Teen Stock God Enters Soap Opera-Like Family Drama: Partner Secretly Films Mnemonic, Transfers $160 Million in BTC

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-19Last updated on 2026-03-19

Abstract

Hong Kong financial influencer and self-proclaimed "Stock Prodigy" Yuen Bing-fai, also known as "Fire Liu Sen," is embroiled in a sensational divorce case in the UK High Court. He accuses his estranged wife, Li Huanyong, and her sister of installing hidden cameras in their Brighton mansion to secretly record him entering his Trezor cold wallet PIN and 24-word seed phrase. This allegedly allowed them to steal 2,323 BTC, worth approximately $163 million at the time of the incident in 2023. Key evidence includes covertly recorded conversations where Li and her sister discuss transferring the Bitcoin, laundering risks, and using a second wallet. The BTC was moved to 71 different addresses and has remained dormant. Although Li denied the allegations, the judge found the evidence "devastating" and granted a global freezing order due to crypto's volatility. Yuen, who gained fame for accurate market predictions during the 2008 financial crisis, claimed he accumulated his Bitcoin holdings between 2010 and 2013. His career has also been marred by controversy, including a 2019 fraud investigation in Hong Kong related to a promoted cloud mining scheme (HE15) that allegedly caused over HK$20 million in investor losses. He relocated to the UK prior to the investigation.

If this story were made into a drama, it would undoubtedly be the most controversial soap opera-family mystery of early 2026—the protagonist is no ordinary person, but the once Hong Kong-wide famous financial KOL Fire Liu Sen, real name Yuen Bing-fai, who was once hailed as the "Teen Stock God."

He made his fortune early on through stock trading and Bitcoin, and his radio program "Spark to Prairie Fire" was once highly popular among countless Hong Kongers. He also published an investment book titled "I Borrowed the First Ten Million from Buffett."

However, no one could have predicted that recent court cases would reveal the most dramatic family feud.

Partner Uses Hidden Camera to Steal Mnemonic and Rob BTC

In 2023, Fire Liu Sen's divorce case reached the UK High Court. He accused his partner, Li Huanyong, with whom he is undergoing separation, of conspiring with her sister to install hidden cameras in their Brighton mansion to record him entering his cold wallet PIN and storing the mnemonic phrase, directly transferring 2,323 BTC.

After recent reports in Hong Kong's "Sing Tao Daily" and "Hong Kong Economic Times," as well as the UK's "Daily Mail" and "The Times," the case has sparked heated discussions among netizens in Hong Kong and other regions.

The incident dates back to 2023. At that time, Fire Liu Sen and Li Huanyong were going through a divorce. In early July, the trigger turned out to be their eldest daughter. She privately told Fire Liu Sen that her mother might be plotting something with the Bitcoin.

Fire Liu Sen immediately became alert. Instead of confronting her directly, he secretly installed recording devices at home to gather evidence.

According to court documents, the conversations between Li Huanyong and her sister were fully recorded. Li Huanyong said: "The Bitcoin has already been transferred to me, but will people find out that you took it?"

A more crucial and accusatory dialogue: "It's fine, take it all."

They also discussed money laundering risks, using a second wallet, and whether the police would notice... These conversations later became key evidence in court.

In his testimony submitted to the court, Fire Liu Sen clearly stated that Li Huanyong had secretly installed hidden cameras in the mansion specifically to record him operating his Trezor cold wallet.

The cold wallet was not connected to the internet and was protected by a 6-digit PIN code, with the core being a 24-word mnemonic phrase. Anyone who obtained the mnemonic phrase could restore the entire wallet on another device, instantly transferring ownership of the funds.

Later, the 2,323 BTC were indeed moved—transferred in batches to 71 different addresses and have remained untouched since. Dissatisfied, Fire Liu Sen confronted Li Huanyong, but ended up being arrested himself. He pleaded guilty to one count of actual bodily harm and two counts of common assault. He immediately reported the incident to the police, accusing Li Huanyong of stealing the Bitcoin. In December, Li Huanyong was arrested by UK police and released on bail. During the search, police found 10 cold wallets, 5 sets of mnemonic phrases, and several luxury watches at her residence, some of which were confirmed to be Fire Liu Sen's property. However, the police stated there was no new evidence and did not investigate further.

