Why former Bank of America strategist sees an Ethereum ‘tactical bottom’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

Stephen Suttmeier, former Bank of America strategist, identifies a potential "tactical bottom" for Ethereum (ETH), contingent on the price holding above $1690-$1700 and reclaiming $1800. A decisive move above $1800, turning the 50-day moving average into support, could target the 200-day MA near $2200, implying a 25% upside. This technical view finds some support from other analysts and a double-bottom pattern on the daily chart. However, on-chain data shows significant headwinds. Exchange selling pressure has surged, with over 220K ETH moved to exchanges recently, and whale selling persists. Furthermore, U.S. spot ETH ETFs, after days of inflows, recorded a $52 million net outflow due to macro risks like U.S.-Iran tensions and bond market volatility. In summary, while technicals suggest a bullish reversal is possible if ETH sustains above $1800, sustained selling pressure and macroeconomic risks threaten to invalidate the optimistic "tactical bottom" thesis.

Stephen Suttmeier, former Head of Technical Strategy at Bank of America, believes Ethereum could be forming a “tactical bottom.”

In his recent analysis report, Suttmeier said that if the price stays above $1690-$1700, it would support his thesis of the altcoin forming a tactical low above its June lows. Another confirmation for this bottoming pattern would be a reclaim of $1800.

His projection was based on technical analysis, particularly using moving averages (MA) to gauge short- and long-term momentum shifts. As of press time, the Ethereum [ETH] price has briefly stalled below the 50-day MA (DMA).

Should the 50DMA be decisively reclaimed as support (ETH price above $1800), the next upside target would be the 200-day MA(blue line) at $2.2K, Suttmeier added. That would imply a 25% upside potential if the $2.1K obstacle is cleared.

Source: ETH/USDT, TradingView

In fact, even Bitmine Immersion Technologies chairman and Fundstrat’s Tom Lee shared Suttmeier’s analysis, implying that he supported his projection.

Well, if there’s no bearish catalyst in the short term, the ETH daily chart leaned more toward a potential bullish reversal. It had formed a double bottom reversal pattern after the price slipped below $1600 twice in the past few weeks.

But some on-chain metrics were not as bullish on ETH as price charts suggested.

Ethereum’s exchange sell pressure is still high

CryptoQuant reported a 6% surge in exchange selling pressure in the past few days as ETH attempted a rebound. Over 220K Ethereum [ETH] hit exchanges, slowing the relief rally near $1800.

Source: CryptoQuant

And the whales were notably reducing exposure during the relief rally. As such, the brief stalling below $1800 did not come as a surprise. As of writing, the whale sell-off had not tapered off.

In fact, the exchange selling pressure has been steadily rising since March. Hence, if the pressure persists, the ‘tactical bottom’ outlook could be invalidated.

Can ETF flows and macro risks derail ETH?

Apart from the whale pressure, the U.S. Spot ETF demand, which significantly boosted the early July relief recovery, has turned negative.

After seeing net inflows for five straight days, the trend broke on Thursday after the products posted a $52M net outflow. The risk-off move was triggered by renewed Iran-U.S escalations and bond market jitters.

Source: SoSo Value

Overall, ETH was on the verge of flipping its short-term momentum to bullish if it decisively stays above $1800. A 25% upside potential could be feasible if such a scenario plays out. But macro and geopolitical pressures remained at large and could affect bulls.


Final Summary

  • ETH could hit $2100 and offer a 25% potential gain if $1800 is decisively reclaimed.
  • Macro and geopolitical pressure could invalidate the bullish outlook, especially if the U.S-Iran escalations deepen

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Stephen Suttmeier's analysis, what are the two key price levels that would confirm Ethereum is forming a 'tactical bottom'?

AAccording to Stephen Suttmeier's analysis, the two key levels are: 1) The price staying above the $1690-$1700 range, and 2) The price decisively reclaiming the $1800 level.

QBased on Suttmeier's technical analysis, what is the next upside price target for Ethereum if it reclaims the 50-day moving average?

AIf Ethereum decisively reclaims the 50-day moving average as support (price above $1800), the next upside target would be the 200-day moving average, which is at approximately $2,200.

QWhat on-chain metric suggests selling pressure on Ethereum is high, potentially challenging the 'tactical bottom' thesis?

AData from CryptoQuant indicates a 6% surge in exchange selling pressure, with over 220,000 ETH recently moving to exchanges, which is slowing the price rally near $1800.

QWhat recent shift in U.S. Spot ETF flows was mentioned as a potential headwind for Ethereum's price?

AAfter five consecutive days of net inflows, the U.S. Spot Ethereum ETFs posted a net outflow of $52 million on a recent Thursday. This shift was triggered by renewed U.S.-Iran tensions and bond market volatility.

QWhat is the implied potential upside percentage for Ethereum if it overcomes the $2,100 obstacle according to the article?

AIf Ethereum clears the $2,100 obstacle, the article states it would imply a 25% upside potential from that point.

Related Reads

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

This article examines the rise of prediction markets, contrasting their growing institutional acceptance in the West with their restrictive regulation in Asia. It details how prediction markets, which originated from informal political betting and academic experiments like the Iowa Electronic Market, aggregate crowd wisdom into probabilistic prices through binary contracts. Their growth accelerated around 2020, reaching over $14 billion in monthly volume. A key driver is the "skin in the game" principle, where users risk their own capital, leading to high accuracy in predicting events like Fed rate decisions and elections, as demonstrated by platforms like Polymarket. Meta's entry, with Mark Zuckerberg reportedly leading the development of the Arena app, signals the market's maturation. In the U.S., court rulings have distinguished prediction markets from gambling, facilitating entry by traditional financial institutions. However, most Asian jurisdictions still classify them as gambling, focusing on social control rather than financial innovation. The article argues this stance creates three problems for Asia: 1) regulatory arbitrage pushes users to riskier offshore platforms, 2) loss of sovereign information infrastructure as valuable social sentiment data accumulates abroad, and 3) abandonment of user protection. It concludes that Asia needs a policy shift from prohibition to constructive regulation, integrating these markets into the formal system to harness their data as a national asset, as initiatives like Limitless Research are beginning to do.

marsbit5m ago

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

marsbit5m ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手1h ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手1h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit2h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片