Why ONDO price stays weak even as TVL hits $1.93B record

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

Despite reaching a new all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL) of $1.93 billion following its announcement to launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in 2026, ONDO's price remained weak, trading between $0.36–$0.39. Technical indicators showed bearish momentum, with RSI near 34 and MACD below zero, suggesting continued downside pressure. Solana also experienced mixed reactions, briefly dipping below $122 but seeing significant ETF inflows of $35.20 million. The divergence between rising TVL and price weakness indicates potential long-term accumulation by investors, though short-term momentum remains uncertain.

Ondo Finance recorded a new all-time high in Total Value Locked after its announcement on the 15th of December. The firm said it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

The move extended Ondo’s Global Markets platform beyond Ethereum and BNB Chain. It positioned Solana as the next settlement layer for Ondo’s tokenized finance push.

However, market reaction across Ondo [ONDO] and Solana remained mixed in subsequent sessions. Both assets pulled back shortly after the announcement, diverging from improving protocol metrics.

TVL surged as the price stalled

ONDO’s TVL continued rising to an ATH of $1.93 billion even as the price slipped back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range. The steady increase suggested capital remained deployed at the protocol level during consolidation.

Liquidity did not immediately exit following the high-profile announcement.

However, technical indicators failed to confirm bullish price momentum. ONDO’s RSI hovered near 34 on the daily chart. The reading reflected persistent bearish momentum following the pullback.

Did rising TVL signal accumulation, or was the market still pricing broader bearish risk?

Momentum stayed under pressure

ONDO dropped below the $0.40 level, briefly reaching $0.36 during the post-announcement decline.

RSI showed tentative stabilization but lacked confirmation of a sustained reversal.

ONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure. Local resistance stood near $0.50, while downside risk extended toward $0.25 in a worst-case scenario.

That left price action disconnected from improving fundamentals.

Solana held key support

On the 15th of December, the same day as Ondo’s announcement, Solana [SOL] briefly broke below $122, dipping to around $117 before buyers stepped in, keeping the price within the $122–$145 range.

On the four-hour chart, RSI was near 52, and weak MACD reflected neutral momentum and consolidation, consistent with accumulation rather than a breakout.

During the same session, Solana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows. That figure marked the highest inflow of the week and the second-highest daily total in December.

Capital entered despite price weakness, suggesting accumulation during heightened volatility.

Is ONDO consolidating or repricing lower?

ONDO’s rising TVL contrasted sharply with bearish RSI and MACD readings. The setup suggested accumulation without immediate price confirmation. Market participants appeared cautious.

Whether the price stabilized or was repriced lower remained uncertain. Gaining the local resistance level could signal improving momentum, while failure could extend the ongoing consolidation.


Final Thoughts

  • Ondo’s TVL growth showed capital conviction even as price momentum lagged behind.
  • That disconnect suggested investors favored long-term positioning over immediate upside.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the key announcement made by Ondo Finance on December 15th that led to a new TVL record?

AOndo Finance announced it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

QDespite the record TVL, what was the price range ONDO fell back into and what was the RSI level indicating?

AONDO's price fell back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range, and its RSI hovered near 34, reflecting persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat did the MACD indicator signal about ONDO's price momentum after the announcement?

AONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure.

QHow did Solana's market activity, specifically regarding ETF inflows, contrast with its price action on December 15th?

ASolana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows, the highest of the week, despite its price briefly breaking below $122, suggesting accumulation during price weakness.

QWhat does the article suggest is the main reason for the disconnect between ONDO's rising TVL and its weak price?

AThe disconnect suggested that investors were favoring long-term positioning and accumulation over seeking immediate price upside, indicating caution.

Related Reads

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

Robinhood has launched "Robinhood Chain," an Ethereum-based Layer 2 built with Arbitrum technology, and introduced "Stock Tokens." This article clarifies that these tokens are not actual on-chain equity. They are tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited, offering economic exposure to reference stocks or ETFs but lacking direct ownership, voting rights, or other shareholder privileges. The legal structure is conservative, relying on traditional financial intermediaries, custody, KYC/AML controls, and specific jurisdiction rules, even though the tokens are transferable on-chain. The move is part of Robinhood's broader strategy to evolve from a retail brokerage into a global financial ecosystem, integrating services like banking, retirement, crypto, and DeFi. Robinhood Chain aims to provide a programmable settlement layer, making financial products more portable and accessible while masking underlying complexity. However, the "brokerage chain paradox" lies in balancing a simple user interface with the intricate, regulated reality of the wrapped assets. The success of this model depends on users and regulators accepting this structured approach without misunderstanding the tokens as direct stock ownership. Key components supporting this strategy include the Bitstamp acquisition (expanding institutional crypto capabilities), the Robinhood Wallet (bridging brokerage and self-custody), the Robinhood Earn program (integrating DeFi lending), and the Lighter perpetual contracts platform. While ambitious, the initiative is still early, facing challenges in achieving liquidity, developer adoption, and regulatory clarity across jurisdictions.

