Tornado Cash Trial: DOJ Weighs Charges Against More Crypto VC Firms

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-07-27Actualizado a 2025-07-27

Resumen

Dragonfly Capital, a cryptocurrency venture capital firm (VC), may be facing charges from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) related...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Dragonfly Capital, a cryptocurrency venture capital firm (VC), may be facing charges from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) related to its early investment in Tornado Cash, co-founded by Roman Storm. 

Fox journalist Eleanor Terret reported that federal authorities are contemplating charges against several individuals at Dragonfly, including General Partner Tom Schmidt. 

Dragonfly Capital’s Role In Tornado Cash

During a recent court session, Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) Rehn indicated that charges could extend beyond Schmidt, leading to a request to seal the transcript of his comments. 

The court proceedings revealed email exchanges between Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm and Dragonfly partners, Haseeb Qureshi and Tom Schmidt, discussing the potential implementation of Know-Your-Customer (KYC) protocols for the platform. 

This detail adds another layer to the scrutiny surrounding Dragonfly’s involvement with Tornado Cash which has been scrutinized over the past years for allegedly being used by bad actors to launder “billions of dollars” in illicit funds, including stolen crypto.

In response to the ongoing investigation, Haseeb Qureshi took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter), to defend Dragonfly’s position. He clarified that the firm invested in PepperSec, the developers of Tornado Cash, in August 2020, citing a belief in the importance of open-source privacy technologies. 

Qureshi emphasized that prior to the investment, Dragonfly secured an external legal opinion confirming that Tornado Cash was compliant with existing laws, as outlined by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in 2019.

Warns Of Dangerous Precedent

The US Department of Justice has reportedly stated in open court that they are considering charges against Dragonfly based on its investment in the Tornado Cash team. Qureshi expressed concern over this potential course of action, arguing that it would set a dangerous precedent. 

He underscored that Dragonfly did not have operational control over Tornado Cash, maintained no contact with any malicious users, and consistently encouraged compliance with legal standards among its portfolio companies.

Moreover, Qureshi pointed out that bringing charges against a venture capital firm for a portfolio company’s alleged wrongdoing would be unprecedented and could have a chilling effect on investments in the cryptocurrency and privacy-preserving technology sectors

He emphasized that Dragonfly has fully cooperated with the Department of Justice’s investigation, stating that the firm has never been a target of the inquiry and has always adhered to legal guidelines.

In light of the potential charges, Qureshi expressed confidence in Dragonfly’s legal standing, asserting that any attempts to prosecute the firm would be unfounded and contrary to the facts. 

He noted that the government’s statements in court could be aimed at undermining Tornado Cash’s defense, making it more challenging for Schmidt to testify.

Tornado Cash
The daily chart shows TORN’s price recovery. Source: TORNUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Ronaldo is a seasoned crypto enthusiast with over four years of experience in the field. He is passionate about exploring the vast and dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and its practical applications for achieving economic sovereignty. Ronaldo is constantly seeking to expand his knowledge and expertise in the DeFi space, as he believes it holds tremendous potential for transforming the traditional financial landscape.

Lecturas Relacionadas

OUSD y su impacto en Circle, Tether y Paxos: no es una simple noticia negativa, sino una reconfiguración competitiva más compleja

**Resumen en español:** El anuncio de OUSD por parte de Stripe y otras empresas ha generado un impacto complejo en el ecosistema de stablecoins, lejos de ser simplemente negativo para todos. **Para Circle (USDC):** No es una "sentencia de muerte". La caída inicial del 15-20% en sus acciones (CRCL) refleja preocupaciones válidas, pero Circle conserva ventajas clave: liquidez profunda, integraciones existentes y ventaja de ser el primero. Una posible revisión o fin de su acuerdo de reparto de ingresos con Coinbase podría incluso duplicar sus ingresos netos a corto plazo y darle más libertad competitiva. Sin embargo, OUSD podría convertirse en la opción por defecto dentro del ecosistema de Stripe, gracias a sus fortalezas en ingeniería y productos. Circle debe acelerar el desarrollo de sus propios productos de pago/fintech y considerar adquisiciones defensivas. **Para Tether (USDT):** El impacto es mínimo. OUSD no apunta a su mercado central (canales de distribución menos regulados que Circle y Stripe no priorizan). Aunque su cuota de mercado pueda disminuir con el tiempo, lo hará probablemente en un mercado total mucho más grande. **Para Paxos (USDP, USDG):** El desafío es más existencial. OUSD erosiona la principal ventaja de USDG (integración nativa con PayPal) y, a medida que se clarifique el marco regulatorio, la ventaja de Paxos en cumplimiento normativo podría debilitarse. Esto explica su reciente cambio de enfoque hacia servicios de intermediación (brokerage-as-a-service). **Obstáculo persistente para la adopción empresarial:** Tanto USDC como OUSD (si es emitido por una entidad relacionada con Bridge) siguen representando una exposición crediticia a un emisor que no tiene calificación de grado de inversión. Esto sigue siendo una barrera clave para la adopción por parte de grandes instituciones, que podrían preferir stablecoins emitidas por grandes bancos una vez entren en el mercado. En resumen, OUSD introduce una competencia más sofisticada, presionando diferencialmente a cada actor y acelerando la evolución del mercado, donde la liquidez, las integraciones, los ecosistemas y el cumplimiento normativo serán factores decisivos.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

OUSD y su impacto en Circle, Tether y Paxos: no es una simple noticia negativa, sino una reconfiguración competitiva más compleja

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片