A Quick Look at the Latest Portfolio of the 24-Year-Old 'AI Stock God': 60% Allocation Hedges Against Semiconductor Downturn

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

Summary: The article analyzes the latest 13F filing from "AI stock prodigy" Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund, Situational Awareness LP, for Q1 2026. The fund's holdings surged to $13.7 billion, with a significant 32.5% net inflow. Key portfolio adjustments reveal a dual strategy: * **Hedging Semiconductor Downturn:** Over 60% of the fund's *notional value* is allocated to massive put options on major AI semiconductor and hardware stocks (e.g., NVDA, AVGO, AMD, SMH ETF). This acts as a high-leverage hedge against potential short-term volatility or correction in the chip sector. * **Long-term Bullishness on AI Infrastructure:** Alongside the hedges, the fund maintains and increases core long positions in companies providing critical AI infrastructure. This includes substantial equity stakes in CoreWeave (GPU cloud services), Bloom Energy (on-site power), and various power/electrical/data center firms (KEEL, IREN, etc.). Other notable moves include switching Intel exposure from high-leverage calls to minimal stock, exiting optical networking stocks (LITE, COHR), and taking profits in some positions like Bloom Energy and CoreWeave calls. The analysis concludes that Aschenbrenner is not simply turning bearish on AI. Instead, the strategy reflects a nuanced view: extreme caution toward near-term "chip maker" valuations deemed potentially frothy, coupled with strong conviction in the long-term scarcity and value of the underlying *infrastructure* (power, data centers, cloud capac...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

No confidentiality request! No complete liquidation! The newly crowned "AI Stock God," Leopold Aschenbrenner, and his fund Situational Awareness LP officially released their 13F filing this evening.

  • Odaily Note: For details on Leopold Aschenbrenner's personal story, please refer to "SBF's Junior, Turned $225 Million into $5.5 Billion in One Year."

This means our first hypothesis from this morning's article, "Could Be Revealed Today, the Internet is Awaiting the Version Answer from the 24-Year-Old 'AI Stock God'," is confirmed. Situational Awareness LP submitted its filing quite late on the May 15th deadline, preventing the SEC from publishing it on its website that day. As a result, the market had to endure another weekend, finally seeing the fund's holdings disclosure after the SEC resumed work on Monday.

According to this latest 13F filing, as of March 31, 2026, the nominal total value of Situational Awareness LP's holdings has increased to $13.7 billion, more than doubling (up 148%) from $5.52 billion on December 31 of last year.

  • Odaily Note: It's important to note that in the statistical methodology of US stock 13F filings, the market value displayed for option assets is typically the "notional value" of the underlying stocks, not the actual premium cost paid by the fund. This means that although the fund has built a "semiconductor hedge wall" with nominal assets of hundreds of billions of dollars, the actual cash cost (maximum potential loss) consumed is much smaller, representing a typical high-leverage macro hedge.

Additionally, this quarter, net capital inflows accounted for 32.51% of the fund's total holding value, indicating that the fund's explosive growth is not only due to portfolio appreciation but also involves substantial external new capital subscriptions (i.e., fresh capital injections).

Frenetic Portfolio Adjustment in Progress

The filing also shows that Situational Awareness LP executed substantial portfolio adjustments in the first quarter of this year.

  • New Purchases: 23 stocks (including options);
  • Added To: 9 stocks;
  • Sold Out Of: 10 stocks (including options);
  • Reduced Holdings In: 4 stocks (including options).

New Purchases: 60% Allocation Hedges Semiconductor Downturn

  • Odaily Note: The chart above only covers new stock purchases with values exceeding $100 million. For the complete list of all 23 new purchases, click the "Portal."

First, looking at the new purchase actions, this is the most shocking information in Situational Awareness LP's entire 13F report — in the first quarter, the fund systematically hedged risks for the AI semiconductor and computing hardware sector through large-scale put option positions.

Looking directly at the data:

  • SMH PUT (VanEck Semiconductor Core ETF Put Options): 14.94% of portfolio (market value $2.04 billion) — Largest new position;
  • NVDA PUT (NVIDIA Put Options): 11.47% (market value $1.56 billion) — Second largest new position;
  • ORCL PUT (Oracle Put Options): 7.84%;
  • AVGO PUT (Broadcom Put Options): 7.36%;
  • AMD PUT (AMD Put Options): 7.09%;

Just these top five put option holdings account for 48.7% of Situational Awareness LP's $13.7 billion nominal total holding value. Adding subsequent put options on Micron (MU), TSMC (TSM), ASML (ASML), and Intel (INTC), the fund has over 60% of its nominal portfolio betting on or hedging against declines or severe volatility in core AI hardware stocks.

