Bitcoin ETFs Lost Nearly $390 Million Over the Week, While SOL ETFs Attracted New Capital

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-16Last updated on 2026-08-16

Abstract

Between August 10 and 14, 2026, the US spot Bitcoin ETF sector experienced a significant net outflow of $389.71 million, according to SoSoValue data. Outflows were recorded on four of the five trading days, primarily affecting major funds like Fidelity's FBTC ($153.23M outflow) and BlackRock's IBIT ($78.96M outflow). While Grayscale's BTC and Morgan Stanley's MSBT saw inflows, most Bitcoin ETFs ended the week with outflows or neutral flows. The spot Ethereum ETF sector also saw a net outflow of $2.26 million for the week, led by BlackRock's ETHA. In contrast, several altcoin-based ETFs attracted new capital. SOL-ETFs led with an inflow of $10.26 million, followed by funds tied to HYPE, XRP, LINK, and HBAR. DOGE-ETFs were an exception with a minor outflow. Activity in the Hong Kong market remained minimal. This follows a week where over $1 billion flowed into various crypto funds.

From August 10 to 14, 2026, the spot Bitcoin ETF sector in the United States recorded a total capital outflow of $389.71 million, according to data from SoSoValue.

Dynamics of capital inflows/outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US. Data: SoSoValue.

Outflows were observed on four out of five trading days during the week:

  • August 10 — $144.67 million;
  • August 12 — $61.16 million;
  • August 13 — $131.13 million;
  • August 14 — $57.63 million.

The outflow during the reporting period came from BlackRock's IBIT — $78.96 million. At the same time, the largest single fund to see outflows was Fidelity's FBTC — $153.23 million.

The following funds also showed negative trends:

  • GBTC from Grayscale — $88.3 million;
  • ARKB from ARK Invest/21Shares — $70.36 million.

Only two funds recorded positive results:

  • BTC from Grayscale — $75.98 million;
  • MSBT from Morgan Stanley — $7.08 million.

Other Bitcoin ETFs also ended the week with outflows or without significant capital inflows.

Ethereum ETFs Lost $2.26 Million

The spot Ethereum ETF sector ended the week with a total outflow of $2.26 million, according to SoSoValue data.

Dynamics of capital inflows/outflows from spot Ethereum ETFs in the US. Data: SoSoValue.

The largest outflow was recorded by BlackRock's ETHA — $16.39 million. Investors withdrew another $5.6 million from Fidelity's FETH.

At the same time, some of the losses were offset by:

  • $ETH from Grayscale — $15.07 million;
  • ETHB from 21Shares — $3.86 million;
  • MSSE from Morgan Stanley — $0.81 million.

Other funds based on Ethereum did not attract any assets under management during the week.

We explained what Ethereum ETFs are in a separate article:

$SOL-ETFs Became Leaders Among Altcoins

Unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum funds, some exchange-traded products based on altcoins showed positive trends.

The largest capital inflows were recorded by:

  • $SOL-ETFs — $10.26 million;
  • HYPE-ETFs — $2.74 million;
  • XRP-ETFs — $2.25 million;
  • LINK-ETFs — $1.23 million;
  • HBAR-ETFs — $0.46 million.

At the same time, DOGE-ETFs recorded an outflow of $0.56 million.

Other funds based on altcoins did not attract investments during the reporting period.

Activity remained minimal in the Hong Kong market as well: only 0.17 $ETH was added to spot Ethereum ETFs over the week.

Recall that last week, investors poured over $1 billion into various crypto funds.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the total net outflow from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs for the week of August 10-14, 2026?

AThe U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF sector recorded a total net capital outflow of $389.71 million for the week.

QWhich two Bitcoin ETFs were the only ones to record a positive inflow of capital during the reported week?

AThe two Bitcoin ETFs with a positive inflow were BTC from Grayscale with $75.98 million and MSBT from Morgan Stanley with $7.08 million.

QHow much capital did the U.S. spot Ethereum ETF sector lose during the same week?

AThe U.S. spot Ethereum ETF sector ended the week with a total net outflow of $2.26 million.

QAmong altcoin ETFs, which one attracted the most capital and how much was it?

AThe SOL-ETF was the leader among altcoin ETFs, attracting $10.26 million in capital.

QWhich Bitcoin ETF from a specific issuer experienced the largest single outflow of capital during the week?

AFBTC from Fidelity experienced the largest single outflow among individual Bitcoin ETFs, with $153.23 million withdrawn.

Related Reads

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru24m ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru24m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, is reportedly projecting its revenue could reach between $190 billion and $200 billion by 2028, according to sources cited by Reuters. This forecast, significantly higher than its reported $47 billion annual run-rate in May 2026, is being used by investors and bankers to value the company ahead of a potential IPO. Anthropic has confidentially filed with the SEC, with listing details dependent on market conditions and regulatory approval. The valuation reportedly applies a revenue multiple (EV/Revenue) to these future 2028 figures, an approach common for high-growth tech firms but unusual for a forecast two years ahead of an IPO. This reflects confidence in Anthropic's rapid scaling; its annual run-rate grew tenfold yearly for three years leading into 2026, jumping from ~$9B in late 2025 to over $47B by May 2026. Investors are betting the company's massive spending on GPUs, model training, and infrastructure will eventually outpace costs, leading to expanding margins. Public companies like Palantir, Cloudflare, and SpaceX, valued at high multiples of their forward revenue, serve as benchmarks. While this forward-looking method has precedents, some analysts question the sustainability of such valuations and the actual productivity gains from AI. Despite these concerns, earlier reports suggested Anthropic could be valued at over $1 trillion for its IPO.

cryptonews.ru47m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

cryptonews.ru47m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

Business of Open Blockchain: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed In public blockchains, user transaction fees do not simply become "revenue" for a single entity. The flow of money is complex and protocol-dependent. In Ethereum, fees consist of a base fee (burned, permanently removing ETH from circulation) and a priority tip (paid to the validator). In Solana, half the base fee is burned and half goes to the validator, while priority fees go entirely to validators. Thus, "fees" are not synonymous with "project revenue"; they may go to network operators or be destroyed. Foundations like the Ethereum Foundation do not take a cut of user fees. They are funded by their own treasuries, which can generate income (e.g., from staking rewards) and finance ecosystem development, research, and security. Their role is to fund public goods that are hard to monetize directly. Developers of open-source blockchain code can monetize through services, not the code itself. For example, Optimism provides its technology freely but sells enterprise support and managed services (OP Enterprise). Additionally, networks built on Optimism's tech, like Coinbase's Base, share a portion of their revenue with the Optimism ecosystem via agreements, creating an economic link. Token holders do not automatically receive fees as dividends. In Optimism, a portion of protocol revenue is now used to buy back and treasury-lock OP tokens, creating an indirect link between network usage and token economics. In Ethereum, fee burning reduces ETH supply but doesn't distribute funds to all holders; stakers and validators receive direct rewards. For evaluation, analysts should look beyond total fee figures. Key questions are: Who paid and for what? Where did the money go (to validators, operators, treasury, or burning)? What were the recipient's costs? Is there a mechanism linking this income to the token? The same fee amount impacts different blockchain economies in vastly different ways depending on these factors.

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片