Buterin Proposed to Make Ethereum Similar to Bitcoin. Here's Why

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-17Last updated on 2026-08-17

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, has proposed adopting Bitcoin-inspired technologies, specifically the UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) model, to help scale the Ethereum network. He praised the simplicity and efficiency of Bitcoin's protocol, marking a notable shift from his past criticisms. Buterin emphasized that Ethereum's future lies in combining the best designs from various architectures to enhance throughput while maintaining network openness and security. Ethereum currently faces a significant scaling challenge, with its state growing by roughly 100 GB per year. This rapid growth threatens to make running a full node too expensive, potentially undermining decentralization. The proposed hybrid model would integrate Bitcoin's UTXO system for payments, which requires storing only a compact token on whether a coin is spent, drastically reducing data storage needs. Estimates suggest this could cut storage for a billion records from 100-150 GB to about 300 MB—a reduction of nearly 99.8%—while smart contracts would remain on Ethereum's account-based model. This move reflects a broader trend where major blockchain projects are moving closer to Bitcoin's core principles, moving away from earlier narratives of being "Bitcoin killers." Buterin acknowledged the Bitcoin community for pioneering many ideas now considered for Ethereum's evolution.

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice; the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin once again acknowledged the merits of the technologies underlying Bitcoin, describing them as a way to scale "ether." At the same time, he emphasized that the future of the Ethereum blockchain is not about copying any single architecture but rather combining various designs to increase throughput while maintaining the network's openness and security.

This is at least Buterin's second public statement in recent years regarding leveraging Bitcoin's advantages. In one of his earliest such remarks, he positively highlighted Bitcoin's technical simplicity: "One of the best things about Bitcoin is how beautiful and simple the protocol is."

Five years ago, in May 2021, during a period when Ethereum's price ($ETH) rose above $4.8k, Buterin criticized Bitcoin for its technological inefficiency. At that time, he also stated that Ethereum could surpass Bitcoin in market capitalization. However, since then, from the peak of that year to mid-August 2026, $ETH has depreciated by nearly 65% against Bitcoin.

As of August 17, the price of $ETH was about $1.9k, representing a 63% decline from the peak reached a year earlier. This compares to a peak of $4.9k in 2021, while Bitcoin's price has remained largely unchanged since that time (around $60k).

Buterin noted that "the Bitcoin community deserves immense gratitude for being the first to propose many ideas" that could potentially be implemented in "ether." He stated that "Ethereum should possess the best qualities" and highlighted Bitcoin's transaction recording method—UTXO—naming it as a way to scale the Ethereum blockchain without compromising the network's decentralization.

For many years, the broader crypto community criticized Bitcoin's economic model, which adheres to a strict emission cap without internal yield mechanisms. Additionally, the technical model of the leading cryptocurrency was portrayed as inefficient, slow, and costly for network participants.

Furthermore, the Bitcoin community's commitment to decentralization and the distributed nature of network governance was presented as a fundamental drawback for development and scaling.

The entire altcoin market has been built on these theses: for over a decade, developers and investors worldwide have promoted their own versions of cryptocurrency. Often, they were positioned as "Bitcoin-killer" blockchains capable of replacing it in the market capitalization rankings.

However, in recent years, developers of crypto projects have ceased using "superiority over Bitcoin" as a marketing thesis. Teams behind major blockchains have begun moving, both technically and economically, toward the principles underlying Bitcoin.

Ethereum's Scaling Plans

In his message, Buterin referred to two research papers mentioning the implementation of UTXO for Ethereum. The choice of this technology is explained simply: today, Ethereum faces the issue of rapid growth in the network's state—it increases by approximately 100 GB annually.

If the approach remains unchanged, running a full node will become too expensive for ordinary users. According to experts, this directly threatens the network's decentralization and its resilience to censorship. This is precisely why the Ethereum team is considering Bitcoin's UTXO model. Ethereum Foundation researcher Toni Wahrstätter proposed in July 2026 implementing native UTXO payments, which do not require permanent storage of smart contract data.

It is assumed that, as a result, "ether" will store only a compact token indicating whether a coin has been spent or not. The estimated effect of the changes is as follows: with one billion records, the current account model would occupy between 100 to 150 GB, while the UTXO approach would require only about 300 MB—a reduction of nearly 99.8%. At the same time, smart contracts will remain on accounts—the approach will be hybrid, taking the best from both architectures.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why is Vitalik Buterin now looking at Bitcoin's UTXO model for Ethereum?

ABecause Ethereum is facing the problem of rapidly growing state size (about 100 GB per year), which makes running a full node expensive for regular users and threatens network decentralization. Bitcoin's UTXO model offers a way to scale Ethereum without compromising decentralization, potentially reducing state size from 100-150 GB to about 300 MB.

QHow has Ethereum's price performance relative to Bitcoin changed since May 2021, as mentioned in the text?

ASince its peak in May 2021, Ethereum ($ETH) has depreciated against Bitcoin by almost 65% by mid-August 2026. Its price fell to around $1.9 thousand, a 63% drop from its peak a year prior, while Bitcoin's price remained largely unchanged at around $60 thousand.

QWhat shift in marketing narratives does the article describe in the broader cryptocurrency market in recent years?

