More Popular Than SpaceX, Oversubscribed by Over 6586 Times, What's the Meme Power Behind Liuliumei (06658.HK)?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-15Last updated on 2026-06-15

Abstract

Titled "More Popular than SpaceX, Over 6586 Times Oversubscribed: What's the Meme Power Behind Liuliumei (06658.HK)?", this article discusses the phenomenon of "stock memefication" through the case of Liuliumei's IPO. The Chinese snack company saw its stock price surge over 190% on its Hong Kong debut, fueled not by fundamentals but largely by a viral meme. Its stock ticker abbreviation "06658.HK" was humorously linked to "LLM" (Large Language Model), coinciding with a rally in AI-related stocks like Zhipu AI. This mirrors a broader trend where stocks gain traction based on internet jokes,谐音梗 (homophonic puns), celebrity mentions, or cultural moments—similar to meme coins in crypto. Examples include Gamestop's 2021 short squeeze, Trump-related stock movements ("川大智胜"), and "孚日股份" (interpreted as "capture Japan"). The article argues global markets are entering an era where attention and social media narratives can drive significant capital flows, blurring lines between traditional finance and meme culture. While offering quick gains, this trend also carries risks like pump-and-dump schemes. Liuliumei's explosive IPO, surpassing even蜜雪冰城's subscription record, exemplifies how meme-driven attention is being converted into market volatility and liquidity in today's fragmented, emotion-driven investment landscape.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010 )

"Are you okay? Okay? Okay? Then eat some Liuliumei!"

Once upon a time, a brainwashing commercial line from actress Yang Mi brought Liuliumei into thousands of households. Today, after decades of accumulation, the company behind it finally officially listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, becoming the "first stock of plum snacks" on HKEx. It is reported that its issue price was HKD 43.58, the opening price was HKD 95, a surge of approximately 116% from the offering price of HKD 42; the intraday high reached HKD 127.50, an increase of over 190%; it has now pulled back to HKD 125, still up over 186%.

But contrary to many expectations, the stock price surge of Liuliumei (06658.HK) is not a revival of the concepts of "new consumption, new retail, new snacks." Instead, its name initials coincidentally align with the hot topic of "LLM" (Large Language Model), riding on the wave of today's 45% surge in Zhipu AI (02513.HK).

Many call it an "authentic AI Large Language Model stock," attracting countless hot money and capital inflows. Whether acknowledged or not, global stock markets may be entering the "Stock Meme-ification Era."

The New Era of Global Stock Markets: When Stocks Collide with Memes

First, the basics of Liuliumei's IPO: This was Liuliumei's fourth attempt at a capital market listing.

In 2019, its attempt to list on the A-share market failed; in 2025, its two applications to list on HKEx lapsed; it wasn't until May 21 this year, after updating its listing application materials for the third time and changing its main entity name from "Liuliumei Group Co., Ltd." to "Liuliumei Co., Ltd.," that it successfully listed in less than a month. It must be said, sometimes naming can be a mysterious thing.

According to the company's allocation results announcement, the public offering portion of this IPO recorded an oversubscription of approximately 6586.73 times. The final number of shares offered publicly was 1.1465 million, accounting for approximately 10% of the total global offering. There were approximately 180,500 valid applications received, with about 11,465 applications accepted. The ratio of allotment for one lot application was only 1.5%, meaning the one-lot winning rate was as low as 1.5%, indicating extremely fierce competition for subscription. Regarding the international placement, Liuliumei received a subscription of 2.64 times. The final number of international offering shares was 10.3176 million, accounting for 90% of the total offering shares. Comparing this data, the popularity of Liuliumei's IPO has surpassed that of "the first stock of milk tea stores by outlet number" Mixue Ice City, which listed on HKEx in March last year with a public offering oversubscription multiple of 5258.21 times.

In other words, institutions were not optimistic but held 90% of the shares; retail investors were optimistic but only held 10% of the shares. The main driving force behind the opening surge came more from the free market play of "retail investors and market makers dancing together." And this is precisely the power of "Meme stocks"—transforming the attention attracted by memes into buying power in the capital market.

Some netizens even compared Liuliumei's opening performance to SpaceX, finding its market gains far more dazzling.

It is worth mentioning that "Meme stocks" is not a new term that recently appeared; they are an objectively existing category of stocks in major capital markets like the US, Hong Kong, and A-shares. However, the "Stock Meme-ification Era" is undoubtedly the latest trend emerging in the past 1-2 years, and its driving factors are also somewhat related to the crypto market.

The earliest Meme stocks are untraceable, so we'll only discuss some representative individual stock targets in recent years.

2021's Gamestop might be the starting point of Meme stock enlightenment for many in the US market. Led by well-known retail investors like Roaring Kitty, global retail investors united against Wall Street institutional capital, forcing a short squeeze that led many brokerage platforms and exchanges to "pull the plug" to avoid the storm. Recently, rumors of Gamestop acquiring eBay also caused market fluctuations and a temporary surge in its stock price.

Tesla and the recently IPO'd SpaceX have also been viewed as a type of Meme stock because both companies and stocks are strongly associated and deeply bound with the highly topical "world's first trillionaire" Elon Musk. Before the companies' businesses provided strong performance proof, they were considered "narrative-driven companies with sky-high dream valuations."

Before Donald Trump won the US presidential election in 2024, the A-share market had already started moving. "Chuanda Zhisheng" frequently topped platform trending lists and even experienced multiple limit-up days. That year, during Trump's campaign, an assassination attempt left his ear scratched by flying glass from a bullet. Stock "Goertek" (homophone for "cut ear") was also affected and saw a surge during trading.

