Galaxy Digital and Duel Casino in Conflict Over 230 ETH Related to Coldcard Vulnerability

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

A conflict has emerged between Galaxy Digital and online gambling platform Duel Casino regarding approximately 230 ETH suspected to be linked to the Coldcard wallet vulnerability. Galaxy's head of research, Alex Thorn, accused Duel Casino of refusing to freeze the allegedly stolen funds despite receiving forensic data linking the addresses to the hack. Thorn warned that Duel would become complicit in theft by not acting. In response, a Duel team member defended their policy, stating they cannot freeze a user's balance based solely on claims from a third party to prevent potential abuse. They proposed an exception if the alleged victim could send a message from the "hacked" address and provide a signed statement and transaction proof. The platform insists on requiring some form of official confirmation, typically from law enforcement, before taking action. This stance has drawn criticism from some users but also received support from figures like a former Delphi Digital executive, who called it a sensible policy for crypto-related fintech apps. The incident highlights ongoing dilemmas as criminals attempt to launder proceeds from the larger hack involving over 1,300 stolen BTC.

Funds allegedly connected to the Coldcard vulnerability are already on the move and flowing to third-party platforms as criminals attempt to launder them.

Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, highlighted the behavior of Duel Casino, an online gambling platform that is claimed to have received nearly 230 ETH as a result of the Coldcard hack.

According to Thorn, the platform refused to freeze these funds even after receiving data linking the addresses and transactions to this incident. In response, Duel asked for a police report to be filed, despite allegedly already having access to the incriminating information.

Thorn called Duel's inaction outrageous, emphasizing that a police report would, at best, not arrive until Monday.

"These shady people refuse to freeze funds that have been proven through forensic analysis to be the result of an actual cyber incident. If they do not freeze these funds, they will become accomplices to the theft," he stated.

A member of the Duel team, known on X by the handle Korra, emphasized that they cannot freeze a user's funds just because a third party claims they are stolen, as people could potentially abuse this system for their own gain.

Korra then suggested making an exception if the alleged victim sends a message from the "hacked" address, signs a written statement confirming their account was hacked, and provides the transaction chain proving these funds were sent to Duel's wallets.

"You have to understand why this policy exists: we require SOME official confirmation that a theft actually occurred (i.e., typically confirmation from law enforcement of any kind), otherwise anyone could make any claim about their own balance, about a counterparty, or about a third party they don't even know, and get accounts frozen," Korra emphasized.

Duel Casino's policy has caused dissatisfaction among some users, who criticized the gambling platform for not imposing a temporary freeze on these funds while investigating the source of the funds mentioned in the claim.

Despite this, Korra reaffirmed Duel Casino's position.

"We don't block your balance in Duel just because someone asks us to. We simply don't do it. I'm very sorry, but that's how it is, and we will stick to this position," concluded Korra.

Former Delphi Digital Chief Legal Officer Gabriel Shapiro supported Duel Casino's stance: "This remains perhaps my only unpopular opinion, but I still believe it's practically the only sensible policy a fintech/crypto-related application can have..." he noted.

As more wallets are being drained and the perpetrators attempt to cash out part of the more than 1,300 stolen BTC, it should be expected that more users, companies, and institutions will face similar dilemmas.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core conflict between Galaxy Digital and Duel Casino according to the article?

AThe core conflict is over approximately 230 ETH allegedly stolen via the Coldcard exploit. Galaxy Digital's Head of Research, Alex Thorn, accused Duel Casino of receiving these stolen funds and criticized the platform for refusing to freeze them without a formal police report, which Thorn deemed outrageous and tantamount to aiding theft.

QWhat was Duel Casino's primary reason for not freezing the funds as requested?

ADuel Casino's primary reason, as stated by a team member known as Korra, is their policy against freezing user funds solely based on third-party claims of theft. They argue this is necessary to prevent abuse of the system, requiring official confirmation, typically from law enforcement, that a theft has actually occurred.

QWhat specific proof did Korra from Duel Casino suggest the alleged victim could provide for an exception to their freezing policy?