As of March 2026, the case has been formally transferred to the UK High Court for trial. Presiding Judge Cotter, after reviewing the transcript of the recordings, pointed out that the plaintiff's evidence was "devastating" and stated that the probability of success was extremely high.

Given the highly volatile nature of cryptocurrency prices, the judge specifically approved a worldwide freezing order aimed at preserving the value of the related assets through an early trial. Although the defendant, Li Huanyong, has firmly denied knowledge of the asset transfer by submitting an affidavit, the court has ruled to allow the civil litigation process to proceed.

Fire Liu Sen's Rise and Controversial History

However, behind Fire Liu Sen's professional achievements, there have also been numerous negative controversies.

He graduated from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University with a degree in accounting in 2003. Early in his career, he worked as a commentator for Hong Kong radio stations and financial magazines. He gained fame for his accurate market predictions around the 2007-2008 financial crisis (such as bearish views on the property market and bullish strategies on gold/yen), earning him the title "Teen Stock God." He accumulated his initial capital through publishing multiple best-selling investment books, hosting financial programs, and personal stock investments.

Subsequently, his investment in Bitcoin took his wealth to a new level.

In his testimony to the UK High Court, Fire Liu Sen claimed that he began purchasing and holding large amounts of Bitcoin as early as 2010 to 2013 (when Bitcoin was priced from a few dollars to a few hundred dollars).

Holding onto the 2,323 Bitcoin until now, at a price of $100,000, would be worth $232.3 million. At the current price of $70,000, it is worth approximately $163 million.

However, in 2017-2018, there were complaints about losses from investments in virtual currency vending machines he promoted.

According to reports from multiple media outlets, Fire Liu Sen vigorously promoted a cryptocurrency called HE15 on his social platforms and in seminars. Investors were required to pay approximately HK$20,000 to HK$30,000 to purchase a so-called "cloud mining machine." The machine did not need to be taken home; it was operated by a hosting center, generating virtual currency daily, which could be exchanged for BTC or ETH on a trading platform associated with Fire Liu Sen.

Starting in mid-2018, the price of HE15 plummeted, and exchange channels were blocked. Investors found that their assets could not be withdrawn or were nearly worthless. Some investors even discovered that the so-called "high-performance mining machines" actually had extremely low hardware specifications and were sold at prices far above market value.

In early 2019, over 100 victims sought help from the Hong Kong Democratic Party and reported the case to the police. The total amount involved was estimated to be at least over HK$20 million.

In April 2019, the Hong Kong Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB) took action and arrested several individuals associated with the company on suspicion of "conspiracy to defraud."

Fire Liu Sen was identified as the KOL for the project at the time, but he subsequently moved to the UK.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWho is the 'Stock Prodigy' involved in the recent high-profile divorce case in the UK High Court?

AThe 'Stock Prodigy' is Hong Kong financial KOL Fire Liu Sen, also known as Yuen Bing-fai.

QWhat was the wife, Li Huanyong, accused of doing to steal the Bitcoin?

AShe was accused of installing hidden cameras in their Brighton mansion to secretly record him entering his cold wallet PIN and mnemonic seed phrase, which were then used to transfer 2,323 BTC.

QWhat key evidence was presented in court that was described as 'devastating' by the judge?

AAudio recordings of conversations between the wife and her sister discussing the transfer of Bitcoin, money laundering risks, and using a second wallet were key evidence described as 'devastating'.

QWhat was the estimated value of the 2,323 stolen Bitcoin at the time of the article?

AAt a price of $70,000 per Bitcoin, the estimated value was approximately $163 million.

QWhat previous controversy was Fire Liu Sen involved in before this incident?

AHe was involved in a 2017-2018 controversy where over 100 investors accused him of promoting a fraudulent cryptocurrency investment scheme called HE15, involving over-the-priced 'cloud mining machines,' leading to arrests by Hong Kong police.

Related Reads

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbit1h ago

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbit1h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit2h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit2h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit3h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit3h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit5h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片