How Did a White House Tweet Overturn the Old Order with a BSC Chain Meme Frenzy?

比推Published on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

An unexpected meme coin race unfolded on January 21 after the White House tweeted about "victory, eviction, and memes." Within minutes, two versions of a token named "memes" were launched—first on Solana, then on BSC. Contrary to expectations that Solana’s first-mover advantage would dominate, the BSC version outperformed significantly in market metrics. At its peak, the BSC meme reached a market cap of $28 million with 7,300 holders, while Solana’s version peaked at $3.6 million with 3,900 holders. Real-time user engagement data from GMGN also showed stronger activity on BSC. This outcome challenges the long-standing perception that BSC meme coins rely solely on endorsements from figures like CZ or He Yi—a pattern once criticized as a "top-down decree model." Despite suspicions of market manipulation, the organic traction suggests a shift in BSC’s meme culture. CZ has since publicly cautioned against creating or investing in meme coins based on his tweets, emphasizing that such tokens are high-risk and not endorsed by him. The event signals a possible new phase—dubbed "BSC 3.0"—where community-driven momentum, rather than influential figures, shapes meme coin success.

Author: Golem

Original Title: White House Ignites, BSC Spreads: A Meme Frenzy That Bids Farewell to the 'Imperial Decree Model'


The meme market today witnessed another "golden dog" legend.

At 11:10 on January 21, the White House official account posted on X platform mentioning "victory, eviction action, and memes". One minute later, a meme coin named memes quickly emerged on the Solana chain; 20 minutes later, the BSC chain version was born. A meme race between the two chains officially began.

According to empiricism, the Solana version should have the advantage—not only is the ecosystem active, but it also aligns with the consensus of "first is first". However, the result was unexpected: the BSC chain version of memes surpassed in market capitalization. According to GMGN data, the BSC version reached a peak market cap of $28 million, with 7,300 holding addresses; while the Solana version peaked at only $3.6 million, with 3,900 holding addresses.

The new feature of GMGN also revealed where players' attention was: three hours after the token was born, the number of simultaneous online users for the Solana version remained below 1,000, while the BSC version once approached 3,000.

Although some questioned whether the BSC version's market cap was due to "pump and dump schemes aimed at harvesting", the real market attention does not lie—this time, BSC indeed won.

Previously, the community often joked that BSC's meme model was "Shandong-style learning in the crypto circle", where only projects related to CZ and He Yi had a way out, raising concerns about the sustainability of the ecosystem. However, BSC's victory in this meme race not only sparked a wave of "slapping thighs" regrets over missing out but also prompted the community to rethink the evolution of its meme model. As Haze, founder of GMGN, stated: "The BSC 3.0 era has arrived." (Odaily Note: Haze holds 1.93% of BSC chain memes, ranking second on the holdings list.)

CZ and He Yi Publicly State They Do Not Support 'Word-Picking Memes'

I once expressed my thoughts on BSC's meme model at an Odaily editorial tea party, believing that CZ and He Yi were actually "held hostage" by the community. The current meme model of BSC, which relies on "imperial decrees" for cold starts, deceptive continuous interactions, and finally "pouring" onto Binance Alpha, is actually a consensus of the BSC community. Although this model started with CZ's unintentional actions in early 2025, they actually do not like it. However, as it has developed now, CZ and He Yi are powerless to reverse the situation.

When I published this view, it was merely a conjecture, but recent public statements from CZ and He Yi have proven it to be true. On January 13, CZ posted that although he likes meme coins, if players blindly follow and buy meme coins "picked" from his tweets, they are almost certain to lose money.

To prevent everyone from blindly chasing these "word-picking memes", CZ's tweets have become cautious. Yesterday, CZ reposted a plush toy created by a user based on his image, which was an ordinary matter, but CZ still specifically noted: If you create or buy meme coins based on my tweets, please note that I may not mention the same words again for a long time, or even never. I do not recommend you do this. He even added at the end

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604799

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the unexpected outcome in the meme coin race between BSC and Solana after the White House tweet?

