Solana dips below $120 as activity cools – Yet THIS group leans in, why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

Despite short-term volatility and declining activity metrics, Solana (SOL) demonstrated resilience as its price dipped below $120. While retail participation waned amid market fear, on-chain data revealed significant whale accumulation during the price weakness. A specific wallet purchased 41,000 SOL worth $5 million, following a historical pattern of profitable accumulation. Furthermore, Solana ETFs recorded $11 million in net inflows, indicating sustained institutional demand that counterbalanced spot selling pressure. Technically, SOL found support between $117-$122, with improving momentum indicators suggesting a potential reversal. The price action underscores a divergence between short-term fear and long-term conviction, with strategic investors showing confidence during the downturn.

Strong networks continued attracting capital despite short-term volatility across digital asset markets, even as some chain activity weakened and key support levels gave way.

Market fear reduced retail participation across crypto, pressuring usage metrics without erasing long-term network relevance. Solana remained one of the more resilient Layer-1 chains as risk appetite deteriorated.

Solana’s [SOL] network Revenue peaked sharply in January before declining to the lowest levels of the year.

The pullback erased earlier gains as trading activity slowed across decentralized applications. That contraction aligned with extreme fear conditions rather than signs of structural deterioration.

Weekly Active Addresses also trended lower during the same period. The decline reflected risk-off behavior and reduced retail participation across crypto markets.

Activity stabilized near recent lows as volatility compressed.

Solana whale accumulation emerges below $120

As Solana dropped back below $120 on the 18th of December, whale accumulation intensified across several wallets.

Wallet G6gemN bought 41,000 SOL worth approximately $5 million during the dip. The buying suggested strategic positioning into weakness rather than reactive selling.

Historical behavior added context to the move.

About eight months earlier, the same wallet accumulated 24,528 SOL near $122. It was later sold for around $175, realizing roughly $1.28 million in profit.

The renewed accumulation followed a familiar pattern. Price weakness attracted capital instead of triggering broad distribution. Whale behavior pointed toward confidence during periods of elevated fear.

SOL ETF inflows offset spot selling pressure

Spot Solana ETFs recorded $11 million in Net Inflows on the 18th of December. Institutional products continued absorbing supply even as spot prices weakened.

ETF demand counterbalanced selling pressure during the pullback.

Flows suggested positioning during fear-driven declines. Institutions appeared willing to accumulate amid heightened volatility. ETF activity reinforced demand beneath short-term weakness.

Support holds as momentum steadies

From a technical perspective, Solana traded near $124 at press time, after dipping from $122 to $117.

Bulls defended that zone, pushing price back into the broader $122–$145 accumulation range. Price action held around support, signaling absorption rather than continuation lower.

Momentum indicators also improved. MACD showed a developing bullish crossover, while RSI printed a bullish divergence as selling pressure faded near recent lows. Momentum improved as Solana remained within its established accumulation range.

That setup left traders focused on whether support could hold as broader sentiment stabilized.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s recent price action highlighted a growing divide between short-term participation and longer-term conviction.
  • While fear weighed on activity metrics, accumulation beneath support hinted at confidence during uncertainty.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the key price level that triggered increased whale accumulation for Solana?

AThe key price level that triggered increased whale accumulation was below $120, specifically on the 18th of December.

QHow did Solana ETF flows behave during the market dip and what was their significance?

ASolana ETFs recorded $11 million in net inflows on December 18th, which helped counterbalance spot selling pressure and indicated institutional accumulation during the fear-driven decline.

QWhat technical indicators showed improvement for Solana's price momentum near the support level?

AThe MACD showed a developing bullish crossover and the RSI printed a bullish divergence, indicating improving momentum as selling pressure faded near recent lows.

QHow did the activity on the Solana network, such as Weekly Active Addresses and Revenue, change during this period?

ASolana's network revenue declined to its lowest levels of the year, and Weekly Active Addresses also trended lower, reflecting reduced retail participation and risk-off behavior in the crypto markets.

QWhat does the behavior of 'Wallet G6gemN' suggest about large investors' strategy during the price dip?

AThe behavior of Wallet G6gemN, which bought 41,000 SOL during the dip, suggests a strategy of strategic positioning into weakness and accumulation during periods of elevated fear, rather than reactive selling.

Related Reads

In Such a Crowded Cross-border Payment Track, Where Does the Next Stop Lie in the Future?