It's also notable that Situational Awareness LP purchased both call and put options on the same stock, such as buying Micron put options (MU PUT, 4.27%) while also buying MU CALL (3.09%), and buying TSMC put options (TSM PUT, 3.91%) while also buying TSM CALL (2.59%).

This is a two-way bet strategy commonly used by hedge funds. It suggests the fund believes that Micron (memory chips) and TSMC (foundry) could experience stock price volatility far exceeding market expectations in upcoming 2026 earnings or industry cycles, possibly due to geopolitics or extreme supply-demand imbalances — profits can be made on both sides as long as the unidirectional move is large enough.

Increased Holdings: Common Stock Still Favors SanDisk, CRWV

Regarding increased holdings, Situational Awareness LP chose not to use options but rather added to 9 stocks via common shares.

In Q1, Situational Awareness LP slightly increased its position in SanDisk (SNDK) by 85,000 shares, bringing its total holdings to 1.14 million shares, with a holding value of $724 million, accounting for 5.30% of the entire investment portfolio. This is one of the very few super-heavyweight holdings in Situational Awareness LP's portfolio that exists entirely in common stock form.

Another noteworthy move is that Situational Awareness LP significantly increased its position in CoreWeave (CRWV) by over 1.07 million shares in Q1, pushing the holding value to $556 million, representing 4.07% of the portfolio. CoreWeave is one of the most closely watched infrastructure companies in the current AI GPU cloud services field and a key partner in the NVIDIA ecosystem. Shortly after its IPO, Situational Awareness LP swiftly incorporated it into its core portfolio and aggressively increased its position. This indicates that while the fund is short-term bearish on NVIDIA's valuation (via PUTs), it remains wildly optimistic about cloud giants that directly convert GPUs into computing power for leasing to large models.

Furthermore, Situational Awareness LP also increased holdings in KEEL, IREN, APLD, RIOT, CLSK, BTDR, and other computing or power infrastructure companies, continuing the logic advocated by Leopold Aschenbrenner that "electricity is the new oil."

Liquidated Holdings: Unloading Intel Call Leverage, Exiting Optical Communications

Regarding liquidated holdings, Situational Awareness LP's most significant move was completely unwinding the leverage on Intel call options (INTC CALL). In the previous disclosure period, Situational Awareness LP had allocated over 13% of its portfolio to Intel call options (a staggering 2.023 million option contracts), representing an extremely high-leverage directional bet. This quarter, it liquidated this position entirely, shifting to holding a minimal common stock position in Intel (0.07%).

Additionally, Situational Awareness LP completely liquidated its positions in LITE (previous weight 8.68%) and COHR (previous quarter weight 1.61%) in Q1. LITE and COHR are among the world's leading optical communication chip and optical transceiver module giants. This liquidation suggests Situational Awareness LP is exiting the AI optical module/network hardware sector.

Situational Awareness LP also liquidated its positions in CIFR (previous weight 2.80%) and HUT (previous weight 0.72%) in Q1. Both are cryptocurrency mining companies (including CORZ, which was reduced in the next section). Considering the increased holdings in similar companies like RIOT, CLSK, and BTDR, this might just be a routine portfolio adjustment.

Reduced Holdings: Significant Profit-Taking on BE

Finally, looking at the reduced holdings, Bloom Energy (BE) was the top holding disclosed in Situational Awareness LP's previous 13F filing. In Q1, the fund reduced its position by 3.59 million shares, with the portfolio weight plummeting from 15.87% last quarter to 6.42%.

Bloom Energy focuses on solid oxide fuel cell technology and is a key player in providing "on-site power" for data centers, bypassing traditional power grids for direct supply. Considering the retained position is still substantial, the reduction likely does not mean Situational Awareness LP is no longer bullish on the company, but rather appears to be a routine profit-taking move.

CoreWeave call options (CRWV CALL) were Situational Awareness LP's second-largest reduction (portfolio weight plummeted from 14.04% to 1.03%). As mentioned earlier, the fund has shifted to holding CRWV via common stock, so this is more of a de-leveraging operation.