Last year, when Sino-Japanese diplomatic relations deteriorated, the defense stock "Furi Shares" experienced a dramatic stock price surge due to the patriotic homophone pun "capturing Japan" (孚日 sounds like 'capture Japan'), pulling up for eight consecutive trading days, with cumulative gains exceeding 100%, becoming one of the short-term "monster stocks" in the A-share market.

In today's capital markets, similar to the crypto market with its fragmented attention and concentrated emotions, individual stock targets and sector themes that can spark the widest discussion and attention have become "attention foci" that stir up funds and liquidity.

Liuliumei's surge is also a prime example of the "Stock Meme-ification" era.

The Stock Meme-ification Era Begins: Homophone Puns, Abbreviations, AI Era Dividends

As the valuations of OpenAI and Anthropic rise close to the trillion-dollar scale, companies and stocks related to the AI industry chain—such as optics, communications, materials, and computing power—have successively entered an explosive growth period:

  • NVIDIA became the first listed company with a market cap exceeding $5 trillion;
  • Micron, SanDisk, etc., saw their stock prices break new highs consecutively, with institutions raising their bullish price targets;
  • The stock price fluctuations of SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics dictate the rises and falls of South Korea's KOSPI index;
  • A single statement from Nvidia's founder about "seeing Marvell as a future trillion-dollar giant" caused Marvell (MRVL) stock to rise accordingly;
  • Innolight (Zhongji Xuchuang) mentioned by the new stock god Serenity was misread due to translation issues as "Inno Laser," causing the latter's stock price to surge 10% due to an influx of 300 million hot money.

In the great tide of the "Stock Meme-ification" era, being associated with AI,蹭上 (catching the heat) of "large language models," having homophones with popular targets, or receiving mentions from celebrities have all become reasons for market attention and the best stage for the simultaneous influx of attention and capital.

"Trump concept stocks," "US stock government concept stocks," "TACO-style trading beneficiary targets," etc., are also manifestations of this industry trend. This is precisely the common play in the "attention-intensive industry" highly advocated by the crypto market—the Meme coin sector.

However, the capital markets are different now, the market rules are different, and the scale of funds and liquidity is also incomparable to the crypto market. After all, compared to the trading scale of the US, Hong Kong, A-share, and Japan/South Korea stock markets, the crypto market's total size of less than $3 trillion looks somewhat pitiful.

SpaceX, upon listing, immediately jumped into the top 10 of global major asset rankings. In contrast, BTC has fallen to the 17th position on that list. It must be said, numerical comparisons always look this cruel—over a decade of diligent development in the crypto industry is worth less than the market cap of one company's IPO.

Now, the emergence and increase of Meme stocks may have become an industry trend. The earlier incident where Joyoung Company produced corresponding products and saw its stock price rise due to the viral meme "North-South Mung Beans Hachimi" already illustrates one thing: for the younger generation and investor groups in today's society, investment targets that can trigger emotional fluctuations, attract market attention, and stir liquidity are more worthy of buying.

Even if this fleeting chasing sentiment is just a momentary frenzy, for most people, if you can't beat them, join them is the better choice. Of course, objectively speaking, the emergence of Meme stocks does not mean one-sided benefits, such as wealth creation effects or industry booms. Sometimes, this process is accompanied by negative phenomena like pump-and-dump schemes, one-sided harvesting, and emotional marketing.

Just like Liuliumei's opening surge, some angrily criticize it as a "pump to dump" scheme; others analyze that perhaps it's because Liuliumei joined the "Stock Connect" program, allowing A-share market funds to buy in, that pushed its stock price up. The truth and reasons are certainly multidimensional and chaotic. For us, perhaps all we can do is go with the flow of this era and find our own path to prosperity.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason behind the surge in Liuliumei's stock price on its IPO day?

AThe main reason is that its stock ticker abbreviation 'LLM' coincidentally matches the acronym for 'Large Language Model', allowing it to ride the hype of the AI and LLM trend, making it a so-called 'Meme stock'.

QHow does the article describe the level of oversubscription for Liuliumei's IPO public offering?

AThe article states that the IPO's public offering portion was oversubscribed by approximately 6586.73 times, indicating extremely high retail investor demand.

QWhat comparison does the article make to illustrate the concept of 'Meme stocks' besides Liuliumei?

AThe article mentions several examples: GameStop in 2021, Tesla and SpaceX associated with Elon Musk, '川大智胜' and '歌尔股份' in the A-share market related to Donald Trump events, and '孚日股份' due to a patriotic homophonic pun.

QWhat is the article's view on the relationship between the rise of 'Meme stocks' and the cryptocurrency market?

AThe article suggests that the trend of 'stock Meme-ization' is partly influenced by the cryptocurrency market, which pioneered the 'attention-intensive' model of meme coins. However, it notes that traditional stock markets have vastly larger capital scales than the crypto market.

QWhat potential risks or negative aspects does the article associate with the 'Meme stock' phenomenon?

AThe article points out that the Meme stock trend is not without downsides. It can be accompanied by negative phenomena such as 'pump and dump' schemes, one-sided harvesting of retail investors, and emotional marketing, rather than representing genuine value creation or industry growth.

Related Reads

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit8m ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit8m ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手12m ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手12m ago

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit15m ago

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit15m ago

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit19m ago

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit19m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片