Google users think BTC is dead — 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week

CointelegraphPublicado a 2022-06-27Actualizado a 2022-06-27

Resumen

Bitcoin (BTC) starts a new week above $20,000 but heading for a new bearish record as a key support level remains out of reach.

Bitcoin (BTC) starts a new week above $20,000 but heading for a new bearish record as a key support level remains out of reach.
After a calm weekend punctuated by a brief spike to near $22,000, BTC/USD is back near the Friday closing price of CME futures markets.
A “round trip” thus allows traders to pick up where they left off at the end of last week’s final Wall Street trading session, but what could lie in store in the coming days?
A familiar cocktail of macro threats and ongoing bearish tendencies make the current climate far from ideal for the average hodler. Despite seeing some relief last week, crypto markets continue to bear the brunt of cold feet, which have defined macro sentiment increasingly throughout 2022.
With the June monthly close fast approaching, meanwhile, Bitcoin faces a few days of reckoning amid what could be its worst monthly performance since 2018.
Cointelegraph takes a look at five potential market triggers for the week ahead as inflation rages and crypto struggles to regain its footing.
Traders expect July to provide BTC price "catalysts"
“Apathetic” is a good word to describe the general sense of resignation among Bitcoin traders this week.
While the weekend spared the average hodler more unwelcome surprises, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows, the fact remains that BTC/USD is far from where anyone wants it to be — even in a bear market.
With the key 200-week moving average (WMA) out of reach, there is precious little bullish sentiment out there, as evidenced by the “extreme fear” of the Crypto Fear & Greed Index still firmly in control.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index (screenshot). Source: Alternative.me“BTC will capitulate in the next 6 months & hit cycle bottom (anywhere between $14-21k), then chop around in $28-40k in most of 2023 and be at ~$40k again by next halving,” Venturefounder, contributing analyst at on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant, summarized in part of a Twitter update on June 27.
Venturefounder’s thesis is indicative of a broader belief that the bottom is not yet in for Bitcoin, and that any relief moves are exactly that — distractions on the way to lower levels which suck capital out of market newbies and weak hands.
Expectations are that the first week of July could provide the next major bout of volatility across crypto and risk assets.
“Not much happening overnight on Bitcoin but am expecting quite a slow week due to the lack of catalysts currently,” popular trader Crypto Tony confirmed.
“July will be more of an action packed month for volatility due to the catalysts upcoming.”
For Arthur Hayes, former CEO of derivatives giant BitMEX, the first week of next month is a period where macro stars will align to punish hodlers once again.
In a blog post earlier in June, he flagged the United States Federal Reserve’s outsized rate hike and balance sheet reduction as providing the key backdrop to a risk asset nightmare.
“By June 30 (second quarter end), the Fed will have enacted a 75bps rate hike and begun shrinking its balance sheet. July 4 falls on a Monday, and is a federal and banking holiday. This is the perfect setup for yet another mega crypto dump,” Hayes warned.
A “wild ride to the downside” thus could be just days away.
As Cointelegraph reported, popular consensus for a genuine price bottom focuses on the area between $14,000 and $16,000, but $11,000 has also made an appearance, this corresponding to an 84.5% drawdown versus Bitcoin’s most recent all-time high.

BTC/USD 1-hour candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingViewHow normal is this bear?
While some panic sell their BTC, analysts are striving to show that so far, there is nothing unusual about the scope of the Bitcoin bear market.
Among them is on-chain analytics firm Glassnode, which in its recent research piece, “A Bear of Historic Proportions,” called for calm on sub-$20,000 BTC.
“Bear market lows have historically been established with BTC drawdowns of -75% to -84% from the ATH, and taking a duration of 260-days in 2019-20, to 410-days in 2015,” it wrote.
“With the current drawdown reaching -73.3% below the Nov-2021 ATH, and taking a duration between 227-days and 435-days, this bear market is now firmly within historical norms and magnitude.”
What singles out the current climate is not Bitcoin itself, but investors’ reactions to price changes.
Despite losses remaining within historical norms, sales of BTC at a loss have eclipsed previous records.
“The recent price collapse through to the $20k region was punctuated with the largest daily USD denominated realized loss in history,” Glassnode noted.
“Investors collectively locked in a loss of -$4.234B in a single day, which is a 22.5% increase from the previous record of $3.457B set in mid-2021.”
In BTC terms, the losses amount to the third-largest in Bitcoin’s history.

