Solana – Is ‘liquidity’ the real FOMO signal for SOL this cycle?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-03Last updated on 2026-04-03

Abstract

Despite a 35% price decline in Q1, Solana's on-chain fundamentals remain strong, suggesting potential undervaluation. Key metrics show a divergence: while SOL's price lagged, its stablecoin market cap grew by 5%, and the network processed over 500 billion transactions, far surpassing competitors. Total Real World Asset (RWA) value on Solana reached a record $2 billion, a 40% quarterly increase, further boosted by the recent SoFi partnership. The strategic minting of USDC on the network indicates that liquidity, rather than price action, is becoming the primary FOMO driver for SOL this cycle, as capital flows and usage continue to expand.

FOMO in altcoins isn’t always about the price action or technical strength.

Instead, stablecoin flows often set the tone, and Solana [SOL] seems to be following that pattern. Its network fundamentals are holding up well, even though the price has lagged, hinting at potential undervaluation that the market may be overlooking.

Looking at Q1, SOL was one of the bigger losers among high-cap altcoins, falling by nearly 35%. And yet, beneath the price weakness, its stablecoin market cap actually grew by around 5% – A sign of clear divergence between on-chain activity and market performance.

Source: DeFiLlama

Backing that up, Solana’s on-chain signals are pointing to growing network usage too.

Total transaction volume on the network recently crossed 500 billion, well ahead of the next 13 blockchains combined, making it clear that Solana is still the go-to for on-chain activity. Unique addresses on the network have also been dominant, further proving that the ecosystem is active even if the price isn’t keeping up.

In short, when you compare network activity to market performance, Solana’s fundamentals remain strong. That kind of divergence usually points to undervaluation, hinting that SOL could be gearing up for a rebound.

The real story, though, is stablecoin flows. Naturally, the big question is – Could liquidity be the main FOMO trigger for SOL this cycle?

Stablecoin inflows are supercharging Solana’s DeFi this cycle

The pace of growth in DeFi is really showing through a few key sectors, and stablecoins are at the forefront.

The logic is simple – When on-chain liquidity is high, capital naturally starts moving across the network, powering activity and usage. Building on that momentum, the Real World Asset (RWA) sector continues to outperform most other areas, and Solana is no exception.

From a technical standpoint, even with Q1 price weakness, Solana closed the quarter with its total RWA value hitting a fresh all-time high of $2 billion – Marking more than a 40% QoQ jump. Add in the recent partnership with SoFi, and it’s clear Solana may be strategically leaning into this DeFi momentum, potentially supercharging network activity and capital flows even more.

Source: The Block

Against this backdrop, the recent USDC supply mint on Solana doesn’t feel like a random event.

Instead, with strong network fundamentals, usage outpacing other chains, partnerships expanding stablecoin use cases, and healthy capital flows across key growth sectors, it’s clear that Circle is positioning USDC as a central driver of activity on Solana.

Consequently, this could make liquidity (not price action) the main FOMO trigger for SOL in this cycle.


Final Summary

  • Despite price weakness, strong on-chain activity, rising USDC supply, and growing network usage highlight Solana’s fundamentals and potential undervaluation.
  • RWA value hitting $2 billion, plus strategic moves like the SoFi partnership, position USDC liquidity as the likely key FOMO trigger for SOL.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main FOMO trigger for Solana (SOL) this cycle, according to the article?

AThe article suggests that liquidity, particularly stablecoin inflows and the growth of USDC supply on Solana, is the main FOMO trigger for SOL this cycle, rather than price action.

QDespite a 35% price drop in Q1, what on-chain metric for Solana showed growth?

ADespite the price drop, Solana's stablecoin market cap grew by around 5% in Q1, indicating a divergence between on-chain activity and market performance.

QWhat recent partnership is mentioned as a strategic move to boost Solana's DeFi momentum?

AThe article highlights the recent partnership with SoFi as a strategic move that could supercharge Solana's network activity and capital flows.

QWhat key metric demonstrates Solana's dominance in on-chain activity compared to other blockchains?

ASolana's total transaction volume recently crossed 500 billion, which is well ahead of the next 13 blockchains combined, demonstrating its dominance in on-chain activity.

QTo what all-time high did Solana's total Real World Asset (RWA) value climb in Q1?

ASolana's total Real World Asset (RWA) value hit a fresh all-time high of $2 billion in Q1, marking a more than 40% quarter-over-quarter jump.

Related Reads

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbit44m ago

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbit44m ago

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbit1h ago

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbit1h ago

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手1h ago

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片