Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-16Last updated on 2026-08-16

Abstract

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, is reportedly projecting its revenue could reach between $190 billion and $200 billion by 2028, according to sources cited by Reuters. This forecast, significantly higher than its reported $47 billion annual run-rate in May 2026, is being used by investors and bankers to value the company ahead of a potential IPO. Anthropic has confidentially filed with the SEC, with listing details dependent on market conditions and regulatory approval. The valuation reportedly applies a revenue multiple (EV/Revenue) to these future 2028 figures, an approach common for high-growth tech firms but unusual for a forecast two years ahead of an IPO. This reflects confidence in Anthropic's rapid scaling; its annual run-rate grew tenfold yearly for three years leading into 2026, jumping from ~$9B in late 2025 to over $47B by May 2026. Investors are betting the company's massive spending on GPUs, model training, and infrastructure will eventually outpace costs, leading to expanding margins. Public companies like Palantir, Cloudflare, and SpaceX, valued at high multiples of their forward revenue, serve as benchmarks. While this forward-looking method has precedents, some analysts question the sustainability of such valuations and the actual productivity gains from AI. Despite these concerns, earlier reports suggested Anthropic could be valued at over $1 trillion for its IPO.

Company Anthropic forecasts that its revenue could reach approximately $190 billion-$200 billion in 2028, and investors are already using these figures to value the company ahead of a potential initial public offering. This was reported by Reuters, citing four sources familiar with Anthropic's finances and IPO preparation.

This forecast significantly exceeds the annual revenue run rate of $47 billion disclosed by the company in May. Thus, the future valuation of Anthropic will largely depend not on current financial results, but on the company's ability to realize massive growth over the next two years.

Anthropic had previously confidentially filed with the SEC for an IPO, marking the first formal step towards going public. However, the timing and terms of the listing remain dependent on market conditions and regulatory approval.

Anthropic to be Valued Based on Future Revenue

According to the publication's sources, bankers and potential investors are using an enterprise value-to-revenue (EV/Revenue) multiple to value Anthropic, applying forecasted financial indicators.

This approach is common among high-tech companies that are growing rapidly but have not yet achieved stable profitability. However, using a two-year forward projection for an IPO valuation is less typical.

The reason is the scale and speed of Anthropic's business development, as well as the enormous costs of building AI infrastructure. The company spends significant funds on:

  • GPUs and other computing power;
  • training and operating AI models;
  • inference;
  • hiring personnel;
  • infrastructure expansion.

Investors are essentially betting that as Anthropic grows, its revenue will increase faster than its expenses, and its operating margin will gradually expand.

The company's dynamics already demonstrate the scale of this growth. At the end of 2025, Anthropic's annual revenue run rate was about $9 billion, and by May 2026 it exceeded $47 billion. The company also forecasted at least $10.9 billion in revenue for Q2 2026—more than double the previous quarter—and expected its first quarterly operating profit of $559 million.

According to the company, its annual revenue run rate increased more than tenfold each year for three years until early 2026.

It is precisely this dynamic that explains why potential investors are willing to value Anthropic based on financial indicators that the company might only achieve in 2028.

Palantir, Cloudflare, and SpaceX Serve as Benchmarks

During preparations for its analyst day, investors are also comparing Anthropic to public companies with similar growth characteristics or significant AI exposure.

Among such benchmarks, sources name:

  • Palantir — valued at approximately 53 times its expected 2026 annual revenue;
  • Cloudflare — valued at about 41.6 times its forecasted annual revenue;
  • SpaceX — also valued at about 41.6 times its forecasted 2026 revenue.

Each of these companies provides investors with a different benchmark for valuing Anthropic. Palantir is viewed as an example of a business with rapid growth and significant AI exposure. Cloudflare serves as a benchmark for a high-tech company combining software and infrastructure, while SpaceX demonstrates a valuation model largely based on the future scale of the business.

A similar approach has been used ahead of IPOs for other fast-growing companies. In particular, Cerebras Systems' investors considered revenue forecasts for 2028 before its 2026 IPO. In the case of SpaceX, forecasts extended to 2029 even before the company's record-breaking IPO in June.

