Decentralized credit scores: How can blockchain tech change ratings

CointelegraphPublicado a 2022-04-25Actualizado a 2022-04-25

Resumen

The concept of lending and borrowing is as old as time itself.

The concept of lending and borrowing is as old as time itself. Regarding finances, while some individuals have more than enough for themselves, others barely have enough to get by. As long as there is this imbalance in finance distribution, there will always be a need to borrow and a desire to lend.
Lending involves giving out a resource on credit with the condition of it being returned upon an agreed period of time. In this case, such resources would be money or any financial asset.
The lender could be an individual, a financial institution, a firm or even a country. Whichever the case may be, the lender, oftentimes, needs a sort of assurance that their resources would be returned to them upon the agreed time.
Certain criteria qualify a borrower to take a loan. Among these are the borrower’s debt-to-income (DTI) ratio which measures the amount of money from their income committed to handling monthly debt service, stable employment, the value of the collateral and actual income.
Credit rating plays a crucial role in lending
Generally, most financial institutions and firms rely more heavily on the credit score of the borrower than the aforementioned criteria.
Consequently, credit scores are by far the biggest factor in determining whether a loan should be granted to a borrower. In a world of financial imbalance where loans are quickly becoming necessary, particularly due to recent economic hardships, individuals, establishments and even governments are expected to keep their credit ratings as favorable as possible.
These ratings or scores can be assigned to individuals, firms or governments that wish to take a loan in the bid to settle a deficit. Defaulting in the payment of the loan at the agreed time generally has an adverse impact on the borrower’s credit rating, making it difficult for them to obtain another loan in the future.
In the case of governments, they are likely to face a sovereign credit risk which is the potential of a government to default on the repayment of a loan taken. According to data from Wikipedia, Singapore, Norway, Switzerland and Denmark respectively rank first to fourth among the least risky countries to lend to.
Traditional credit rating is barely perfect
As simple as it sounds, the concept of credit rating is far from perfect due in large part to its centralized nature.
Credit ratings are carried out by establishments commonly referred to as credit bureaus. The credit rating of individuals can be carried out by agencies including Transunion, Experian and Equifax. Companies and governments are likely to be assessed by firms such as Moody’s and S&P Global, to name a few.
While credit bureaus make every effort to assess borrowers’ creditworthiness as transparently as possible, there have been numerous cases of inadequate assessments due to issues such as concealment of material information, static study, misrepresentation and human bias.
In a recent article, Dimitar Rafailov, Bulgarian associate professor at the University of Economics Varna, stressed the importance of an adequate and transparent credit rating.
However, Rafailov noted that credit bureaus perceived inadequacies in these ratings and such failings have “strengthened the negative effects of the global financial crisis, generating additional systematic risks.” He pointed out that the errors plaguing traditional credit rating as made by credit bureaus are often caused by “business models, conflicts of interest and absent or ineffective regulation of their activities.”
The patent need for decentralization
The advent of blockchain technology revolutionized a lot of sectors, especially the financial sector. Decentralized finance (DeFi), as a product of the burgeoning technology, has revealed the possibility of running financial services with a peer-to-peer (P2P) system, eliminating the idea of an intermediary or central authority.
Decentralized credit scoring refers to the idea of assessing a borrower’s creditworthiness using on-chain — at times off-chain — data without the need for an intermediary. The assessment is done on a blockchain run by a P2P system of computers without any central authority or point of control. Moreover, a decentralized credit rating erases the traditional credit bureaus from the picture.
Jill Carlson, an investment partner at Slow Ventures, expressed the importance of a decentralized form of credit scoring. She noted in a 2018 article that “solutions for decentralized credit scoring, therefore, could be extrapolated into larger identity systems that do not rely on a single central authority,” further stating that the issues that have come from a centralized credit scoring concept “have been more deeply felt than ever than ever in the last year,” citing the Equifax hack of 2017.
In 2017, credit rating giant Equifax had a security breach caused by four Chinese hackers who compromised the data of 143 million Americans.
Antonio Trenchev, former member of the National Assembly of Bulgaria and co-founder of blockchain lending platform Nexo, told Cointelegraph that credit ratings, especially as produced by central authorities, are more problematic than solution-based.
Trenchev boasted of how his platform has managed to rule out credit scores via its “Instant Crypto Credit Lines and Nexo Card.”
“In this utopian borrowing-scape we hope to create, credit scores will be a rarity, and when they are used, they will be decentralized and fair.”
Growing into a reality
Two years ago, blockchain lending protocol Teller raised $1 million in a seed funding round led by venture capital firm Framework Ventures to incorporate traditional credit scores into DeFi
Although it was the first of its kind in the decentralized world, credit scores are expected to help with the problem of over-collateralization that plagued lending in DeFi while making sure that eligible borrowers get what they deserve.
In November last year, Credit DeFi Alliance (CreDA) officially launched a credit rating service that would ascertain a user’s creditworthiness with data from multiple blockchains.
CreDA was developed to work using the CreDA Oracle by evaluating records of past transactions carried out by the user across several blockchains with the help of an AI.
When this data is analyzed, it is minted into a nonfungible token (NFT) called a credit NFT (cNFT). This cNFT is then used to assess incentives or rates peculiar to the user’s data when the user wishes to borrow from a DeFi protocol.
Moreover, CreDA was made to operate across different blockchains including Polkadot, Binance Smart Chain, Elastos Sidechain, Polygon, Arbitrum and more, despite being built on Ethereum-2.0.
Recently, P2P lending protocol RociFi labs concluded a seed funding of $2.7 million in partnership with asset management firm GoldenTree, investment firm Skynet Trading, Arrington Capital, XRP Capital, Nexo and LD Capital. This is geared toward expanding on-chain credit ratings for decentralized finance.
Moreover, RociFi works by using on-chain data and AI in addition to ID data from decentralized platforms to determine a user’s rating. The credit rating, like CreDA’s approach, is turned into an NFT called a nonfungible credit score which could range from 1 to 10. A higher score means less creditworthiness.
A plethora of benefits
The judgments made with regard to a borrower’s creditworthiness can have a profound effect on their life. The necessity to have fair and unbiased judgments in this regard cannot be overemphasized.
Nonetheless, traditional credit rating bureaus have failed to accurately assess borrowers’ creditworthiness in a lot of cases, either due to inefficiency or just plain bias.
Decentralized credit rating brings fairness to the table. Borrowers are certain of being assessed accurately because of the fact that these assessments are carried out by AI on blockchains without the control of any central authority.
Furthermore, with decentralized credit rating, the on-chain data of consumers are not collected and stored on a central ledger but scattered throughout a blockchain maintained by a P2P system. This makes it very hard for hackers to steal users’ data, as was encountered in the Equifax hack of 2017.
From DeFi to decentralized credit rating, the blockchain industry has brought security and efficiency to the financial world. Although decentralized credit rating is in its early stages, even with the advancements already made, there’s no doubt about its growth into an even better assessment tool in the future.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Anthropic lanza su OPI: ¿Milagro comercial o burbuja de valoración?

