Solana vs. Ethereum heats up – Is the ‘ETH killer’ narrative finally real?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

The competition between Solana and Ethereum intensifies as Solana demonstrates significant on-chain growth, positioning it to potentially surpass Ethereum in annual revenue for the first time with $1.4 billion. This surge is largely driven by Solana's dominance in the Real World Asset (RWA) sector, which has grown 372% compared to Ethereum's 198%, attracting substantial capital inflows. Despite a bearish SOL/ETH price ratio in 2025, Solana has shown relative strength with a higher high on the 12-month chart. Its scalability and increasing network activity suggest that its on-chain dominance may soon reflect in price performance, making it a key competitor to watch.

The competition between L1s has never been this tight.

As blockchain adoption grows, L1s are upgrading their infrastructure to attract more real-world use cases. In 2025, the pace of back-to-back upgrades has accelerated, pushing mainstream adoption even further.

Notably, Solana and Ethereum remain at the center of this rivalry. Over the years, both L1s have gone head-to-head.

However, it looks like Solana [SOL] might finally be living up to its “Ethereum-killer” narrative.

Solana set to overtake Ethereum in annual revenue

Over time, L1s have seriously widened their playbook.

In other words, each chain is branching into new sectors. Take the RWA (Real World Asset) space, which is a standout.

According to RWA.xyz, it has added around $14 billion in value this year alone, up 240% in 2025.

From a revenue perspective, that’s a big deal as network activity ramps up. Notably, Solana seems to be leaning into this strategy, putting it on track to surpass Ethereum [ETH] for the first time with $1.4 billion in Annual Revenue.

Naturally, it shows Solana’s on-chain usage is firing.

According to the chart above, Solana’s revenue has jumped from a measly $28 million in 2021 to $2.5 billion YTD in 2025, while Ethereum has slid from $5 billion+ peaks to $1.4 billion. But is this reflected on-chain?

Looking at RWA growth, it’s clear: Solana’s up 372%, Ethereum 198%.

Technically, that’s 2× more RWA capital flowing into Solana, which lines up with its growing revenue lead. In short, SOL’s scalability is proving its edge.

Solana’s surge shakes up the SOL/ETH balance

No doubt, SOL’s on-chain dominance hasn’t yet translated into price action.

From a technical perspective, the SOL/ETH ratio has experienced a fully bearish 2025, erasing all of the 27% rally it posted in 2024. Consequently, this has left Solana relatively weaker in terms of holding support.

However, when we zoom in, a notable divergence shows up.

Despite the overall drawdown, the SOL/ETH ratio still managed to post a higher high on the 12-month candle, reaching as high as 0.93 in mid-January.

In plain terms, Solana has shown pockets of relative strength this year.

From an investor’s perspective, that could be enough to keep SOL in the race to compete with (or even overtake) ETH in the next rally, with the SOL/ETH ratio chopping sideways around 0.042 on the weekly.

Add in Solana’s growing dominance, and its revenue lead becomes no fluke.

At this pace, it seems like only a matter of time before this resilience starts showing in price, making SOL one to watch heading into 2026.

Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s on-chain growth is driving a revenue surge, putting it on track to surpass Ethereum for the first time.
  • Despite a bearish SOL/ETH price ratio in 2025, Solana shows pockets of strength, suggesting its on-chain dominance could soon translate into price action.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit5m ago

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit5m ago

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit19m ago

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit19m ago

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1h ago

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1h ago

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1h ago

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1h ago

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1h ago

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions