XPL tests $0.08 demand as bears press hard: Reversal ahead?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

XPL's price has dropped over 12% in 24 hours, approaching a key demand zone at $0.08. Despite a 38% surge in daily trading volume, bearish pressure remains strong, as indicated by negative Bull Bear Power and increased selling activity. The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate has turned sharply negative to -0.0437%, reflecting extreme pessimism among futures investors and heightened short positioning. Network activity has declined significantly over two weeks, though daily transactions saw a slight uptick. A break below $0.08 could establish a new low for XPL, with current market conditions making a bullish reversal challenging.

A few weeks ago, chains associated with the stablecoin narrative were thriving but have since lost the flair. Plasma [XPL] was one of them, with their focus on stablecoin payment, which also featured Tether’s USDT.

XPL lost more than 12% of its total market capitalization in only 24 hours. A spike in daily trading volume by 38% confirmed the selling pressure.

Additionally, the coin’s turnover ratio of 0.436 indicates a significant portion of the capitalization was being traded. Can bulls step in as they did previously as the price approached a key demand zone?

XPL approaches a key demand zone

XPL price extended its decline for the second consecutive day to 18% following the day’s losses.

The current bear strength, as evident from the Bull Bear Power indicator whose bars were increasing in size, was pushing price toward the $0.08 zone.

As per the Market Structure Break and OB Probability indicator, the $0.08 was a key demand zone. Initially, XPL rebounded from this zone and pushed the price above $0.10.

While a decline to the $0.08 zone could trigger bulls into buying, bear strength was still very present. In fact, it increased with each candle close, with BBP at negative 0.0148.

This value was half of what the strongest bears in February had managed.

The decline made a potential rebound at $0.08 difficult with the current conditions. Probably, pessimism among traders and low chain activity amplified the losses.

XPL perpetual Futures traders at extreme pessimism

Looking at the perpetual Futures data for XPL, traders showed pessimism. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate sharply dropped into the negative territory, hitting 0.0437%.

The data showed that the market was overly crowded on the short side, an indication of panic selling. Furthermore, these shorts were paying longs to keep their positions open as well as opening more sell orders.

This sharp decline could mean further downside risk, especially if bulls did not step in. Breaking below $0.08 would create a new low for the altcoin, surpassing the current one at $0.0709.

Activity falls sharply in two weeks

XPL’s network activity was also following the price action. Over the past two weeks, the number of transactions dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K.

But from a daily perspective, transactions rose by 4.28%, while total transaction fees were up 56%. This spike in activity was probably from the traders who were selling the token.

Meanwhile, its cumulative transaction count stood at 155.76 million at a speed of 4.5 TPS. Generally, most of XPL’s metrics were weak, including its price action, which was approaching a key demand zone.


Final Summary

  • XPL loses 12% as the OI-Weighted Funding Rate turns red and activity drops sharply.
  • XPL price was approaching the demand zone at $0.08, but the bearish strength was not relenting.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level that XPL is approaching, and why is it considered a key demand zone?

AXPL is approaching the $0.08 level, which is considered a key demand zone because it was the area from which the price previously rebounded and pushed above $0.10.

QWhat does the negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate for XPL perpetual futures indicate about trader sentiment?

AThe negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate of -0.0437% indicates extreme pessimism among traders, with the market being overly crowded on the short side, signaling panic selling and traders paying to keep short positions open.

QHow has XPL network activity changed over the past two weeks according to the article?

AOver the past two weeks, the number of transactions on the XPL network dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K, indicating a sharp decline in activity.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 suggest about the current market strength?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 shows significant bearish strength that is increasing with each candle close, making a potential rebound at the $0.08 demand zone difficult.

QWhat was the percentage change in XPL's daily trading volume, and what did this confirm?

AXPL's daily trading volume spiked by 38%, which confirmed the intense selling pressure the token was facing.

Related Reads

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2m ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2m ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

Recently, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," first outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's March mandate as core principles guiding its focus: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. CROPS represents Ethereum's commitment to providing foundational capabilities for user sovereignty—enabling asset ownership, identity expression, and coordination without reliance on centralized platforms or surrendering ultimate control. This framework is gaining new urgency with the rise of AI, particularly AI agents managing digital assets and automating transactions. While AI offers convenience, it risks centralizing user data, intent, and control if dependent on opaque, centralized services. Vitalik argues for "CROPS AI"—AI that is open, privacy-preserving, secure, and capable of local execution to maintain user agency. He highlights convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layers" and "CROPS AI," such as using zero-knowledge proofs for private remote LLM calls and Ethereum RPC reads, ensuring users can access services without exposing sensitive information. Ultimately, CROPS is not just an abstract ideal but a practical guide for Ethereum's development and AI integration. It addresses the critical long-term question: as digital systems grow more powerful, how can users retain control over their privacy, assets, and autonomy? In an AI-driven era, these principles may define Ethereum's enduring value—prioritizing verifiable, secure, and user-centric design over short-term optimizations like speed and cost alone.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is PLASMA

