Post a Tweet for $5 Million? The Price Tag for a President's Endorsement of a Meme Coin Exposed

比推Published on 2026-03-17Last updated on 2026-03-17

Abstract

Argentine President Javier Milei is accused of accepting a $5 million bribe to promote the meme token LIBRA on his X (formerly Twitter) account, according to a report by local media El Destape. The allegation is based on evidence recovered from the phone of a crypto lobbyist, Mauricio Novelli, who represented KIP Protocol, the entity behind LIBRA. The scandal erupted after Milei posted a tweet on February 15, 2025, endorsing LIBRA as a project aimed at supporting Argentine entrepreneurs. The token's market cap surged to $4.56 billion within 30 minutes, but it collapsed after insiders executed a "rug pull," cashing out over $100 million. Milei later deleted the tweet, claiming he was misled and that the post was intended to support private enterprise. Investigators uncovered a purported agreement between Milei and Hayden Davis, the alleged mastermind behind the scheme. The deal involved a $5 million payment—$1.5 million upfront, another $1.5 million after Milei publicly endorsed Davis as an advisor, and a final $2 million for a blockchain consulting contract. Phone records also showed frequent communication between Novelli and Milei’s office around the time of the tweet. Despite initial investigations by anti-corruption offices and Congress, no conclusive action was taken. The report suggests Milei was aware of the token’s speculative nature but proceeded for financial gain. Davis defended the scheme in an interview, arguing that meme token trading is a “casino” where such ...

Author: Eric, Foresight News

Original Title: How Much Does It Cost for a President to Endorse a Meme Coin? Milei: $5 Million


On March 17, Beijing time, Argentine local media El Destape broke an exclusive bombshell: information recovered from the phone of a cryptocurrency lobbyist in Argentina revealed that Argentine President Milei posted a tweet promoting LIBRA a year ago because he accepted a $5 million bribe, and the mastermind was none other than Hayden Davis, as previously speculated by the outside world.

Opposition lawmakers in Argentina who pushed for the investigation called this an "explosive scandal" and demanded further investigation. However, as of the time of writing, neither Milei nor the presidential office has responded.

Promoting Meme Coin Backfires, Blames "Political Struggle"

On February 15, 2025, Argentine President Milei promoted a Meme token named LIBRA on X, with the caption "Free Argentina is growing!!! This private project will be committed to promoting Argentina's economic growth and providing funding for Argentine small businesses and startup projects. The world wants to invest in Argentina."

At that time, the hype around the Meme tokens of the US Trump couple had not yet subsided, and the new "presidential concept coin" once again ignited market enthusiasm. The FDV of the LIBRA token soared to a maximum of $4.56 billion within 30 minutes of its launch.

This project, which claimed it would invest token proceeds in Argentine entrepreneurs and education, saw a large number of rat warehouses withdraw liquidity and sell tokens after Milei helped the token price take off, successfully cashing out over $100 million and leaving within an hour or two. At noon Beijing time that day, Milei deleted the tweet and stated that his previous action was merely to support private enterprises and was not related to them, and that after understanding the situation, he decided not to spread the message further.

After the tweet was deleted, the price of LIBRA headed straight to zero without looking back. The entire event started in the early morning Beijing time and was over before the afternoon even arrived.

Even someone as abstract as Trump only dared to issue Meme coins before taking office, but Milei publicly helped promote a Rug project while in office. This kind of "not even pretending" blatant corruption was met with indiscriminate criticism. As the torrent of verbal and written attacks fell, Milei was forced to respond, but these responses seemed more like excuses.

The Argentine presidential office first stated that Milei met with Mauricio Novelli, the representative of KIP Protocol (the entity behind LIBRA) in Argentina, in October 2024. At that time, this representative said that a project named Viva la Libertad would be launched in the future to provide financing support for Argentine private enterprises. Milei's retweet after KIP Protocol launched the LIBRA token was merely to support Argentine entrepreneurs, and he himself was not aware of the details.

In other words, Milei believed LIBRA was a project to help Argentine entrepreneurs, and the retweet was well-intentioned.

Later, Milei himself stated again on a television program that his actions were in good faith, hoping to support any project that could improve the financing situation for technology entrepreneurs, but he was "deceived" because he did not understand the project's situation. Furthermore, Milei shamelessly stated that the vast majority of the deceived investors were Americans and Chinese, and he had not wronged his own citizens.

Finally, Milei even stated that the smear campaign against him was politically motivated and vowed to pursue the matter.

This flimsy explanation was obviously unconvincing: Why would a national president promote a private company without investigation?

Took the Money, But Didn't Fully Deliver

After this national-level scandal occurred, both the Argentine Anti-Corruption Office and Congress launched investigations. The Anti-Corruption Office believed that Milei's action was personal and did not violate public ethics regulations; the congressional investigation committee accused Milei of providing "key cooperation" in the LIBRA incident and recommended that Congress assess whether it constituted misconduct.

However, these investigation results did not reveal details, and the outside world was unclear about what exactly happened.

El Destape's爆料 revealed a key piece of evidence, shedding light on the gray transaction between LIBRA's issuer and the president.

According to the report, investigators recovered an agreement between H (confirmed to be Hayden Davis) and Milei from the phone of Mauricio Novelli, who was referred to by the Argentine presidential office as the "representative of KIP Protocol in Argentina" but was actually a cryptocurrency lobbyist.