**Resumen:** Anthropic, la empresa de IA creadora de Claude, ha presentado en secreto su solicitud para una OPV (IPO), con el objetivo de cotizar en bolsa en octubre. Con una valoración actual cercana a los 965.000 millones de dólares tras una ronda de financiación de 650.000 millones, se espera que su valor supere el billón de dólares al debutar, pudiendo llegar incluso a 1,5 o 2 billones. Aunque algunos ven similitudes con la burbuja puntocom del año 2000, el artículo argumenta que existen diferencias fundamentales. A diferencia de las empresas de aquella época, que dependían de promesas sin ingresos, Anthropic presenta un crecimiento de ingresos sin precedentes (de 10.000 millones de dólares en ingresos anuales recurrentes a principios de 2025 a una proyección de 1 billón a finales de 2026), ya es rentable a nivel operativo y tiene una sólida cartera de clientes empresariales. Su alto valor se basa en métricas tangibles, como su ingreso por empleado (más de 10 millones de dólares), y un modelo de negocio SaaS predecible. El artículo concluye que este hito refleja una transición económica más profunda: el paso de una economía impulsada principalmente por el "carbono" (trabajo humano) a una economía dual "carbono-silicio", donde la inversión en capacidad de IA y potencia de cálculo se convierte en un motor clave de productividad y competitividad empresarial.

链捕手Hace 9 min(s)

Anthropic lanza su OPI: ¿Milagro comercial o burbuja de valoración?

链捕手Hace 9 min(s)

Senadores de EE.UU. presionan a los reguladores bancarios para obtener reglas de capital "justas" para las criptomonedas

Un grupo de senadores republicanos estadounidenses está presionando a los reguladores bancarios para que establezcan un marco de capital más claro y justo para las actividades con criptoactivos. En una carta dirigida a la Fed, la FDIC y la OCC, los legisladores, encabezados por la senadora Cynthia Lummis, criticaron los estrictos estándares de capital del Comité de Basilea, que asignan una ponderación de riesgo del 1250% a los criptoactivos, calificándola de "penalización general" que actúa como una prohibición efectiva. Los senadores elogiaron la guía interagencial reciente sobre valores tokenizados, que aclara que deben recibir el mismo tratamiento de capital que sus equivalentes no tokenizados, basándose en el riesgo del activo subyacente y no en la tecnología. Instaron a que este principio se aplique de manera consistente a otros activos digitales y a que se desarrolle un nuevo marco regulatorio, aprovechando también el progreso del proyecto de ley sobre estructura del mercado cripto. La solicitud coincide con el testimonio de los principales reguladores ante el Congreso, donde destacaron un cambio hacia una supervisión más "basada en el riesgo" y eficiente. El presidente de la FDIC, Travis Hill, y el interventor de la OCC, Jonathan Gould, subrayaron el papel del capital para la resiliencia del sistema y se comprometieron a facilitar la innovación responsable, revisando prácticas supervisoras pasadas e investigando denuncias de exclusión bancaria ("debanking").

