Who is Harriet Hageman? The Republican Congresswoman Eyeing Cynthia Lummis’ Senate Seat

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, a prominent crypto advocate, will not seek reelection in 2026, creating a policy void for the digital asset sector in the Senate. Her departure may impact crypto legislation, as she co-sponsored key bills on regulation, self-custody rights, and stablecoins. Harriet Hageman, Wyoming’s Republican House Representative, is reportedly considering a run for the seat. While not as vocal as Lummis on crypto, Hageman has a pro-crypto voting record, supporting bills like FIT21 and opposing a retail CBDC. Her potential election could maintain Wyoming’s support for crypto, though her advocacy style may differ.

Key Takeaways
  • Cynthia Lummis has announced that she won’t run for reelection in 2026.
  • Lummis’s departure leaves a political opening in Wyoming and a policy vacuum for crypto advocates in the Senate.
  • Harriet Hageman, the House Representative from Wyoming, is considering running for Lummis’s Senate seat.

With Cynthia Lummis announcing that she won’t seek reelection in 2026, the U.S. crypto sector is set to lose one of its most important champions in Washington.

Now, the future of American crypto policy may rest on who replaces her.

A strong contender for the role is Harriet Hageman, Wyoming’s House Representative, who is reportedly considering running for Lummis’s seat.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Tangem

promotions
Trusted & Secure
Coins
111
Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Cynthia Lummis to Retire From the Senate

Since arriving in the Senate in 2021, Lummis has been one of the most visible and outspoken advocates for digital assets in Congress.

A long-time Bitcoin holder, she positioned Wyoming as a testing ground for crypto-friendly policy well before Washington fully engaged with the sector.

During her tenure, Lummis has championed issues ranging from clearer regulatory definitions for digital assets to more favorable tax treatment for everyday crypto transactions.

She co-sponsored several high-profile crypto bills, including bipartisan efforts to clarify the roles of the SEC and CFTC, protect self-custody rights, and integrate stablecoins into the U.S. financial system.

The six months, however, have underscored ongoing challenges for U.S. crypto legislation.

Even as Republicans have rallied behind the cause, Democratic opposition and the longest government shutdown in U.S. history have derailed progress on highly anticipated market structure legislation.

Plans to establish a U.S. Bitcoin reserve—one of Lummis’s flagship policies—have also fallen flat, or been watered down to the point of irrelevance.

When Lummis announced on Dec. 19 that she would not run for a second Senate term, she acknowledged that her stamina “doesn’t match up” with what the job requires.

“In the difficult, exhausting session weeks this fall, I’ve come to accept that I do not have six more years in me,” she said in a statement.

Harriet Hageman Eyes Senate Bid

Lummis’s announcement leaves both a political opening in Wyoming and a policy vacuum for crypto advocates in the Senate.

Hageman, who Axios reported is eying a run in the 2026 race, could be a strong contender to fill the Senate seat.

The report cited Republican operatives and lawmakers who view Hageman as the most natural successor to Lummis, given her statewide profile and MAGA-aligned politics.

The story quickly gained traction in Washington, where an open Wyoming Senate seat is seen as safely Republican but strategically important.

For the crypto industry, the key question raised by the report was whether Hageman would simply vote with the party, or actively engage in shaping digital asset policy the way Lummis did.

Hageman’s Crypto Track Record

While Hageman has not made crypto a defining personal cause in the way Lummis did, her voting record places her firmly within the industry’s preferred legislative coalition.

In the House, she has consistently voted in favor of pro-crypto bills and resolutions, including the FIT21 Act, the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY Act, and H.J. Res. 25.

Hageman also co-sponsored the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block the Federal Reserve from issuing a retail central bank digital currency.

If she formally launches a Senate bid and wins, Wyoming is likely to remain a reliable pro-crypto state in Congress, even if the style of advocacy shifts from Lummis’ full-throated evangelism to more muted alignment.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWho is Harriet Hageman and what is she considering in relation to Cynthia Lummis's Senate seat?

AHarriet Hageman is the Republican House Representative from Wyoming who is reportedly considering running for Cynthia Lummis's U.S. Senate seat in the 2026 election.

QWhy is Cynthia Lummis's decision not to seek reelection significant for the U.S. crypto sector?

ACynthia Lummis's decision is significant because she has been one of the most important champions for digital assets and crypto-friendly policy in the U.S. Senate, and her departure creates a policy vacuum for crypto advocates.

QWhat are some of the key crypto policy issues that Cynthia Lummis championed during her time in the Senate?

ALummis championed clearer regulatory definitions for digital assets, more favorable tax treatment for crypto transactions, co-sponsored bills to clarify the roles of the SEC and CFTC, protected self-custody rights, and worked to integrate stablecoins into the U.S. financial system.

QWhat is known about Harriet Hageman's track record and voting history on crypto legislation?

AIn the House, Hageman has consistently voted in favor of pro-crypto bills like the FIT21 Act, the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY Act, and H.J. Res. 25. She also co-sponsored the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act.

QWhat challenge has recent U.S. crypto legislation faced, as mentioned in the article?

ARecent U.S. crypto legislation has faced challenges from Democratic opposition and the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, which derailed progress on highly anticipated market structure legislation.

Related Reads

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy T

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Threshold Network Token (T) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Threshold Network Token (T) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Threshold Network Token (T)After purchasing your Threshold Network Token (T), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Threshold Network Token (T)Easily trade Threshold Network Token (T) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

12.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy T

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of T (T) are presented below.

活动图片