Bitcoin Difficulty Drops 3.3% As Miners Pull Back Hashrate

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

Bitcoin mining difficulty has decreased by 3.28% in the latest network adjustment, dropping from 146.47 trillion to 141.67 trillion hashes. This marks the second consecutive reduction and the fifth decline in the last six adjustments since November. The decrease is attributed to a sustained drop in the network's hashrate, which fell to a multi-month low of 978.8 EH/s in mid-January. The difficulty adjustment mechanism ensures block production remains near 10 minutes per block by increasing difficulty when miners are too fast and decreasing it when they are too slow. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price has declined over 5% in the past week, trading around $90,000.

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin mining Difficulty has seen a downward adjustment following the decline in the network Hashrate.

Bitcoin Blockchain Has Eased Mining Difficulty

According to data from CoinWarz, the Bitcoin mining Difficulty has gone through a decline in the latest network adjustment. The “Difficulty” here refers to a metric built into the blockchain that controls how hard miners would find it to discover a block.

The indicator’s value automatically changes roughly every two weeks in events called adjustments, based on how miners performed since the last such event. The blockchain follows one simple rule to adjust the Difficulty: miner blockchain production rate should converge to 10 minutes per block.

If miners find the average block in an interval greater than 10 minutes, then the network responds by raising its Difficulty just enough that these validators are slowed back down to the standard rate. On the other hand, this cohort performing slower than needed forces the blockchain to ease things up.

The latest Bitcoin Difficulty adjustment occurred on Thursday, and as the below chart shows, it resulted in a decrease for the metric.

How the BTC Difficulty has changed over the last six months | Source: CoinWarz

Prior to the change, the indicator had a value of 146.47 trillion hashes. Now, it has dropped to 141.67 trillion hashes, indicating a decrease of 3.28%. This is the second-consecutive reduction in the network Difficulty.

In fact, the indicator has been in a long-term decline since November, with five of the six Difficulty changes that have occurred in the period leading to a drop in its value. Even the one adjustment that didn’t lead to a decrease in the metric had an almost neutral effect, so while the decline didn’t strengthen during it, it didn’t correspond to a change of direction either.

The reason for this long drawdown in the Bitcoin Difficulty lies in the trend witnessed by the Hashrate, a measure of the total amount of computing power connected by the miners to the network.

As data from Blockchain.com shows, the 7-day average value of the Hashrate has been going down during the last few months.

The trend in the 7-day average value of the BTC Hashrate during the past year | Source: Blockchain.com

On January 18th, the 7-day average Bitcoin Hashrate fell to 978.8 exahashes per second (EH/s), its lowest level since the first half of September. The indicator has observed a rebound since this low, but its value still remains notably lower than earlier in the month.

Miners’ pace tends to directly correlate with the amount of computing power that they possess, so a decline in the Hashrate usually results in a correction for the Difficulty. The continued downtrend in the former since October is why the latter has also plunged.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $90,000, down more than 5% over the last week.

Looks like the price of the coin has gone down recently | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Bitcoin mining difficulty and how often does it adjust?

ABitcoin mining difficulty is a metric built into the blockchain that controls how hard miners find it to discover a block. It automatically adjusts roughly every two weeks based on the miners' performance since the last adjustment, aiming to maintain a block production rate of 10 minutes per block.

QWhat was the percentage decrease in Bitcoin's mining difficulty in the latest adjustment?

AThe latest Bitcoin mining difficulty decreased by 3.28%, dropping from 146.47 trillion hashes to 141.67 trillion hashes.

QHow has the Bitcoin mining difficulty trended since November, according to the article?

ASince November, Bitcoin mining difficulty has been in a long-term decline, with five out of the six difficulty adjustments resulting in a drop in its value. The one adjustment that didn't decrease the metric had an almost neutral effect.

QWhat is the relationship between Bitcoin's hashrate and mining difficulty?

AThere is a direct correlation between Bitcoin's hashrate and mining difficulty. A decline in the hashrate (the total computing power connected by miners to the network) usually results in a downward correction for the mining difficulty, as the network adjusts to maintain the 10-minute block time.

QWhat was the approximate price of Bitcoin at the time the article was written?

AAt the time the article was written, Bitcoin was trading around $90,000, down more than 5% over the previous week.

