Galaxy Digital and Duel Casino in Conflict Over 230 ETH Related to Coldcard Vulnerability

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

A conflict has emerged between Galaxy Digital and online gambling platform Duel Casino regarding approximately 230 ETH suspected to be linked to the Coldcard wallet vulnerability. Galaxy's head of research, Alex Thorn, accused Duel Casino of refusing to freeze the allegedly stolen funds despite receiving forensic data linking the addresses to the hack. Thorn warned that Duel would become complicit in theft by not acting. In response, a Duel team member defended their policy, stating they cannot freeze a user's balance based solely on claims from a third party to prevent potential abuse. They proposed an exception if the alleged victim could send a message from the "hacked" address and provide a signed statement and transaction proof. The platform insists on requiring some form of official confirmation, typically from law enforcement, before taking action. This stance has drawn criticism from some users but also received support from figures like a former Delphi Digital executive, who called it a sensible policy for crypto-related fintech apps. The incident highlights ongoing dilemmas as criminals attempt to launder proceeds from the larger hack involving over 1,300 stolen BTC.

Funds allegedly connected to the Coldcard vulnerability are already on the move and flowing to third-party platforms as criminals attempt to launder them.

Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, highlighted the behavior of Duel Casino, an online gambling platform that is claimed to have received nearly 230 ETH as a result of the Coldcard hack.

According to Thorn, the platform refused to freeze these funds even after receiving data linking the addresses and transactions to this incident. In response, Duel asked for a police report to be filed, despite allegedly already having access to the incriminating information.

Thorn called Duel's inaction outrageous, emphasizing that a police report would, at best, not arrive until Monday.

"These shady people refuse to freeze funds that have been proven through forensic analysis to be the result of an actual cyber incident. If they do not freeze these funds, they will become accomplices to the theft," he stated.

A member of the Duel team, known on X by the handle Korra, emphasized that they cannot freeze a user's funds just because a third party claims they are stolen, as people could potentially abuse this system for their own gain.

Korra then suggested making an exception if the alleged victim sends a message from the "hacked" address, signs a written statement confirming their account was hacked, and provides the transaction chain proving these funds were sent to Duel's wallets.

"You have to understand why this policy exists: we require SOME official confirmation that a theft actually occurred (i.e., typically confirmation from law enforcement of any kind), otherwise anyone could make any claim about their own balance, about a counterparty, or about a third party they don't even know, and get accounts frozen," Korra emphasized.

Duel Casino's policy has caused dissatisfaction among some users, who criticized the gambling platform for not imposing a temporary freeze on these funds while investigating the source of the funds mentioned in the claim.

Despite this, Korra reaffirmed Duel Casino's position.

"We don't block your balance in Duel just because someone asks us to. We simply don't do it. I'm very sorry, but that's how it is, and we will stick to this position," concluded Korra.

Former Delphi Digital Chief Legal Officer Gabriel Shapiro supported Duel Casino's stance: "This remains perhaps my only unpopular opinion, but I still believe it's practically the only sensible policy a fintech/crypto-related application can have..." he noted.

As more wallets are being drained and the perpetrators attempt to cash out part of the more than 1,300 stolen BTC, it should be expected that more users, companies, and institutions will face similar dilemmas.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core conflict between Galaxy Digital and Duel Casino according to the article?

AThe core conflict is over approximately 230 ETH allegedly stolen via the Coldcard exploit. Galaxy Digital's Head of Research, Alex Thorn, accused Duel Casino of receiving these stolen funds and criticized the platform for refusing to freeze them without a formal police report, which Thorn deemed outrageous and tantamount to aiding theft.

QWhat was Duel Casino's primary reason for not freezing the funds as requested?

ADuel Casino's primary reason, as stated by a team member known as Korra, is their policy against freezing user funds solely based on third-party claims of theft. They argue this is necessary to prevent abuse of the system, requiring official confirmation, typically from law enforcement, that a theft has actually occurred.

