Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

Author: Ada, Deep Tide TechFlow

Recently, NVentures, NVIDIA's venture capital arm, made a new investment in the French quantum computing company Alice & Bob, focusing on fault-tolerant quantum computing.

It is a common misconception to attribute all of NVIDIA's external investments under the name NVentures. In fact, the collective scale of this venture division's approximately 30 annual investments, established in 2021, pales in comparison to a single investment made casually by the Corporate Development team. The latter's $2 billion equity investment in Synopsys at the end of 2025 alone is several times larger than NVentures' cumulative investment amount over nearly three years.

To understand how NVIDIA uses capital to weave the AI ecosystem, one must start with the "Three-Track Architecture" of its investment system. The Corporate Development team handles strategic large-scale investments and mergers & acquisitions ranging from billions to hundreds of billions of dollars. NVentures is responsible for early-stage, broadly scoped financial investments across industries. NVIDIA Inception is a startup accelerator that provides resource connections without direct capital investment. These three parts work in synergy, forming the largest and fastest-paced capital deployment machine in Silicon Valley's history, and also becoming the core target of "circular financing" allegations in the eyes of short-sellers.

The True Face of NVentures: 2-Person Team, 79 Companies, 20 Unicorns

Although bearing NVIDIA's brand, NVentures' internal size is surprisingly small. According to private equity data firm Tracxn, as of May 2026, the entire team consists of only 2 people, having cumulatively invested in 79 companies, fostering 20 unicorns, including AI video generation platform Synthesia, clinical AI company Abridge, quantum computing company PsiQuantum, and others. In the past 12 months, the team completed 43 new investments, with 20 deals in the first five months of 2026 alone, indicating a significantly accelerated pace.

Leading NVentures is Mohamed "Sid" Siddeek, corporate vice president and head of NVentures. Siddeek's resume itself reflects NVIDIA's positioning for this division. He worked at Morgan Stanley in the late 1990s, accompanying Jensen Huang during NVIDIA's IPO roadshow; then served for nearly a decade as head of TMT & Telecom investments at the UAE sovereign wealth fund Mubadala; later managed enterprise software and healthcare investments at SoftBank's Vision Fund; and finally returned to NVIDIA in 2021 to establish NVentures.

Siddeek's own description of the investment scope is: "The real screening criteria are only two layers: the first is anywhere NVIDIA can reach, the second is which areas are investable." In an interview with Global Corporate Venturing, he revealed this means horizontal coverage across almost all industries AI can transform—healthcare, manufacturing, robotics, autonomous driving, quantum, etc.—and vertical coverage from underlying tools to the application layer, all within NVentures' investment scope.

Three-Track Architecture: Corp Dev for Strategy, NVentures for Early-Stage, Inception for Ecosystem

NVIDIA's external investment system consists of three distinct parts with clear division of labor.

The first layer is the Corporate Development team, led by Vishal Bhagwati, responsible for all strategic-level large-scale investments, joint ventures, and M&A. The magnitude of deals on this track is completely different from NVentures. Representative moves from the second half of 2025 to the first half of 2026 include leading a $30 billion investment in OpenAI in February 2026 (as part of a roughly $110 billion funding round), with a commitment to potentially increase to $100 billion in the future; a $10 billion commitment to Anthropic in November 2025; a $2 billion injection into Synopsys at the end of 2025; a $2 billion follow-on investment in CoreWeave in early 2026, accompanied by a $6.3 billion cloud capacity purchase agreement; a $2 billion investment in Nebius in March 2026; and an equity commitment of up to $2 billion in xAI.

According to CNBC, in just the first four months of 2026, AI-related equity investments led by the Corporate Development team exceeded $40 billion. NVIDIA invested a total of $17.5 billion in private companies and infrastructure funds during fiscal year 2025.

