, cuestionando su valor. El cliente de ChatGPT para Mac reporta frecuentes caídas. La comunidad china espera con expectativas el lanzamiento de DeepSeek V4.1. **Web3/Cripto:** Polymarket es acusado de usar creadores pagados para videos engañosos. Los exchanges coreanos Upbit y Bithumb listan nuevas monedas (ARX y CC). **Chips/Hardware:** AMD restaura la función de cifrado de memoria en sus CPUs tras protestas. ASML impulsa la fabricación con máquinas de litografía de 400M$. Los precios de alquiler de GPUs de Nvidia caen. Las ventas de memoria HBM4 de Samsung superan los 1000M$ en un mes. **Empresas Tecnológicas:** Huawei promete responsabilidad por su sistema de conducción autónoma y sube su precio. Prueba de autonomía del Xiaomi SU7 genera debate. Lei Jun (Xiaomi) habla sobre su apuesta con Dong Mingzhu (Gree). Google invierte 75M$ en A24 para herramientas de cine con IA. Apple parchea una vulnerabilidad de escucha en sus Beats Studio Buds. **Mercados y Finanzas:** Acciones de chips coreanos se hunden casi un 10%, arrastrando al índice KOSPI. Micron cae un 10% en premercado. Las acciones de SpaceX caen más de un 16%. Los bajistas predicen que la burbuja de la IA podría estallar en Q3, con posibles caídas del mercado. El oro y la plata bajan, mientras que las exportaciones de petróleo de Irán alcanzan un máximo en tiempos de guerra, presionando a la baja los precios del crudo. **Productos/Tendencias:** Se lanza Steam Machine a un precio alto de 1049$. Red Magic anuncia su tablet gaming 5 Pro con soporte para 185Hz. **Línea Subyacente del Día:** Una corrección en el mercado: las acciones de chips caen, los precios de alquiler de GPUs disminuyen, lo que señala un enfriamiento en la infraestructura de IA. Paralelamente, las quejas sobre herramientas de IA como Cursor y ChatGPT sugieren una fase de "desencanto" en la capa de aplicación. El mercado se pregunta si la IA es un nuevo paradigma o una burbuja más, mientras la narrativa pasa de "posibilidades infinitas" a un momento clave de "demostrar valor".

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Agencia de Inteligencia: AMD restaura función de cifrado de memoria en CPU para consumidores, acciones de chips coreanas se desploman un 10% causando conmoción en el mercado

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Visión Profunda: La Inferencia Descentralizada no es Hype, es el Campo Clave para Romper el Monopolio Centralizado de la IA

**Análisis profundo: El razonamiento descentralizado no es exageración, es clave para romper el monopolio centralizado de la IA** Ante un hipotético escenario donde un modelo de IA puntero es prohibido en 2026, el artículo argumenta que el **razonamiento descentralizado** es fundamental como protección contra la censura, ya que los modelos de código abierto serían imposibles de eliminar por completo. Sin embargo, construir redes de inferencia descentralizadas viables implica superar **cuatro desafíos principales**: 1. **Escalabilidad:** Ejecutar modelos enormes dividiéndolos en múltiples GPUs (swarm), luchando contra la latencia de red con técnicas como decodificación especulativa. 2. **Verificación:** Probar que el nodo ejecutó el modelo correcto y no una versión más barata. Se analizan opciones como ZKML (lento), pruebas de fraude o huellas estadísticas, todas con concesiones entre integridad, coste y velocidad. 3. **Privacidad:** Proteger el "prompt" del usuario. El sharding por sí solo no garantiza privacidad; se requieren soluciones como Entornos de Ejecución Confiables (TEE) o cifrado totalmente homomórfico (FHE), aunque este último es aún costoso. 4. **Mercado viable:** Identificar clientes reales dispuestos a pagar (empresas, agentes de IA) y crear un mercado sostenible más allá de la especulación con tokens. El artículo revisa proyectos como **Dolphin Network** (pruebas de pesos en vivo), **Inference.net** (verificación estadística), **Morpheus** (TEE) o **Darkbloom** (para Macs), destacando que cada uno aborda los problemas de forma distinta. La **ventaja competitiva** de la inferencia descentralizada no está en la baja latencia (donde lo centralizado gana), sino en tareas por lotes que priorizan el rendimiento agregado y el coste marginal bajo, como la generación de datos sintéticos. Un **valor oculto** a largo plazo es el ciclo de datos: las redes de inferencia pueden generar datos valiosos (por ejemplo, de interacciones con agentes) para entrenar mejores modelos de código abierto, creando un círculo virtuoso con el entrenamiento descentralizado. Finalmente, ofrece una **lista de verificación** para evaluar proyectos, enfatizando la necesidad de una propuesta de valor clara para usuarios no cripto, un equipo con sólidas capacidades técnicas en IA y una comprensión realista de su mercado objetivo.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Visión Profunda: La Inferencia Descentralizada no es Hype, es el Campo Clave para Romper el Monopolio Centralizado de la IA

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片