Situational Awareness LP also reduced its position in Core Scientific (CORZ) by 2.74 million shares, lowering the portfolio weight from 7.59% to 2.84%. CORZ is a leading Bitcoin mining company transitioning to AI computing power hosting. However, given that Situational Awareness LP increased holdings in other mining companies still in the transition phase with more attractive valuations this quarter, reducing CORZ seems more like partial profit-taking.

What Exactly Is the 'AI Stock God' Thinking?

Looking only at the surface data of this 13F, many might draw a simple, crude conclusion — Leopold Aschenbrenner, who once proclaimed "AGI by 2027," has turned bearish on AI.

But the reality is clearly not that simple. Within Situational Awareness LP's portfolio structure, there simultaneously exist two seemingly contradictory yet highly unified main themes.

  • On one side, there is extreme vigilance toward short-term valuation bubbles in the "chip sector." Situational Awareness LP has used a shockingly large nominal allocation of PUTs (put options) to essentially "buy crash insurance" for nearly the entire AI semiconductor industry chain, including NVIDIA, Broadcom, and others;
  • On the other side, there is an almost obsessive optimism about the long-term demand for AI infrastructure. Whether it's CoreWeave, Bloom Energy, or a series of companies related to electricity, transformers, and data centers, they all essentially point to the same deterministic logic — the war for AI computing power has entered a deep-water phase.

This is perhaps Situational Awareness LP's most core judgment at present. What will truly be scarce in the future may not necessarily be GPU chips themselves, but rather the energy, power systems, and data center infrastructure required to sustain these GPUs' continuous operation. GPU production can scale, and advanced process technology will eventually ramp up, but megawatt-level power supply capacity, transformers, transmission systems, and large-scale data center construction cycles are difficult to replicate simultaneously in a short time. Compared to the "selling shovels" logic already fully priced in by the market, Leopold Aschenbrenner seems more focused on where the real potential bottlenecks might emerge in the next stage of the AI industry.

This also explains why Situational Awareness LP would simultaneously buy large-scale semiconductor put options to hedge against severe volatility risks in the AI hardware sector while continuing to heavily invest in GPU cloud services, power, and computing infrastructure assets.

In a sense, this 13F is less a simple holdings disclosure and more like Leopold Aschenbrenner's directional roadmap judgment for the next stage of evolution in the AI industry chain.

When a genius investor who rose to fame by going all-in on AI begins to deploy multi-billion-dollar nominal positions to buy insurance for the AI sector, it at least indicates one thing — even the most steadfast AI bulls of this era have begun to take volatility itself seriously.

Related Questions

QWhat is the total nominal value of Situational Awareness LP's holdings as of March 31, 2026, and how does it compare to the previous quarter?

AAs of March 31, 2026, Situational Awareness LP's total nominal holdings value was $13.7 billion. This represents an increase of 148% from the $5.52 billion reported on December 31, 2025.

QWhat is the most significant new position taken by Situational Awareness LP in Q1, and what does it consist of?

AThe most significant new position was a large-scale hedge against the AI semiconductor and computing hardware sector using put options. Notably, the top five put option holdings (on SMH, NVDA, ORCL, AVGO, and AMD) alone accounted for 48.7% of the fund's total nominal value.

QHow did Situational Awareness LP adjust its holdings in CoreWeave (CRWV) during Q1?

ASituational Awareness LP significantly increased its holdings in CoreWeave by over 1.07 million shares, bringing the position's value to $556 million (4.07% of the portfolio). It also drastically reduced its position in CRWV call options, lowering their weight from 14.04% to 1.03%, suggesting a move away from leverage into direct stock ownership.

QWhat major sector did Situational Awareness LP exit from in Q1, and which stocks were sold?

AThe fund exited from the AI optical module/network hardware sector. It completely sold out of its positions in LITE (which had an 8.68% weight previously) and COHR (which had a 1.61% weight previously).

QAccording to the article's analysis, what is the seemingly contradictory but unified core investment thesis behind Situational Awareness LP's Q1 portfolio adjustments?

AThe fund's strategy reflects two unified lines of thought: 1) Extreme caution towards short-term valuation bubbles in the 'chip' end of the AI sector, hedging with massive put options. 2) Persistent, almost obsessive optimism about the long-term demand for AI infrastructure, particularly the underlying energy, power systems, and data center facilities needed to power GPUs, which are seen as the next potential bottleneck.

Related Reads

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit11m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit11m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit41m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit41m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片