Bitcoin net realized profit/loss annotated chart (screenshot). Source: GlassnodeBTC risks first monthly close below 200WMA
With three days left before the June monthly close, things are either looking worrying or “interesting” for Bitcoin depending on one’s perspective.
With the bear market in full swing, BTC/USD remains below a key trendline that has supported it during previous macro lows. The 200-week moving average (WMA), which has never decreased in value, currently sits at $22,430.
In previous bear markets, as Cointelegraph reported, Bitcoin has retained the 200WMA as support while wicking below it to put in floor prices.
This time, however, the level is flipping to resistance as bulls’ attempts to follow historical norms repeatedly fail. As such, the end of the month could be “interesting,” says Stock-to-Flow price model creator PlanB, as it would mark the first monthly close under the 200WMA ever.
An accompanying chart uploaded on June 26 shows Bitcoin’s relationship to the 200WMA versus the distance from its block halving events, these delineating the four-year cycles, which contain the bear market paradigms previously referred to.
This is getting interesting! If BTC does not close June above 200WMA ($22K) that would be the first monthly close below 200WMA ever. 4 days to go .. pic.twitter.com/YtshVcIpks
— PlanB (@100trillionUSD) June 26, 2022
Meanwhile, Checkmate, lead on-chain analyst at Glassnode, noted further unusual bearish traits currently characterizing the BTC price.
In addition to being under the 200WMA, he notes, BTC/USD Is also below its realized price and deep in the “buy” zone of the Mayer Multiple metric.
As Cointelegraph recently reported, the Mayer Multiple shows how far the price below its 200-day moving average and thus how likely a buy at a specific level would be to generate asymmetrical returns.
“Such events in the past have only occurred for 13 out of 4,360, representing 0.2% of all trading days,” Checkmate wrote in part of a tweet.
#Bitcoin is trading below the following models which have coalesced around bear market floors in the past:

200W moving average
Realized Price
0.6 x Mayer Multiple

Such events in the past have only occurred for 13 out of 4,360, representing 0.2% of all trading days. pic.twitter.com/DtWGMrL2U2
— _Checkɱate ⚡ (@_Checkmatey_) June 26, 2022
Bitcoin dominance dives from multi-month high
It was only recently that altcoins were suffering even more than Bitcoin due to upheaval from multiple major projects including Terra and Celsius.
Now, however, the tables are turning — Bitcoin dominance has reversed after spiking this year, leading to suggestions that altcoins could be the place to be in the short term.
“Bitcoin dominance is moving down strongly. The advantage lies with altcoins right now,” popular Twitter account BTCfuel summarized.
After reaching an 11-month high of 48.36% on June 11, Bitcoin’s share of the overall crypto market cap has declined to 43.46% at the time of writing — a noticeable shift in under three weeks.
For veteran trader Peter Brandt, Bitcoin’s relative strength versus alts could have more significance than meets the eye for bulls.
“This chart could be the big ‘tell,’” he argued about the market cap dominance data.
“A decisive close back above 50% would be huge positive.”
Others are meanwhile confident that despite the latest reversal, it is not altcoins’ time to shine in any meaningful way going forward.
According to Venturefounder, holding BTC is still an investor’s best bet.
#Bitcoin dominance peaked at 48% and started going down again: but imo it's definitely NOT the beginning of #ALTSEASON.

Rest assured in a cycle-end bearmarket #BTC shall remain the best bet over #altcoins

Such event has happened multiple times during the 2018 cycle as well. pic.twitter.com/SJQolLNvy6
— venturef◎undΞr (@venturefounder) June 27, 2022
“Normal bear market narrative altcoins bleed more heavily Bitcoin,” trading suite Decentrader added in separate comments on the latest dominance action.
“However, for the last 2 weeks altcoins (generally) have out performed. So either: 'This time is different' or 'This won't last.' Dominance remains in 40-48% range.”

Bitcoin dominance 1-day candle chart. Source: TradingViewBitcoin goes mainstream again — for the wrong reasons
Bitcoin is more popular among mainstream internet users than at any time in over a year — but is it something worth celebrating?
Related: Top 5 cryptocurrencies to watch this week: BTC, UNI, XLM, THETA, HNT
Data from Google Trends confirms that more people have been googling “Bitcoin” this month than at any point since May 2021.

