Chainlink adds 99K LINK to reserves, yet prices stall: Why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

Chainlink has significantly increased its reserves, adding 99,103 LINK in a single accumulation, bringing the total to 1.77 million—a 377% rise since before Q4 2025. This supply squeeze, funded by strong on-chain and off-chain revenue from high network usage, has not translated into price gains. LINK remains one of the worst-performing assets, down 39% in Q4 2025 and 11.7% in 2026, largely due to broader market sentiment. Despite this underperformance, strong fundamentals, record-high fees, and strategic accumulation suggest LINK is undervalued and poised for a potential scarcity-driven rally once demand recovers.

Supply squeezes remain one of the key drivers of long-term growth.

From a technical standpoint, locking up a portion of the total supply naturally pushes the per-coin valuation higher. When this supply reduction meets rising demand, it sets the stage for a strong scarcity-driven rally.

But it’s not just about the charts. These supply shocks also help reinforce holding conviction. That said, does Chainlink’s [LINK] recent accumulation really support this thesis, given LINK’s recent underperformance?

For context, Chainlink recently revealed that its reserve has added 99,103 LINK, its largest single accumulation so far. This pushes the total amount of LINK locked in reserves to 1.77 million, further tightening supply.

As the chart above shows, that’s a 377% increase from the 371K LINK held before Q4 2025, meaning 1.4 million LINK has been added since. And yet, that supply squeeze hasn’t really shown up in price action so far.

Notably, Chainlink funds its accumulation through both on- and off-chain revenue, pointing to solid adoption and network usage. This divergence raises a key question: Is LINK simply being undervalued by the market?

Chainlink’s activity signals scarcity-driven potential

In the current market setup, being undervalued is actually a bullish signal.

Looking at LINK, it fits this setup perfectly. Acting as a bridge, Chainlink generates revenue through fees whenever smart contracts on other chains rely on its oracles, such as a DeFi lending protocol using its price feeds.

Recently, fees across 13 chains hit an all-time high, with Ethereum [ETH] alone bringing in $6.8 million, showing strong demand for Chainlink’s services and growing network usage that’s capturing real value.

Put simply, solid on-chain revenue is flowing straight into LINK’s reserve.

And yet, that hasn’t shown up in the price, with LINK standing out as one of the worst-performing assets, down 39% in Q4 2025, and still dipping 11.7% so far in 2026. However, this pullback mostly reflects broader market FUD.

In this context, Chainlink looks undervalued.

Strong on-chain usage and fee generation, combined with strategic accumulation, point to solid fundamentals. Once demand kicks in, LINK could spark a scarcity-driven rally, making this “dip” a great entry point.


Final Thoughts

  • Chainlink has locked 1.77 million LINK in reserves, driven by both on- and off-chain revenue, yet this hasn’t shown in price.
  • Growing fees across, strong network usage, and strategic accumulation suggest LINK could trigger a scarcity-driven rally once demand returns.

Related Questions

QWhat was the amount of LINK recently added to Chainlink's reserves, and what is the new total?

AChainlink recently added 99,103 LINK to its reserves, bringing the new total to 1.77 million LINK locked.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason LINK's price has not increased despite the supply squeeze?

AThe article suggests that LINK's price underperformance is mostly due to broader market FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt), despite strong fundamentals.

QHow does Chainlink fund its accumulation of LINK tokens for its reserves?

AChainlink funds its accumulation of LINK through both on-chain and off-chain revenue generated from its oracle services.

QWhat evidence does the article provide for strong demand and usage of the Chainlink network?

AThe article cites that fees across 13 chains reached an all-time high, with Ethereum alone generating $6.8 million in revenue for Chainlink's services.

QWhy does the article argue that the current market situation for LINK is actually a bullish signal?

AThe article argues that strong on-chain usage, fee generation, and strategic accumulation make LINK undervalued, positioning it for a potential scarcity-driven rally once demand returns, making the current price a good entry point.

Related Reads

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit44m ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit44m ago

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1h ago

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1h ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1h ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy LINK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ChainLink (LINK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ChainLink (LINK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ChainLink (LINK)After purchasing your ChainLink (LINK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ChainLink (LINK)Easily trade ChainLink (LINK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

9.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy LINK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LINK (LINK) are presented below.

活动图片