The agreement content shows that Hayden Davis would first pay Milei $1.5 million in liquid tokens or cash as an advance payment. After Milei announced on X that Hayden Davis/Kelsier/Davis family were his advisors, another $1.5 million in liquid tokens or cash would be paid. As for the final $2 million, it required Milei to sign a blockchain/artificial intelligence consulting contract.

The creation date of this file was just three days before Milei posted the promotional LIBRA tweet, and the file came from an expert report by the Argentine General Directorate of Technical Support for Criminal Investigations, but it only appeared in a folder of an attachment.

The secrets found on the phone were far more than just this file; they even included materials related to Milei teaching a cryptocurrency course at a school, which also proved that Milei's claim a year ago that he did not understand cryptocurrency was a pure lie.

In addition, the investigation report also exposed密集的通话记录 (dense call records) between Mauricio Novelli and Milei, as well as Milei's sister (who serves as Secretary General of the Argentine Presidential Office) from a few minutes before to a few hours after Milei promoted the token. Although there was no specific call content, the timing吻合 (coincidence)恰好证明 (just proves) that LIBRA was a premeditated financial scam organized with the involvement of the president.

Judging from Milei's tweet, the cooperation between the two parties may have only reached the first step. Before the tweet announcing that Hayden Davis was his advisor could be sent, the LIBRA incident spiraled out of control, forcing Milei to quickly clarify and distance himself. No wonder Hayden Davis said in an interview with crypto blogger Coffeezilla that Milei was originally supposed to post more interactive tweets, but for some reason the cooperation suddenly stopped.

Bottomless "Open Robbery"

In fact, after the LIBRA incident, some people inferred through on-chain information that Hayden Davis and his Kelsier Ventures were the masterminds behind the incident, and also uncovered that the token MELANIA launched by Trump's wife was also manipulated by him.

El Destape reported that on January 30, 2025, Hayden Davis met with Milei and Milei's sister at the Argentine presidential palace and signed a contract with Milei, making Davis an advisor to the Argentine government in the blockchain field. This contract was also found on Novelli's phone but was concealed by prosecutor Eduardo Taiano and not made known to the relevant parties.

After this agreement was reached, a bank account associated with Davis transferred $1 million to an account with an unconfirmed owner.

So far, we roughly know the whole story:

In October 2024, Mauricio Novelli introduced KIP Protocol (actually controlled by Hayden Davis) to Argentine President Milei, claiming that a project named Viva la Libertad would be launched to provide financing support for Argentine private enterprises, thereby getting closer to Milei.

At the end of January 2025, Hayden Davis, through the introduction of Mauricio Novelli, contacted Argentine President Milei and successfully became the blockchain advisor to the Argentine government. Afterwards, Hayden Davis, through Mauricio Novelli, reached an agreement with Milei: Hayden Davis would pay Milei a total of $5 million in exchange for Milei promoting the Viva la Libertad project and its issued LIBRA token on his personal X account.

Between October 2024 and the end of January 2025, Hayden Davis and Milei may have had more or less contact through Mauricio Novelli and discussed how to promote LIBRA. Milei was probably well aware that this was a pure scam project using cryptocurrency, but the reason he agreed was probably, as Hayden Davis said in an interview, their series of plans would not let this token quickly "rug pull.

But unexpectedly, after Milei posted the tweet, the rat warehouses couldn't wait to cash out over $100 million, quickly triggering a large amount of critical public opinion. Seeing the situation turning bad, Milei chose to cut losses rather than continue the cooperation. As public opinion further发酵 (fermented), the originally win-win situation turned into Milei being left alone in the lurch, while Hayden Davis cashed out and left.

The most terrifying thing about this incident is that Hayden Davis never considered it fraud. In an interview with Coffeezilla, he stated, "In the meme market, this is not illegal. This is what happens in every trade. These are the rules here. People know this, agree to this, and make money from this. If you're going to blame this, I think, for the vast majority of retail traders betting on meme tokens, especially those who get in early, this is the rules of the game in this market. This is not the capital market; this is a casino."

The development process of the industry is never afraid of speculators participating. What it fears is that speculators truly believe the industry is simply a casino for speculation.

This perhaps explains some of the chaos in the Web3 industry in the past two or three years: when schemers don't think they are scheming, they naturally lose all bottom lines. Eventually, projects no longer compare in the simple sense of good or bad, but only in who has the more clever means of "robbing."


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620466

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the alleged bribe amount that Argentine President Javier Milei received to promote the LIBRA meme coin on Twitter?

AArgentine President Javier Milei allegedly received a bribe of $5 million to promote the LIBRA meme coin on Twitter.

QWho was identified as the mastermind behind the LIBRA meme coin promotion scandal involving President Milei?

AHayden Davis was identified as the mastermind behind the LIBRA meme coin promotion scandal involving President Milei.

QWhat was the fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the LIBRA token shortly after its promotion by President Milei?

AThe fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the LIBRA token surged to a peak of $4.56 billion within 30 minutes after its promotion by President Milei.

QHow did President Milei respond to the backlash after promoting the LIBRA meme coin?

APresident Milei deleted the promotional tweet, claimed he was deceived and acted in good faith to support Argentine entrepreneurs, and alleged that the criticism was politically motivated.

QWhat evidence was recovered from the phone of cryptocurrency lobbyist Mauricio Novelli that implicated President Milei?

AEvidence recovered from Mauricio Novelli's phone included a agreement detailing a $5 million payment plan to President Milei for promoting the LIBRA token, documents related to Milei's cryptocurrency lectures, and records of密集的通话记录 between Novelli, Milei, and his sister around the time of the promotion.

Related Reads

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片