The second layer is NVentures, led by Sid Siddeek, positioned as a traditional venture capital firm pursuing financial returns. Individual deal sizes range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars, primarily investing at Seed to Series B stages. Siddeek explicitly told Global Venturing that NVentures "primarily focuses on early-stage investments, while the Corporate Development team handles larger, more directly strategic investments." Behaviorally, NVentures predominantly participates as a co-investor, leading only about one-eighth of its investments, more often joining rounds led by top VCs like Accel, a16z, and Sequoia, leveraging the NVIDIA endorsement.

The third layer is NVIDIA Inception, essentially a startup accelerator program that does not directly invest capital but provides startups with NVIDIA hardware credits, technical support, market promotion, and VC connection channels. NVIDIA's upgraded "VC Alliance" launched in 2025, partnering with institutions like Accel, Elaia, Partech, and Sofinnova, distributes NVIDIA DGX Cloud Lepton compute credits to their portfolio companies, representing an extension of Inception in Europe.

There is a clear "funnel" relationship among the three. Inception discovers early-stage projects and integrates them into the NVIDIA ecosystem. Those with investment potential come into NVentures' view and may receive early-stage checks from a few million to tens of millions of dollars. When a company grows to a size significant enough to impact NVIDIA's strategic landscape (becoming a major customer, key supplier, or potential acquisition target), it "upgrades" to the Corporate Development team, entering cooperation frameworks worth billions or even hundreds of billions of dollars.

NVentures' Recent Moves: Quantum, Inference Routing, AI Security

NVentures' activity in May 2026 was notable. Just within the recent month, there have been four publicly disclosed deals. On May 22, French quantum computing company Alice & Bob announced NVentures participated in the extension of its €100 million Series B round. Alice & Bob's core technology is a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture based on "cat qubits," deeply collaborating with NVIDIA's hybrid quantum-classical computing stack like CUDA-Q, cuQuantum, Dynamiqs, and NVQLink. On May 26, AI model routing platform OpenRouter completed a $113 million Series B round, with NVentures co-investing alongside Google CapitalG, Snowflake, and others. OpenRouter's business provides developers a unified interface to access APIs from dozens of different model providers globally. On May 28, AI inference infrastructure startup Tensormesh completed a $20 million seed extension round, with NVentures co-investing alongside CoreWeave, AMD, and others. On May 6, AI cybersecurity company Xbow completed a $35 million Series C extension, with NVentures participating.

Judging by the investment targets, NVentures' recent tilt clearly leans toward three directions: quantum computing (Alice & Bob, Quantinuum, PsiQuantum), AI biopharma (Relation Therapeutics, Genesis Therapeutics), and AI Agent & inference layer (OpenRouter, Tensormesh, etc.). This aligns with Siddeek's statement "anywhere NVIDIA can reach" and also corresponds precisely to the directions NVIDIA is investing in for its next-generation software stacks like CUDA-Q, CUDA-X, and Triton.

Geographically, NVentures' European deployment has notably accelerated. It completed 14 European investments in 2025, double the 7 investments in 2024.

Panoramic View of the Three-Tier Investment Portfolio

If we overlay the portfolios of the three investment tiers on the same map, NVIDIA's "capital radiation" on the AI ecosystem can be summarized into five main quadrants.

The foundation model layer includes OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Mistral, Cohere, Thinking Machines Lab, Reflection AI, Black Forest Labs. This layer is primarily funded by the Corporate Development team, with NVentures participating in smaller shares.

The cloud & infrastructure layer includes CoreWeave, Nebius, Lambda, Crusoe, Nscale, Firmus Technologies. This layer is also dominated by the Corporate Development team, with individual investments often reaching billions of dollars, accompanied by long-term compute purchase contracts.

The application & developer tools layer includes Cursor, Perplexity, Synthesia, Runway, Lovable, Together AI, Weka. NVentures has higher participation in this layer, with relatively smaller amounts.

The robotics & autonomous driving layer includes Figure AI (latest valuation $39 billion) and Wayve (valuation $8.6 billion). This involves combined efforts from both Corporate Development and NVentures.

The quantum computing & biopharma layer includes PsiQuantum, Quantinuum, Alice & Bob, Relation Therapeutics. This consists mainly of early-stage investments led by NVentures, serving as NVIDIA's hedging bets on post-GPU-era computing paradigms.