AKorra suggested an exception could be made if the alleged victim sent a message from the 'hacked' address, signed a written statement confirming their account was compromised, and provided the transaction chain proving the funds flowed to Duel's wallets.

QWhich notable figure expressed support for Duel Casino's policy, and what was their main argument?

AGabriel Shapiro, former Chief Legal Officer of Delphi Digital, supported Duel Casino's policy. His main argument was that this is practically the only reasonable policy a crypto-related fintech application can have, implying it's a necessary standard for the industry despite being unpopular.

QWhat broader trend or expectation does the article mention in its conclusion regarding the Coldcard exploit?

AThe article concludes that as more wallets are drained and the attackers attempt to cash out part of the over 1,300 stolen BTC, more users, companies, and institutions should expect to face similar dilemmas regarding the handling of potentially stolen funds.

Related Reads

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbit10m ago

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

marsbit10m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbit23m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbit23m ago

CATL Invests in a 00s Graduate from Harbin Institute of Technology

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) has exclusively invested in the Pre-A round of RoboParty, a company founded by 22-year-old Huang Yi. A former student at Harbin Institute of Technology, Huang built a bipedal humanoid robot in his dorm room and later dropped out to launch RoboParty in Shanghai. The company focuses on developing a fully open-source platform for humanoid robots, combining self-developed hardware, operating systems (Party OS), and foundational models. RoboParty's strategy emphasizes open-source collaboration to accelerate development and build a developer ecosystem, positioning itself as foundational infrastructure for embodied AI. Since its 2025 founding, the team—composed largely of top-tier university graduates—has secured six funding rounds in eight months, with investors including Matrix Partners, Xiaomi, and now CATL. This investment by CATL's corporate venture arm signals strong industry confidence in RoboParty's potential for real-world manufacturing and complex scenarios. Huang Yi prioritizes technological excellence and developer community growth over rapid commercialization. The company has already garnered significant interest from developers and research institutions globally. With a focus on continuous, rapid iteration and open innovation, RoboParty aims to prove the versatility of humanoid robots and drive the field toward an open-source future.

marsbit26m ago

CATL Invests in a 00s Graduate from Harbin Institute of Technology

marsbit26m ago

Will SpaceX's First Quarterly Report Rescue Its Stock Price Under the Pressure of 1.2 Billion Shares Unlocking?

SpaceX is set to release its first quarterly earnings report since going public, a key test for its stock which has declined 20% from its IPO price. Approximately 9.12 billion shares are set to unlock on August 6, with an additional 3.19 billion following a week later, creating potential selling pressure from early investors. A strong report may be the only catalyst to reverse the downtrend. The report will cover three segments: Space, Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. The AI business, centered on the merged xAI, is the biggest uncertainty. While it generated $818 million in revenue last quarter, it also reported a $2.5 billion operating loss and $7.7 billion in capital expenditures. New data center rental agreements with Anthropic and Google, particularly the substantial $1.25 billion monthly deal with Anthropic, add significant revenue variability this quarter. Investors await guidance on AI's future outlook and the timeline for launching AI computing satellites via Starship. Starlink remains the stable profit driver, ending last quarter with 10.3 million subscribers. Key metrics will be user growth, average revenue per user (ARPU), and enterprise/government contract backlogs. The Space segment, which posted a $657 million operating loss last quarter, will be scrutinized for updates on Starship development following its 13th test flight and the pace of Falcon 9 launches, many of which support internal Starlink deployment. Wall Street expects Q2 revenue of around $6.9 billion and EBITDA of $2.1 billion. However, as this is the first earnings report, analyst forecasts lack a historical baseline and could see significant variance. With a current market cap of ~$1.4 trillion and a high valuation, the market's reaction post-earnings will hinge on the report's strength, the magnitude of post-lockup selling, and ongoing investor concerns.

marsbit26m ago

Will SpaceX's First Quarterly Report Rescue Its Stock Price Under the Pressure of 1.2 Billion Shares Unlocking?

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片