Hedge Funds Reportedly Shorting USDT With Hudreds of Millions: Tether CTO Responds

CryptoPotatoPublicado a 2022-06-28Actualizado a 2022-06-28

Resumen

Tether's CTO has responded to reports of hedge funds spending hundreds of millions of dollars to bet against USDT.

Paolo Ardoino, the chief technology officer (CTO) of Bitfinex and its stablecoin Tether (USDT), has reacted to reports that traditional hedge funds have joined retail traders in shorting USDT.
Hedge Funds Betting Against USDT
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Monday that a growing number of hedge funds had opened USDT short positions, worth hundreds of millions” of dollars in notional value, with Genesis Global Trading Inc., a leading crypto brokerage for professional investors, in the past month.
“There has been a real spike in the interest from traditional hedge funds who are taking a look at tether and looking to short it,” Leon Marshall, Genesis’ head of institutional sales, told WSJ in an interview.
The report further noted that some investors have been shorting USDT for at least a year, but more hedge fund managers picked up interest in betting against Tether after the fall of Terra’s algorithm stablecoin (UST) last month.
TerraUSD was one of the largest stablecoins in the market, with its value algorithmically pegged at 1:1 to the US dollar. However, UST lost its dollar parity and crashed 99% in May despite the efforts from the Terra team to defend the peg, including emptying its entire crypto reserve.
The UST collapse also affected Terra’s governance token LUNA, and the cryptocurrency slumped to zero from an all-time high of $119.02. The fiasco sent massive shockwaves through the stablecoin market and the broader crypto space, with billions wiped off the industry.
The drama also affected Tether, and USDT briefly lost its peg on exchanges, falling to as low as $0.97 before recovering.
Tether Confirms Stablecoins are Fully Backed
Marshall noted that hedge funds are shorting Tether because of the controversies surrounding Tether’s assets and the Federal Reserve’s decision to hike interest rates to combat inflation.
Last month, Tether issued a report confirming that its stablecoins are fully backed with cash, liquid assets, and other investments.
According to the report, the company’s total assets were worth at least $82.4 billion, with its total liabilities, including issued stablecoins, amounting to $82.2 billion.
Tether CTO Responds
Shortly after the WSJ report surfaced, Ardoino said on Twitter that he had been “open about the attempts from some hedge funds that were trying to cause further panic on the market after TERRA/LUNA collapse.”
I have been open about the attempts from some hedge funds that were trying to cause further panic on the market after TERRA/LUNA collapse.
It really seemed from the beginning a coordinated attack, with a new wave of FUD, troll armies, clowns, etc.
According to the Tether CTO, the move seemed like a “coordinated attack” from the onset and that hedge funds are always spreading FUD about the company and its stablecoins, including arguments that USDT is not 100% backed or that the firm issues tokens from thin air.
Ardoino believes that hedge funds that borrowed billions to short USDT will eventually have to buy back the stablecoin.
“Tether is the only stablecoin that is proven with fire under extreme pressure,” he said.
Meanwhile, since the Terra fiasco, Tether has unveiled two more stablecoins pegged to the Mexican peso and the British pound sterling. This brings the company’s total stablecoins to five.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El verdadero campo de batalla de la IA está en el "Bosque Oscuro"

El verdadero campo de batalla de la IA está en el "bosque oscuro": un análisis de la divergencia estratégica entre China y EE.UU. Mientras los modelos chinos de generación de video por IA (como el "Happy Horse" de Alibaba, Seedance 2.0 de ByteDance y Kling 3.0 de Kuaishou) superan técnicamente a Sora de OpenAI en aplicaciones de consumo, el panorama estratégico global muestra una divergencia crítica. EE.UU., liderado por Anthropic con su modelo Claude Mythos (capaz de descubrir y explotar vulnerabilidades de ciberseguridad) y OpenAI con GPT-5.4-Cyber, se enfoca en el sector empresarial y de seguridad, dominando mercados de alto valor como ciberseguridad (100.000 millones de dólares en EE.UU. en 2026) y herramientas de productividad. Anthropic alcanza 30.000 millones de dólares en ingresos anuales recurrentes (ARR), superando a OpenAI. China, en cambio, prioriza el mercado de consumo, integrando la IA en ecosistemas existentes (TikTok, Alibaba Cloud) para impulsar la creación de contenido y la retención de usuarios, aunque con ARR muy inferiores (ej: 300 millones de dólares para Kling). Esta estrategia "embebida" es eficiente en costes y se beneficia de un mercado de consumo maduro, pero no construye capacidades profundas en áreas críticas como ciberseguridad o programación. La raíz de esta divergencia es estructural: EE.UU. controla el 75% de la capacidad de computación de IA de vanguardia y tiene un mercado B2B maduro y dispuesto a pagar. China, con un 17-18% de la capacidad de computación y un mercado B2B menos desarrollado, optimiza para el consumo. El artículo advierte que la competencia está entrando en una fase de "bosque oscuro", donde la IA defensiva/ofensiva en ciberseguridad se convierte en el verdadero campo de batalla por la supremacía digital. La falta de capacidades equivalentes a Mythos podría dejar a China vulnerable. La solución propuesta es una "guerra asimétrica": impulsar modelos de código abierto (ej: GLM-5.1 de Zhipu AI), adaptarse al hardware local y buscar mercados globales en desarrollo (Sudeste Asiático, Oriente Medio) no cubiertos por los gigantes estadounidenses.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

El verdadero campo de batalla de la IA está en el "Bosque Oscuro"

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片