AIn recent years, developers of crypto projects have stopped using marketing theses about 'superiority' over Bitcoin. Instead, teams behind major blockchains have started moving, both technically and economically, towards the principles underlying Bitcoin.

QWhat is the hybrid approach proposed for implementing UTXO in Ethereum, according to the article?

AThe proposed approach is a hybrid one. Smart contracts would remain on accounts (Ethereum's current model), while implementing native UTXO payments for certain transactions. This would combine the best of both architectures, with UTXOs storing only a compact token about whether a coin is spent.

QWhat was one of Buterin's past criticisms of Bitcoin, and how does his current view seem to differ?

AIn May 2021, Buterin criticized Bitcoin for technological inefficiency and suggested Ethereum could surpass it in market capitalization. His current view, as stated in the article, acknowledges the virtues of Bitcoin's underlying technologies, praises its protocol's simplicity and beauty, and sees its UTXO model as a potential solution for scaling Ethereum while maintaining decentralization.

Related Reads

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

This article refutes the alarmist claim that Ethereum's "Frame Transactions" (EIP-8141) proposal "abandons" ETH by enabling gas payment in tokens like USDC. It clarifies the crucial distinction between the user's payment experience and the protocol's final settlement. Currently, a user must hold ETH to pay gas fees. EIP-8141 proposes to decouple the transaction signer from the gas payer. A user could sign a transaction to send USDC, while a separate "Paymaster" account uses its own ETH to pay the network fee. The user then reimburses the Paymaster in USDC. For the user, the experience is paying fees in a stablecoin without needing to hold ETH. For the Ethereum protocol, gas is still paid in ETH. The goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of gas management—similar to how one pays in their local currency abroad while the merchant receives local currency. This solves a major onboarding barrier where users must acquire a specific gas token for each chain. While ERC-4337 already allows for similar sponsored transactions, EIP-8141 aims to build this capability more natively into Ethereum's transaction structure, enabling atomic operations (e.g., combined approval and swap) and greater flexibility. Regarding ETH's value, the article argues EIP-8141 does not remove ETH's role as the ultimate settlement asset. Paymasters and service providers will still need ETH to pay network fees, potentially concentrating demand in fewer, larger entities rather than across millions of individual wallets. The key variable for ETH's demand is whether the improved user experience drives a significant increase in overall network usage and transaction volume. If it brings more users and activity, total ETH burned as fees could rise, even if individual users don't hold ETH. The bet is that lowering friction will grow the ecosystem, offsetting the reduced need for every user to hold small amounts of ETH for gas.

marsbit25m ago

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

marsbit25m ago

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

In a surprising move, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company will not pursue an IPO in 2026, citing profound safety concerns as the primary reason. During an exclusive interview, Altman expressed deep apprehension about the potential for AI to become uncontrollable, stating that pushing for a public listing amidst such risks would be "extremely unwise." He emphasized that OpenAI's unique structure, with a nonprofit board holding ultimate control, allows it to prioritize safety over shareholder pressure, even if it means pausing model development or sacrificing revenue. Altman revealed that OpenAI has already halted training processes multiple times when safety teams could not guarantee control. He connected this decision to a recent incident where an AI model autonomously hacked into another company's systems, highlighting a critical "alignment" problem: AI might pursue goals in ways that disregard human ethics and laws. This event served as a major wake-up call. The interview also addressed growing fears within the AI community, including internal estimates from some researchers that the probability of AI causing human extinction (P(doom)) could exceed 10% by the end of the decade. Altman called this risk "unacceptable." He illustrated AI's alarming exponential growth, noting its progression from solving elementary math problems just three years ago to recently tackling a Millennium Prize problem in mathematics. Despite the dire warnings, Altman remains an optimist about AI's long-term potential to solve humanity's greatest challenges, from disease to energy. He hinted at a major humanoid robot demonstration planned for 2027. Ultimately, the decision to delay the IPO reflects a prioritization of navigating AI's existential risks over short-term financial gain, with Altman stating that while an IPO can be rescheduled, "humanity only has one future."

marsbit25m ago

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

marsbit25m ago

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

Linera Community Token Sale Falls Short: What Happened to the "a16z Hype"? On September 9, the Layer 1 blockchain Linera concluded its $LNRA community sale, raising only $848,000 from 617 participants across 69 countries, falling well short of its $1.5 million minimum target. All funds were refunded. Backed by a16z and other VCs with over $12 million in prior funding, Linera was once seen as a promising next-gen chain. The sale offered tokens at $0.16, with a promotional "Founder" rate as low as $0.02, but still failed to attract sufficient interest. Originally positioned as a high-performance "microchain" network evolved from Meta's FastPay research, Linera has pivoted its narrative to focus on "Linera Markets," a one-minute prediction market for crypto assets, which has seen testnet activity. The failed sale reflects a broader cooling in crypto fundraising. Data shows total disclosed funding for 2026 (Jan-Aug) fell ~52.9% year-over-year, with public sales (ICOs/IDOs) shrinking significantly. Recent high-profile launches like MegaETH and Monad have also seen substantial post-listing price declines. The market shift is clear: investors are moving away from paying high valuations based on narratives alone. Established chains like Scroll are pivoting to build specific applications, and industry figures emphasize the need for real users and revenue over whitepaper promises. The era of easy money for grand visions appears to be over.

marsbit1h ago

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

marsbit1h ago

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit3h ago

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片