Bitcoin: Shorts still dominate BTC – But buyers are fighting back

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Bitcoin has reclaimed the $71,000 level after weeks of volatility, though it remains uncertain if this marks the start of sustained growth or a temporary pause. The market is undergoing significant deleveraging, with Open Interest dropping from $47.5 billion to $23.2 billion since October 6th, reducing the risk of cascading liquidations and violent price swings. Despite the price rebound, derivatives data shows persistent bearish sentiment, with negative Funding Rates indicating shorts still dominate. However, the Taker Buy/Sell Ratio has risen to 1.16, suggesting growing buying pressure. Additionally, declining exchange reserves signal reduced immediate selling pressure, providing structural support. While the market isn't fully bullish, downside risk appears limited in the near term due to flushed-out leverage and easing selling pressure.

Bitcoin [BTC] has navigated weeks of turbulence. Amid renewed geopolitical tensions, capital has gradually rotated back into the asset, helping price reclaim lost ground.

At press time, Bitcoin was holding above the $71,000 threshold after spending several weeks below it. The recovery is notable.

However, the broader question remains whether this marks the beginning of sustained upside expansion or simply a temporary stabilization before another wave of volatility.

Deleveraging reshapes market risk

Bitcoin has entered a pronounced deleveraging cycle, significantly altering the risk profile of the derivatives market.

Since the 6th of October, Open Interest has contracted from $47.5 billion to $23.2 billion—a $24.3 billion reduction. More than half of the leveraged capital previously deployed has now exited the market.

This scale of capital withdrawal matters. When leverage compresses during a period of price struggle, it often signals that speculative excess has been flushed out.

With fewer overextended positions in play, the probability of a cascading liquidation event declines materially.

Earlier this year, the largest daily liquidation event reached $1.14 billion on the 5th of February. Several sessions in January also recorded combined long and short liquidations exceeding $500 million.

In contrast, recent liquidation totals have struggled to breach $150 million. The sharp decline in forced position unwinds suggests that systemic fragility has eased.

Without heavy leverage stacked in one direction, the market becomes less prone to violent swings triggered by liquidations.

This does not eliminate volatility. However, it meaningfully lowers the risk of a disorderly breakdown from current levels.

Derivatives positioning reflects lingering skepticism

Despite the recent price rebound, derivatives data reveals persistent caution among traders.

The Funding Rate remains negative, indicating that short traders continue to pay to maintain their positions. Since the 6th of January, bulls have controlled funding on only four occasions.

That imbalance highlights a sustained bearish lean within perpetual markets.

Price often reacts to funding dynamics. A negative Funding Rate during upward price movement can imply that traders expect the rally to fade. In some cases, such divergence signals underlying weakness.

Yet the picture is not one-sided. The Taker Buy/Sell Ratio has climbed to 1.16, indicating that aggressive market buyers have recently outpaced sellers.

A reading above 1 reflects stronger demand in the perpetual market. Notably, the last time this ratio reached similar levels was in June—a period that preceded a broader upward trend.

If buying pressure continues to absorb supply, short positions could face pressure. A sustained imbalance between aggressive buyers and short-heavy positioning may create conditions for incremental upside.

Exchange reserves strengthen the structural case

Beyond derivatives, on-chain positioning offers additional insight.

Bitcoin’s exchange reserves have fallen to approximately 2.73 million BTC. A declining reserve balance typically signals that investors are withdrawing assets from exchanges into private wallets.

This behavior historically aligns with reduced immediate selling pressure. Coins held off exchanges are less accessible for quick liquidation, tightening available supply in the spot market.

The steady drawdown in reserves provides mechanical support for price stability. While it does not guarantee appreciation, it reduces the probability of heavy spot-driven sell pressure emerging unexpectedly.

Overall, the market has not fully transitioned into a bullish phase. Still, with leverage flushed out and structural selling pressure easing, the downside risk appears increasingly constrained—at least in the near term.


Final Summary

  • Ongoing deleveraging reduces the probability of a volatility shock.
  • Shorts still dominate funding rates, yet volume strength and falling exchange reserves offer support.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current status of Bitcoin's price and why is the recovery notable?

AAt press time, Bitcoin was holding above the $71,000 threshold after spending several weeks below it. The recovery is notable because it occurred amid renewed geopolitical tensions, with capital gradually rotating back into the asset.

QHow has the Bitcoin derivatives market's risk profile changed due to deleveraging?

ABitcoin has entered a pronounced deleveraging cycle, with Open Interest contracting from $47.5 billion to $23.2 billion since October 6th. This $24.3 billion reduction means more than half of the leveraged capital has exited, flushing out speculative excess and significantly lowering the risk of a cascading liquidation event.

QWhat does the negative Funding Rate indicate about trader sentiment despite the price rebound?

AThe negative Funding Rate indicates persistent caution and a sustained bearish lean among traders, as short traders continue to pay to maintain their positions. It suggests that many traders expect the recent rally to fade, highlighting underlying skepticism.

QWhat is the significance of the Taker Buy/Sell Ratio climbing to 1.16?

AA Taker Buy/Sell Ratio of 1.16 indicates that aggressive market buyers have recently outpaced sellers, reflecting stronger demand in the perpetual market. The last time it reached similar levels was in June, which preceded a broader upward trend.

QHow do falling Bitcoin exchange reserves provide support for price stability?

AFalling exchange reserves, now at approximately 2.73 million BTC, signal that investors are moving assets into private wallets. This reduces immediate selling pressure because coins held off exchanges are less accessible for quick liquidation, thereby tightening available supply and providing mechanical support for price stability.

Related Reads

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit26m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit26m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手33m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手33m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1h ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片