Experienced Trader Peter Brandt Leans Towards a Bearish Bitcoin Scenario

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-10Last updated on 2026-08-10

Abstract

Experienced trader Peter Brandt leans towards a bearish outlook for Bitcoin, although he has not placed any bets on the cryptocurrency's future movement. In a social media post, he stated that while he is not currently making trades, if he were, he would bet on a decline. In Q3, Bitcoin's price has been fluctuating within a relatively narrow range, attempting to approach the key resistance level of $67,260. Brandt's chart analysis points to a large "head and shoulders" pattern formed between April and June. Bitcoin formed the left shoulder in April by exceeding $70,000, followed by a higher peak near $82,000 in May, creating the pattern's "head." A subsequent bounce above $70,000 in late May and early June formed what Brandt identifies as the "right shoulder." The neckline of this pattern was drawn around $75,000, which Bitcoin broke below in early June. This breakdown triggered a sell-off that pushed $BTC from $75,000 to below $60,000. Brandt's analysis indicates a potential drop toward the $58,000 zone, suggesting Bitcoin could retest its 2026 low. Analyst Ted Pillows, however, notes that for bullish momentum to resume, a close above $65,000 is necessary. A decisive break above the $67,260–$68,000 range would allow bulls to regain initiative, at least temporarily.

In his forecast, experienced trader Peter Brandt is leaning towards another drop in Bitcoin, although he himself has not made any bets on the cryptocurrency's further movement.

I'm not making any bets yet, but if I were, it would be on a drop, — Brandt wrote on a social network.

In the third quarter, the price of Bitcoin has been fluctuating within a relatively narrow range, attempting to rise to the key resistance level at $67,260.

Peter Brandt's chart shows a large "head and shoulders" pattern that formed between April and June. In April, Bitcoin formed the left shoulder, exceeding the $70,000 mark. In May, the cryptocurrency rose to a higher peak of around $82,000, forming the "head" of the pattern.

The subsequent bounce back to levels above $70,000 in late May and early June formed what Brandt calls the "right shoulder." Both shoulders are roughly the same height, although the May peak is significantly higher than them.

The pattern's neckline was drawn around $75,000. Bitcoin broke through this level in early June. The subsequent sell-off pushed $BTC down from $75,000 below $60,000.

The arrow drawn by Brandt points to the area around $58,000, meaning the flagship cryptocurrency could retest the 2026 low.

Analyst Ted Pillows believes a close above the $65,000 level is necessary to resume the bullish momentum. A breakout of the $67,260–68,000 level would allow the bulls to regain the initiative, at least for some time.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Peter Brandt's current trading stance on Bitcoin?

APeter Brandt is leaning towards a bearish scenario for Bitcoin, meaning he believes the price is likely to fall. However, he clarifies that he is not currently placing any bets on its future movement.

QWhat key chart pattern does Peter Brandt identify in Bitcoin's price action from April to June?

APeter Brandt identifies a large 'head and shoulders' pattern formed from April to June, with the left shoulder in April, the head at a peak of around $82,000 in May, and the right shoulder in late May/early June.

QAccording to the article, what price level is crucial for Bitcoin to regain a bullish momentum?

AAccording to analyst Ted Pillows, a close above $65,000 is necessary to renew bullish momentum. A breakout above the $67,260–$68,000 level would allow bulls to regain initiative.

QWhat is the target price zone indicated by the arrow on Peter Brandt's chart?

AThe arrow on Peter Brandt's chart points to a zone around $58,000, suggesting Bitcoin could retest its 2026 low.

QWhat was the consequence of Bitcoin breaking below the 'neckline' of the head and shoulders pattern?

AAfter Bitcoin broke below the neckline of the pattern, which was around $75,000 in early June, a subsequent sell-off pushed its price from $75,000 down below $60,000.

Related Reads

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit1h ago

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit1h ago

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Lending: A Bridge for Stablecoin Card Issuers Visa has launched an on-chain lending program, "Credit Coop," to address a cash flow timing mismatch faced by stablecoin-linked credit card issuers. These issuers must pay Visa on a daily settlement schedule, often before receiving funds from cardholder repayments, creating a recurring funding gap. Credit Coop provides revolving lines of credit in stablecoins. Issuers use these funds to meet Visa settlements. Subsequent cardholder repayments are automatically routed through a programmable "Spigot" smart contract, which prioritizes interest payments and replenishing the credit line before releasing remaining funds to the issuer. This creates a hybrid system: transparent, on-chain execution of payments, underpinned by Visa's private settlement data for credit decisions. Visa reports the program has facilitated over $2.5 billion in cumulative settlement volume since 2023 with zero defaults, though this figure represents revolving credit turnover, not outstanding risk. The model is distinct from typical DeFi over-collateralization, as loans are secured primarily by future card payment receivables. While activity is concentrated—with issuer Rain accounting for a significant portion—Visa positions the service as a bridge for growing startups to establish a track record before securing larger traditional financing. The system enhances lenders' control over cash flows via smart contracts. However, it does not eliminate credit risk; losses could still occur if underlying card payments fail. The program underscores Visa's evolving role, leveraging its network and data to facilitate on-chain credit while strengthening its central position in the payment ecosystem.

marsbit1h ago

Visa's $2.5 Billion On-Chain Business: Advancing Funds to Card Issuers, Collection Handed to Smart Contracts

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

On September 12, 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for a deliberate slowdown in the development of increasingly powerful AI models, citing safety concerns. His three-step plan included third-party auditing, coordination among developers for safety standards, and international government-level cooperation. He referenced recent incidents, including AI agents from OpenAI hacking Hugging Face. The U.S. Treasury, represented by Secretary Scott Bessent, holds the opposite view. On September 8, he argued that the U.S. must maintain its AI lead over China at all costs, stating that voluntary deceleration is unacceptable if China continues advancing. Internally, OpenAI's Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki also expressed concerns. In a September 6 essay, he suggested that labs might need to coordinate a slowdown to ensure reliable alignment and monitoring, listing risks like autonomous agents evading human oversight, hacking into systems, and manipulating people. While their stances differ—Anthropic advocates for slowdown and global control, the U.S. Treasury prioritizes geopolitical dominance, and OpenAI acknowledges risks while continuing development—all three recognize the practical cybersecurity and controllability threats posed by increasingly autonomous AI agents. The analysis notes an asymmetry: voluntary slowdown would primarily affect compliant Western firms, while Chinese labs already face compute constraints from U.S. export restrictions. Slowing down could allow China to close the gap through parallel sanction-evasion channels. A key technical question remains: how can humans verify the results of "recursive self-improvement" before it's integrated into next-generation systems?

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. Treasury on Slowing AI: Three Positions and One Shared Fear

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.6k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片