Plasma: A Cutting-Edge Solution for Blockchain Scalability Introduction to Plasma As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, there is an increasing need for enhanced efficiency within blockchain networks. Plasma, a Layer 2 scaling solution, emerges as a pioneering player in this area, particularly in the sphere of Web3 development. By strategically shifting a significant portion of tasks from the main chain to a series of smaller chains, Plasma aims to significantly enhance the scalability and performance of Ethereum—a widely-used blockchain platform that is at the forefront of decentralised applications. What is Plasma? Plasma is an innovative off-chain scaling solution specifically designed for the Ethereum blockchain. It was introduced in August 2017 by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, and Joseph Poon, a prominent advocate of scaling solutions like the Lightning Network. Plasma serves as a framework that enables the creation of scalable applications by establishing a hierarchical structure of child chains that sit above the main Ethereum chain. At its core, Plasma facilitates the development of potentially unlimited side chains that can operate independently while still relying on the Ethereum network for security and consensus. This architecture is supported by smart contracts and Merkle Trees, which efficiently manage transactions and data storage. Core Objectives of Plasma The primary goal of Plasma is to increase the throughput of the Ethereum network. By diverting a significant volume of transactions away from the congested main chain, Plasma's architecture offers higher transaction speeds, more efficient data processing, and lower transaction costs. This is particularly crucial in an age where the demand for decentralised applications—especially in finance, gaming, and supply chain management—is reaching unprecedented levels. Creator of Plasma Plasma is the brainchild of two renowned figures in the blockchain community: Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon. Buterin is celebrated primarily for co-founding Ethereum and pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve. Poon, on the other hand, is known for advocating scalable solutions that enable faster and more cost-effective transactions on blockchain networks. Their collaboration on the Plasma framework has significantly contributed to its innovative nature, merging advanced technical insights with practical applications. Investors of Plasma While the specific investment foundations or organisations supporting Plasma remain undisclosed, the project has attracted interest from various prominent figures and players in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. With its potential for enhancing scalability within Ethereum, it has captured the attention of various entities aiming to push the boundaries of blockchain technology. How Does Plasma Work? Plasma's unique functionality stems from its architectural framework that relies on child chains and their interaction with the main Ethereum network. Below are some key factors that contribute to Plasma's innovative approach: Child Chains: Plasma establishes numerous child chains that can execute transactions independently of the main Ethereum chain. Each child chain operates as a separate smart contract with unique features, allowing developers to create tailored solutions based on their specific requirements. Smart Contracts and Merkle Trees: The framework utilises smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements with predefined conditions, combined with Merkle Trees that enable efficient verification of data. This technology allows Plasma to achieve both high scalability and security. Transaction Compression: By batching transactions on the child chains, Plasma reduces the data load on the Ethereum network. This implies that fewer transactions need to be recorded on the main chain—thereby freeing up space and alleviating congestion. Enhanced Security: Despite being off-chain, Plasma leverages the security measures of the main Ethereum network, ensuring that all transactions on child chains maintain a high level of integrity and security. Timeline of Plasma Understanding the development of Plasma involves tracing its significant milestones: August 2017: Plasma was first introduced by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon as a scalable solution to address Ethereum's performance challenges. 2018: The Plasma framework was officially developed and made available on GitHub, marking a crucial step towards its implementation in practical applications. 2019: As awareness about Plasma grew, it began to attract developers interested in scaling Ethereum applications, thus increasing its adoption. 2020: Plasma continued evolving, with substantial enhancements made to its architecture and functionality—making it even more appealing to developers. Key Features of Plasma Plasma boasts several characteristics that position it as a transformative solution in the blockchain space: Scalability: By creating multiple child chains, Plasma can handle a higher volume of transactions without placing further strain on the main Ethereum chain. Speed: Each child chain can process transactions more rapidly, providing users with a better experience and service. Lower Transaction Costs: Plasma's structure effectively reduces the costs associated with transactions by minimising the burden on the main chain. Interoperability: The architecture allows Plasma to seamlessly interact with multiple blockchains, enhancing cross-network functionality. Security: By harnessing the security of Ethereum’s main chain, Plasma ensures the integrity of its operations while using its child chains. Use Cases for Plasma The innovative architecture of Plasma opens the door for various practical applications across different sectors: Decentralised Finance (DeFi): Plasma has the capacity to enhance the scalability and efficiency of DeFi applications, creating smoother and more effective trading processes. Gaming: The framework facilitates the development of quick and cost-efficient gaming experiences, making it appealing to developers in the gaming industry. Supply Chain Management: With the ability to achieve efficient transaction processing, Plasma can promote the development of decentralised supply chain management solutions. Conclusion Plasma stands at the forefront of blockchain technology, positioned as a pivotal Layer 2 scaling solution aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Ethereum network and beyond. Through its unique structure of child chains, smart contracts, and Merkle Trees, Plasma presents a compelling solution to the scalability crisis that has long plagued blockchain networks. As blockchain technology continues to advance, solutions like Plasma promise to reshape how developers approach scalability challenges, potentially revolutionising how decentralised applications function. The ongoing efforts by its creators and the interest of various stakeholders indicate a bright future for Plasma as it seeks to elevate blockchain capabilities to new heights in the digital realm.

174 Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.03Updated 2024.12.03

What is PLASMA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XPL (XPL) are presented below.

活动图片