According to venture capital research firm F4 Fund, from 2025 to early 2026, in the investment rounds participated in by NVIDIA (Corporate Development + NVentures), at least 10 companies crossed the $1 billion valuation threshold, including OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Mistral, Figure AI, Cursor, Perplexity, Scale AI, Wayve, and others.

Controversy: Burry's Shorts and the Question of "Circular Financing"

However, NVIDIA's massive external investment landscape is attracting increasing scrutiny. The most representative criticism comes from hedge fund manager Michael Burry, famous from the movie "The Big Short."

According to Scion Asset Management's Q3 2025 13F filing, Burry established short positions against NVIDIA and Palantir before September 30, 2025, including put options for approximately 1 million NVIDIA shares, representing a nominal exposure of about $187 million based on the stock price at the time; and 50,000 put option contracts (each for 100 shares) on Palantir, with actual premium payments of about $9.2 million. Burry posted on his X account "Cassandra Unchained" with a screenshot from "The Big Short," captioning "Sometimes, we can see bubbles," and later retweeted a Bloomberg chart about NVIDIA's circular financing, directly pointing the finger at NVIDIA's capital deployment model.

Burry's specific accusations are technical. He estimated in a Substack post that between 2026 and 2028, cloud providers including Microsoft, Google, Oracle, and Meta would cumulatively understate depreciation by about $176 billion by extending the accounting depreciation period for NVIDIA GPUs, thereby inflating profits during that period. This accounting adjustment resonates with NVIDIA's equity investments in customers. The former gives buyers higher "paper profits" to absorb larger capital expenditures, while the latter directly provides buyers with funds to purchase NVIDIA hardware.

At the institutional level, similar suspicions are accumulating. The EU competition regulator explicitly included the "risk of circular spending" within NVIDIA's investment system in its review scope in March 2026. Seaport Research estimates that for every $1 of equity NVIDIA invests, it corresponds to about $3.5 in downstream chip purchase revenue. Bloomberg's March 2026 feature on "AI Circular Trades" mapped the dense web of fund flows among NVIDIA, CoreWeave, OpenAI, Oracle, and Anthropic. NVIDIA holds about a 7% stake in CoreWeave, CoreWeave uses NVIDIA GPUs as collateral for financing, in turn uses cash to purchase more GPUs from NVIDIA, and NVIDIA then signs a $6.3 billion cloud capacity purchase agreement, committing to absorb CoreWeave's excess capacity through 2032. NVIDIA committed up to $100 billion in investment to OpenAI, OpenAI commits to purchasing NVIDIA hardware and building a $300 billion data center via Oracle, and Oracle then purchases GPUs from NVIDIA. NVIDIA invests $10 billion in Anthropic, Anthropic commits to deploying Claude on Microsoft Azure, and Azure purchases NVIDIA Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems.

Counterarguments from supporters also exist. Asset manager Janus Henderson characterized this model as a "virtuous cycle," arguing that in an era of extreme compute scarcity, binding supply and demand through "equity + long-term purchase contracts" is a reasonable commercial arrangement. Morningstar's analysis pointed out that NVIDIA's arrangement with CoreWeave to "commit to purchasing excess capacity" actually makes NVIDIA bear CoreWeave's inventory risk, thus constituting a constraint on the impulse to push hardware sales in the short term.

In this controversy, NVentures' position is rather delicate. Its early-stage, small-scale, co-investment-focused, and industry-dispersed investment style forms a stark contrast to the "circular trade" model of the Corporate Development team. Companies like Alice & Bob, Tensormesh, and OpenRouter, which NVentures invests in, are not large enough to form the "both NVIDIA customer and NVIDIA investee" cycle; their investment behavior is closer to the financial investment logic of a traditional CVC. However, from the perspective of NVIDIA's overall investment system, whether NVentures, to some extent, acts as the "compliant venture capital facade" in external disclosures, making it easier for outsiders to interpret NVIDIA's investment activities as normal venture capital behavior rather than systematic seller financing, is the unspoken but implied question from Burry and EU regulators.