AContrary to expectations, the BSC version of the meme coin achieved a higher market cap, reaching $28 million, compared to Solana's $3.6 million.

QAccording to the article, what did the GMGN data reveal about the number of holders for each chain's meme coin?

AThe BSC version had 7,300 holder addresses, while the Solana version had 3,900.

QWhat new term does the article use to describe the evolution of BSC's meme coin model?

AThe article refers to it as 'BSC 3.0 era'.

QWhat is CZ's (Changpeng Zhao) stated opinion on people creating or buying meme coins based on his tweets?

ACZ stated that he does not to do it, as he may not mention the same words again for a long time, if ever, and that blindly following such meme coins will almost certainly result in losing money.

QWhat was the common community perception of the BSC meme model before this event, as mentioned in the article?

AThe community often调侃 (teased/mocked) that the BSC Meme model was like '币圈山东学' (Shandong style in the crypto circle), where only projects related to CZ or He Yi had a chance to succeed.

Related Reads

Is Bitcoin's Recent Surge a Blessing or a Trap?

Bitcoin recently surged from around $63,000 to almost $80,000. According to Glassnode, this rally is not solely due to low liquidity but driven by real capital inflows. Key factors include aggressive spot market buying, increased trading volumes, improved market depth, and significant institutional demand, as evidenced by high volumes and inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs. Derivatives market data shows investors adopting more aggressive risk management, with strong perpetual futures buying. However, a substantial increase in futures open interest points to heightened speculative activity and leverage use. On-chain metrics support the bullish activity, with growth in active addresses and asset-adjusted transfer volume, indicating accelerated user and economic activity within the network. Investor profitability has also improved significantly, with both unrealized and realized profits rising well above historical averages. This is shifting investor behavior toward profit-taking rather than loss-selling. However, Glassnode cautions that the current market structure is not yet fully based on long-term capital accumulation. It notes that "hot capital," representing short-term, price-sensitive funds, is elevated, while macroeconomic-scale capital inflows remain relatively limited. The rally appears to be supported more by active short-term investors, tactical positioning, and growing speculative appetite than by sustained, long-term accumulation.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Is Bitcoin's Recent Surge a Blessing or a Trap?

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Bitcoin Reaches $80,000: Three Arguments Against a Bull Market

Bitcoin reached $80,000 on August 24, 2026, a 38% rise from its July low of $57,800. While this surge is notable, analyst Rekt Capital presents three arguments against it signaling a true bull market reversal, suggesting it may instead be a rally within a broader bear market. First, if July 2026 was the bear market bottom, its formation time was 27% shorter than historical averages, a conclusion only valid if no new lower low forms by year-end. Second, Bitcoin broke down from a macro triangle pattern in July, but the subsequent ~30% drop was significantly smaller than the 48-62% declines seen after similar breakdowns in past cycles. Third, and crucially, the price has failed to break the long-term descending trendline from early 2025 highs, meaning Bitcoin is still making lower highs on macro timeframes, indicating underlying weakness. Rekt Capital notes the dynamic trendline resistance is near $79,000 this month, dropping to ~$76,300 next month. A monthly close below it could open the door for a correction. On weekly charts, resistance sits at $74.5k-$83.5k, with support at $62.5k-$68.5k. Adding another perspective, Crypto Rover highlights two key liquidation levels on Bitcoin's heatmap: a cluster of short positions at $80k-$90k (which could fuel a squeeze higher) and a concentration of long positions at $48k-$60k, acting as competing price "magnets." The article contrasts Rekt Capital's current cautious stance with his past calls in 2025, noting he correctly identified market direction but underestimated the scale of both the subsequent spring rally and the following autumn/winter decline. His current analysis again emphasizes macro weakness despite the recent price rise.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Bitcoin Reaches $80,000: Three Arguments Against a Bull Market

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片