Worldwide Google search data for "Bitcoin." Source: Google TrendsThen, as now, however, BTC price action was targeting long-term lows, rather than highs, indicating that it is bearish events that trigger mainstream interest.
Last November’s all-time high, by comparison, looks like a blip on the radar when it comes to search interest.
Not a capitulation pic.twitter.com/rmp7ukK1HU
— JACKIS (@i_am_jackis) June 26, 2022
As such, activity for phrases such as “Bitcoin is dead” has spiked, this noted by social media users as a possible sign that the market is in a “capitulation” phase.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Harcok Exclusivo | La empresa de inteligencia corpórea marina 'Shihang Intelligent' obtiene una inversión récord de 10.000 millones, Zhu Xiaohu y Temasek apuestan por ella

**La empresa emergente china de inteligencia corpórea marina, Shiheng Intelligence, ha cerrado una ronda de financiación Serie A récord de más de 1.000 millones de yuanes (unos 10.000 millones de RMB).** Esta es la mayor ronda única en el campo global de la robótica marina. La ronda fue liderada por inversores industriales, incluido el fondo Shanghe Momentum (respaldado por las empresas de chips Moore Threads y Kunlunxin), Vertex Growth (plataforma de inversión estatal de Singapur) y la empresa cotizada en bolsa Broad-Ocean Motor. Inversores existentes como GSR Ventures, Vertex Ventures China y Vision Plus Capital también participaron. Fundada por Chen Xiaobo (graduado de la Universidad de Ingeniería de Harbin y ganador más joven del Premio Nacional al Progreso en Ciencia y Tecnología para la Defensa), Shiheng Intelligence se centra en el desarrollo de robots submarinos y su modelo de IA corpórea "Cangqiong CEORION". La compañía afirma que sus robots son capaces de operar a profundidades de hasta 10.000 metros y realizar tareas complejas en 3D. Sus aplicaciones prácticas incluyen la limpieza de buques, seguridad submarina, parques eólicos marinos, granjas de acuicultura e inspección de fondos marinos, con pedidos que superaron los 10.000 millones de RMB en el primer semestre de 2026. El modelo de IA "Cangqiong CEORION", lanzado en abril, integra percepción, comprensión y ejecución autónoma en una arquitectura única. Está entrenado con millones de horas de datos de operaciones reales y de simulación, cubriendo 12 categorías principales de tareas submarinas. En pruebas, logra una tasa de éxito superior al 90% en tareas y una capacidad de adaptación a entornos nuevos superior al 70%. El modelo incorpora un módulo de razonamiento físico que reduce las colisiones en un 80%. La empresa utilizará los nuevos fondos para I+D, expansión global y desarrollo del ecosistema de la cadena de suministro. Recientemente, fue seleccionada como socio tecnológico clave para el plan nacional de inspección y limpieza de cascos de Singapur.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Harcok Exclusivo | La empresa de inteligencia corpórea marina 'Shihang Intelligent' obtiene una inversión récord de 10.000 millones, Zhu Xiaohu y Temasek apuestan por ella

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

¿Qué tiene que ver Huang Zheng, el creador de Pinduoduo, con la blockchain?

Resumen: La conexión entre Huang Zheng, fundador de Pinduoduo, y la blockchain En su artículo "Voltear el capitalismo", Huang Zheng, fundador de Pinduoduo, expone la lógica central de su plataforma: no es solo sobre productos baratos, sino un "negocio de seguros" que gestiona la incertidumbre. Argumenta que la riqueza fluye hacia los ricos porque estos asumen la "incertidumbre" (riesgos como enfermedades o pérdidas) por otros. La gente común paga por certeza (seguros, ahorros), transfiriendo valor hacia arriba. Pinduoduo intenta "voltear" esto mediante un "seguro inverso": agrega la demanda masiva de consumidores a través de funciones como "compras en grupo" para crear pedidos certeros y a gran escala. Esta "certeza agregada" permite a los fabricantes reducir los costos de riesgo y ofrecer precios más bajos. Huang señala que el eslabón final para hacer viable este modelo a gran escala podría ser la **blockchain**. El problema clave del "seguro inverso" es que las promesas individuales carecen de valor: son fáciles de romper. La blockchain, mediante **contratos inteligentes**, puede hacer que los compromisos sean creíbles, ejecutables y con un coste por incumplimiento. Transforma la confianza, pasando de depender de personas o intermediarios a depender de reglas codificadas e inmutables. Así, mientras Pinduoduo crea certeza mediante la **agregación masiva** de voluntades dispersas, la blockchain (ejemplificada por sistemas como Bitcoin) la crea mediante **reglas predefinidas e inalterables**. Ambas son caminos distintos para generar confianza y reducir la incertidumbre en las transacciones económicas.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

¿Qué tiene que ver Huang Zheng, el creador de Pinduoduo, con la blockchain?

