FOX Journalist Slams Ripple: $10 Billion CEO, But No Financials

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-03-22Actualizado a 2025-03-22

Resumen

In a post on X, Fox Business reporter Charles Gasparino has raised questions about Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse....

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a post on X, Fox Business reporter Charles Gasparino has raised questions about Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse. According to Gasparino, Garlinghouse may now be worth an estimated $10 billion—yet the firm’s financial disclosures remain largely concealed from public view.

Ripple CEO Faces Scrutiny

“With the recent price surge in XRP, the net worth of Brad Garlinghouse, Ripple’s CEO, is around $10 billion, making him one of the richest people in the country,” Gasparino wrote. “And yet, why hasn’t anyone seen a public filing from Ripple about just how much money the company makes? Ripple is a business after all, in the traditional sense. It is not a blockchain experiment.”

He further hinted that this lack of transparency could become a pivotal issue for Paul Atkins, the former SEC Commissioner who has been nominated by President Donald Trump to lead the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Atkins is scheduled to appear before the Senate Banking Committee on March 27, 2025, for his confirmation hearing, where he is expected to face lawmakers like US Senator Elizabeth Warren.

“That’s going to be the key question for Paul Atkins and the SEC on the Ripple case going forward. Retail trading of XRP passes the decentralization test, according to the SEC. But there’s no doubt it was used to build the Ripple platform, which is a business. Under securities laws, that usually mandates disclosures of financials. This could come up during Atkins confirmation hearing next week from someone like Senator Warren who does know securities laws, I am told,” Gasparino wrote.

Garlinghouse and Ripple, for their part, have not publicly commented on Gasparino’s remarks. While the company is known for releasing quarterly XRP Markets Reports detailing its token holdings and the status of certain escrow accounts, it does not publish comprehensive financial statements like public companies do. Because the firm is privately held, US securities law does not require it to submit filings such as 10-Ks or 10-Qs.

Gasparino’s posts arrive amid another significant legal development for Ripple. Just this week, Garlinghouse revealed that the US Securities and Exchange Commission ended its appeal of Judge Analisa Torres’s July 2023 ruling in Manhattan, which found that XRP sold on public exchanges does not meet the legal definition of a security.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, widely considered a critic of cryptocurrency, is seen as a potential linchpin in the upcoming confirmation hearing. Gasparino noted that the Massachusetts senator may press Atkins to address whether Ripple, as a private company issuing a token integral to its operations, must disclose traditional financials under securities laws.

If Garlinghouse’s net worth truly stands at $10 billion, he would be hovering around the 100th spot on Forbes’ US wealth rankings, fueled largely by the rise in XRP’s market value. Ripple’s token, initially allocated at 100 billion units, has sparked repeated questions over the years about how profits flow to corporate leadership and early founders.

While public records are sparse, court documents in the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple shed some light on Garlinghouse’s personal sales of XRP. Between 2017 and 2020, Garlinghouse sold an estimated $164.26 million worth of XRP, with more than 90% of the sales conducted on foreign exchanges. The highest single-year sale occurred in 2017, netting around $42.27 million in one self-directed transaction via Bitstamp.

Chris Larsen, Ripple’s executive chairman and co-founder, reportedly accounted for the remaining portion of the $600 million in personal, unregistered XRP sales cited in the SEC lawsuit. Meanwhile, the initial founders—Arthur Britto, Jed McCaleb, and Larsen—collectively received 20 billion XRP when the token was created. Ripple later locked 55 billion XRP in escrow in 2017, aiming to provide predictability around token supply.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.41.

XRP price
XRP is squeezed between trend line and 0.382 Fib, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Lecturas Relacionadas

OUSD, que hizo caer un 17% a Circle en un día, se ve envuelto en polémica de marketing

Un nuevo stablecoin, Open USD (OUSD), anunciado por la empresa Open Standard, generó gran expectativa al prometer características como acuñación y canje gratuitos, participación en los rendimientos de los activos de reserva y gobernanza colaborativa. Su lanzamiento se vio impulsado por una lista de más de 140 supuestos socios, incluyendo grandes nombres como Western Union, Ripple y MetaMask. Este anuncio tuvo un impacto inmediato en el mercado, provocando una caída del 17.55% en las acciones de Circle, el emisor de USDC. Sin embargo, la credibilidad de la lista de socios fue rápidamente cuestionada. Medios coreanos informaron que empresas como Samsung Electronics y Dunamu (matriz de Upbit) negaron haber mantenido negociaciones formales o dado su consentimiento para figurar como miembros de la alianza. Otras, como Shinhan Financial Group, admitieron solo haber recibido una consulta preliminar. Críticos acusaron a Open Standard de emplear tácticas de marketing engañosas, presentando contactos exploratorios como acuerdos firmes para generar legitimidad por asociación. Ante la polémica, Jeremy Allaire, CEO de Circle, cuestionó públicamente la sostenibilidad a largo plazo del modelo de OUSD, argumentando que características como los costes cero podrían comprometer la inversión en la infraestructura crítica necesaria para un stablecoin. A pesar de las controversias, algunas empresas como Stripe y Coinbase confirmaron su apoyo e integración planificada de OUSD en sus plataformas. El incidente deja una primera impresión negativa para OUSD en un sector donde la confianza es fundamental.

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

OUSD, que hizo caer un 17% a Circle en un día, se ve envuelto en polémica de marketing

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

Una década de cambio: El camino hacia la desaparición de las startups cripto

De 2017 a 2026, la industria cripto ha pasado de una era de baja barrera de entrada y experimentación anónima a un entorno altamente regulado con costes de cumplimiento prohibitivos. Antes, un whitepaper y un repositorio de GitHub bastaban para lanzar una startup mediante una ICO. Hoy, operar en mercados regulados como EE.UU., la UE o Asia requiere equipos legales, canales bancarios, licencias (como BitLicense o MiCA) y una inversión inicial que puede superar el millón de dólares. La inversión de capital riesgo se ha concentrado en empresas maduras, dejando a las startups tempranas con menos financiación. Los datos muestran que en 2026, el 57% de la inversión se destinó a etapas tardías, mientras que las rondas iniciales apenas captaron un 5.2%. Las fusiones y adquisiciones se han disparado, permitiendo a los grandes actores (como Coinbase y Ripple) adquirir rápidamente licencias y canales de distribución. La innovación técnica ya no es el factor clave; ahora, las ventajas competitivas son las relaciones bancarias, las licencias y la confianza institucional. Esto eleva la calidad y seguridad del sector, atrayendo capital institucional, pero también crea una barrera alta para nuevos emprendedores sin recursos o contactos. La industria, nacida para desafiar los monopolios financieros, parece estar siguiendo la misma curva de consolidación y concentración de poder que otros sectores regulados antes que ella.

Foresight NewsHace 53 min(s)

Una década de cambio: El camino hacia la desaparición de las startups cripto

Foresight NewsHace 53 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片