The crowded cross-border payments industry faces a paradox: intense competition above water with financing and narratives, while beneath, price wars and shrinking margins in basic PSP services are common. The path forward lies not in simple "cross-border" solutions but in deep **localization**. Success requires mastering the fragmented and tightening regulations of fiat currencies in each market—the "last mile" of compliance, banking, and settlement. Many Chinese PSPs have succeeded by following Chinese merchants overseas but have not deeply penetrated mainstream local merchant ecosystems abroad. Their strong product capabilities need to be applied to new, complex markets. The future belongs to companies that evolve from single-channel providers to **cross-border capital network operators**. This means moving beyond competing on transaction fees to creating internal networks that optimize capital efficiency through multi-directional matching, netting, and position reuse across countries and currencies. For Web3 and stablecoins, the key is integration, not replacement. Stablecoins offer efficiency gains but cannot bypass the foundational trust, compliance, and legal frameworks of traditional finance. The realistic path is the gradual adoption and "taming" of Web3 technologies by established financial institutions. The ultimate solution is a **dual clearing infrastructure** combining deep local fiat capabilities (local accounts, compliance, banking) with lightweight stablecoin-native capabilities (on-chain settlement, wallets). The biggest opportunity lies not in oversaturated mainstream corridors but in complex, underserved regional corridors (e.g., specific CIS, Middle East-Southeast Asia, or Latin American trade pairs). The winners will be those who build hard-to-replicate, deep capabilities in these areas—acting as the essential "clearing shovels" or infrastructure providers. The future keywords are **more local, more networked, and more stablecoin-native**. High-profit opportunities remain in the non-standardized, difficult-to-replicate deep waters of the industry, requiring genuine on-the-ground presence and long-term patience.

链捕手34m ago

In Such a Crowded Cross-border Payment Track, Where Does the Next Stop Lie in the Future?

链捕手34m ago

Lightning Fast Five-Whip Combo! Strategy's Self-Rescue Plan Officially Released

Strategy, amidst the STRC de-pegging crisis, has unveiled its "Digital Credit Capital Framework" self-rescue plan. The five-part framework includes: 1) **Cash Reserves**: Management of ~$2.55B in USD reserves, dedicated solely to covering ~17.4 months of preferred stock dividends and debt interest, with a 12-month minimum coverage floor. 2) **Dividend Policy**: STRC's dividend yield rises to 12% from July 1st, with monthly reviews. Strategy clarifies de-pegging does not automatically trigger further hikes. 3) **Preferred Stock Buyback**: A $1B authorization, prioritizing STRC repurchases to support its price, reduce future dividend obligations, and signal commitment, using funds separate from dividend reserves. 4) **Common Stock Buyback**: A separate $1B authorization for MSTR stock, aimed at creating shareholder value when the stock is deemed undervalued, establishing a two-way capital management mechanism. 5) **Bitcoin Monetization**: Formal authorization to sell BTC (up to $1.25B earmarked) to build USD reserves, cover dividends/interest, or fund buybacks, marking a strategic shift where BTC becomes a managed asset rather than a strictly "hold-only" reserve. Market reaction saw MSTR and STRC shares rise pre-market, while BTC remained stable. The plan aims to restore confidence in STRC, ensure dividend sustainability, and reopen Strategy's funding channels.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Lightning Fast Five-Whip Combo! Strategy's Self-Rescue Plan Officially Released

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Sword of Damocles Over the AI Bull Market: Not Just in South Korea, Leverage in U.S. Stocks Is Equally Staggering

Global equity markets are hitting new highs driven by the AI boom, but the fuel behind this rally is becoming increasingly dangerous. From the US to South Korea, margin debt and leveraged ETF assets have soared to historical extremes, with their pro-cyclical nature amplifying tail risks in market volatility. In the US, margin debt rose 54% year-over-year in May, reaching a record $1.4 trillion. Simultaneously, leveraged ETF assets nearly doubled in under 70 days to over $220 billion by early June, with intense focus on tech, semiconductor indices, and single stocks like NVIDIA and Tesla. A warning sign appeared in South Korea, where the KOSPI index experienced extreme volatility, plunging 10% to trigger a circuit breaker, then sharply rebounding before halting again, partly driven by concentrated, highly leveraged positions in chip stocks. Analysts are raising alarms. Barclays warns that leveraged funds have accumulated roughly $300 billion in equity-linked derivatives since late March, creating a major source of non-discretionary risk. Morgan Stanley notes an unprecedented reliance on leveraged financing by marginal buyers, with financing becoming more expensive and scarce. Charles Schwab has tightened margin requirements. The core risk lies in the mechanics: leveraged ETFs and derivatives can create a "tail wags the dog" effect, where fund flows force market makers to buy underlying stocks, amplifying gains. This process reverses in a downturn, triggering a self-reinforcing selling spiral as funds deleverage. Additionally, the cost of borrowing to buy stocks has spiked to multi-year highs. Morgan Stanley warns this sets up a nonlinear risk: high financing costs stall momentum, a price decline triggers forced deleveraging, and selling pressure is multiplied by leverage, potentially leading to outsized declines. The current market breadth is narrow, with gains heavily concentrated in tech, making the rally vulnerable to a pullback in leveraged positions. In summary, the AI-fueled bull market is increasingly propped up by record leverage. When this trend reverses, the deleveraging process could magnify losses, posing a significant threat to financial stability.

marsbit2h ago

The Sword of Damocles Over the AI Bull Market: Not Just in South Korea, Leverage in U.S. Stocks Is Equally Staggering

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片