# UST Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "UST", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News06/05 08:15

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News06/05 08:15

Wall Street's Most Mysterious Money Machine: Dumping Bitcoin at 10 AM Sharp Every Day

A mysterious pattern dubbed the "Jane 10 AM Dump" has been observed in Bitcoin markets, where prices drop sharply each day at 10 AM EST, coinciding with the US stock market open. Traders and media, including ZeroHedge, point to Jane Street, a major market maker and large holder of BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF (IBIT), as the likely orchestrator—selling at 10 AM to then buy back at lower prices. This theory gained traction amid a lawsuit from Terraform Labs' bankruptcy estate. The suit alleges Jane Street used insider information to exit TerraUSD (UST) positions just before its May 2022 collapse, avoiding $40 billion in losses. Key to the case is a former Terra intern, Bryce Pratt, who joined Jane Street and allegedly ran a secret chat group ("Bryce's Secret") to funnel non-public information from Terraform insiders. The complaint details that Jane Street, which had a prior trading relationship with Terraform, withdrew 85 million UST from a liquidity pool minutes after Terraform secretly pulled 150 million UST—before public panic began. Chain analysis suggests Jane Street systematically reduced exposure pre-collapse. Further supporting the pattern of misconduct, India's regulator SEBI fined Jane Street a record $570 million for a "pump-and-dump" scheme manipulating banking index options, exploiting retail investors. While unproven, the cases depict Jane Street as a powerful, secretive firm adept at leveraging information advantages, now under scrutiny for practices that blur ethical and legal lines. The "10 AM dump" pattern reportedly stopped after the Terra lawsuit, adding circumstantial weight to the allegations.

marsbit02/26 01:09

Wall Street's Most Mysterious Money Machine: Dumping Bitcoin at 10 AM Sharp Every Day

marsbit02/26 01:09

Jane Street drawn into Terra fallout as fresh lawsuit surfaces in 2026

A new lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York on February 23 has revived scrutiny around the 2022 collapse of the Terra ecosystem, naming Jane Street among several parties referenced in connection with market activity surrounding the failed stablecoin project. The civil action seeks damages for losses suffered during Terra’s dramatic implosion, which erased tens of billions from the crypto market. The plaintiffs allege that a group of trading firms engaged in transactions that accelerated the breakdown of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin mechanism. While not accused of criminal conduct, Jane Street is cited as a sophisticated entity whose trading activity intersected with Terra’s ecosystem during its collapse. The suit references the firm’s role in market structure and liquidity provision, which plaintiffs claim destabilized price dynamics. The filing highlights broader legal questions about the responsibility of large, professional trading firms operating within fragile crypto systems. It suggests their size and speed may have amplified structural weaknesses in Terra’s design, though it acknowledges the core failure stemmed from Terra’s economic model. Jane Street has not publicly commented. The case underscores how Terra’ collapse continues to generate legal, financial, and reputational fallout, reflecting growing scrutiny of traditional market actors in largely unregulated crypto environments.

ambcrypto02/24 16:31

Jane Street drawn into Terra fallout as fresh lawsuit surfaces in 2026

ambcrypto02/24 16:31

活动图片