QWhat specific proof did Korra from Duel Casino suggest the alleged victim could provide for an exception to their freezing policy?

AKorra suggested an exception could be made if the alleged victim sent a message from the 'hacked' address, signed a written statement confirming their account was compromised, and provided the transaction chain proving the funds flowed to Duel's wallets.

QWhich notable figure expressed support for Duel Casino's policy, and what was their main argument?

AGabriel Shapiro, former Chief Legal Officer of Delphi Digital, supported Duel Casino's policy. His main argument was that this is practically the only reasonable policy a crypto-related fintech application can have, implying it's a necessary standard for the industry despite being unpopular.

QWhat broader trend or expectation does the article mention in its conclusion regarding the Coldcard exploit?

AThe article concludes that as more wallets are drained and the attackers attempt to cash out part of the over 1,300 stolen BTC, more users, companies, and institutions should expect to face similar dilemmas regarding the handling of potentially stolen funds.

Related Reads

Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline: The Crypto Market is Experiencing Its Longest Ebb Since 2022

The cryptocurrency market experienced its third consecutive quarterly decline in Q2 2026, marking its longest downturn since 2022, according to a CoinGecko report. The total market capitalization fell 12.6% to $2.1 trillion, a retreat of roughly 52% from its October 2025 peak. Multiple indicators signal an orderly capital exit from the sector. For the first time since Q3 2023, the total stablecoin market cap shrank (-1.6% to $305.1B), indicating funds are leaving the ecosystem entirely, not just rotating to safer crypto assets. Trading volumes on centralized exchanges dropped 27.9%, while DeFi's Total Value Locked (TVL) plummeted 23.4%. Both Bitcoin (-14.2%) and Ethereum (-25.4%) underperformed traditional risk assets like equities in Q2, breaking from previous correlative narratives. Ethereum saw its first-ever three-quarter losing streak, with its market share falling to around 10%. A few areas saw growth. Prediction market volumes surged 48.7%, largely driven by sports betting. Hyperliquid's HYPE token entered the top 10 by market cap, and tokenized collectibles platforms grew, though primarily via gamified mechanics. Despite a ~9.8% Bitcoin rebound in July, historical trends suggest caution for August. The market, now ~49% below its 2025 high, is undergoing a measured retreat. Its recovery hinges on future Federal Reserve policy and the industry's ability to develop sustainable revenue streams beyond speculation.

marsbit5m ago

Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline: The Crypto Market is Experiencing Its Longest Ebb Since 2022

marsbit5m ago

Insurance Agent in Hong Kong Loses Over $3.3 Million Due to 'Romantic' Crypto Scam

An experienced Hong Kong insurance agent fell victim to a "romance scam" involving fake crypto investments, losing over HK$26 million (approximately US$3.3 million), according to local police. Authorities reported 25 similar cases of online romance-linked investment fraud in just one week in late July, with total losses nearing HK$70 million. The scam began when an acquaintance introduced the victim to a woman seeking insurance advice. The woman later connected him via WhatsApp to a man nicknamed "Uncle," who claimed to sell cars. Over time, "Uncle" built trust and an online romantic relationship with the victim. He then claimed to have successful investment experience and persuaded the victim to invest in cryptocurrencies, directing him to install a fake crypto investment platform app and introducing a person posing as the platform's owner to "help" manage a crypto wallet. Over roughly six months, the victim personally handed over more than HK$4 million in cash across various Hong Kong locations and transferred nearly HK$22 million to bank accounts provided by the scammers. Suspicion only arose when the fake app showed returns exceeding 800% and withdrawal attempts were blocked. Subsequently, both the "romantic partner" and the supposed expert cut off all contact. Police emphasized that even financially experienced individuals can be defrauded when scammers use emotional pressure and gradually build trust.

cryptonews.ru38m ago

Insurance Agent in Hong Kong Loses Over $3.3 Million Due to 'Romantic' Crypto Scam

cryptonews.ru38m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片