Ethereum eyes $3.4K – But ETH bull trap looms if THIS level breaks

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

Ethereum's price action shows mixed signals, with potential for both bullish and bearish outcomes. While the weekly and daily chart structures suggest a possible upward move from the $2.5k–$2.7k demand zone, indicators like RSI and OBV reflect weakening momentum. A key supply zone at $3,370–$3,660 poses a major resistance, and a break below the $3.2k support could lead to further declines. Short-term bullish opportunities may exist near the $3,014–$3,086 demand area, targeting $3.4k. However, low volume and bearish market sentiment indicate risk, and a drop below $3k remains possible if buying pressure doesn't increase.

Ethereum [ETH] could be undervalued at $3k, warned Bitmine Immersion’s [BMNR] Tom Lee. Yet, selling pressure from the 1k-10k ETH holder cohort continued. To add to the confusion, supply on exchanges was falling, hinting at accumulation.

The Fusaka upgrade pushed Ethereum toward a model where everyday activity happens on L2, while settlement occurs on the base layer. This can improve throughput and data capacity, as well as reduce network fees.

Smart money seems to believe that going long will be profitable, but this is no guarantee of the next move.

The next Ethereum move will likely be...

On the weekly chart, the swing structure (orange) is still bullish. Within this bullish structure, the dip below $4.2k in September reflected a bearish shift. The subsequent retracement to the $2.7k demand zone from May reinforced the weakness of the bulls.

Yet, in this timeframe, the bulls have the power to force a comeback. The RSI reflected bearish momentum with its drop below the neutral 50 in October.

The OBV, which had trended higher till September, began to turn downward swiftly.

Neither indicator showed that immediate bullishness is likely. However, the price action hinted at a possible bullish reaction from the $2.5k-$2.7k demand zone. So far, we have gotten an 18% move in three weeks.

On the 1-day timeframe, too, the bearish trend was visible. However, the move past the previous local high at $3.1k meant that the Ethereum internal structure was bullish on this timeframe. This aligned well with the swing weekly structure and could be the start of the next move higher.

To the north, the supply zone (red box) at $3,370-$3,660 posed a severe obstacle. It is possible that a move to this resistance would see ETH bulls rejected.

The OBV was feeble in its attempts to climb higher over the past three weeks. The RSI was yet to get pushed decisively beyond the neutral 50 line.

Gauging ETH’s next move

By the looks of things, the low volume was a warning of a lack of demand. As a result, even though the daily structure appears bullish, the $3.2k local support could still reject attempts by bulls to spark a rally.

Market sentiment remains bearish and fearful, with Bitcoin [BTC] still far from the key $100k psychological level.

Ethereum traders, look for THIS bullish setup

The lower timeframes, such as 4-hour and below, could yield bullish trade opportunities.

For example, on the 1-hour chart, the $3,014-$3,086 area is a short-term demand zone that is likely to yield a bullish move to $3.4k.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum is sending mixed signals onchain and on the price charts.
  • The bias, for now, shows bullish promise, but traders need to be prepared for a drop below $3k if the buying volume is unable to gather strength.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Reads

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手2m ago

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

链捕手2m ago

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit6m ago

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit6m ago

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit33m ago

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片