黄仁勋、Marvell CEO同台对谈:未来AI拼的不是算力是「连接」

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-03Last updated on 2026-06-03

随着 AI 模型走向庞大的「智能体(Agent)」时代,数据中心的算力瓶颈正逐渐向「连接」转移,一场由铜缆向光纤跨越的底层基础设施革命正在全面引爆。

在中国台北 Computex 大会的第二天,AI 定制芯片、光通信与数据中心互联龙头 Marvell 董事长兼 CEO Matt Murphy 发表主题演讲。

英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋作为特邀嘉宾惊喜现身,两位站在 AI 算力与网络互联顶端的掌舵人同台,将两家公司深度的战略绑定关系推向台前。这场联合亮相迅速成为本届展会迄今为止最高光的时刻。

黄仁勋站定后用一句话定调全场:「女士们、先生们,下一个万亿美元公司(The next trillion dollar company, ladies and gentlemen)」——他指的,正是 Marvell。

现场掌声雷动。据华尔街见闻文章写道,这背后,是英伟达数月前宣布向 Marvell 战略投资 20 亿美元 的深度绑定,也是两家公司在 AI 数据中心基础设施领域联合深耕的最新注脚。

伴随着前一季度财报的发布,市场正高度聚焦 Marvell 在 AI 超级计算周期中的受益程度。

对此,Murphy 交出了一份令市场瞩目的答卷:十年前,Marvell 数据中心业务营收占比不到 10%,而上个季度,这一比例已超过 75% 且正以每年约 40% 的速度加速增长。

基于最新财报指引,华尔街普遍预期其明年营收将达到惊人的 164 亿美元

在这一业绩狂飙的背后,黄仁勋与 Murphy 在对谈中揭示了 AI 基础设施最核心的投资主线——当算力和内存的瓶颈被相继突破后,「连接」将定义系统的最终性能。两位 CEO 的核心共识是:

AI 基础设施的下一个决定性战场,不是算力,不是内存,而是连接(Connectivity)。 Marvell 正处于这场革命的核心位置。

值得注意的是,Marvell 股价夜盘大涨超 16%。

算力尽头是连接:AI 进入「有用阶段」,引爆基础设施互联需求

为什么连接在今天变得如此重要?

Murphy 在演讲中用一条清晰的逻辑链,解释了「连接」为何成为当前最关键的约束:

AI 基础设施的瓶颈依次出现,依次被突破——算力(英伟达引领,成为全球首家市值达 5 万亿美元 的公司)→ 内存(内存领域近期已涌现出 三家新万亿美元市值公司)→ 连接(正在发生)。

「全球顶级超大规模云服务商正在重新规划其整体网络架构,他们意识到 AI 基础设施的扩展已成为首要的连接挑战,」Murphy 说,「这不是我个人观点,而是我们从最大客户处得到的反馈。」

黄仁勋则在对谈中给出了最直白的商业逻辑:

「实用型 AI(Useful AI)已经到来,它现在能盈利,Token 也能盈利。

当 Token 生产有利可图时,所有人都想生产更多 Token,这就是为什么 Marvell 的需求如此旺盛,也是为什么我们的需求如此旺盛。」

黄仁勋指出,当下的 AI 正迈向「智能体(Agent)」模式,这种新型计算模式要求将任务打碎,分布式部署在巨大的计算集群中。「当你将一个计算问题拆解成多个部分,并将其分布在整个数据中心时,最不可或缺的就是连接性。」

黄仁勋毫不吝啬对合作伙伴的赞美,甚至在台上直言:「女士们先生们,(Marvell)这就是下一家万亿美元市值的公司。」

Murphy 则表示,单靠一个处理器早已无法满足 AI 工作负载,未来需要数百万个处理器协同工作。

「计算规模的扩大本质上是一个连接性挑战。整个行业已经解决了算力瓶颈,正在解决内存瓶颈,而下一个限制基础设施极限的瓶颈,正是连接。」

「能用铜就用铜,必须用光才用光」

在 Murphy 与黄仁勋的对话中最具市场参考价值的环节,是双方对铜缆向光纤过渡时间表的研判。

黄仁勋给出的策略框架干脆直接:「能用铜缆的地方就用铜缆,必须用光学器件的地方才用光学器件(You use optics wherever you must, you use copper wherever you can)。」

他解释,铜缆在带宽和传输距离上存在物理上限,突破这一边界之前,铜缆是简单、低成本、实用的选择;一旦越过临界点,光纤才接力承担机架间、数据中心间及跨数据中心的扩展需求。

他的核心结论是:

「未来 5 到 10 年,我们仍将大量使用铜缆,同时也会使用海量的光器件。这些数据中心如今已是基础设施的一部分了。」

这一「铜光并用、各守边界」的判断,对市场意味着:无论铜缆还是光纤领域,Marvell 均处于持续受益的位置——而 Marvell 正是业内少数能在两个方向上同时提供完整解决方案的公司之一。

铜光切换的时间表背后,是不可回避的物理规律。Murphy 解释:铜缆传输距离与带宽成反比,带宽每翻倍,传输距离缩短一半。

当前最快量产系统单通道速率达 200 Gbps,对应铜缆长度约 2.5 米,而机架高度约 2 米——考虑到内部布线,2.5 米已触及极限。

「当我们升级到 400 Gbps 时,铜缆将无法完全连接整个机架。铜墙(Copper Wall)正在移动,而且现在已经开始了。」 每当铜墙向右移动一步,连接数量至少增加一个数量级,这将直接引爆光通信需求。

为了应对这一物理极限,Marvell 正在重注 CPO(共封装光学)技术,通过将光纤直接接入封装,紧邻计算芯片,来解决密度和功耗的难题。

大会当天,Marvell 正式发布了专为 AI 数据中心设计、具备行业最低功耗的全新 100T 以太网交换机,并展示了基于 CPO 的 51.2T 交换机,在板级层面完全消除了铜质走线。

「这不是什么未来的概念,它现在就已经在落地了。」Murphy 表示,一旦光互联彻底打破了距离的限制,未来的数据中心将不再有计算和内存的物理刚性边界,基础设施将能够根据 AI 模型的需求进行大规模的动态组合。

NV Link Fusion 构筑异构生态:Marvell 要做 AI 时代的「瑞士」

为了应对极其复杂的网络架构需求,英伟达此前已向 Marvell 战略投资了 20 亿美元,双方的合作正向光通信、硅光子及 NV Link Fusion 等多个维度拓展。

NV Link Fusion 的出现,旨在解决云服务商(CSP)的定制化痛点。黄仁勋解释道,云厂商在设计自家定制芯片(ASIC)的同时,依然希望接入英伟达的系统架构。

「你不必从我们这里买所有东西,只需买一部分就好。我们将英伟达的技术平台与 Marvell 的技术方案相融合,本质上就能构建出一个解耦、分布式且异构的数据中心。」

在这样的生态中,Marvell 找到了自己无可替代的生态位。

Murphy 强调了 Marvell 中立且关键的地位:

「我们与计算公司深度合作,也与存储公司深度合作。在很多方面,我们就像行业中的『瑞士』,与所有企业都保持合作。」

Related Reads

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit33m ago

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit33m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit38m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit38m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit38m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit38m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报47m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片