Bitcoin Policy Institute to Assess Federal Reserve Basel Proposal on Bitcoin Risk Rules

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

The Bitcoin Policy Institute announced it will review an upcoming Federal Reserve proposal that could influence how U.S. banks handle Bitcoin under international banking rules. The Fed is expected to release a proposal next week detailing how major banks should apply Basel risk-weighting regulations, followed by a 90-day public comment period. Currently, Basel rules assign Bitcoin a 1250% risk weight, classifying it as an extremely high-risk asset. This requires banks to hold significantly larger reserves to cover Bitcoin-related exposures, which critics argue discourages banking engagement with the cryptocurrency sector. The policy could restrict services for Bitcoin firms, custody solutions for investors, and overall financial infrastructure supporting Bitcoin. The Institute plans to analyze the proposal and submit formal feedback, as the outcome may shape traditional banks' future involvement in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The Bitcoin Policy Institute said it plans to review an upcoming proposal from the Federal Reserve that could affect how U.S. banks treat Bitcoin under international banking regulations.

Fed Proposal to Public Comment Period

According to policy observers, theFederal Reserve is expected to release a public proposal next week outlining how large U.S. banks should implement the Basel risk-weighting rules. . Once published, it will begin a 90-day public comment period. During this time, banks, industry groups, and policy organizations will be able to review the proposal and submit feedback before the rules are finalized.

Under the current Basel guidelines, Bitcoin is given a 1250% risk weight on bank balance sheets. This means regulators treat the cryptocurrency as a very high-risk asset. Because of this rule, banks must hold much larger reserves if they want to keep Bitcoin on their balance sheets or provide services related to it.

Critics say the current risk weighting discourages banks from interacting with the crypto sector. According to advocates, the rule could limit banking services for Bitcoin firms and custody services for Bitcoin investors, as well as the financial infrastructure supporting the Bitcoin ecosystem. The Bitcoin Policy Institute has indicated it will carefully review the Federal Reserve proposal and submit formal feedback.

Critics say this requirement makes it difficult for banks to work withBitcoin companies or offer services to crypto users. Industry supporters believe the outcome of the Federal Reserve proposal could shape how much traditional banks participate in the Bitcoin sector in the future.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XRP Holds $1.40 Support as ETF Outflows Weigh on Sentiment

TagsBitcoinCryptocurrency

Related Questions

QWhat is the Bitcoin Policy Institute planning to review regarding the Federal Reserve?

AThe Bitcoin Policy Institute plans to review an upcoming Federal Reserve proposal that could affect how U.S. banks treat Bitcoin under international banking regulations.

QWhat is the risk weight assigned to Bitcoin under the current Basel guidelines?

AUnder the current Basel guidelines, Bitcoin is given a 1250% risk weight on bank balance sheets, treating it as a very high-risk asset.

QHow long is the public comment period for the Federal Reserve's proposal once it is published?

AOnce published, the Federal Reserve's proposal will begin a 90-day public comment period.

QWhy do critics say the current risk weighting rule discourages banks from interacting with the crypto sector?

ACritics say the current risk weighting rule discourages banks because it requires them to hold much larger reserves to keep Bitcoin on their balance sheets or provide related services, making it difficult to work with Bitcoin companies or offer services to crypto users.

QWhat potential impact could the Federal Reserve proposal have on traditional banks' participation in the Bitcoin sector?

AIndustry supporters believe the outcome of the Federal Reserve proposal could shape how much traditional banks participate in the Bitcoin sector in the future, potentially affecting banking services for Bitcoin firms, custody services for investors, and the financial infrastructure supporting the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Related Reads

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit1h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit1h ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

After Alphabet's announcement of an $84.75 billion equity financing round, market focus for AI investment is shifting from pure growth narratives to capital efficiency and payback periods. The core argument is that AI is being re-priced from a software-like growth story into a heavy-asset infrastructure cycle, requiring massive capital expenditure (CapEx) on chips, data centers, and power grids. While Alphabet's financing itself is not a distress signal—part of it is for administrative purposes like tax obligations on stock compensation—it highlights the enormous capital demands of AI infrastructure. This demand extends beyond tech giants to pure-play AI model companies (like OpenAI, Anthropic), data center REITs, and utilities. Major tech firms are projected to spend heavily on AI data centers in 2026, signaling a broad-based capital cycle the market must absorb. Consequently, valuation logic is changing. Investors are moving away from questions about who has the strongest AI narrative and are now prioritizing clear visibility into orders, stable cash flows, and the cost of capital. This has led to recent pressure on high-multiple AI software and semiconductor stocks, while "picks-and-shovels" hardware, data center, and power assets with firmer near-term demand may see relative support. The key going forward will be monitoring whether rising CapEx guidance across companies is matched by a timely monetization of AI investments into revenue and cash flow. The market's tolerance for high spending depends on demonstrable returns. While the long-term AI thesis remains intact, the valuation framework has fundamentally shifted to emphasize capital discipline and payback speed.

marsbit1h ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片