Will This Trigger Panic in the $1.8 Trillion Bitcoin Market? A Prominent CEO Voices Opinion, Urges Preparation!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

Amid Bitcoin's recent sideways trend, rising global bond yields are capturing crypto investors' attention. Sean Farrell, Fundstrat's Head of Digital Asset Strategy, notes Bitcoin's current volatility is historically low, suggesting sharper price swings could occur in the coming months. Historically, after similar low-volatility periods, Bitcoin's price has experienced median absolute moves of around 30% over 60-day periods. A key market concern is the rapid surge in global bond yields, with US Treasury yields reaching multi-decade highs. Farrell attributes this to factors like the growing US budget deficit, high AI infrastructure investment, elevated oil prices, and monetary policy uncertainty. This bond market turbulence has sparked discussions about a potential "panic" scenario affecting roughly $1.8 trillion in the global financial system, which could trigger significant volatility in high-risk assets like Bitcoin. Analysts note the focus is shifting beyond just Fed rate cuts to factors like long-term yields, energy prices, inflation risks, and the global risk premium for pricing assets like Bitcoin. While no true panic is currently observed, markets are watching bond investors closely. Koinly CEO Robin Singh warns not to ignore the possibility of another sharp Bitcoin drop in coming months, suggesting it could fall to around $50,000 in a negative scenario. He indicates that if historical cycles repeat, investors may need to endure a final wave of panic selling before B...

While the recent sideways trend in the bitcoin market persists, the sharp rise in global bond yields has captured the attention of cryptocurrency investors. Sean Farrell, head of digital asset strategy at Fundstrat, stated that the current volatility of bitcoin is historically quite low, and that much sharper price fluctuations may be observed in the coming months.

According to Farrell's assessment, historically after periods of similarly high bitcoin volatility, a significant acceleration in price movement has been observed. Historical data shows that the median absolute price change of bitcoin over 60-day periods following such conditions was approximately 30 percent.

One of the main concerns for markets has been the rapid rise in global bond yields. The yield on the U.S. 30-year Treasury bond reached its highest level since 2002, the yield on the 20-year bond hit its highest level since 2006, and the yield on the 10-year bond reached its highest level since 2007.

Farrell believes that the growing U.S. budget deficit, high investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure, high oil prices, and uncertainty regarding monetary policy are exerting upward pressure on long-term bond yields.

The sharp fluctuations in the bond market have also sparked discussions about a "panic" scenario affecting the global financial system, involving roughly $1.8 trillion. Analysts believe such a wave of risk aversion could lead to much more significant price fluctuations for highly volatile assets like bitcoin.

The analytical firm Yardeni Research stated that while there is no real panic in the markets yet, they are closely watching to see if bond investors, known as "bond vigilantes," will once again set the direction for market movements.

Analysts at Bitunix noted that investor attention is shifting away from the simple question of whether the Fed will cut interest rates. In the view of the analysts, the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, energy prices, inflation risks, and the global risk premium are becoming increasingly important factors in pricing risk assets, including bitcoin.

Koinly CEO Robin Singh also stated that the possibility of another sharp decline in bitcoin in the coming months cannot be ignored. According to Singh, under a negative market scenario, bitcoin could fall to around the $50,000 level.

Singh said that if historical market cycles repeat, investors may need to endure one final wave of "panic selling" before it can be confidently said that bitcoin has reached the bottom of the current cycle.

*This is not investment advice.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Sean Farrell's view on the current volatility of Bitcoin and future price movements?

ASean Farrell stated that Bitcoin's current volatility is historically quite low and that much sharper price fluctuations could occur in the coming months. He estimated that historically, following periods of similarly low volatility, the median absolute price change for Bitcoin over 60-day periods was approximately 30 percent.

QWhat are the key factors putting upward pressure on long-term bond yields according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Sean Farrell believes the growing US budget deficit, high investment in AI infrastructure, high oil prices, and uncertainty about monetary policy are putting upward pressure on long-term bond yields.

QWhat potential price level for Bitcoin was mentioned in a negative market scenario, and by whom?

AKoinly CEO Robin Singh stated that in a negative market scenario, Bitcoin could potentially fall to a level around $50,000.

QWhat market scenario involving $1.8 trillion is discussed in the article, and what could its impact be on Bitcoin?

AThe article discusses discussions about a potential 'panic' scenario in the global financial system affecting approximately $1.8 trillion. Analysts believe such a wave of risk aversion could lead to much more significant price fluctuations for highly volatile assets like Bitcoin.

QAccording to Bitunix analysts, what factors are becoming increasingly important for pricing risk assets including Bitcoin?

ABitunix analysts noted that investors' attention is shifting beyond just whether the Fed will cut rates. They believe US long-term Treasury yields, energy prices, inflation risks, and the global risk premium are becoming increasingly important factors for pricing risk assets, including Bitcoin.

Related Reads

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit3h ago

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit3h ago

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit3h ago

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit3h ago

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit3h ago

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.6k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片