Against this backdrop, Anthropic's valuation will depend on whether the developer of Claude can translate massive investments in computing infrastructure and model development into sustainable revenue growth.

"Can Anthropic get a $2 trillion valuation? Yes, it can. And I'm simply wondering if it will stay at that level over time," said David Merkel, head of investment firm Aleph Investments.

He also questioned the scale of the economic impact from AI development:

"Is AI really creating that much additional productivity? These are just questions we need to ask if we're thinking about valuing this company and investing in it."

It should be recalled that news of Anthropic's preparation for a public offering emerged in March of this year. Already in April, analysts at The Kobeissi Letter named a preliminary valuation for the company at over $1 trillion.

Later, in May, the Buidlpad platform attempted to conduct a pre-IPO offering for project Antropic, but failed to raise the planned $3 million. More details in the article:

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is Anthropic's revenue forecast for 2028 and how does it compare to its current reported revenue run rate?

AAnthropic forecasts its revenue could reach approximately $190-$200 billion in 2028. This projection significantly exceeds the company's reported annual revenue run rate of $47 billion as of May 2026.

QWhat valuation approach is being used for Anthropic's potential IPO, and why is it noteworthy?

ABankers and potential investors are valuing Anthropic using an Enterprise Value-to-Revenue (EV/Revenue) multiple based on its *projected* 2028 financials. This approach, while common for fast-growing tech companies, is less typical for IPOs as it involves valuing the company on forecasts that are two years into the future.

QWhich public companies are being used as benchmarks for valuing Anthropic, and what aspect does each represent?

APalantir (trading at ~53x its 2026 expected revenue) is a benchmark for rapid growth and significant AI exposure. Cloudflare (~41.6x forecasted revenue) represents a high-tech company blending software and infrastructure. SpaceX (~41.6x forecasted revenue) exemplifies a valuation model largely based on the future scale of the business.

QWhat key financial growth metrics for Anthropic are highlighted in the article?

AThe article highlights that Anthropic's annual revenue run rate grew from about $9 billion at the end of 2025 to over $47 billion by May 2026. The company also projected at least $10.9 billion in Q2 2026 revenue (more than double the previous quarter) and anticipated its first quarterly operating profit of $559 million. Its revenue run rate increased more than tenfold annually for three years until early 2026.

QWhat are some of the major expenses Anthropic incurs, according to the report?

AAnthropic incurs significant costs on building its AI infrastructure, including spending on GPUs and other computing power, training and operating AI models, inference, hiring personnel, and expanding its infrastructure.

Related Reads

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru24m ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru24m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

Business of Open Blockchain: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed In public blockchains, user transaction fees do not simply become "revenue" for a single entity. The flow of money is complex and protocol-dependent. In Ethereum, fees consist of a base fee (burned, permanently removing ETH from circulation) and a priority tip (paid to the validator). In Solana, half the base fee is burned and half goes to the validator, while priority fees go entirely to validators. Thus, "fees" are not synonymous with "project revenue"; they may go to network operators or be destroyed. Foundations like the Ethereum Foundation do not take a cut of user fees. They are funded by their own treasuries, which can generate income (e.g., from staking rewards) and finance ecosystem development, research, and security. Their role is to fund public goods that are hard to monetize directly. Developers of open-source blockchain code can monetize through services, not the code itself. For example, Optimism provides its technology freely but sells enterprise support and managed services (OP Enterprise). Additionally, networks built on Optimism's tech, like Coinbase's Base, share a portion of their revenue with the Optimism ecosystem via agreements, creating an economic link. Token holders do not automatically receive fees as dividends. In Optimism, a portion of protocol revenue is now used to buy back and treasury-lock OP tokens, creating an indirect link between network usage and token economics. In Ethereum, fee burning reduces ETH supply but doesn't distribute funds to all holders; stakers and validators receive direct rewards. For evaluation, analysts should look beyond total fee figures. Key questions are: Who paid and for what? Where did the money go (to validators, operators, treasury, or burning)? What were the recipient's costs? Is there a mechanism linking this income to the token? The same fee amount impacts different blockchain economies in vastly different ways depending on these factors.

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

cryptonews.ru48m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片