Missed the AI Stock Surge, What to Do Now?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-03Last updated on 2026-06-03

Abstract

The article addresses investor anxiety over having missed the explosive, multi-year rally in AI stocks (e.g., NVIDIA, Micron, SK Hynix) across global markets. It notes that despite the broad bull run, data shows most retail investors lost money in 2025, and even major institutions like Bridgewater and Berkshire Hathaway significantly reduced holdings or held excessive cash, thereby missing substantial gains. The piece highlights common pitfalls: panic selling during corrections, misdirected investments into underperforming AI verticals, and premature profit-taking. It argues that AI represents a foundational, long-term technological shift comparable to electricity or the internet, implying the opportunity is not over. Citing figures like Jack Ma and Ma Huateng, the article suggests the AI wave is just beginning, with vast potential across the entire产业链, from infrastructure to applications. The conclusion advises against chasing trends blindly. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, long-term approach—focusing on one's own strengths within the expansive AI ecosystem to prepare for the next structural opportunities.

Author: Think AI, Aaron

The surge in artificial intelligence stocks has been going on for three and a half years now, with no signs of stopping;

Those who started predicting a US stock market crash and an AI bubble last year have fallen into deep thought.

South Korea's stock index has triggered circuit breakers 19 times this year. The main board index has quadrupled since last year. SK Hynix is up 260% year-to-date, either hitting new highs or on the way to new highs;

US memory giant Micron broke the trillion-dollar market cap, joining the top 10 US companies by market value, with gains of over 200% year-to-date and more than 10x in a year;

In Japan, SoftBank, which previously invested in Alibaba, is seeing its stock price rise continuously due to its heavy bets on AI, and it has already become Japan's highest-valued company.

Domestically, Yushu and ChangXin have already passed listing reviews. ChangXin's market cap starts at 1.5-2 trillion yuan, directly placing it in the top 5 of A-shares;

Meanwhile, AI companies like Nvidia and Google are always rising amidst fear; there's even news that housing prices in Shenzhen and other Chinese cities are warming up, as executives from semiconductor and AI companies, buoyed by超预期收益, are starting a batch property-buying spree.

But there is another scene: those who took out loans to buy gold at the beginning of the year are still underwater, domestic consumer stocks continue to slide quietly, and many netizens say they have completely missed this AI bull market, feeling anxious every day. What should they do now?

Profits Are Always for the Minority

First, look at the data. In 2025, only about 18.9% of A-share retail investors made a profit, while a staggering 81.1% incurred losses, with an average loss of about 21,000 yuan. For small散户 with less than 100,000 yuan, the loss ratio was close to 98.7%.

This happened in 2025 when the大盘指数 closed up nearly 20%, the STAR 50 index saw a maximum intra-year gain of 80%, and the market overall rose last year. Wind data shows 500 stocks doubled in 2025, with over 120 rising more than threefold.

When the大盘 corrected from January to April 2026, faith in AI collapsed, and institutions cut their losses at the lows.

During the decline, AI stocks saw a wave of减持. Ingenic's (optical module) controlling shareholder and executives减持 4.914 billion yuan, after which the stock price rose another 35%; Kunlun Tech's major shareholder Li Qiong planned to减持 35.86 million shares. After the减持 announcement, the stock price fell 20%, but then rebounded 40% within a month, with some减持 shareholders "selling at the bottom."

A专题报告 by Securities Times on the AI sector减持 pointed out that in the AI computing power板块 in 2026, potential收益损失 caused by institutions减持ing too early exceeded 200 billion yuan (calculated based on average gains post-减持).

Meanwhile, institutions that firmly held onto AI often bet on the wrong方向.

At the end of 2025, institutions bet on vertical applications like AI education and AI healthcare. These vertical applications failed to爆发, and in 2026, these板块平均跌幅 over 20%, while the computing power板块 rose over 50%;

Looking abroad, missed opportunities and premature selling are everywhere.

The globally renowned fund Bridgewater大幅减持ed Nvidia (nearly two-thirds), Alphabet (over half), Amazon (9.6%), and Microsoft (35%) in Q3 2025. Subsequently, from Q4 2025 to Q1 2026, these stocks平均涨幅 over 80%;

There are even many short sellers. Short interest in the US stock market recently hit its highest level since 2012.

Data shows hedge fund total leverage has risen to about 293%. Short exposure and the Days-to-Cover indicator for the S&P 500 both hit records.

Even the mighty Warren Buffett started减仓 early. His cash reserves reached a record $397.38 billion in Q1 2026, completely missing the AI行情 and the surge in US tech stocks.

Multiple Waves Rising Simultaneously

But it's undeniable that AI remains the most certain and revolutionary opportunity in the current market.

AI is not a short-term concept, but a底层基础设施革命 akin to electricity and the internet. Historical experience shows that many who missed the first wave of tech stocks found opportunities in the application layer or the next round of infrastructure upgrades.

China also has unique空间 in AI self-research, application落地, and补短板ing the industrial chain.

When we feel迷茫 and anxious, perhaps we should look at how the best in the industry see it. This might give us some guidance and启示.

Ma Huateng of Tencent, long considered lagging in the AI era, has been catching up fiercely since last year. His remarks at this year's May shareholders' meeting sparked heated讨论.

Regarding AI, he said, "A year ago, we thought we had boarded the ship, but later found it was leaking. Now it feels like we're standing on it, but can't sit down yet. We still hope the ship can go faster."

Regarding "how to proceed next," he pointed out, "We can't just跨过去 and抢 others'地盘 because we see them doing it there. We've抢ed before but mostly failed later."

