After Capitulation, Bitcoin Market Losses Ease — Yet Selling At A Loss Continues

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-12Last updated on 2026-03-12

Abstract

Bitcoin's price has recovered above $70,000, showing early signs of stabilization after a market-wide capitulation. However, on-chain data reveals that realized losses still dominate, with weekly net losses at -$264 million, indicating investors continue to sell at a loss. Although this marks an improvement from the extreme $2 billion weekly losses seen earlier, the market remains fragile. Short-term holder supply has doubled since January 2023, increasing volatility. Additionally, negative funding rates suggest Bitcoin may be at a short-term bottom, yet the overall trend remains uncertain as the market struggles to return to sustained profitability.

With a brief bounce, the price of Bitcoin is now back above the key $70,000 level, showing signs of bullish traction once again. As a result, BTC appears to be showing early indications of stabilization following a wave of capitulation sweeping through the entire market.

Bitcoin Realized Losses Are Dominating The Market

The broader cryptocurrency market is showing positive signs, and Bitcoin’s price has turned slightly bullish after a period of capitulation. However, according to underlying on-chain data, the current market pain has not seemed to have come to an end yet.

Verified author at CryptoQuant and market expert Darkfost shared that market losses are easing after capitulation, but realized losses are still dominating Bitcoin in this context of growing uncertainty. As realized losses continue to dominate on-chain activity, this is an indication that many investors are still closing their positions below their cost basis.

Data shows that there is currently $611 million in realized losses against $346 million in profit, which results in a net Profit and Loss (PnL) of -$264M on a weekly basis. This pattern frequently appears during significant corrections, when the most extreme selling starts to wane, but the market is still processing the effects of recent drops.

Source: Chart from Darkfost on X

Even though the market remains in the negative territory, this profit and loss divergence highlights a clear improvement in the situation. On February 7, Darkfost highlighted that the weekly average PnL was sitting at approximately $2 billion, marking a clear capitulation as Bitcoin’s price fell below the $60,000 level.

During this market trend, short-term BTC holders were constantly the most active players in the sector. These investors currently maintain a larger share of the supply than during the bear market, leaving Bitcoin in a fragile phase.

In January 2023, the percentage of Bitcoin supply classified as short-term holders was 12%, but today, it is 22%, indicating a 2x growth. At this point, it is crucial that BTC’s momentum continues and holds. This slight resilience is bolstering holding sentiment and accumulation among many investors, which is adding to the current consolidation. Meanwhile, it would be a definite improvement to see the net PnL return to positive territory after more than four months of losses and capitulation.

Funding Rates Are Showing A Negative Trend

While Bitcoin struggles to regain an upward trajectory, certain areas appear to be pulling the asset back. For example, BTC Funding Rates is exhibiting bearish action. CW, a data analyst and crypto investor, highlighted that most of the range when the BTC Perpetual Future Funding Rate fell to a negative value were the bottom of a short-term decline.

After that, CW outlined a general upward trend, with no declines confirmed yet. Currently, the funding rate is in negative territory again, which implies that the present price is a short-term bottom for BTC.

BTC trading at $69,550 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level that Bitcoin has reclaimed, indicating signs of bullish traction?

ABitcoin has reclaimed the key $70,000 level.

QAccording to the on-chain data, what is the net weekly Profit and Loss (PnL) figure mentioned in the article?

AThe net weekly Profit and Loss (PnL) is -$264 million, with $611 million in realized losses against $346 million in profit.

QWhat key metric, related to futures trading, is in negative territory and is considered an indicator of a potential short-term bottom for BTC?

AThe BTC Perpetual Future Funding Rate is in negative territory, which is considered an indicator of a potential short-term bottom.

QHow has the percentage of Bitcoin supply held by short-term holders changed since January 2023?

AThe percentage of Bitcoin supply held by short-term holders has grown from 12% in January 2023 to 22% today, indicating a 2x growth.

QWhich market analyst, cited in the article, shared that realized losses are still dominating Bitcoin's on-chain activity?

ADarkfost, a verified author at CryptoQuant and market expert, shared that realized losses are still dominating.

Related Reads

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbit17m ago

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbit17m ago

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手25m ago

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手25m ago

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

396 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片