NVIDIA's consistent official stance is that all investments are based on independent business judgment and are not linked to hardware sales. But market observers are increasingly quoting a phrase: in an era of compute shortage, whether to believe "the entanglement of equity and purchase contracts is coincidental" is itself a question of trust.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three parts of NVIDIA's investment system as described in the article?

AThe three-part system consists of: 1) The Corporate Development team, which handles strategic, large-scale investments and acquisitions worth billions to hundreds of billions of dollars. 2) NVentures, the venture capital arm that makes early-stage, financially-focused investments ranging from millions to tens of millions of dollars. 3) NVIDIA Inception, a startup accelerator program that provides resources and connections but does not make direct investments.

QWho leads the NVentures team and what is its typical investment role?

ANVentures is led by Mohamed 'Sid' Siddeek. Its typical investment role is that of a traditional VC seeking financial returns, primarily participating in early-stage rounds (Seed to Series B). It mostly acts as a co-investor in rounds led by top VCs like Accel or Sequoia, with only about one-eighth of its investments being lead roles.

QWhat are some recent investment areas for NVentures as of May 2026?

AAs of May 2026, NVentures's recent investments show a clear tilt towards three areas: Quantum Computing (e.g., Alice & Bob, Quantinuum, PsiQuantum), AI Biopharma (e.g., Relation Therapeutics, Genesis Therapeutics), and AI Agent & Inference Layer (e.g., OpenRouter, Tensormesh).

QWhat is the core criticism from Michael Burry regarding NVIDIA's investment activities?

AMichael Burry's core criticism revolves around the concept of 'circular financing.' He alleges that NVIDIA's equity investments in its customers (like AI companies and cloud providers) effectively provide them with funds to purchase NVIDIA hardware. This, combined with accounting practices that extend GPU depreciation periods for buyers, creates a loop that inflates reported profits and sustains demand for NVIDIA's products.

QAccording to the article, what is the "funnel" relationship between the three parts of NVIDIA's investment system?

AThere is a clear 'funnel' relationship: NVIDIA Inception discovers early-stage projects and brings them into the NVIDIA ecosystem. Promising companies from this pool may then attract NVentures for an early-stage investment. Finally, if a company grows to a size significant enough to impact NVIDIA's strategic landscape (as a key customer, supplier, or potential acquisition target), it 'graduates' to the Corporate Development team for multi-billion dollar strategic partnerships or investments.

Related Reads

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

A sell-off in AI-related stocks, triggered by Broadcom's disappointing earnings forecast, sent shockwaves through global markets. South Korea's KOSPI led Asia's decline, plunging 1.8% as the risks from concentrated chip stock gains and surging leveraged investments came to the fore. The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.5% following Broadcom's 14% after-hours plunge, which signaled a slower-than-expected transition to AI clients. This pullback extended Wall Street's weakness, halting the S&P 500's nine-day rally amid hawkish Fed signals and renewed Middle East tensions. South Korean authorities convened an emergency meeting, pledging "immediate measures" against market volatility and warning of record-high stock margin debt. The adjustment rippled across assets: Bitcoin fell to around $64,000, its lowest since February, while safe-haven gold rose 1% on bargain hunting. Oil prices dipped on Middle East ceasefire news. Market analysts noted the sell-off was driven by profit-taking after massive gains, particularly in chip stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix, which now dominate the KOSPI. Wall Street banks are divided on Korea's outlook, with Goldman Sachs raising its target while Citigroup and others warn of overvaluation and a potential bubble. Bridgewater's Ray Dalio noted that great technological shifts often create bubbles. Meanwhile, Fed officials' hints at potential future rate hikes added to the cautious mood ahead of key U.S. jobs data.

华尔街日报27m ago

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

华尔街日报27m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit50m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit50m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit1h ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit2h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy AR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Arweave (AR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Arweave (AR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Arweave (AR)After purchasing your Arweave (AR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Arweave (AR)Easily trade Arweave (AR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

10.8k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy AR

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AR (AR) are presented below.

活动图片