bitcoinistHace 17 min(s)

Senadores de EE.UU. presionan a los reguladores bancarios para obtener reglas de capital "justas" para las criptomonedas

bitcoinistHace 17 min(s)

Near vuelve al escenario de la IA: la transformación en cadena pública por problemas para pagar salarios, y los agentes y la privacidad como nueva narrativa de crecimiento

**Resumen: Near regresa a la IA: De una cadena de bloques por problemas de pago a Agentes y privacidad como nueva narrativa** Near, fundada por Illia Polosukhin, coautor del influyente artículo "Transformer" de IA, nació de manera inesperada en 2017. La razón original fue pragmática: una startup de IA que Polosukhin cofundó tuvo que pausar su trabajo en "síntesis de programas" (enseñar a máquinas a escribir código) debido a la dificultad de pagar a desarrolladores remotos en todo el mundo. Ante sistemas de pago transfronterizos ineficientes, él y su cofundador decidieron construir su propia cadena de bloques escalable y de bajo costo: Near. Aunque Near ganó tracción como cadena de alto rendimiento, su momento crucial llegó con el auge actual de la IA. La participación de Polosukhin en eventos como el GTC de Nvidia volvió a poner el foco en su legado en IA. Near ha reposicionado su tecnología hacia dos áreas clave: 1. **Near Intents (Intenciones):** Este sistema abstrae la complejidad de las transacciones entre cadenas. Los usuarios (o futuros Agentes de IA) solo declaran su objetivo (ej. "intercambiar BTC por ETH"), y una red de "solvers" (solucionadores) encuentra y ejecuta la mejor ruta, manejando los costos de gas de fondo. Esta capa ha procesado más de **200.000 millones de dólares** en volumen y generado **más de 34 millones** en tarifas, integrada en 25 cadenas. 2. **Transacciones Privadas:** Near ha lanzado funciones de "Intenciones Confidenciales" e "Intercambios Confidenciales" que ocultan los detalles de las operaciones (monto, dirección) hasta su liquidación. Esto protege a los grandes traders del "MEV" y del deslizamiento. Sorprendentemente, este tipo de transacciones ya representa **más del 40%** del volumen reciente en Near, mostrando una fuerte demanda, pero también planteando posibles desafíos regulatorios en el futuro. En resumen, Near ha vuelto a sus raíces en IA, aprovechando su tecnología de cadena abstracta para facilitar la economía de los Agentes de IA y abordando la creciente demanda de privacidad en DeFi, mientras navega por las oportunidades y riesgos de este nuevo capítulo.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Near vuelve al escenario de la IA: la transformación en cadena pública por problemas para pagar salarios, y los agentes y la privacidad como nueva narrativa de crecimiento

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

De Ethereum a la IA, 'CROPS': ¿Qué son estas 'variables lentas' que Vitalik enfatiza repetidamente?

En las últimas semanas, Vitalik Buterin ha destacado repetidamente el concepto CROPS, definido en el mandato de la Fundación Ethereum (EF Mandate) como los principios rectores fundamentales para Ethereum: Resistencia a la Censura, Resistencia a la Captura, Código Abierto, Privacidad y Seguridad. Más que un lema, CROPS constituye un marco estratégico que orienta el desarrollo de Ethereum hacia la soberanía del usuario, la descentralización robusta y la sostenibilidad a largo plazo, priorizando estos valores sobre mejoras puramente transaccionales como velocidad y costes. La relevancia de CROPS se amplifica con el auge de la IA. A medida que los agentes de IA se integran en billeteras y automatizan operaciones financieras, surge un riesgo crítico: los usuarios podrían ceder el control sobre sus activos, datos e identidad a plataformas centralizadas de IA. Vitalik vincula así "CROPS Ethereum" con "CROPS AI", planteando la necesidad de un ecosistema donde el acceso a la cadena de bloques y la ejecución de modelos de IA sean privados, verificables y resistentes a la censura. Propone soluciones como llamadas remotas a LLM pagadas con pruebas de conocimiento cero (ZK) y lecturas confidenciales de RPC para proteger la privacidad del usuario. En esencia, CROPS trasciende a Ethereum para abordar una cuestión central de la era digital: cómo preservar la autonomía y seguridad del usuario frente a sistemas cada vez más poderosos y potencialmente opacos. Este enfoque podría redefinir el diseño de billeteras y la experiencia de interacción en Web3, posicionando la privacidad, la apertura y el control verificable como pilares esenciales para el futuro.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

De Ethereum a la IA, 'CROPS': ¿Qué son estas 'variables lentas' que Vitalik enfatiza repetidamente?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片