Related Reads

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

Bitcoin mining is a race without a real-time referee. A newly mined block must physically propagate across the global peer-to-peer network before consensus is reached on the chain's tip. This takes seconds, sometimes longer on congested connections. If a second miner finds a valid block before learning of a competing one, they build on their last-known version and broadcast their own block. For a short time, two equally valid blocks exist at the same height, creating a temporary chain split. The network resolves this not by voting or timestamps, but by Proof-of-Work: the chain that accumulates the most work becomes canonical. Blocks on the losing side are "orphaned" or "stale." Their miners lose the block reward and fees, though unconfirmed transactions return to the mempool. Usually, a single subsequent block resolves the tie. A notable two-block reorganization occurred on March 24, 2026. Antpool and Foundry USA mined competing versions of block 941,881 seconds apart. ViaBTC extended Antpool's chain, while Foundry extended its own, creating a one-block split. Foundry then pulled ahead by mining six consecutive blocks, making its chain the heaviest. All nodes switched to Foundry's chain, orphaning blocks from Antpool and ViaBTC. While such multi-block reorganizations are rare, the underlying race condition is common. Analysis shows about 9.2% of block intervals in a sample period were under 60 seconds, each representing a potential short-lived race. Fast relay networks have reduced propagation delays, making prolonged splits rarer. However, the event highlighted a trend of hash rate concentration, where well-resourced pools have a higher chance of winning any specific race and mining consecutive blocks, marginalizing smaller miners.

cryptonews.ru8m ago

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

cryptonews.ru8m ago

AmericanFortress proposed a scheme to protect crypto wallets from quantum threats

AmericanFortress has published a preprint detailing ZKPoSP, a cryptographic scheme designed to protect hierarchically deterministic (HD) cryptocurrency wallets from potential quantum attacks without requiring users to change their addresses. The proposed scheme replaces classical digital signatures with non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs, aiming to maintain compatibility with existing address formats. The company also introduced the QBIP32 scheme, intended to generate a signing scalar, a separate quantum-resistant proof, and a chain code in a single function call. According to the authors, QBIP32 can be applied to various elliptic curves of prime order, including secp256k1 and Ed25519. The post-quantum security of the scheme is described as "conjectured," relying on the quantum resistance of the underlying hash functions and NIZK proofs. However, for the scheme to function in a given blockchain network (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana), nodes would need to support verification of these new proofs instead of standard signatures—a capability currently not implemented. An implementation in Rust using RISC Zero reportedly takes 12–13 seconds to generate a proof and 9–10 milliseconds to verify it. The publication follows other industry efforts to address quantum threats, including reports from Galaxy on vulnerable assets, new hardware wallets like the PQ1, and consortiums like the Bitcoin Security Consortium pledging funding for post-quantum cryptography research. This new work specifically focuses on HD wallets and positions ZKPoSP/QBIP32 as a general mechanism for multiple curves and networks.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

AmericanFortress proposed a scheme to protect crypto wallets from quantum threats

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Weekly On-Chain Data Review: Robinhood Chain Explodes, FWA Goes Viral, Mantle Doubles Down on RWA

**Chain Data Weekly Digest: Vault Regulation, Robinhood Memecoin Surge, and FWA's NFT Gamble** * **Vault Managers Face SEC Scrutiny:** SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce warned that some DeFi Vault strategies could trigger investment advisor regulations. This may lead to licensing requirements, potentially sidelining smaller managers while bringing more traditional finance firms on-chain. The industry debates whether Vaults are purely code-driven or resemble discretionary portfolio management. * **Robinhood Chain's Memecoin-Led Boom:** Despite its initial RWA focus, Robinhood Chain has seen explosive early growth driven by memecoin trading and launchpads, which now dominate its DEX volume. The chain facilitates memecoin trading via tokenized stock pairs. It boasts over $800M in on-chain assets, $5B in stablecoin market cap, and strong fee revenue, positioning it as a consumer trading hub. * **FWA Revives NFT Activity with a Gamble:** The Fake World Assets (FWA) protocol, a gachapon-style system on Ethereum where users pay to randomly win deposited NFTs, has rapidly captured 10% of Ethereum's mainnet gas consumption in its first week. It demonstrates how simple, consumer-facing mechanics can reignite NFT engagement, attracting a broad user base. * **CEX Consolidation & DEX Growth:** The closures of BitMEX and BitMart highlight intense central exchange (CEX) competition and consolidation. Meanwhile, the DEX/CEX spot trading volume ratio hit a record high of 24.3% in July, signaling a shift of trading activity and innovation to on-chain venues. * **Mantle's RWA Focus at 3 Years:** Celebrating its third anniversary, Mantle Network is solidifying its role as a "full-stack distribution layer" for tokenized real-world assets (RWA). It ended Q2 with $1.2B in DeFi TVL, $955M in stablecoin market cap, and a growing suite of native RWA trading infrastructure like Fluxion and xChange.

marsbit27m ago

Weekly On-Chain Data Review: Robinhood Chain Explodes, FWA Goes Viral, Mantle Doubles Down on RWA

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片