Core Scientific Writes Off $41.9 Million to Accelerate Exit from Bitcoin Mining

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-29Last updated on 2026-07-29

Abstract

Core Scientific reported a $41.9 million payment to terminate a contract with Block and its subsidiary Proto for the supply of Bitcoin mining chips. This move finalizes its exit from plans to grow its hash rate, shifting its business model entirely towards AI colocation. The agreement, announced in July 2024, was for 3nm chips providing roughly 15 EH/s of hash rate. Following the cancellation, Core Scientific stated it will no longer invest in new mining hardware to maintain or expand its cryptocurrency mining capacity. Instead, it will generate cash flow from its existing mining fleet while repurposing its data centers, potentially selling or decommissioning ASIC miners. In Q2 2026, revenue from AI colocation surged to $136.7 million from $10.6 million a year earlier, representing 83% of total revenue. In contrast, its own Bitcoin mining revenue fell 66% to $21.5 million. Quarterly Bitcoin production dropped 53% year-over-year. AI colocation capacity reached 437 MW by mid-July 2026, with CoreWeave accounting for all current hosting revenue and approximately 77% of Core Scientific's total revenue in H1 2026. The company also announced a partnership with AMD for up to 2.5 GW of potential data center capacity, with initial 15-year agreements for about 530 MW estimated to bring in over $14 billion in contract revenue. Total Q2 revenue grew to $164.2 million, while capital expenditures jumped to $797.5 million. As of June 30, 2026, the company reported long-term debt of $4.3 ...

In its quarterly report, Core Scientific disclosed a payment of $41.9 million to terminate a contract with Block and its subsidiary Proto for the supply of chips for Bitcoin mining. The company is definitively abandoning plans to increase its hash rate and is shifting its business to an AI colocation model.

Additional payment terms beyond the reflected loss of $41.9 million were not disclosed.

The agreement, announced in July 2024, stipulated the supply of 3nm chips with a total hash rate of approximately 15 EH/s and included an option for additional volume. Following the cancellation of the order, Core Scientific stated that it would not invest in new mining equipment to maintain or expand its cryptocurrency mining capacity.

The company plans to generate cash flow from its existing fleet of installations. Concurrently, the firm intends to repurpose its sites, selling or decommissioning ASIC miners as necessary.

In the second quarter of 2026, revenue from AI system hosting surged to $136.7 million compared to $10.6 million a year earlier, accounting for 83% of total revenue. Income from proprietary mining fell by 66% to $21.5 million from $62.4 million. Revenue from hosting for third-party miners amounted to $6 million.

Quarterly Bitcoin production decreased by 53% year-over-year, and the average realized price dropped by 27%. As of June 30, 2026, capacity for AI colocation was 395 MW, and by mid-July 2026, it reached 437 MW. The total customer-leased power capacity reached approximately 1.1 GW.

All current revenue from hardware hosting comes from CoreWeave. The company accounted for about 77% of Core Scientific's total revenue in the first half of 2026.

At the end of July, Core Scientific also announced a partnership with AMD for a potential 2.5 GW of data center capacity. The initial 15-year agreements cover approximately 530 MW across five sites and, according to the company's estimates, could bring in over $14 billion in contracted revenue.

Core Scientific's total revenue in the second quarter grew to $164.2 million from $78.6 million. Capital expenditures jumped to $797.5 million from $121.3 million. As of June 30, 2026, purchase and construction commitments were approximately $1 billion, long-term debt was $4.3 billion, and free liquidity was $1.82 billion.

Recall that in 2026, major Bitcoin miners accelerated their transition to AI amid pressure on Bitcoin's profitability, according to data confirmed by Stanford University.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the amount Core Scientific paid to terminate its chip supply agreement with Block (Proto), and what major strategic shift did this decision signify?

ACore Scientific paid $41.9 million to terminate its chip supply agreement with Block (Proto). This decision signifies the company's final move to abandon plans for increasing its Bitcoin mining hash rate and marks a strategic shift towards focusing its business on AI colocation services.

QAccording to the Q2 2026 report, how much did revenue from AI colocation grow year-over-year, and what percentage of total revenue did it represent?

AIn Q2 2026, revenue from AI colocation systems grew to $136.7 million, compared to $10.6 million in the same period the prior year. It represented 83% of the company's total revenue.

QWhat happened to Core Scientific's Bitcoin mining revenue and quarterly production in Q2 2026 compared to the previous year?

AIn Q2 2026, Core Scientific's revenue from its own Bitcoin mining fell by 66% to $21.5 million from $62.4 million. The quarterly Bitcoin production also contracted by 53% year-over-year.

QWhich single client accounted for the majority of Core Scientific's revenue from colocation and what was its contribution in H1 2026?

AAll current colocation revenue comes from CoreWeave. This client accounted for approximately 77% of Core Scientific's total revenue in the first half of 2026.

QWhat major partnership did Core Scientific announce in July, and what is the potential financial scale of the initial agreements?

AIn late July, Core Scientific announced a partnership with AMD for potential data center capacity of up to 2.5 GW. The initial 15-year agreements cover about 530 MW across five sites and are estimated to generate over $14 billion in contract revenue for the company.

Related Reads

Mass Production Timelines Shift Collectively, Is Glass Substrate Facing Its First Major Test?