Indeed, the AI era offers vast opportunities. Combining one's own strengths and characteristics to find the most suitable opportunity is the best choice.

Now retired from the front lines but having had deep洞见 into AI 10 years ago, Jack Ma said AI is a once-in-centuries, industrial revolution-level opportunity comparable to the invention of electricity. The AI era has just begun, and now is the time to布局; there's no such thing as missing out;

From computing power infrastructure and large model platforms to industry-specific AI applications, the entire产业链持续释放s long-term investment opportunities.

From this perspective, the entire产业链 offers无限 opportunities. Whether in work, investment, or entrepreneurship, digging deep along the产业链, coupled with段永平's long-termism and本分思想, will eventually yield results.

Large models are now smart enough, but only Claude has率先 achieved profitability in the coding agent赛道. AI+ is still on the way.

The next round of structural opportunities will definitely be留给 those who are well-prepared and maintain a stable心态.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what was the profitability situation for retail investors in the A-share market in 2025?

AAccording to the article, in 2025, the profit ratio for retail investors in the A-share market was only about 18.9%, with a loss ratio as high as 81.1%. The average loss per person was about 21,000 yuan. For small retail investors with less than 100,000 yuan, the loss ratio was close to 98.7%.

QWhat is the core argument made about the nature of AI's opportunity compared to previous technological shifts?

AThe core argument is that AI is not a short-term concept but a foundational infrastructure revolution comparable to electricity or the internet. Historical experience suggests that those who missed the first wave of a technology can often find opportunities in the application layer or the next round of infrastructure upgrades.

QWhat key point did Pony Ma (Ma Huateng) make about how companies should approach the AI era?

APony Ma emphasized that companies should not simply jump into areas where others are already active or try to take over others' territory. He noted past failures from such attempts. The best approach is to combine one's own strengths and characteristics to find the most suitable opportunities within the vast AI landscape.

QHow did Jack Ma (Ma Yun) characterize the AI opportunity and the current timing for involvement?

AJack Ma characterized AI as a once-in-centuries, industrial revolution-level opportunity comparable to the invention of electricity. He stated that the AI era has just begun, making the present the right time for布局 (layout/positioning), and therefore the concept of 'having missed it' does not exist.

QWhat contrasting outcomes are presented regarding institutional investors' actions in the AI sector during market volatility?

AThe article presents two contrasting outcomes for institutional investors. First, some institutions sold ('cut meat') at lows during the early 2026 market correction, missing subsequent rebounds (e.g., stocks rebounding 35%-40% after减持/sell-offs). Second, other institutions that held firm nevertheless押错了方向/bet on the wrong direction, such as focusing on AI vertical applications (education, healthcare) which underperformed compared to the算力/computing power板块/sector.

Related Reads

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit11m ago

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit11m ago

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin’s price has recently fallen sharply, hitting a two-month low near $66,000, with Ethereum also dropping to a three-month low. While surface explanations point to ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and corporate selling, a deeper issue is emerging: Bitcoin is losing a crucial asset competition. For years, Bitcoin thrived in a low-rate environment where investors sought alternatives amid inflation fears and dissatisfaction with traditional options. Now, the market landscape has shifted, leaving Bitcoin stuck in an "awkward middle ground," facing challenges on three fronts: 1. **As an inflation hedge, gold is winning.** Investors worried about persistent inflation are turning to tangible assets like gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers, which offer more direct pricing power and physical backing. 2. **For growth exposure, AI is winning.** Those seeking high growth now favor AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits, an area where Bitcoin's lack of cash flow puts it at a disadvantage. 3. **Within crypto, infrastructure and stablecoins are winning.** Even investors wanting crypto exposure have alternatives like exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms, whose performance is directly tied to real-world adoption and offers clearer operational leverage. The recent market reaction to inflation warnings highlights this shift. Instead of boosting Bitcoin as "digital gold," such news now drives flows toward traditional inflation-sensitive assets. Therefore, recent events like ETF outflows and corporate selling are seen not as causes, but as symptoms of this new reality. Capital has more compelling options, and investors are becoming more selective. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is no longer about it being a fraud or failed technology, but rather that **scarcity alone is no longer enough**. It is no longer seen as the best hedge, the best growth asset, or the only crypto play.

marsbit27m ago

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

marsbit27m ago

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

**Summary** The AI revolution has triggered a "SaaS apocalypse," forcing a brutal market shakeout. The key dividing line is the pricing model. Companies like Snowflake and Datadog, which charge based on consumption (e.g., data processed or compute used), are thriving. AI workloads actively *generate* more demand for their services, fueling growth. Datadog's accelerating revenue is a prime example. Microsoft and Palantir, as platform/ecosystem players, also benefit by acting as essential channels for AI deployment. In contrast, traditional SaaS firms built on per-seat or per-task licensing (e.g., Intuit, Adobe) face direct pressure, as AI threatens to automate the very human tasks their software supports. Companies like Salesforce, a per-seat giant, are caught in the middle. While showing strong AI monetization (e.g., its Agentforce platform) and experimenting with consumption-based "Flex Credits," its stock remains under pressure, illustrating that the market rewards *completed* transitions, not just the intent. The recent Microsoft Build conference underscored key trends: AI is evolving from an assistant to an autonomous "agent," and platform providers like Microsoft are consolidating their control. The market's recovery is highly selective, focused on identifying which companies are "fed by AI" versus "eaten by AI." Future focus will be on the diffusion of this recovery to transforming companies and the real-world adoption data of AI agents like Microsoft Copilot.

marsbit44m ago

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片