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

El gigante del almacenamiento que forjó un imperio de billones, al final no pudo convertirse en el hombre más rico

**Resumen en español (cerca de 1500 caracteres):** **Título: El magnate del almacenamiento que construyó un imperio billonario, pero que nunca será el más rico** El artículo analiza la trayectoria de Zhu Yiming, fundador de dos gigantes chinos de chips de memoria: GigaDevice (兆易创新) y ChangXin Memory Technologies (长鑫科技). Aunque ChangXin se prepara para una OPV que podría valorarla en más de un billón de yuanes, Zhu, con una participación indirecta de menos del 3%, no se convertirá en uno de los individuos más ricos de China. Su estrategia se centró en un enfoque pragmático y "oportunista". En 2005, fundó GigaDevice con capital limitado. En lugar de competir directamente en el segmento premium, la compañía se especializó inteligentemente en productos de memoria de baja y media gama (como NOR Flash y SLC NAND), nichos que los grandes actores globales (Samsung, Micron) fueron abandonando. Más tarde, GigaDevice se diversificó hacia microcontroladores (MCU), sensores y chips analógicos, principalmente a través de adquisiciones. A pesar de la fuerte ciclicidad del sector, GigaDevice ha demostrado ser una compañía sólida, manteniendo márgenes brutos superiores al 40% y controlando estrictamente sus gastos, lo que le ha permitido generar beneficios operativos consistentemente. Sin embargo, Zhu comprendió que el modelo "fabless" (sin fábricas propias) de GigaDevice tenía limitaciones inherentes en la industria de la memoria, donde la expansión anticíclica y las enormes inversiones en fabricación (modelo IDM) son claves para sobrevivir a largo plazo. Por ello, en 2016, colaboró con el gobierno de Hefei para fundar ChangXin, un proyecto IDM masivo enfocado en DRAM. Para atraer la confianza y la financiación masiva necesaria (préstamos a largo plazo superiores a 100.000 millones de yuanes), Zhu tomó decisiones poco comunes: no cobró un sueldo como CEO de ChangXin hasta que la empresa fuera rentable, utilizó la mitad de sus opciones sobre acciones (valoradas en más de 10.000 millones de yuanes) para recompensar a los empleados, y extendió su periodo de bloqueo de acciones a 10 años. Este compromiso, que diluyó significativamente su participación y control personal, fue fundamental para que ChangXin acumulara activos de planta y equipo por valor de casi 170.000 millones de yuanes, superando incluso a gigantes como BYD en este aspecto. En conclusión, la historia de Zhu Yiming es la de un visionario que, a través de una estrategia astuta y un sacrificio personal significativo (renunciando a un potencial patrimonio personal mucho mayor), logró construir dos pilares fundamentales para la industria china de semiconductores, priorizando el éxito industrial a largo plazo sobre la riqueza individual máxima.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

El gigante del almacenamiento que forjó un imperio de billones, al final no pudo convertirse en el hombre más rico

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Exploit de gobernanza de Token of Power drena $1.58 millones en WETH, según TRM

La empresa de inteligencia de blockchain TRM Labs ha detallado un ataque de toma de control de gobernanza contra el protocolo Token of Power, que drenó aproximadamente 1,58 millones de dólares en WETH. Según el análisis, el atacante explotó una debilidad en la configuración de la DAO de Aragon del protocolo: la ausencia de un timelock. Esto permitió al atacante proponer, votar y ejecutar una acción de gobernanza maliciosa en un solo bloque. El atacante financió la operación con 662 ETH retirados de Tornado Cash, compró suficientes tokens TOP para obtener poder de voto mayoritario, acuñó 10 mil millones de nuevos TOP y los cambió por WETH a través de un grupo de Balancer antes de devolver los fondos mediante Tornado Cash. La explotación ejemplifica cómo el diseño de gobernanza puede convertirse en un riesgo de seguridad directo. Los timelocks están diseñados para dar tiempo a los usuarios y equipos de seguridad para reaccionar antes de que una propuesta sea ejecutable. Para los usuarios de DeFi, este caso recuerda que el riesgo no se limita a los errores de código; los parámetros de gobernanza y los controles del tesoro son igual de cruciales. El siguiente paso será monitorear si los fondos robados se mueven nuevamente y si el protocolo, Aragon o los proveedores de liquidez afectados publican más detalles sobre remediación. Este informe se basa en datos del reporte de seguridad de TRM Labs.

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

Exploit de gobernanza de Token of Power drena $1.58 millones en WETH, según TRM

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片