The article discusses the shift in the glass substrate industry from initial announcements to practical delivery and reliability testing. In mid-to-late 2026, key developments include Intel and Lens Technology advancing AI-era glass substrate packaging cooperation, Avaco launching a TGV pilot line in South Korea, and reports that Samsung Electro-Mechanics is facing delays, potentially pushing mass production beyond 2028. The core challenge has moved from material comparisons to rigorous customer reliability certifications, focusing on thermal cycling, humidity resistance, and stable electrical performance post-processing. Samsung Electro-Mechanics' reported delay, linked to client sample reliability bottlenecks, reflects a broader industry trend where timelines are being adjusted. Other players like SKC/Absolics, LG Innotek, and DNP are also targeting initial supply systems or pilot lines between 2027-2028, with mainstream adoption potentially post-2030. The delays highlight that the current hurdle is supply-side technical maturity—particularly achieving stable yields and passing client certifications—rather than a lack of demand driven by AI and HPC. The collaboration between Intel and Lens Technology focuses on establishing design and verification standards. Meanwhile, Japanese firms like Shinko Electric and DNP are progressing with multi-layer wiring and stress control. Chinese panel makers, led by BOE, are rapidly entering with automated pilot lines and customer testing. On the material side, companies like Corning are exploring glass substrates for co-packaged optics (CPO), potentially offering an earlier application path than core substrates. Ultimately, the central barrier is TGV (Through Glass Via) yield, currently around 60-70%, lower than organic substrates, with higher costs due to glass brittleness and process complexity. The industry's current phase represents its first major test in transitioning from lab R&D to volume manufacturing, with success hinging on overcoming these yield and certification challenges.

marsbit6m ago

Mass Production Timelines Shift Collectively, Is Glass Substrate Facing Its First Major Test?

marsbit6m ago

Crypto Bull Is Back, Which Assets Bounced the Hardest?

The cryptocurrency market experienced a significant surge last week, with Bitcoin rallying over 26% to nearly $79,500, its strongest weekly gain since March 2023, fueling discussions of a renewed bull market. This rebound highlighted several key market dynamics. First, short-term directional shifts are increasingly tied to U.S. policy cycles. The rally was driven by two major catalysts: the U.S. Treasury's announcement to increase long-term bond buybacks, easing macro liquidity pressures, and former President Trump's push for clearer crypto legislation, boosting regulatory certainty and risk appetite. Second, Bitcoin spot ETFs solidified their role as a leading market indicator. In the week ending August 21, U.S. Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs saw a combined net inflow of $2.6 billion, the highest since October 2025, signaling strong institutional re-entry. Third, the rally followed a clear capital rotation pattern: Bitcoin's breakout ignited broader gains, with Ethereum (up nearly 30%), major altcoins, and meme coins sequentially posting larger percentage increases. Analysis of the top performers among the top 50 altcoins by market cap revealed the week's biggest gainers: ENA (Ethena) led with a 100.75% surge, fueled by a Coinbase partnership. It was followed by PUMP (Pump.fun, up 88-99%), STX (Stacks, up 82-94%), TRUMP (Official Trump, up 79-91%), and ZEC (Zcash, up 75.15%), which uniquely reached a new all-time high. Meme coins like BOME on Solana also saw explosive gains, exemplifying the high-risk, high-reward sentiment. The rally illustrated a clear path: Bitcoin set the stage, major coins like Ethereum led the charge, and altcoins/meme coins delivered the most explosive returns, mapping the gradient of returning market enthusiasm.

marsbit18m ago

Crypto Bull Is Back, Which Assets Bounced the Hardest?

marsbit18m ago

Wuhan is About to Witness Its Largest IPO in History

Wuhan is poised for its largest-ever IPO as Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd. (YMTC) has officially applied for a listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's STAR Market, seeking to raise 33 billion yuan. The domestic leader in 3D NAND flash memory chips completed its IPO辅导 (tutoring) process in a record three months, with market expectations valuing the company at 300 billion yuan or higher. YMTC's roots trace back to 2006 with the founding of Wuhan Xinxin. After surviving the global financial crisis and periods of operational difficulty, the company was formally established in 2016 through a joint investment involving Tsinghua Unigroup, the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund (the "Big Fund"), and local Hubei government funds. With a distinct "national team" background, its major shareholders include provincial and municipal state-owned assets committees and the Big Fund. Based in Wuhan's Optics Valley (East Lake High-tech Development Zone), YMTC's potential listing highlights the region's rise as a tech hub. Optics Valley is already home to 72 listed companies and has ambitious plans to exceed 100 by 2030. The zone recently established four industry-focused母基金 (mother funds) totaling 18 billion yuan to further boost sectors like integrated circuits and optoelectronics. YMTC's IPO would complete the "Optics Valley Seven Stars," a group of leading local optoelectronic and communication giants.

marsbit19m ago

Wuhan is About to Witness Its Largest IPO in History

marsbit19m ago

Banks and Regulators Join Pilot Project to Test Quantum-Resistant Crypto Transfers

Banks and financial regulators from Europe, the Middle East, and Asia have joined a pilot project to test quantum-resistant crypto infrastructure for digital asset wallets and on-chain transactions. The initiative, announced by the Responsible Fintech Institute and infrastructure provider Safeheron, will use NEAR's quantum-resistant testnet. It will employ the ML-DSA-65 post-quantum digital signature standard, recently finalized by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Participating regulators include the Abu Dhabi Global Market, Bhutan's Gelphu Financial Services Authority, and Malta's Financial Services Authority. Financial institutions involved are Bison Bank and DK Bank. In the pilot, banks will test wallet creation and transactions in a unified application environment, while regulators will initially observe and later contribute to governance mechanisms. The organizers plan to publish a technical paper detailing the research, protocol design, and test results, eventually open-sourcing the core technology. This effort comes as financial authorities prepare for the advent of quantum computers, which threaten current public-key cryptography. For instance, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority aims for the territory's banking sector to be fully prepared for quantum-related security risks by 2030. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) also recommended in a 2025 document that financial institutions begin a coordinated, phased transition to post-quantum systems.

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Banks and Regulators Join Pilot Project to Test Quantum-Resistant Crypto Transfers

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片