marsbit10m ago

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

marsbit10m ago

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报26m ago

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报26m ago

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

"Silicon Valley's Meritocracy to Relationship Game: How Networks Now Trump Talent." The article argues that Silicon Valley has shifted from a meritocracy to a "kingmaker" system where connections and background outweigh true ability. Key factors driving this change include: 1. **AI-Distorted Expectations:** Unprecedented growth curves (e.g., Anthropic) have led VCs to seek only "sure things" or pattern-match against past successes. 2. **Capital Concentration:** LP funds are concentrated in a few large, multi-stage funds, pushing VCs to overpay for hot deals to secure capital. 3. **VC Professionalization:** The industry has become a standardized career path, attracting conformist "NPCs" rather than independent thinkers. The long IPO timeline incentivizes safe, consensus bets for career advancement over risky, fund-returning outliers. This consensus capital fuels consensus founders. Startups are now a standard career option, with accelerators pressuring uniform ideas (e.g., 81% AI). Founders from elite schools (Stanford, OpenAI) easily raise millions based on pedigree, not proof. Large funds preemptively back "centrally cast" teams with $10-50M war chests to dominate categories, sidelining outsiders. The "kingmaker" strategy has downstream effects: it encourages aggressive, sometimes fraudulent, revenue reporting and allows founders to sell significant secondary shares early, attracting grifters. The author predicts a mean reversion. History shows the hottest trends rarely produce the most valuable companies. They advocate backing underestimated outsiders with "a chip on their shoulder" over anointed insiders, believing true meritocracy will ultimately win. "Those chasing the herd are set up for slaughter."

marsbit42m ago

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

marsbit42m ago

From 2 Million Monthly Active Users to Zero: Zapper's Demise in the "Maturation" of DeFi

From 2M MAU to Zero: The Demise of Zapper in a Maturing DeFi Landscape On July 8, 2026, Zapper co-founder Seb Audet announced the platform's full shutdown. Once a DeFi star with 2 million monthly active users, $13B in processed transactions, and $16.5M in funding, Zapper's journey ends. Born in 2020 from the merger of DeFiZap and DeFiSnap, Zapper rode the "DeFi Summer" wave. It became essential for users to track complex, multi-protocol yield farming positions across chains. At its peak, it supported 14 chains, 450+ protocols, and 7000+ tokens, with its signature "Zap" feature simplifying multi-step DeFi actions. However, sustainable revenue never materialized. Its primary model—taking small fees from DEX aggregation—faced fierce competition and squeezed margins. Meanwhile, maintaining its extensive, real-time data indexing system was costly. Crucially, the DeFi ecosystem matured, with activity and liquidity concentrating in fewer top protocols. The core demand for a complex, multi-protocol dashboard waned as user behavior simplified. Zapper attempted multiple pivots that failed to gain traction: an NFT-based points system (2021), a social app called Chainchat (2023), and plans for a ZAP token and open protocol (2024). These efforts reflected a persistent "blockchain-native" mindset focused on creating new C端 (consumer) needs rather than addressing existing pain points or bolstering its revenue-generating products. The article contrasts Zapper with DeBank, which successfully narrowed its asset-tracking focus while developing Rabby Wallet—a revenue-stabilizing, competitive product. Zapper's story serves as a cautionary tale for tooling projects: over-immersion in a purist vision, coupled with an inability to adapt business models to market shifts—like the consolidation of DeFi activity—can be fatal, even for once-dominant platforms.

marsbit1h ago

From 2 Million Monthly Active Users to Zero: Zapper's Demise in the "Maturation" of DeFi

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy ONDO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing OndoFinance (ONDO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy OndoFinance (ONDO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your OndoFinance (ONDO)After purchasing your OndoFinance (ONDO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade OndoFinance (ONDO)Easily trade OndoFinance (ONDO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ONDO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ONDO (ONDO) are presented below.

活动图片