Bernstein Analysts Dive Deep Into Ethereum Treasury Companies, Highlight Unique Risks

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-07-31Actualizado a 2025-08-01

Resumen

Analysts at investment firm Bernstein have discussed in detail the Ethereum treasury companies, which have begun to emerge. The analysts...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Analysts at investment firm Bernstein have discussed in detail the Ethereum treasury companies, which have begun to emerge. The analysts highlighted specific risks around their ETH operations but declared that they remain bullish on the largest altcoin by market cap.

How The Ethereum Treasury Companies Are Unique

The Bernstein report noted how the Ethereum treasury companies are different from the Bitcoin treasury companies since the former are not just holding the asset but using it to generate yield. Companies like SharpLink Gaming, BitMine, and BitDigital have adopted ETH as a reserve asset and expanded their presence in the Ethereum ecosystem by using their holdings for DeFi activities. 

The report further noted that staking returns are currently around 3%, although it has historically surged to as high as 5%. Based on this, the analysts remarked that an Ethereum treasury company that holds $1 billion in ETH, for example, could earn between $30 and $50 million in annual yields.

However, the Bernstein analysts noted that this staking mechanism comes with its risks, especially since these Ethereum treasury companies have to deploy their holdings to earn these yields. As such, these companies face liquidity constraints, unlike Bitcoin treasury companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which hold a 100% reserve at all times. 

Furthermore, these ETH treasury companies also have to deal with the risks involved in unstaking their coins, as it could take days due to the validator queue. There is also an additional risk if these companies choose to restake their coins. Bernstein also highlighted DeFi yield farming and smart contract risks. 

In line with this, the analysts opined that the Ethereum treasury companies that are likely to advance are those that adopt proper risk management with institutional-grade custody. Bernstein warned that these companies must maintain a balance between trying to generate yields while maintaining their good standing.  

Bullish On ETH As Demand Increases

The Bernstein analysts revealed that they remain bullish on ETH even as demand for the altcoin continues to increase through these Ethereum treasury companies and even the Ethereum ETFs. They expect ETH’s price to rally higher in the long run as the network’s usage also grows, thanks to its expanding stablecoin ecosystem and Real World Assets (RWAs) tokenization.  

It is worth noting that Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan recently attributed ETH’s 60% rally in the past month to the Ethereum treasury companies and Ethereum ETFs. He predicted that ETH could still further witness a demand shock, as these entities potentially purchase up to $20 billion of ETH in the next year, equivalent to 5.33 million ETH at today’s prices. 

StrategicEthReserve data shows that these treasury companies currently hold 2.73 million ETH ($10.56 billion). Meanwhile, SoSo Value data shows that the ETH ETFs boast $21.43 billion in net assets. 

At the time of writing, the ETH price is trading at around $3,865, up in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Ethereum
ETH trading at $3,869 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Lecturas Relacionadas

JP Morgan considera que la política de ventas de Bitcoin de Strategy es un 'riesgo bidireccional' – ¡Detalles!

Durante un tiempo, MicroStrategy, la empresa de Michael Saylor, ha sido ampliamente criticada. Ahora, actores importantes como JPMorgan están emitiendo advertencias. El gigante bancario ha señalado la política de venta de Bitcoin de la empresa, calificándola de "riesgo bidireccional". Históricamente, MicroStrategy operaba principalmente como compradora de Bitcoin, utilizando capital obtenido mediante deuda y emisión de acciones para adquirir más BTC, bloqueando así una parte significativa de la oferta circulante. Sin embargo, su nueva estructura de capital ha cambiado esta dinámica. La empresa se ha autorizado formalmente a vender una cantidad limitada de Bitcoin para pagar dividendos de sus acciones preferentes u otros compromisos financieros, al tiempo que ha lanzado un programa de recompra de acciones. JPMorgan argumenta que, aunque las reservas de efectivo de MicroStrategy (unos 2.550 millones de dólares) cubren aproximadamente 17 meses de costos de dividendos e intereses, este colchón es insuficiente para descartar por completo futuras ventas de Bitcoin. El banco sugiere que se necesitaría una cobertura de 24 a 36 meses (incrementando las reservas en dólares, incluso si ello hace que las acciones cotizen con descuento respecto al valor patrimonial) para dar mayor tranquilidad a los inversores. El problema central es la introducción de incertidumbre: MicroStrategy ya no es únicamente un comprador neto que retira Bitcoin del mercado; ahora puede convertirse en una fuente de oferta si necesita liquidez. Aunque su capacidad de venta autorizada (1.250 millones de dólares) es pequeña en comparación con sus tenencias totales (847.363 BTC), el impacto psicológico en el mercado podría ser significativo. Esto ocurre en un momento en que los ETF spot de Bitcoin en EE.UU. enfrentan salidas netas y el precio de la criptomoneda lucha por mantenerse. La única esperanza a corto plazo, según el análisis, podría ser la aprobación de la Ley CLARITY, que tiene el potencial de restaurar la integridad del mercado y el precio de Bitcoin, mejorando así el panorama para MicroStrategy.

ambcryptoHace 11 min(s)

JP Morgan considera que la política de ventas de Bitcoin de Strategy es un 'riesgo bidireccional' – ¡Detalles!

ambcryptoHace 11 min(s)

Las stablecoins son los 'realistas' del mundo cripto: Open USD hace que el viejo sistema monetario entre en juego personalmente

El artículo analiza el lanzamiento de Open USD, una nueva stablecoin respaldada por un consorcio de más de 140 instituciones tradicionales (Visa, Mastercard, Google, BlackRock, etc.). El autor, Hu Yilin, argumenta que las stablecoins como Open USD no representan una revolución monetaria real, sino una "reforma leal" al sistema actual. Aunque aprovechan la eficiencia de blockchain, refuerzan el papel central del dólar y la Reserva Federal, en lugar de desafiarlo. Compara este enfoque con el sistema de Tycho Brahe en astronomía, que adoptó nuevas técnicas pero mantuvo la Tierra en el centro. La llegada de Open USD, impulsada por actores tradicionales, cuestiona el papel de los proyectos nativos de criptomonedas. Si su objetivo es solo mejorar la eficiencia del sistema existente, se arriesgan a ser absorbidos por él. El autor sostiene que la verdadera revolución criptográfica, encarnada por Bitcoin, requiere desafiar la idea de que se necesita un banco central como núcleo del orden monetario. Para los proyectos que aspiran a un cambio fundamental, depender solo de las tarifas de transacción (como "vender combustible") es insuficiente; deben mantener un núcleo "disruptivo", ya sea la soberanía monetaria, la descentralización o la resistencia a la censura. En resumen, las stablecoins pueden ser un puente útil, pero no el destino final de la revolución criptográfica.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Las stablecoins son los 'realistas' del mundo cripto: Open USD hace que el viejo sistema monetario entre en juego personalmente

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片