Cryptocurrency Companies Urge AI Labs to 'Arm' Bitcoin Defenders with the Most Powerful Models

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-13Last updated on 2026-08-13

Abstract

Over thirty Bitcoin and cryptocurrency companies have called on leading AI labs to provide open-source developers with early access to the most powerful cybersecurity models. In an open letter organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, signatories including Coinbase, Block, BitGo, Blockstream, ARK Invest, and Foundry argue that developers of critical financial infrastructure like Bitcoin Core are at a disadvantage, using less capable AI tools than potential attackers. They contend that the safety restrictions of public AI models can hinder legitimate vulnerability research. The letter requests that AI labs establish trusted access programs offering early model access, sufficient computing resources for audits, secure environments for private code analysis, and inclusion for small teams and independent developers. The signatories warn that the Bitcoin network secures over $1 trillion in assets, and infrastructure vulnerabilities pose significant risks. They cite recent incidents like the exploitation of a critical vulnerability in BTCPay Server and a major attack on Coldcard wallets, where a configuration error led to the theft of approximately 1,719 BTC ($111 million). The call comes amid a series of high-value crypto infrastructure attacks in 2026, including multimillion-dollar losses from protocols like Ostium, AFX, Summer.fi, and Bonzo Lend due to logic flaws and oracle manipulation. The companies believe advanced AI could strengthen defenses by analyzing large codebases...

More than three dozen Bitcoin and cryptocurrency companies have appealed to leading AI labs, calling for them to provide open-source developers with early access to the most powerful cybersecurity models. The corresponding open letter was organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute. Signatories include Coinbase, Block, BitGo, Blockstream, Anchorage Digital, ARK Invest, Bitwise, Foundry, Casa, Exodus, as well as the Brink, Chaincode, and Btrust funds.

The authors of the appeal stated that Bitcoin Core and other developers of critical financial infrastructure are working with less powerful AI tools than potential attackers. According to them, the safety guardrails of public models, designed to block the creation of malicious code, sometimes hinder legitimate vulnerability research.

At the same time, new cyber capabilities are spreading through open-weight models, stolen access to corporate systems, and specialized tools.

"Cutting-edge AI is changing the economics of both security research and cyber operations," the letter states.

In the signatories' view, early access to advanced models would allow for faster discovery and patching of vulnerabilities in the software that protects trillions of dollars in digital assets.

They emphasized that the Bitcoin network alone secures assets worth over $1 trillion, and a vulnerability in related infrastructure could jeopardize user funds.

What Exactly Are Crypto Companies Asking For

The signatories urged AI labs to create permanent trusted access programs that would include:

  • early access to the most powerful models with cyber capabilities;
  • sufficient computational resources for extended testing;
  • secured environments for analyzing private code;
  • participation of small teams, non-profit organizations, and independent developers;
  • a direct communication channel with the AI labs' security teams.

The relevance of such access has already been demonstrated by recent attacks. BTCPay Server, a signatory of the letter, disclosed a critical vulnerability that attackers used to target merchants' Lightning nodes. The vulnerability was discovered by the Bitcoin Red Team group, which this month began using AI models to audit Bitcoin codebases and has already submitted thousands of reports on potential issues across hundreds of projects.

The scale of the attack on Coldcard also demonstrated how severe the consequences of errors in cryptographic infrastructure can be.

According to SlowMist, attackers stole at least 1,719 $BTC worth approximately $111 million, with the funds linked to over 5,200 addresses.

Researchers reproduced the attack chain and determined that due to a configuration error, the STM32 hardware random number generator was disabled, causing the system to use the predictable Yasmarang software generator. This significantly reduced the entropy level and allowed attackers to brute-force possible values, recover seed phrases, and drain vulnerable wallets.

Critical Vulnerabilities Already Leading to Multi-Million Dollar Losses

The issue of access to advanced AI tools is particularly relevant against the backdrop of a series of attacks on cryptocurrency infrastructure in 2026.

Specifically, in July, the DeFi protocol Ostium lost about $24 million due to a vulnerability in its price oracle update mechanism, and AFX on the Arbitrum network lost over $24 million. In both cases, attackers exploited flaws in the protocols' logic or pricing mechanisms, not a compromise of the blockchain infrastructure itself.

A similar scenario was observed during the attack on Summer.fi, where a hacker stole about $6 million by manipulating the protocol's accounting logic using a $65.4 million flash loan. Another approximately $9.05 million was lost by Bonzo Lend users due to an error in verifying the Supra price oracle.

Precisely such vulnerabilities could be one area where advanced AI models can strengthen the protection of crypto infrastructure: they can analyze large codebases, search for atypical exploitation scenarios, and help developers identify problems before they are exploited by attackers.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main request made by the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency companies to AI labs in the article?

AThey are requesting that leading AI labs provide open-source developers with early access to the most powerful AI models for cybersecurity purposes to help defend Bitcoin's infrastructure.

QWhat organization organized the open letter mentioned in the article?

AThe open letter was organized by the Bitcoin Policy Institute.

QWhat is a key problem that public AI models sometimes cause for legitimate security researchers, according to the letter's signatories?

AThe safety guardrails in public AI models, designed to block the creation of malicious code, can sometimes hinder legitimate vulnerability research.

QList two specific vulnerabilities or attacks discussed in the article that highlight the need for advanced security tools.

A1. A vulnerability in BTCPay Server exploited to attack merchants' Lightning nodes. 2. The Coldcard attack where a misconfiguration led to a predictable random number generator, allowing seed phrase recovery and wallet draining.

QHow could advanced AI models specifically help protect crypto infrastructure, according to the article's final paragraph?

AThey could analyze large codebases, search for atypical exploitation scenarios, and help developers identify problems before malicious actors can exploit them.

Related Reads

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

PayPal recently released its Q2 2024 earnings, reporting revenue of $8.68 billion and a Total Payment Volume of $486.4 billion, both exceeding market expectations. However, GAAP profit margins declined year-over-year, with the company attributing an $81 million net loss partly to strategic investments and crypto assets. The report highlighted the strategic role of its PYUSD stablecoin, now positioned as a "major enabler" for the PayPal World platform and integrated into a newly formed "Payment Services & Crypto" business unit. PayPal aims to launch more merchant products powered by PYUSD and AI-driven "agentic payments," focusing on mainstream consumer and business use cases. Despite this strategic push and expansion to over 70 markets and nine blockchains, PYUSD's circulating supply has contracted significantly. After peaking around $4.2 billion in March 2024, its supply fell approximately 31% to roughly $2.7 billion by the end of Q2, indicating a gap between its broad integration narrative and actual sustained user demand post-incentives. The competitive landscape is evolving with the announcement of Open USD, a consortium-backed stablecoin project with over 140 partners including Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe. Unlike PYUSD's single-issuer model, Open USD proposes a shared revenue and governance model among its participants. Notably, PayPal itself is a signatory to the Open USD initiative, suggesting a hedging strategy where it continues developing PYUSD while securing a potential stake in an alternative industry-standard model. PayPal's challenge is to convert PYUSD's established distribution network into organic, subsidy-independent usage. If unsuccessful, its current supply level may represent a peak, especially as competition intensifies from established giants like USDC and new structural paradigms like Open USD.

Odaily星球日报21m ago

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

Odaily星球日报21m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片